Abstract
Among the Asiatic Momordica, the majority are dioecious (M. dioica, M. subangulata, M. sahyadrica, M. cochinchinensis, M. denticulata, M. denudata, M. rumphii and M. clarkeana) and a few are monoecious, which are otherwise considered to be of African origin (M. balsamina, M. charantia and M. cymbalaria). Anthesis takes place early in the morning in all Momordica spp. except M. dioica in which anthesis takes place during the evening hours. Polylectic bees and oil bees are the major pollinators of Momordica species. Exogenous application of plant growth regulators like MH, ethrel, etc., can alter the sex ratio and sequence while chemical treatment with silver nitrate can modify the sex. Exogenous application of 2, 4-D (100 ppm), α-NAA (100 ppm) and physical stimulus provided by false pollination also induced parthenocarpic fruit development in Momordica spp. The first genetic linkage map of bitter gourd was developed using a set of 146 F2 progenies derived from an inter-botanical variety cross and 7 Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) were identified for different traits like fruit number and yield, fruit length, fruit diameter and weight. The wild species of Momordica offer great resources for improvement of cultivated bitter gourd for desirable edible/quality traits, biotic and abiotic stress. An efficient protocol for Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation of bitter gourd using leaf disc as explants was reported and this optimised transformation system could be used for the genetic improvement of bitter gourd. Microsatellite markers were isolated and characterised from the genome of M. charantia and these markers will have potential utility for applications in genetic diversity evaluation, molecular fingerprinting, identification, comparative genomics analysis and genetic mapping in Momordica. Yield and quality are the major focus of Momordica species improvement and methods like selection, heterosis, mutation and polyploidy breeding have been utilised to develop high yielding varieties. There are about 300 varieties of bitter gourd found around the world and some of the popular varieties have been described in this chapter.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Floral Biology
The breeding system depends upon the reproductive system of the plant. Information about floral biology is the basic need before setting up a breeding programme. There is very little information available about the floral biology and genetic system (number of genes and chromosomes, details of meiosis and pairing, breeding system, sex determination and sex modification, regulation of gene actions) in these species except for bitter gourd (M. charantia) and to some extent in M. dioica. The monoecious species have been shown to be self-compatible (Palada and Chang 2003; Lokesha and Vasudeva 2001; Schaefer and Renner 2010), and self-incompatibility is unknown in Cucurbitaceae.
In M. charantia the first flowers appear 45–55 days after sowing, and under long-day conditions male flowers bloom 2 weeks before the first female flowers; the female to male flower ratio is 1:25, and flowering lasts up to 6 months (Palada and Chang 2003). M. dioica starts flowering 30–40 days after planting depending upon prevailing weather conditions (Dod et al. 2007) and lasts up to 4–5 months (LKB, pers. obs.). Teasel gourd comes to flowering in 50–60 days after planting (Vijay et al. 1977). Among the Momordica species of Indian occurrence M. cochinchinensis come to flowering very late, i.e. 90–100 days after planting (LKB, pers. obs.). Usually anthesis takes place in the early morning hours. There are Momordica species which flower later in the day as in M. cymbalaria (10.30–11.30 AM) and in the late evening hours as in M. dioica (6.30–8.30 PM). Opening of flower (anthesis), dehiscence of anthers, pollen viability and stigma receptivity are influenced by the environment and there is deviation at different locations (Table 8.1).
In bitter gourd, (M. charantia), staminate flowers offer nectar and pollen while pistillate flowers are rewardless (Bahadur et al. 1986). These pistillate flowers mimic the staminate flowers and are in most cases pollinated by deceit (Baker 1976; Dafni 1984). Momordica species relies heavily on pollinators for fruit set. However, in case of M. subangulata subsp. renigera, though the flowers are bigger in size and showy with three black spots in petals there is no effective pollinator and natural fruit set is recorded up to 50 % only. Studies on pollinator diversity and their influence on the yield of M. charantia are scanty (Free 1993). Natural pollination of balsam apple and bitter gourd in the field is usually by polylectic bees while spine gourd is pollinated by moth and teasel gourd, sweet gourd and other Asiatic Momordica spp. by oil bees (Schaefer and Renner 2010). Honey bees (Roubik 1995) and halictids (Grewal and Sidhu 1978) have been reported as the principal pollinators of M. charantia in Tropical America and India respectively. Other important pollinators include Apis florea, A. cerana and A. dorsata (Apidae) in India (Behera 2004), Diabrotica speciosa (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) in Brazil (Lenzi et al. 2005). Deyto and Cervancia (2009) recorded A. mellifera, A. cerana, Trigona sp. (Apidae) and Halictus sp. (Halictidae) foraging on M. charantia in Philippines and Oronje et al. (2012) reported Plebeina hildebrandti and Lasioglossum sp. as the most important pollinator in Kenya.
Sex Form
In Momordica, plants produce three types of flowers: staminate, pistillate and hermaphrodite. Among the Asiatic species, the majority is dioecious bearing staminate flowers and pistillate flowers in different plants and few species are monoecious bearing staminate and pistillate flowers in the same plant. Gynoecious lines originating in India were identified (Ram et al. 2002; Behera et al. 2006) for use in hybrid development programmes. M. charantia, M. balsamina and M. cymbalaria are monoecious, while M. dioica, M. subangulata subsp. renigera, M. subangulata subsp. subangulata, M. cochinchinensis, M. sahyadrica, M. denudata, M. rumphii, M. clarkeana and M. denticulata are dioecious. However, natural occurrence of hermaphrodite flowers in M. dioica (Jha and Roy 1989), M. subangulata subsp. renigera (Fig. 8.1a) and M. charantia (Fig. 8.1b) (per. obs.) has been observed. Trivedi and Roy (1973) have reported the appearance of various intermediate sex forms like andromonoecious, gynoecious and trimonoecious in colchicine treated plants of M. charantia, but remaining as diploids.
Sexual mechanism in M. dioica is an incipient type of sexual dimorphism (an intermediate stage towards X/Y chromosome basis), in which a pair of autosomes is responsible for sexual dimorphism (Jha 1990). However, Seshadri and Parthasarathi (2002) considered the differentiation of sex in M. dioica to be entirely genic or genetical without any cytological evidence of heterogamety. Wang and Zeng (1998) speculated that two predominant 11 and 30 kD protein bands which are present in pistillate and staminate flowers, respectively, may be directly associated with sex expression while Sinha et al. (2001) reported the presence of a sex linked 22 kD polypeptide (p-22) only in the female sex, which was not detected in its male counterpart.
Alteration of Sex Expression
Environmental factors, endogenous levels of auxins, gibberellin, ethylene and ascorbic acid, at the time and seat of ontogeny determine the sex ratio and sequence of flowering. Sex expression is affected by environmental conditions under which M. charantia seedlings grow (Prakash 1974; Yonemori and Fujida 1985; Wang et al. 1997; Thomas 2008). Although sex modification in plants can often be achieved by altering mineral nutrition, temperature, photoperiod and phytohormones (Durand and Durand 1984; Wang et al. 1997; Wang and Zeng 1997a) phytohormones play a key role in modifying the sex (Thomas 2008; Rebecca and Jessica 2011). The concentration of endogenous growth regulators and polyamines (e.g. spermine, spermidine, cadaverine and putrescine) in shoot meristems of bitter gourd may change sex ratio (Wang and Zeng 1997a, b). Foliar application of growth regulators can also modify sex expression (Ghosh and Basu 1982). For example, foliar application of gibberellic acid (25–100 mg/l) can dramatically increase gynoecy in bitter gourd, while cycocel (50–200 mg/l) promotes staminate flower development and the effects of GA and CCC are sustained for over 80 days, which allows for their use in genetic experiments, the increase of gynoecous lines and in commercial hybrid production (Wang and Zeng 1996). The appearance of the first staminate flower is delayed and pistillate flower initiation is promoted by relatively low concentrations (0.04–4 mg/l) of GA3 (Wang and Zeng 1997c). Foliar application of ethrel, malic hydrazide (MH), GA3, naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), kinetin, indole acetic acid (IAA), 3-hydroxymethyl oxindole (HMO), morphactin, silver nitrate and boron when applied at 2- and 4-leaf stage of bitter gourd plants can dramatically affect sex expression (Prakash 1976). Dramatic increases in early pistillate flower appearance can result from foliar application of MH (250 ppm) and ethrel (200 ppm), and staminate flower development can be promoted by application of 50–75 ppm GA3 (Damodhar et al. 2004). Although exogenous application of GA3 @ 20–40 mg/l increases pistillate and staminate flower number, comparatively high concentrations of GA3 (60 mg/l) increases only pistillate flowers (Ghosh and Basu 1983).
