Abstract
The sex doll—an artificial representation of the human body for sexual usage—has a long and somewhat secret history. After briefly recounting this history, this paper examines the realistic modern sex doll and the motivations of its users. The doll embodies the complex interplay of the human desires for the fantastic as well as the realistic. It then looks at the sex doll as a product of commodity fetishism, the fear of female sexuality, and the fragmentation of human relationships within the socio-economic reality of late capitalism. It then reads the sex doll as what Baudrillard would call a ‘mythological’ object, reproducing and thereby perpetuating the ideology it is a product of, at the semiotic level. Later sections will outline a genealogy of the taboo surrounding sex dolls, from a historical and psychological perspective, examining the ‘uncanny’ affect it produces. A final section will consider the phenomenon in the light of posthumanism, asking whether its use is ‘cyborgic’, and whether it heralds a post- or transhumanist future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
I am grateful to Anthony Ferguson for his thorough and well-researched book on the topic of sex dolls, The Sex Doll: A History (2010). Ferguson’s book is largely a history intertwined with cultural critique, examining the sex doll both in reality and as represented in literature and film, as one of many related instances of the patriarchal domination of women in contemporary culture. While I have touched on many of Ferguson’s conclusions, particularly in early sections of this chapter, I have taken my analysis in new directions, examining, for instance, the philosophical and ontological implications of sex doll use, the taboo surrounding users, and the doll vis-à-vis posthumanist criticism.
- 2.
For a more detailed history of anthropomorphic fornicatory devices, see Ferguson (2010: 9–56).
- 3.
I use the masculine pronoun ‘he’ because sex doll usage remains a predominantly male, heterosexual phenomenon (Valverde 2012: 12, 16). Abyss Creations (USA), and Orient Industries (Japan) report that males between the ages of 40 and 65 are their primary customers and that their most popular item is a female doll (pgs. 14, 12). This chapter, frequently discussing doll usage as a metaphor for the subjugation of women within patriarchy, will continue to discuss the phenomenon as a predominantly male one, although the broader points I make regarding the ontological and psychological implications of the practice can apply to any kind of doll usage irrespective of the user’s gender and sexual preference.
- 4.
See ‘Taboo: Strange Love’, YouTube. Uploaded 9 August, 2014. Web. 11 Jan. 2015, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxaOssr6ljA; also, Bates (2015), Samhita (2010), Jessica (2007).
- 5.
Freud’s theory of fetishism forms the basis of later theories in psychology. The Freudian explanation for sexual fetishism is typically phallocentric: his argument is that the fetish is a substitute for the mother’s castrated penis (1927/1950: 152–157).
- 6.
The Christian framework is structured around a deep schism between mind and body, and a rejection of the flesh (Dollimore 1998: xiii).
- 7.
For instance, a recent worldwide poll, ‘The Global Index of Religiosity and Atheism’, conducted by WIN-Gallup, showed that “religiosity worldwide is declining while more people say they are atheists” (Havertz 2012).
- 8.
All citations in this section from Freud’s The Uncanny (1919) are from the translation into English by Alix Strachey now available freely online at http://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/freud1.pdf (accessed 6 January 2015).
- 9.
Interestingly, in Ferguson’s survey (2010: 112–120), a question asking if doll users would like their dolls to be able to move elicited mixed responses. Challenging the argument of Saygin et al. (2010), four out of five surveyed responded ‘yes’. However, in two of the four cases of ‘yes’ (anonymous users A and C), the reasons were purely those of convenience. These users merely wanted a doll that did not have to be carried around. The other two (B and D) gave no reasons for their preference of movement. Only E outright rejected the option of movement, following the ‘uncanny valley’ hypothesis, and saying “We don’t want her to be too lifelike” (Ferguson 2010: 118).
- 10.
It is not my intention to equate women with nature. I rather imply domination over natural processes such as ageing and death.
References
Badmington, N. (2004). Alien Chic: Posthumanism and the other within. London: Routledge.
Bates, D. (2015). Davecat, 40, has shunned ‘organic women’ to marry synthetic doll. Home|Mail Online. September 30, 2013. Web. January 7, 2015. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2439522/Davecat-40-shunned-organic-women-marry-synthetic-doll.html
Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York City, N.Y., U.S.A.: Semiotext(e). Print.
Baudrillard, J. (1996). The system of objects (J. Benedict, Trans.). London and New York: Verso.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Work, consumerism and the new poor. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Beck, J. (2013). Married to a doll: Why one man advocates synthetic love. The Atlantic. September 6, 2013. Web. November 30, http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/09/married-to-a-doll-why-one-man-advocates-synthetic-love/279361/
Binet, A. (1887). Le Fétichisme dans l’amour. Revue Philosophique, 24, 143–167.
Burleigh, T. J., Schoenherr, J. R., & Lacroix, G. L. (2013). Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 759–771.
De Fren, A. (2008). The exquisite corpse: Disarticulations of the artificial female. Dissertation. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
De Fren, A. (2009). Technofetishism and the uncanny desires of A.s.f.r. (alt.sex.fetish.robots). Science-Fiction Studies, 36, 404–440.
Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of constructivist learning environments: Immersion in distributed, virtual worlds. In B.G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 165–175). Edgewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
Dickey, M. D. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 253–273.
Dollimore, J. (1998). Death, desire and loss in western culture. London: Penguin Allen Lane.
Ellen, R. (1988). Fetishism. Man, 23(2), 213–235.
Ferguson, A. (2010). The sex doll: A history. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Co.
Fernandez, K. V., & Lastovicka, J. L. (2011). Making magic: Fetishes in contemporary consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 278–299.
Franklin, A. S. (2009). On loneliness. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 91(4), 343–354.
Freud, S. (1919). The uncanny (A. Strachey, Trans.). MIT—Massachusetts Institute of Technology. October 21, 2004. Web. January 11, 2015. http://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/freud1.pdf
Freud, S. (1927/1950). Fetishism. In The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (J. Strachey, Trans., 1950 ed. Vol. XXI, pp. 147–157). London: Hogarth and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. In Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith (Ed. and Trans.). New York: International Publishers.
Havertz, R. (2012). Atheism on the rise around the globe—CSMonitor.com. The Christian Science Monitor—CSMonitor.com. N.p., August 15. Web. July 28, 2013. http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2012/0815/Atheism-on-the-rise-around-the-globe
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, Il.: University of Chicago Press.
Hiddleston, J. (2009). Understanding postcolonialism. Stocksfield: Acumen.
Human Traffic Watch. (2012). Buy a wife from Vietnam for only 6000 USD. Guaranteed virgin. Human Traffic Watch. October 18. Web. January 11, 2015. https://humantrafficwatch.wordpress.com/2012/10/18/buy-a-wife-from-vietnam-for-only-6000-usd-guaranteed-virgin/
Huyssen, A. (1986). The vamp and the machine: Fritz Lang’s metropolis. In After the great divide: Modernism, mass culture, postmodernism (pp. 65–81). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Jessica. (2007). Real dolls, real creepy. Feministing|Young Feminists Blogging, Organizing, Kicking Ass. July 11, Web. January 10, 2015. http://feministing.com/2007/07/11/real_dolls_real_creepy/
Levy, A. (2006). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture.
Lukács, G. (1971). History and class consciousness, studies in marxist dialectics. London: Merlin Press.
MacDorman, K. F., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive science research. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 297–337.
Miéville, China. (2002). ‘Editorial introduction’ to ‘Symposium: Marxism and fantasy’. Historical Materialism, 10(4), 39–49.
Misselhorn, C. (2009). Empathy with inanimate objects and the uncanny valley. Minds and Machines, 19(3), 345–359.
Mori, M. (2012). The uncanny valley. IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News. June 12. Web. January 11, 2015. http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/the-uncanny-valley
Mulvey, L. (1996). The carapace that failed: Ousmane Sembene’s Xala. In L. Mulvey (Ed.), Fetishism and curiosity. London: BFI.
Paglia, C. (1992). Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Primoratz, I. (2001). Sexual morality: Is consent enough? Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 4(3), 201–218.
Reubins, B. M., & Reubins, M. S. (2014). Pioneers of child psychoanalysis: Influential theories and practices in healthy child development. London: Karnac.
Samhita. (2010). As if sex dolls weren’t enough creepy, now there is one that talks. Feministing|Young Feminists Blogging, Organizing, Kicking Ass. February 2. Web. January 10, 2015. http://feministing.com/2010/02/02/as-if-sex-dolls-werent-enough-creepy-now-there-is-one-that-talks/
Saygin, A. P., Chaminade, T., & Ishiguro, H. (2010). The perception of humans and robots: Uncanny hills in parietal cortex. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2716–2720). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Scruton, R. (1986). Sexual desire: A philosophical investigation. London: Weisenfeld and Nicolson.
Smart, B. (2010). Consumer society: Critical issues and environmental consequences. London: Sage Publications.
Smurrayinchester. (2007). Uncanny valley. Wikipedia, May 1. Web. January 11, 2015. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley#mediaviewer/File:Mori_Uncanny_Valley.svg
Stephanson, A., & Jameson, F. (1989). Regarding postmodernism—A conversation with Fredric Jameson. Social Text, 21, 3–30.
Storey, J. (1998). Cultural theory and popular culture: A reader (2nd ed.). Athens: University of Georgia.
Valverde, S. (2012). The modern sex doll-owner: A descriptive analysis. MSc thesis. California State Polytechnic University.
Wayne, M. (2003). Marxism and media studies: Key concepts and contemporary trends. London: Pluto.
Winnicott, D. W. (1996). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. In D. E. Scharff (Ed.), Object relations theory and therapy: An introductory reading program (pp. 197–210). Northvale, N.J.: J. Aronson.
Wolf, N. (1990). The beauty myth. London: Vintage.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism?. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2015). Fetishism. ICD-10:Version 2015. N.p. 2015. Web. January 10, 2015. http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2015/en
Žižek, S. (2008). The plague of fantasies. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ray, P. (2016). ‘Synthetik Love Lasts Forever’: Sex Dolls and the (Post?)Human Condition. In: Banerji, D., Paranjape, M. (eds) Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures . Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3635-1
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3637-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)