Estratto
La colonscopia virtuale (CV), oltre a consentire un’eccellente visualizzazione del colon, permette d’identificare reperti extra-colici in sede addominale e pelvica [1, 2]. E ciò, se da una parte può essere considerato un valore aggiunto della metodica, dall’altra rappresenta un vero e proprio dilemma, nel senso che non è chiaro se questo sia realmente un vantaggio, in particolare per le possibili implicazioni medico-legali, etiche ed economiche [3, 4]. In altri termini, l’acquisizione di una scansione dell’addome e della pelvi determina necessariamente un ulteriore lavoro del radiologo, rappresentato da una seconda analisi delle immagini con finestra idonea allo studio dei parenchimi, per evitare di tralasciare reperti che possano avere una ricaduta medico-legale ed etica. D’altra parte, bisogna anche capire se l’individuazione di lesioni clinicamente non significative generi solo un ulteriore senso di ansia nel paziente e un costo aggiuntivo per la CV, dovuto alla richiesta di altri esami diagnostici e laboratoristici necessari per caratterizzare con certezza un reperto, e se, per esempio, il riscontro di una neoplasia maligna (es. un carcinoma del pancreas) non produca solo un cosiddetto lead-time bias, ovverosia un’anticipazione diagnostica, di nessun beneficio per la gestione e la prognosi del paziente, ma solo fonte di ulteriore stress emotivo [1, 2].
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliografia
Sosna J, Morrin MM, Coppel L et al (2003) Computer tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): update on technique, applications and further developments. Surg Technol Int 11:102–110
Hara AK (2005) Extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 26:24–7
Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C et al (2004) Computed tomography colonography: colon examination or Pandora’s box. Gut 53:915
Ginnerup Pedersen B, Rosenkilde M, Christiansen TE et al (2003) Extracolonic findings at computed tomography colonography are a challenge. Gut 52:1744–1747
Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL et al (2000) Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 215:353–357
Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR et al (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9
Xiong T, Richardson M, Woodroffe R et al (2005) Incidental lesions found on CT Colonography: their nature and frequency. Br J Radiol 78:22–9
Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA et al (2003) Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 124:911–916
Rajapaksa RC, Macari M, Bini EJ (2004) Prevalence and impact of extracolonic findings in patients undergoing CT colonography. Clin Gastroenterol 38:767–771
Hellstrom M, Svensson MH, Lasson A (2004) Extracolonic an incidental findings on CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). AJR 182:631–638
Edwards JT, Wood CJ, Mendelson RM et al (2001) Extracolonic findings at virtual colonoscopy: implications for screening programs. Am J Gastroenterol 96:3009–3012
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349(23):2191–2200
Yee J, Kumar NN, Godara S et al (2005) Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT Colonography in a male population. Radiology 236:519–526
Ng CS, Doyle TC, Courtney HM et al (2004) Extracolonic findings in patients undergoing abdomino-pelvic CT for suspected colorectal carcinoma in the frail and disabled patient. Clin Radiol 59:421–30
Chin M, Mendelson R, Edwards J et al (2005) Computed Tomographic Colonography: prevalence and clinical significance of extracolonic findings in a community screening program. Am J Gastroenterol 100:2771–76
Khan KY, Xiong T, McCafferty I et al (2007) Frequency and impact of extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic colonography in a symptomatic population. Br J of Surg 94:355–361
van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Selie IW et al (2002) CT Colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224:25–33
Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal BJ et al (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material on CT colonography. Radiology 217:765–771
Spreng A, Netzer P, Mattich J et al (2005) Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT Colonography versus those at non enhanced CT Colonography. Eur Radiol 15:2088–2095
Kim YS, Kim N, Kim SY et al (2007) Extracolonic findings in an asymptomatic screening population undergoing intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography colonography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, in press PMID:17645481
Ng CS, Wei W, Doyle TC et al (2008) Minimal-preparation abdomino-pelvic CT in frail and elderly patients: prognostic value of colonic and extracolonic findings. Clin Radiol 63:424–32
Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P et al (2007) European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:575–9
Hassan C, Pickhardt P, Laghi A et al (2008) Computed Tomographic Colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med 168:696–705
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iafrate, F., Celestre, M., Laghi, A. (2008). Reperti extra-colici: Prevalenza e impatto clinico. In: La colonscopia virtuale. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1067-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1067-3_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1066-6
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1067-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)