Sex Modification
Sex modification is highly useful in case of dioecious species where crossing between genetically female plants is difficult. Selfing is very difficult for the breeding materials (female plants) of dioecious species for generation advancement and to combine the desirable characters through intergenotypic crossing between two female genotypes. However, self-fertilisation and intergenotypic crossing (between female clones) have been made possible in M. subangulata subsp. renigera through sex modification. In dioecious species, inter-genotypic crosses were made possible through the induction of bisexual flowers (Ali et al. 1991; Hossain et al. 1996) to facilitate recombination of desirable characters of parents in homosexual hybrid. Selection of high yielding clones from such homosexual hybrids may lead to establishing a variety in a short period as the dioecious species are vegetatively propagated. Alteration of sex to the desired direction has to be manipulated by exogenous application of plant growth regulators at critical stage. Foliar sprays with AgNO3 (400 ppm) at preflowering stage could induce 70–90 % hermaphrodite flowers in M. dioica (Rajput et al. 1994). Application of ethephon to male plants of kakrol did not affect the plants at any level of concentration tested while application of AgNO3 (400 ppm) produced the highest number of bisexual flowers per vine (Ali et al. 1991). Application of 500 mg/l AgNO3 on female plants produced the maximum proportion of induced hermaphrodite flowers in M. cochinchinensis and the pollen viability was similar to that of normal male plant (Sanwal et al. 2011). However, a perusal of the photographs and description of the material used in the study by the authors indicates the target taxa as M. subangulata subsp. renigera and not M. cochinchinensis. Foliar application of silver nitrate (i.e. 250 mg/l at 5-leaf stage or 400 mg/l at 3-leaf stage) induces bisexual flower formation in M. charantia, where ovaries and petals are larger than typical pistillate flowers (Iwamoto and Ishida 2005).
Parthenocarpy
In case of sweet gourd (M. cochinchinensis) and teasel gourd (M. subangulata subsp. renigera) the young and developing seed coat is whitish, soft and delicate but subsequently it turns ash coloured to black and hard, which is a major thaw in consumer acceptance and it is obvious that the development of parthenocarpic fruit will greatly enhance its food value and consumer acceptability (Handique 1988). However, in case of spine gourd (M. dioica) it is observed that the fruit taste is attributed to its seeds. Singh (1978) reported the induction of parthenocarpy in M. dioica with pollen of related taxa (M. charantia and Lagenaria leucantha) and mixture of the pollens from these two species. The parthenocarpic fruit setting was higher with the stimulus of extraneous pollen (66 % against 36 %), compared to natural pollination. The lower fruit setting in natural pollination may be attributed to non-synchronisation of anthesis and duration of corolla opening. Bharathi et al. (2012a) observed that the pollen of dioecious species induced satisfactory parthenocarpic fruit set in M. charantia which is desirable from the consumer point of view and can be further exploited for production of parthenocarpic fruits. A high parthenocarpic fruit set (>70 %) was also observed in an inter-specific hybrid between M. dioica and M. cochinchinensis when the F1 was pollinated with pollen from M. cochinchinensis (unpublished). In the absence of natural or genetic parthenocarpy, alternate methods should be adopted to have seedless fruit. Treatment with α-NAA 100 ppm induced parthenocarpic development up to 95 % in case of M. cochinchinensis (but the taxa used in this study is M. subangulata subsp. renigera) but physical stimulus provided by false pollination is ineffective in inducing parthenocarpic development (Handique 1988). Exogenous application of 2, 4-D @ 100 ppm at anthesis produced around 90 % fruit set in teasel gourd (Vijay and Jalikop 1980; Rasul et al. 2008). However, the fruits were smaller than normal fruits.
Current Goals of Breeding
Yield and quality are the major focus of Momordica species improvement.
Yield. Yield has been a focus of bitter gourd improvement for a number of years. In other species, like M. dioica and M. subangulata, as they are in domestication interface yield being the primary objective it becomes the focus of many studies.
Quality. Bitter gourd comes in a variety of shapes and size. It is green to white in color. Between these two extremes there are a number of intermediate forms. Fruit colour preference varies in different regions. For example, green fruits are in demand in Southern China, whereas white fruits are preferred in Central China. Likewise, dark green to glossy green fruits are preferred in Northern India and some parts of South India, while white fruited types are highly preferred in Kerala (Behera et al. 2010). Some bear miniature fruits of only 6–10 cm length, which may be useful as stuffed vegetables. Fruits with medium bitterness and soft tubercles are preferred in most parts of India. Development of varieties suitable for canning and dehydration is also an objective of bitter gourd breeding.
Earliness. Earliness indicate emergence of first female flower at the earliest nodes in case of monoecious species while appearance of first female flower in case of dioecious species with early fruit maturity at marketable stage.
High femaleness. High female to male ratio in case of monoecious species, resulting in higher number of fruits per plant.
Pest and disease resistance. Development of varieties resistant to diseases like Fusarium wilt, anthracnose, powdery mildew, downey mildew and insect pests like root knot nematode, red pumpkin beetle, ladybird beetle, fruit fly and fruit borer.
Stress resistance. There are several environmental factors like high and low temperature, drought, excessive moisture, salinity, alkalinity, etc., which affect cultivation and development of variety with improved abiotic stress resistance could be beneficial.
Breeding Methods and Techniques
Selection. The most effective method for the improvement of quantitative traits, such as yield in Momordica spp. may be individual plant recurrent selection. However, the initial populations must possess the necessary genetic diversity for selection. Wide range of diversity has been reported in bitter gourd and spine gourds (Rasul and Okubo 2002; Ram et al. 2004; Rasul et al. 2004; Joseph and Antony 2009; Islam et al. 2009; Macusi and Rosario 2009; Paul et al. 2010; Bharathi et al. 2010; Promote et al. 2011; Dalamu et al. 2012; Laxuman et al. 2012). Selection from a local cultivar has been the most commonly adopted breeding method in bitter gourd, spine gourd and teasel gourd.
Single plant selection and mass selection were followed to develop most of the high yielding varieties in bitter gourd in India. In M. charantia, the number of fruits per plant and fruit length showed high genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV), high heritability and expected genetic advance (Singh et al. 1977). High heritability with high genetic advance was observed for yield per plant and vine length indicating that this trait was under additive gene control and selection for such trait would be effective (Islam et al. 2009). A perusal of the literature shows that yield had a positive correlation with different traits such as number of leaves per plant, number of primary branches per plant, leaf area, number of flowers per plant, vine length, days to first harvest, fruit length, fruit girth, fruit volume, number of fruits per plant and number of seeds per plant (Ramachandran 1978; Indiresh 1982; Pal and Vani 1986; Geetashri et al. 1995). Among these traits fruit traits like number of fruits/plant, fruit weight, fruit length, etc., were repeatedly reported as high correlated characters with yield/plant. Simple selection strategies focusing on flowering duration, harvesting span, fruit length and diameter, fruit rind thickness, average fruit weight, number of fruits per vine, dry matter per vine and harvest index could be used to improve bitter gourd yield (Behera et al. 2010).
Selection of high yielding clones is commonly practiced in dioecious crops like teasel gourd and spine gourd. Though the dioecious species are vegetatively propagated sexual reproduction becomes possible which is helpful in mass selection for improvement. The estimates of GCV and phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) indicated that selection can be done on the basis of phenotype alone for yield improvement in spine gourd (Bharathi et al. 2010) and selection for characters such as number of fruits per plant, individual fruit weight and fruit volume are more important for yield improvement in M. dioica (Bharathi et al. 2006).
