Abstract
Newton’s Principia contained a science of mechanics that was able to withstand experimental tests in a demanding way. Newton also articulated and defended an atomic theory of the ultimate structure of matter. His atoms bore the marks of his science insofar as inertia was attributed to them. In other respects they were particles of universal matter with a given shape and size very much like those of Boyle. Newton speculated that there were short-range forces at the atomic level analogous to the force of gravity acting between gross bodies at sensible distances identified in his mechanics. As was the case with the mechanical philosophers who came before him, Newton’s atomistic matter theory was accommodated to rather than confirmed by observation and experiment. His atomism did not and could not fruitfully guide his experimenting. Eighteenth-century attempts to develop Newtonian atomism similarly did not bear fruit.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chalmers, A. (2009). Newton’s Atomism and its Fate. In: The Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 279. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2362-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2362-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2361-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2362-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)