Heterosis breeding. As all the species of Momordica are cross-pollinated, there is ample scope for exploitation of heterosis. Heterosis breeding utilises mainly the dominance variance. It involves three important steps in cross-pollinated crops (a) production of inbred lines, (b) testing the combining ability of inbred lines and (c) production of seeds in bulk. Techniques used for hybrid development in bitter gourd are similar to those of melons and cucumber (Behera 2004). In bitter gourd, vigorous parental inbred are maintained routinely by selfing without inbreeding depression (Behera 2004). As there is no or negligible inbreeding depression reported, the homozygous varieties can be directly used for production of F1 hybrids unlike production of inbred and hybridisation in other cross-pollinated crops like onion. It is comparatively easier to produce the seeds of F1 hybrids of bitter gourd (through bagging and hand pollination) than in self-pollinated crops (through emasculation and hand pollination) like tomato, brinjal, etc. In case of dioecious species inbreeding is not possible. Sib mating is possible but there is often loss in vigour on sib mating. However, through induction of bisexual flowers (as described earlier under the section sex modification) inbreeding is possible to produce inbred lines which can be used for production of F1 hybrids.
More pronounced hybrid vigor could be observed with the inclusion of diverse parents (Behera et al. 2011). However, moderate genetic diversity is most desirable to produce highly heterotic hybrids (Laxuman et al. 2012). Heterosis for earliness, high number of fruits and bearing at each flowering node should be exploited. Selection for divergent parent based on number of fruits, fruit weight, fruit length, inter-nodal length and yield will be useful as these characters were the major traits contributing to divergence and selection of parents based on number of fruits per plant and individual fruit weight is more important for spine gourd (Bharathi et al. 2005; Bharathi et al. 2006).
Heterosis in M. charantia was investigated at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi as early as 1943 (Pal and Singh 1946). Extensive work on various aspects of heterosis in bitter gourd has been carried out over the past several years (Table 8.2). Heterosis for yield per vine varied from 1.30 (Singh and Joshi 1980) to 98.21 % (Singh et al. 2001) over the standard parent depending on genotype. This heterosis is likely attributable to earliness, first node to bear fruit (first female flowering node), and total increased fruit number (Celine and Sirohi 1998). Genetic dominance and complementary gene action associated with some of these traits combined with their low narrow sense heritability indicate that hybrid breeding would be an advantageous strategy when breeding for increased yield in these crop species (Celine and Sirohi 1998; Mishra et al. 1998).
Mutation breeding. Sudden change in a gene on chromosome known as mutation which is heritable occurs spontaneously in crop plants. A white bitter gourd mutant ‘Pusa Do Mausami’ was developed through spontaneous mutation from the natural population of ‘Pusa Do Mausmi’ (green-fruited type) at the Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhi. Mutations can also be induced by irradiation through mutagens like X-rays, gamma rays, ethylmethane sulphonate (EMS), etc. Mallaiah and Nizam (1986) induced variability in bitter gourd with gamma irradiation and EMS treatment. In M. charantia, M1 progeny derived from radiation mutagenesis can possess economically important unique characters, which are controlled by single recessive genes (Campose 1963). One such promising variety is developed in bitter gourd, i.e. MDU 1, developed as a result of gamma radiation (seed treatment) of the landrace MC 103 which was found to possess improvement for yield (Rajasekharan and Shanmugavelu 1984). A study to induce restricted vine growth habit in bitter gourd indicated that gamma ray irradiation of seed at 9 kr and pollen between 3 and 5 kr were effective, but the plants were not stable after M4 generation (Reyes and Rasco 1994).
Polyploidy breeding. The natural polyploids recorded in this genus are M. subangulata subsp. renigera with 2n = 56 (Bharathi et al. 2010), M. dioica 2n = 42 (Agarwal and Roy 1976) and M. charantia 2n = 33 (Roy 1985). Teasel gourd (tetraploid) has been adapted to vegetative propagation through adventitious tubers to overcome the barriers of sexual propagation (Singh 1979). The reported occurrence of tetraploid forms in M. dioica (Roy et al. 1966) may probably be a misidentification of M. subangulata which is an allotetraploid derived from spine gourd and sweet gourd. Artificial tetraploids and triploids of bitter gourd (Saito 1957; Kadir and Zahoor 1965; Wanjari and Phadnis 1971; Trivedi and Roy 1973; Roy et al. 1966) and octoploids of teasel gourd (Cho et al. 2006) have been produced. However, artificial induction of polyploidy for economic exploitation has not resulted in evolving superior types over their diploid counterparts though the plants seemed to be vigorous (Roy et al. 1966). One of the practical uses of polyploidy is to overcome inter-specific and inter-generic fertility barriers (Laptev 1973). At CHES, Bhubaneswar, a fertile inter-specific hybrid was developed by crossing induced tetraploid (spine gourd) with the natural tetraploid (teasel gourd) (unpublished).
Colchicine is the most widely used chemical for chromosome doubling. The method of treatment and the optimum concentration of colchicines varies with the plant part used. Artificial induction of polyploidy for economic exploitation has not evolved superior types over their diploid counterparts. Polyploids can be produced by treating the seedlings at the cotyledon stage with an emulsion of 0.2 % colchicine. Cho et al. (2006) reported that seed treatment 0.4 % colchicines and 0.003 % with amiprophos-methyl was effective for chromosome doubling, in M. dioica (probably M. subangulata subsp. renigera) and produced octoploids. Amiprophos-methyl treated seeds showed high rate of germination. The octoploid plants showed bigger leaves and guard cells while leaf shape index (leaf length/leaf width) was lower than the tetraploids. Colchicine treatment (0.2 % for 18 h) of bitter gourd seedlings (shoot tip) produced tetraploids (Kadir and Zahoor 1965). However, the polyploids were inferior to diploids in terms of economic characters though it is possible that by suitable treatment it may be possible to raise fertile gynoecious, androecious and trimonoecious types of sex forms in bitter gourd (Trivedi and Roy 1973).
Genetic mapping and Molecular breeding. The primary utility of genetic maps in crop improvement is their deployment in marker-assisted selection and breeding. Genetic differences between M. charantia var. charantia and M. charantia var. muricata accessions indicated that they are potential parents for the establishment of mapping populations (Behera et al. 2008a). Kole et al. (2010a, b) detected many AFLPs linked to fruit quality traits employing association mapping. The first genetic linkage map of bitter melon was developed by Kole et al. (2012) using a set of 146 F2 progenies derived from an inter-botanical variety cross between Taiwan White (Momordica charantia var. charantia) and CBM12 (M. charantia var. muricata). They identified four Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) for fruit number and yield, two QTLs for fruit length and one QTL each for fruit diameter and weight.
Although bitter gourd has a long cultivation history, molecular research and breeding efforts were started later than the other cucurbitaceous vegetables. In recent years, variation in DNA fractions has been extensively used to study the diversity of M. charantia. The identification of molecular markers may augment phenotypic selection if markers are identified that are closely linked to or at genes controlling the traits of interest. Although DNA marker analysis can assist in diversity analyses (Behera et al. 2008b), only a few polymorphic markers have been identified in bitter gourd (Dey et al. 2006; Singh et al. 2007; Gaikwad et al. 2008) and teasel gourd (Rasul et al. 2007). Species and genotype-specific fragments detected by the random markers would be useful in introgression breeding for genetic improvement of Momordica cultivated in India (Bharathi et al. 2012b).
Genetic Engineering. To date, the genetic improvement of bitter gourd has been mainly achieved by conventional plant breeding methods. Somatic embryogenesis in suspension is an effective aid for genetic transformation studies. Reports on somatic embryogenesis in cell suspension culture are not extensive. Few reports on somatic embryogenesis through cell suspension culture for bitter gourd have been published (Thiruvengadam et al. 2006; Sultana and Rahman 2012). Among the available gene transfer systems, Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer is considered more efficient for the stable integration of genes into plant genome. Agrobacterium-mediated β-glucuronidase expression was detected in explants of immature cotyledonary nodes in M. charantia (Sikdar et al. 2005). An efficient protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of bitter melon using leaf disc as explants was reported (Thiruvengadam et al. 2012) and this optimised transformation system could be used for the genetic improvement of bitter melon.
Breeding for pests and disease resistance. Very little work has been attempted towards breeding for insect pests and disease resistance though there is wide diversity available in the local germplasm. In bitter gourd, several genetic studies have shown that an association exists between morphological traits and insect resistance and that these associations may be useful for indirect selection during resistance breeding (Dhillon et al. 2005a).
M. balsamina was reported to be highly tolerant to most of the typical cucurbit diseases and pests like ladybird beetle, red pumpkin beetle, pumpkin caterpillar, gall fly, root knot nematode, cucurbit yellow mosaic and little leaf disease (Joseph and Antony 2008) may contribute to Aulocophora tolerance in Momordica species (Behera et al. 2011). M. dioica had been found to be tolerant to pumpkin caterpillar, gall fly and root knot nematode, whereas M. sahyadrica was highly tolerant to pumpkin caterpillar, root knot nematode and fruit fly. M. subangulata subsp. renigera is resistant to cucurbit yellow mosaic and little leaf diseases (Joseph 2005). These resistance sources along with wild African species like M. foetida and M. rostrata may play a role in resistance breeding programmes.
Fruit fly is a major pest of bitter gourd and other Momordica species like M. dioica, M. cochinchinensis and M. subangulata subsp. renigera. The strain ‘Green Rough’ (Fernando and Udurawana 1941), more prickly variety ‘Phule BG 4’ (Anon 1990) of bitter gourd was comparatively resistant to fruit fly. Tewatia and Dhankhar (1996) suggested reciprocal recurrent selection to develop fruit fly resistant varieties after studying the inheritance of fruit fly resistance. The wild variety M. charantia var. muricata shows high level of tolerance to fruit fly and it crosses with the cultivated var. M. charantia var. charantia. However, the wild variety has a dominant trait in F1 for fruit shape and size, which is not desirable (Behera et al. 2010). Wild African species like M. foetida, M. rostrata may play a major role in resistance breeding programmes of M. charantia (Njorge and van Luijk 2004) and M. balsamina may contribute to Aulocophora tolerance in Momordica species (Behera et al. 2010). The resistant source for bitter gourd fruit fly is presented in Table 8.3. Out of 13 genotypes screened against fruit fly, Col-II and FSD-long were found to be resistant and can be used as a source of resistance for developing bitter gourd genotypes resistant to melon fruit flies (Gogi et al. 2009).
Among the accessions maintained at the Institute of Plant Breeding, Philippines, the accessions 83-003, 83-006 and 9-32 were found to be bacterial wilt resistant and none of the accessions was resistant to root knot nematode and Cercospora leaf spot (Alcazar and Gulick 1983). Out of 86 genotypes screened against bitter gourd distortion mosaic virus (BDMV), nine genotypes from northern and central parts of Kerala were identified as resistant viz, IC 68296, IC 68335, IC 68263B, IC 68275, IC 68250A, IC 85620, IC 68285, IC 68312 and IC 68272 and suggested scope for exploitation of heterosis with resistance to BDMV (Arunachalam 2002). Khaire et al. (1987) reported BG 598 and BG 102 as resistant to pumpkin beetle. Biophysical characteristics of the plants play an important role in affecting infestation of foliage feeding insect pests.
Mandal et al. (2012) reported that the higher the length of trichome and density the lower the incidence of the foliage feeding insect pests and the cultivars having dense trichome showed tolerance against foliage feeding insect pests. Females of leaf miner are often deterred from ovipositing on M. charantia leaves due to the presence of momordicin I (Mekuria et al. 2005) and momordicin II which was found to elicit feeding deterrent activity against red pumpkin beetle (Chandravadana 1987). Selecting/screening plants with high trichome density and high momordicin I, II can reduce the incidence and be used in further resistance breeding programmes.
Breeding for stress tolerance. Sundaram (2009) evaluated eight genetically diverse parents of bitter gourd under saline soil and it was found that BGS 1 was the best as it had recorded significant performance for five of the eight characters studied and could be better utilised in further breeding programmes for improvement of yield under saline conditions. The preponderance of dominant gene action for node of first male flower appearance, vine length, yield of fruits per vine and leaf sodium: potassium ratio revealed the importance of heterosis breeding for simultaneous improvement of yield as well as saline tolerance in bitter gourd (Sundaram 2007).
Utilisation of wild species for Momordica breeding. Inter-specific hybridisation is used to improve crops by transferring specific traits such as pest and stress resistance from their wild relatives (Bowley and Taylor 1987) to their cultivated counterparts and is one of the most important challenges for breeders, but the genetic resources of wild Momordica species have not been explored yet. The wild species of Momordica offer great resources for improvement of cultivated bitter gourd for desirable edible/quality traits, biotic and abiotic stress (Joseph 2005). In M. dioica the tubers do not have the capacity to perpetuate indefinitely and cannot be used for mass multiplication while the adventitious root propagation in M. subangulata subsp. renigera is unique to the species and can be used fruitfully in the breeding of Momordica (Joseph et al. 2009). Ali et al. (1991) highlighted the scope for transfer of useful traits from the related species of Momordica to M. dioica through inter-specific hybridisation.
There are a few reports of inter-specific hybridisation between M. dioica and M. cochinchinensis (Mohanty et al. 1994; Mondal et al. 2006), M. charantia and M. balsamina (Singh 1990), M. charantia and M. dioica (Roy et al. 1966; Dutt and Pandey 1983; Vahab and Peter 1983; Anon. 2004), M. balsamina and M. dioica (Roy et al. 1966) and among the species of Indian occurrence (Bharathi et al. 2012a). However, the poor germination of F1 seeds, unsatisfactory growth and flowering in F1 seedlings, and partial to complete sterility in F1 indicate the rather limited potential of inter-specific hybrids from these species in conventional crop improvement (Bharathi et al. 2012a). In many cases, this sterility was associated with meiotic abnormalities, and was a large obstacle that followed hybridisation and hindered utilisation. When chromosomes are doubled, each chromosome will have a homologous partner for pairing during meiosis; if there is no cytoplasmic incompatibility, the chromosome-doubled F1 hybrid may produce viable gametes and fertility restoration is anticipated. Among various agents, colchicine is one of the antimitotic substances most frequently used for this purpose (Bharathi 2010).
At CHES, Bhubaneswar, during 2008–2011, several attempts were made to restore the fertility of inter-specific hybrids between spine gourd and teasel gourd. First, triploid F1 hybrid was backcrossed to both the parents and after several attempts (>1000) a fruit with few seeds were obtained. Substantial heterosis for vine length, number of flowers per plant and yield per plant was observed in BC1F1. In BC1F1, fruit set was significantly higher (99 %) when dusted with teasel gourd pollen while the fruit set was very less and fruits were of deshaped and not of commercial importance when selfed (35 %) or dusted with spine gourd pollen (65 %). The BC1F1 expressed the favourable traits of teasel gourd (earliness and adventitious root tubers) and spine gourd (fruit texture, flavor and taste). Also, the fruits were less seeded and soft with good cooking quality (in pollinations with teasel gourd) when compared to its parents indicating its potential to be exploited as a new variety (Bharathi et al. 2012c). Another attempt was made to double the ploidy of spine gourd and then crossed with the natural tetraploid teasel gourd. The F1 was highly fertile and combined the desirable traits of both the species (Unpublished).
Inter-generic Hybridisation. In a cross between M. charantia and Trichosanthes anguina more than 50 % fruit set as well as seed germination has been reported (Patrude and Krishnamurthy 1934). The floral and vegetative traits of M. charantia were dominant. However, the above observation needs further experimentation for confirmation (Patrude and Krishnamurthy 1934). Of late, there were newspaper reports of an innovative farmer in Kerala cultivating F1 hybrid of bitter gourd and snake gourd as a new vegetable crop (personal communication, Dr. Joseph John K).
Varieties
Bitter gourd. Bitter gourds can be divided into three basic groups—small triangular, long dark green and the light green types that are less bitter. There are about 300 varieties found around the world. However, a few important varieties are described here.
India
Public Sector Varieties/Hybrids
-
(1)
Pusa Do Mausmi. Developed at the Indian Institute of Agricultural Research (IARI), New Delhi. Fruits are long, dark green, medium thick, club-shaped with 7–8 continuous ridges. First picking begins 55 days after sowing and individual fruit weighs around 100–120 g. Suitable for spring–summer and rainy season cultivation. It gives an average yield of 12–15 t/ha in 120 days.
-
(2)
Pusa Vishesh. A selection from a local variety of Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India developed at IARI, New Delhi suitable for spring–summer season. Fruits are medium thick, dark green in colour, fusiform with regular unbroken ridges. It takes 55–60 days for first fruit harvest and gives an average yield of 15 t/ha. Because of its dwarf habit, more number of plants can be accommodated per unit area. Fruits are suitable for pickling and dehydration.
-
(3)
Pusa Hybrid 1. Developed at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi. Pusa Hybrid 1 is proved to be superior to its parents Pusa Do Mausami and Pusa Vishesh. It gives 42–58 % higher yield than the parents. Vines are of medium growth with broad dark green leaves. The fruits are attractively green, medium long and medium thick (fruit length, 13.5 cm and breadth, 5.0 cm and flesh thickness of 7.3 mm) with irregular smooth tubercles on the surface and on an average it weighs about 100 g. The fruits are suitable for making curries, pickles and also for dehydration purpose. Its average yield is about 21.8 t/ha.
-
(4)
Pusa Hybrid 2. Fruits are dark green, medium-sized (length: 11.25 cm; breadth: 4.5 cm) with irregular smooth ridges, and individual fruit weighs around 110 g.
-
(5)
Kalyanpur Baramasi. Fruits are 20–25 cm long, thin, dark green with 8–10 seeds per fruit. It is tolerant to mosaic and fruit fly under field conditions. Average yield is about 10–12.5 t/ha.
-
(6)
Co 1. It is a selection from a local type collected from Thudiyalur, Tamil Nadu (Long Green). The vines are moderate in growth with a length of 130 cm and 5–7 branches per vine. The fruit is dark green, medium long (25–30 cm) and thick (6–8 cm) with characteristic warts. Each vine produces 20–22 fruits each weighing 100–120 g. Each fruit contains 24–30 seeds. Vines flower in 45–50 days and first harvest can be had in 55–60 days after sowing. The variety produces about 14.4 t/ha of fruits in crop duration of 115 days with 6–8 harvests.
-
(7)
MDU 1. It is an induced mutant developed by gamma irradiation of local cultivar (MC 103). It is early in flowering (60 days) with a sex ratio of 1:20 of female and male flowers. The fruits are long with a mean length of 40.3 cm and a girth of 17.5 cm and each fruit weighs 410 g on an average. Fruits contain less seeds and each vine yields an average of 16.6 fruits. Total fruit yield is about 32.19 t/ha.
-
(8)
COBgoH1. It is an F1 hybrid developed from a cross of MC 84 × MDU 1 with high momordicine content (2.99 mg/g). The variety is suitable for cultivation in Kharif (June–Sept) and Rabi (Dec–March) seasons. Fruits at vegetable maturity are useful for making stir fry, porial and stuffed vegetable. It recorded an average yield of 44.4 t/ha with a potential yield up to 51.29 t/ha in crop duration of 115–120 days.
-
(9)
Coimbatore Green. It is a selection from the Coimbatore collection and fruits are 60 cm long and dark green in colour. Individual fruits weigh between 300 and 400 g. It gives a yield of 15–18 t/ha.
-
(10)
Coimbatore Long White. Developed by National Seeds Corporation. Fruits are long, tender, white in colour and suitable as a rainy season crop with an average yield of 25–30 t/ha.
-
(11)
VK 1 Priya. A selection from local type developed by Kerala Agricultural University (KAU), Thrissur, India. The fruits are green with white tinge at stylar end and 35–40 cm long, heavy bearing variety with first picking in 60 days. Yield potential is up to 30 t/ha.
-
(12)
Preethi. It is a selection released by KAU, Thrissur, India. Fruits are medium, white, 30 cm long and a single fruit weighs around 310 g. The yield ranged from 15 to 34 t/ha depending on location and environment.
-
(13)
Priyanka. A local selection from KAU centre, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India. Fruits are uniformly white, spindle shaped with spiny ridges, medium long, average fruit weight is 300 g with yield potential of 28 t/ha.
-
(14)
Arka Harit. Developed at Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), Bangalore, India. The fruits are attractive, spindle shaped with glossy green colour, small in size with smooth regular ribs. The average yield is about 12 t/ha with crop duration 100–110 days.
-
(15)
Phule Green Gold. Developed at Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (MPKV), Rahuri, Maharashtra, India. Fruits are 25–30 cm long, dark green coloured with tubercles and suitable for the export market.
-
(16)
Phule Priyanka. Developed at MPKV, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India. It is a hybrid variety with dark green colour fruits. Fruits are 20–25 cm long with tubercles. Average yield is 35–40 t/ha.
-
(17)
Phule Ujwala. Developed at MPKV, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India. Fruits are 18–20 cm long, dark green in colour with tubercles and produces about 30–35 tonnes fruits per hectare suitable for export market.
-
(18)
RHR BGH 1. It is an F1 hybrid developed at MPKV, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India and is tolerant to downy mildew. It is suitable for cultivation in both summer and rainy season. Fruits are tubercled with 20 cm length and dark green in colour. The average yield of this variety is about 20 t/ha.
-
(19)
Hirkani. Developed by selection from a local type at MPKV, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India. Fruits are dark green, 15-20 cm long. Average yield is 13.8 t/ha in a crop duration of 160 days.
-
(20)
Pant Karela 1. Developed at Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology (GBPUAT), Pantnagar, Uttaranchal. It is highly resistant to red pumpkin beetle.
-
(21)
Pant Karela 3. An early and high yielding variety developed at GBPUAT, Pantnagar, Uttaranchal. Its fruits are cylindrical 24 cm long of dark-green colour, and are suitable for plain and hilly areas of north India. Yield potential of this variety is 16 t/ha.
-
(22)
Konkan Tara. Developed by Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Maharashrtra, India. Fruits are green, prickly medium long (15 cm) and spindle shaped. Yield potential is 24 t/ha.
Private Sector Varieties/Hybrids
-
(1)
Chaman. F1 hybrid developed by Nunhems India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore. It is an early maturing and prolific bearing hybrid. Fruits are attractive, shining and green coloured (Fig. 8.2a) with prominent tubercles.
-
(2)
Sarkar. F1 hybrid developed by Nunhems India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore. Plants are vigourous with strong vines and more branches. Fruits are traditional jhalari type, attractive, shining and dark green (Fig. 8.2b). It shows intermediate resistance to downy mildew.
-
(3)
Amanshri. F1 hybrid developed by Nunhems India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore. Prolific bearer, fruits are attractive, shining, green to dark green in colour (Fig. 8.2c). It has extended harvesting period, good shipping and keeping quality.
-
(4)
Racer. Predominantly female bearing F1 hybrid developed by Nunhems India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore. Fruits are spindle shaped, dark green coloured and 8–10 cm long (Fig. 8.2d).
-
(5)
Visesh. F1 hybrid developed by Golden seeds, India. Fruits are dark green with prominent tubercles. Individual fruit weighs around 100–125 g.
-
(6)
Prachi. F1 hybrid developed by East–West seeds, India. Plants are vigorous bearing short spindle shaped fruits of 5–6 cm length. Fruits are dark green coloured with medium tubercles. This hybrid is suitable for stuffed preparations.
-
(7)
Vivek. F1 hybrid developed by Sungro seeds, India. Fruits are straight, dark green coloured with sharp tubercles and weighing 125 g.
-
(8)
NS 1024. F1 hybrid developed by Namdhari seeds Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India. It is an early hybrid that starts fruiting at 45–50 days of sowing. Fruits are long (25–30 cm), dark green with shining skin and sharp tubercles.
-
(9)
NS 463. F1 hybrid developed by Namdhari seeds Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India. Plants are vigorous, early and good yielders. Fruits are shiny light green with continuous attractive ribs and few bubbles. Fruits are 30–35 cm in length and weighing 350–400 g with blunt ends. Perform well in Thailand and is recommended for South–East Asia.
-
(10)
NS 469 (H 2069). Developed by Namdhari seeds Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India. The plants are vigorous and early. Fruits are shiny light green with continuous attractive ribs and few bubbles. Fruits are 35–40 cm in length with blunt ends and weighing 700–750 g.
-
(11)
NS 473 (H 63). F1 hybrid developed by Namdhari seeds Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India. Fruits are shiny light green with continuous attractive ribs and few bubbles. Fruits are 22–25 cm in length having attractive spindle shape. Early and vigorous plants of this hybrid are high yielding and recommended for cultivation in India.
-
(12)
NS 497. F1 hybrid developed by Namdhari seeds Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India. Vigorous plants, early and good yielders. Fruits are shiny light green with continuous attractive ribs and few bubbles. Fruits are 30–35 cm in length and weighing 350–400 g with blunt ends. Performs well in Thailand and is recommended for South–East Asia.
-
(13)
NS 487. F1 hybrid developed by Namdhari seeds Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India. Vigorous plants, early and good yielders. Fruits are shiny light green with continuous attractive ribs and few bubbles. Fruits are 30–35 cm in length and weighing 350–400 g with blunt ends. Perform well in Thailand.
-
(14)
NS 469T. Developed by Namdhari seeds. The plants are vigorous and early. Fruits are shiny light green with continuous attractive ribs and few bubbles. Fruits are 35–40 cm in length with blunt ends and weighing 700–750 g.
China
-
(1)
Xiang Kugua 1. Developed in Hunan Vegetable Research Institute, China. It is an early maturing, high yielding variety of good quality.
-
(2)
Cuilii. It is an F1 hybrid developed by crossing gynoecious line 19 with Jiang Xuan 105. It is early maturing and high yielding suitable for cultivation in southern China in spring and autumn.
Some other remarkable bitter gourd varieties/hybrids are Darouyihao, Guinongke 1, Guinongke 2, Yu 5, Zaoyoukugua, Zaolukugua, Nongyou 1, Xinke 3 Kugua, Hongkong Green, Large Top, Hybrid Beauty Winner-1, Green Lover and strong-female varieties Q11-2 and Yuqiang-2.
Australia
-
(1)
Kiew Yoke 59. Productive cultivar with long, smooth light green fruit. Fruit weight 500–600 g.
-
(2)
Kiew Yoke 68. Vigorous, disease tolerant cultivar with large and broad shouldered, glossy fruit. Single fruit weighs around 500–600 g with good shelf life and recommended for rainy season production.
-
(3)
Known You Green. A Taiwanese cultivar with a smooth, shiny, beautiful green skin. Plants are early, vigorous and prolific. Fruit has ribbed stripes and weighs 400–700 g. The flesh is green and mildly bitter. Fruit is good for salad and frying.
-
(4)
Verdure. An early, vigorous, productive, high yielding cultivar. Fruits are short, beautifully shaped with a maximum weight of 500 g. Its green skin and light green flesh are suitable for stewing.
-
(5)
Moonrise. Plants are early, vigorous and prolific. Fruits are long, with light green skin and flesh and weigh up to 700 g. It has an excellent crispy and tender taste and is ideal as a fresh vegetable and also for stir frying.
-
(6)
Moonlight. An early, prolific cultivar which produces medium-long fruit that seldom cracks. Fruits weigh up to 650 g and have light green skin and flesh. This cultivar is suitable for use as a fresh vegetable and for stir frying.
-
(7)
Moon Beauty. Plants are early, vigorous and high yielding. Fruits are oblong shaped and have shiny white skin with a wart-like surface. Moon Beauty fruits are 30 cm long and 9 cm wide and weigh 700 g. It has thick and crispy flesh with good taste.
Philippines
Popular varieties in the Philippines include open pollinated varieties Sta Rita, Makiling and their F1 hybrids namely Jade Star A and B (Reyes and Rasco 1994).
Sta Rita. It is an open pollinated variety and most popular in Philippines. First harvest starts from 70 days after planting. Its fruits are green, thin straight, shiny, 20–35 cm long weighs about 200 g and resistant to downy mildew.
Japan
Japan Long, Japan Green Spindle, Nikko and Peacock.
Taiwan
Taiwan Large, Taiwan White, Hybrid White Pearl, Hybrid Taiwan White.
Thailand
Small Baby, Hybrid Bangkok Large, Hybrid White Pearl, Hybrid Jumbo Choice.
Sri Lanka
Palee, Matale Green and Thinnaweli White.
Pakistan
Ambika, Rama Krishna and Phauja.
Bangladesh
Hybrid White, Hybrid Green.
USA
CBM 9, CBM 10, CBM 12, CBM 18.
Spine Gourd
-
(1)
Arka Neelachal Sree. Developed through clonal selection at Central Horticultural Experiment Station, Bhubaneswar, India. It has good appearance, high yield (4–5 kg/plant) and high market preference (Fig. 8.3a). Its vines are thin and spreading which grows well on 3-line wire-trellis system. The variety is moderately resistant to anthracnose and downy mildew in fields, and is moderately susceptible to angular leaf blight and pumpkin caterpillar.
-
(2)
Indira Kankad (RMF 37). It is the first variety of spine gourd released for commercial cultivation by Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Ambikapur, Chattisgarh, India. Its fruits are dark green coloured. Single fruit weighs around 14 g and the average yield is 0.8–1 t/ha in the first year and 1.0–1.5 t/ha in the second year and 1.5–2.0 t/ha in third year after planting.
-
(3)
Visal. It is popular among the farmers of Sri Lanka.
-
(4)
Small Baby Doll. It is popular among the farmers of Thailand.
Teasel Gourd
-
(1)
Arka Neelachal Gaurav. Developed through clonal selection at Central Horticultural Experiment Station, Bhubaneswar, India. It is characterised by dark-green and oval fruits along with small spines (Fig. 8.3b). Its fruits are 6.0 cm long and 3.8 cm thick with an average weight of 50 g. The plant produces 230–250 fruits in full cropping season with assured pollination. The variety needs hand pollination for assured yield which varies between 12 and 15 kg per plant per season. The selected variety is vigorous with dark-green foliage, strong vine and fairly long growing period (15 June–15 October). It produces large numbers of female flowers and shows moderate resistance to pumpkin caterpillar infestation, and moderate susceptibility to anthracnose and downy mildew diseases in the field.
Barring Indian taxa, the South East Asian and African taxa needs to be studied for their ecology, biology and breeding behaviour. Except for enumeration and morphological description, in-depth botanical studies are absent and hence a botanical treatise on biology and breeding behaviour of the taxa leading to their agronomic utilisation and ex situ conservation is the need of the hour. Only in M. charantia, a fairly large number of accessions have been explored and available for improvement while in other species only limited work has been carried out. To a large extent, the success of plant breeding depends upon the genetic diversity of germplasm. The natural genetic diversity available in South–East Asia needs to be exploited and genetic analysis of morphological and yield related traits needs to be studied to provide a rational basis for on-going breeding efforts. Among the different species of Asia, some genetic/cytogenetic information has been accumulated on M. charantia and emphasis should be given to other species also. Utilisation of interspecific hybridisation for the improvement of Momordica is limited due to limited success of species hybridisation and hybrid sterility. There is a need to find out the barriers in various cross combinations and methods to overcome the barriers. In some cases, for example, between the two botanical varieties of M. charantia, though high crossability is there, concerted efforts have not been made to advance the crosses (F2, F3, BC1, BC2, etc.) to get the desirable trait. Very little attention has been given to improve the quality and productivity in these vegetables and there is a great scope to exploit heterosis to increase the productivity and quality. There is a need to make concerted effort to promote progress in the exploitation of heterosis in these crops.
References
Agarwal PK, Roy RP (1976) Natural polyploids in Cucurbitaceae I. Cytogenetical studies in triploid Momordica dioica Roxb. Caryologia 29:7–13
Agarwal JS, Khanna AN, Singh SP (1957) Studies on floral biology and breeding of Momordica charantia Linn. Indian J Hortic 14:42–48
Alcazar JTE, Gulick PJ (1983) Genetic Resources of Cucurbitaceae-a global report. IBPGR, Rome
Ali M, Okubo H, Fujii T, Fujiedan K (1991) Techniques for propagation and breeding of kakrol (Momordica dioica Roxb.). Sci Hortic 47:335–343
Anonymous (1990) Annual Report. Project Directorate on Vegetables, ICAR, New Delhi
Anonymous (2004) Wide hybridization. In: Rai M, Singh J (eds.) IIVR annual report, 2004, Indian Institute of Vegetable Research. Varanasi, p 24
Arunachalam P (2002) Breeding for resistance to distortion mosaic virus in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Dissertation, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala
Bahadur B, Chaturvedi A, Swamy NR (1986) Floral nectarines in some Cucurbitaceae. J Swamy Bot Club 3:149–156
Baker HG (1976) Mistake pollination as a reproductive system with special reference to the Caricaceae In: Burley J, Styles BT (eds.) Tropical trees: Variation, Breeding and Conservation, Academic Press, New York, pp 161–169
Behera TK (2004) Heterosis in bitter gourd. J New Seeds 6:217–221
Behera TK, Dey SS, Sirohi PS (2006) DBGy-201 and DBGy-202: Two gynoecious lines in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) isolated from indigenous source. Indian J Genet 66:61–62
Behera TK, Singh AK, Staub JE (2008a) Comparative analysis of genetic diversity of Indian bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) using RAPD and ISSR markers for developing crop improvement strategies. Sci Hortic 115:209–217
Behera TK, Gaikwad AB, Singh AK, Staub JE (2008b) Relative efficiency of DNA markers (RAPD, ISSR and AFLP) in detecting genetic diversity of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). J Sci Food Agric 88:733–737
Behera TK, Behera S, Bharathi LK, Joseph JK (2010) Bitter gourd: Botany, Horticulture and Breeding. In: Janick J (ed.) Hort Reviews, Wiley Blackwell, pp 101–141
Behera TK, Joseph John K, Bharathi LK, Karuppaiyan R (2011) Momordica. In: Kole C (ed.) Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources, Springer, Netherlands. ISBN 978-3-642-20449-4 pp 217–246
Bharathi LK, Naik G, Dora DK (2005) Genetic divergence in spine gourd. Veg Sci 32:179–181
Bharathi LK, Naik G, Dora DK (2006) Studies on genetic variability in spine gourd. Indian J Hortic 63:96–97
Bharathi LK (2010) Phylogenetic studies in Indian Momordica species. Dissertation, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
Bharathi LK, Munshi AD, Behera TK, Joseph John K, Vishalnath, Bisht IS (2010) Genetic resources of spine gourd (Momordica dioica Roxb. Ex Willd.): An underexplored nutritious vegetable from tribal regions of eastern India. Plant Genet Resour 8:225–228
Bharathi LK, Munshi AD, Behera TK, Vinod, Joseph JK, Bhat KV, Das AB, Sidhu AS (2012a) Production and preliminary characterization of novel inter-specific hybrids derived from Momordica species. Curr Sci 103: 178–186
Bharathi LK, Parida SK, Munshi AD, Behera TK, Raman KV, Mohapatra T (2012b) Molecular diversity and phonetic relationship of Momordica spp. of Indian occurrence. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:937–948
Bharathi LK, Singh HS, Mandal S, Srinivas P (2012c) A novel inter-specific hybrid of Momordica subangulata subsp. renigera × Momordica dioica with desirable agronomic traits. In: Abstracts of Global conference on Horticulture for food, nutrition and livelihood options. ASM foundation and Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology (OUAT), Bhubaneswar, 28th–31st May, 2012 pp 120
Bowley SR, Taylor NL (1987) Introgressive hybridization. In: Christie BR (ed) CRC handbook of plant science in agriculture, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, pp 23–59
Campose FF, Generoso WM (1963) Effects of ionizing radiations on Cucumis sativus and Momordica charantia, Genetics today. Proc 11th Int Cong Genet, The Hague, The Netherlands
Celine VA, Sirohi PS (1996) Heterosis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Veg Sci 23:180–185
Celine VA, Sirohi PS (1998) Generation mean analysis for earliness and yield in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Veg Sci 25:51–54
Chandravadana MV (1987) Identification of triterpenoid feeding deterrent of red pumpkin beetles (Aulacophora foveicollis) from Momordica charantia. J Chem Ecol 13:1689–1694
Chaubey AK, Ram HH (2004) Heterosis for fruit yield and its components in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Veg Sci 31:51–53
Cho Y, Ozaki Y, Okubo H, Matsuda S (2006) Ploidies of kakrol (Momordica dioica Roxb.) cultivated in Bangladesh. Sci Bull Fac Agr Kyushu Univ 61:49–53
Chaudhari SM, Kale PN (1991) Studies on heterosis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Maharashtra J Hortic 5:45–51
Dafni A (1984) Mimicry and deception in pollination. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:259–278
Dalamu, Behera TK, Gaikwad AB, Swati S, Bharadwaj C, Munshi AD (2012) Morphological and molecular analyses define the genetic diversity of Asian bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) Australian J Crop Sci 6:261–267
Damodar VP, Ghode PB, Nawghare PD, Sontakke MB, Pawar PM (2004) Studies on after-effects of foliar application of PGR on sex-expression and sex-ratio in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) cv. Hirkani. Karnataka J Hortic 1:86–88
Dey SS, Singh AK, Chandel D, Behera TK (2006) Genetic diversity of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) genotypes revealed by RAPD markers and agronomic traits. Sci Hortic 109:21–28
Deyto RC, Cervancia CR (2009) Floral biology and pollination of Ampalaya (Momordica charantia L.). Philipp Agric Scientist 92:8–18
Dhillon MK, Singh R, Naresh JS, Sharma NK (2005a) Influence of physico-chemical traits of bitter gourd, Momordica charantia L. on larval density and resistance to melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett). J Appl Entomol 129:393–399
Dhillon MK, Singh R, Naresh JS, Sharma HC (2005b) The melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae: A review of its biology and management. J Insect Sci 5:40
Dod VN, Mahorkar VK, Peshattiwar PD (2007) Floral biology of underutilized vegetable: Kartoli. The Asian J Hortic 2:285–287
Dubey AK, Srivastava JP, Singh NP (2007) Studies on floral biology of spine gourd (Momordica dioica Roxb.) Acta Hortic (ISHS) 752:453–458
Durand R, Durand B (1984) Sexual differentiation in higher plants. Physiol Plant 60:267–274
Dutt B, Pandey C (1983) Callose deposition in relation to incompatibility in Momordica species. In: Sinha RD, Sinha U (eds) Current approaches in cytogenetics. Spectrum Publishing House, Patna, India, pp 201–205
Fernando M, Udurawana S (1941) The relative resistance of some strains of bitter gourd to the cucurbit fruit fly. Trop Agric 96:347
Free JB (1993) Insect pollination of crops. Academic Press, New York
Gaikwad AB, Behera TK, Singh AK, Chandel D, Karihaloo JL, Staub JE (2008) AFLP analysis provides strategies for improvement of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia). HortScience 43:127–133
Geetashri P, Mishra HN, Mishra RS (1995) Correlation and path-coefficient studies in bitter gourd. Indian J Hortic 52:132–136
Ghosh S, Basu PS (1982) Effect of some growth regulators on sex expression of Momordica charantia. Sci Hortic 17:107–112
Ghosh S, Basu PS (1983) Hormonal regulation of sex expression in Momordica charantia. Physiol Plant 57:301–305
Gogi MD, Ashfaq M, Arif ML, Khan MA (2009) Screening of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) germplasm for sources of resistance against melon fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) in Pakistan. Int J Agric Biol 11:746–750
Grewal GS, Sidhu A (1978) Insect pollinators of some cucurbits in Punjab. Indian J Agric Sci 48:79–83
Handique AK (1988) Hormonal induction of parthenocarpy in Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng. Curr Sci 57:896–898
Hossain MA, Islam M, Ali M (1996) Sexual crossing between two genetically female plants and sex genetics of kakrol (Momordica dioica Roxb.). Euphytica 90:121–125
Indiresh BT (1982) Studies on genotypic and phenotypic variability in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.), Dissertation, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore
Islam MR, Hossain MS, Bhuiyan MSR, Husna A, Syed MA (2009) Genetic variability and path co efficient analysis of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Int J Sustainable Agric 1:53–57
Iwamoto E, Ishida T (2005) Bisexual flower induction by the application of silver nitrate in gynoecious balsam pear (Momordica charantia L.). Hort Res (Japan) 4:391–395
Jha UC (1990) Autosomal chromosomes carrying sex genes in Momordica dioica Roxb. Curr Sci 59:606–607
Jha UC, Roy RP (1989) Hermaphrodite flowers in dioecious Momordica dioica Roxb. Curr Sci 58:1249–1250
Joseph JK. (2005) Studies on ecogeography and genetic diversity of the genus Momordica L. in India. Dissertation, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala, India
Joseph JK, Antony VT (2008) Ethnobotanical investigations in the genus Momordica L. in the southern Western Ghats of India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55:713–721
Joseph JK, Antony VT (2009) Collection and preliminary evaluation of small bitter gourds (Momordica charantia L.) a relict vegetable of Southern Peninsular India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 56:99–104
Joseph JK, Antony VT, Jose M, Karuppaiyan R (2009) Tuber morphology, germination behaviour and propagation efficiency in three edible Momordica (Cucurbitaceae) species of India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 56:861–868
Kadir ZBA, Zahoor M (1965) Colchiploidy in Momordica charantia L. Sind Univ Res J 1:53
Khattra AS, Singh NJ, Thakur JC (1994) Heterosis and correlation studies in bitter gourd. Veg Sci 21:68–71
Khaire VA, Lawande KE, Patil JD, Kolhe DS (1987) Relative susceptibility of bitter gourd genotypes to pumpkin beetle, Raphidopalpa foveicollis (Lucas.) Curr Res Reporter. Mahatma Phule Agricultural University 2:306–308
Kole C, Olukolu BA, Kole P, Abbott AG (2010a) Towards phylomedomics with bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.) as a model. In: International Conference on the status of Plant and Animal Genome Research, Jan 9–13, San Diego, CA, USA, p 164
Kole C, Olukolu BA, Kole P, Abbott AG (2010b) Association mapping of fruit traits and phytomedicine contents in a structured population of bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.). In: Thies JA, Kousik CS, Levi A (eds.) Proc Cucurbitaceae 2010, Section: Breeding and Genetics. ASHA, Alexandria Va, pp 1–4
Kole C, Olukolu BA, Kole P, Rao VK, Bajpai A, Backiyarani S, Singh J, Elanchezhian R, Abbott AG (2012) The first genetic map and positions of major fruit trait loci of bitter melon (Momordica charantia). J Plant Sci Mol Breed 1–6
Lal SD, Seth JN, Solanke SS (1976) Note on the heterosis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Indian J Agric Sci 10:195–197
Laptev YP (1973) Experimental polyploidy in the potato. Referativnyi Z 5.55.48 (Pl. Breeding Abstr 43, 4643)
Lawande KE, Patil AV (1989) Heterosis and combining ability studies in bitter gourd. J Maharashtra Agric Univ 14:292–295
Lawande KE, Patil AV (1990) Heterosis in bitter gourd. Haryana J Hortic Sci 19:342–348
Laxuman Patil SA, Salimath PM, Dharmati PR (2012) Study on genetic diversity and its relation to heterosis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Karnataka J Agric Sci 25:14–17
Lenzi M, Orth AI, Guerra TM (2005) Pollination ecology of Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae) in Florianopolis, SC, Brazil. Rev Bras Bot 28:505–513
Lokesha R, Vasudeva R (2001) Differential influence of pollen and stylar genotypes on lifespan of pistillate flowers in a monoecious herb, Momordica tuberosa (Cogn.) Roxb. (Cucurbitaceae). Curr Sci 81:1628–1633
Macusi ES, Rosario TL (2009) Morphological characterization and determination of the total alkaloid and saponin content of the 15 Accessions of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). The Philipp J Crop Sci 34:21–32
Mallaiah B, Nizam J (1986) Induced polygenic variability in Momordica charantia L. J Indian Bot Soc 65:80
Mandal T, Biswas S, Laskar N (2012) Impact of biophysical characteristics of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) on the infestation of foliage feeding coleopteran pests. Curr Biotica 6:103–106
Mekuria DB, Kashiwagi T, Tebayashi S, Kim C (2005) Cucurbitane triterpenoid oviposition deterrent from Momordica charantia to the leaf miner Liriomyza trifolii. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69:1706–1710
Mishra HN, Mishra RS, Mishra SN, Parhi G (1994) Heterosis and combining ability in bitter gourd. Indian J Agric Sci 64:310–313
Mishra HN, Mishra RS, Parhi G, Mishra SN (1998) Diallel analysis for variability in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia). Indian J Agric Sci 68:18–20
Mohanty CR, Maharana T, Tripathy P, Senapati N (1994) Interspecific hybridization in Momordica species. Mysore J Agric Sci 28:151–156
Mondal A, Ghosh GP, Zuberi MI (2006) Phylogenetic relationship of different kakrol collections of Bangladesh. Pak J Biol Sci 9:1516–1524
Munshi AD, Sirohi PS (1993) Studies on heterosis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Veg Sci 20:147–151
Njoroge GN, van Luijk MN (2004) Momordica charantia L. In: Grubben GJH, Denton OA (eds) PROTA 2: Vegetables/Legumes. PROTA, Wageningen
Oronje ML, Hagen M, Gikungu M, Kasina M, Kraemer M (2012) Pollinator diversity, behaviour and limitation on yield of karela (Momordica charantia L. Cucurbitaceae) in Western Kenya. Afr J Agric Res 7:1629–1638
Palada MC, Chang LC (2003) Suggested cultural practices for bitter gourd. AVRDC Publ, No 3
Pal HP, Singh H (1946) Studies in hybrid vigour. II. Notes on the manifestation of hybrid vigour in brinjal and bitter gourd. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 6:19–33
Pal AB, Vani A (1986) Studies on association between economic traits in gourds. Indian J Hortic 43:3
Pal AB, Srinivasan K, Doijode SD (1984) Sources of resistance to melon fruit fly in bitter gourd and possible mechanisms of resistance. SABRAO J 16:57–69
Patrude SS, Krishnamurthy D (1934) Intergeneric cross in Cucurbitaceae. Curr Sci Mysore 2:431
Pal UR, Singh UR (1972) Floral Biology of Bitter-Gourd. Indian J Hortic 29:73–76
Paul A, Bandyopadhyay S, Acharya P, Raychoudhuri SS (2010) Studies on genetic diversity of twelve accessions of Momordica charantia L. using morphological, RAPD and SCAR markers. Asian J Plant Sci 9:471–478
Prakash G (1974) Effect of photoperiod NAA and MH on sex expression and sex ratio in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia). Plant Sci 6:97–99
Prakash G (1976) Effect of plant growth substances and vernalization on sex expression in Momordica charantia L. Indian J Exp Biol 14:360–362
Pramote P, Pornthip P, Numuen C (2011) Phenotypic diversity and classification of Thai bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.) landraces from three provinces in central region of Thailand. J Agric Technol 7:849–856
Rajasekharan KR, Shanmugavelu KG (1984) MDU 1 Bitter gourd. South Indian Hortic 32:47–48
Rajput JC, Parulekar YR, Sawant SS, Jamadagni BM (1994) Sex modification in kartoli (Momordica dioica Roxb.) by foliar sprays of silver nitrate (AgNO3). Curr Sci 66:779
Ram D, Kalloo G, Singh M (1997) Heterosis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Veg Sci 24:99–102
Ram D, Kumar S, Banerjee MK, Kalloo G (2002) Occurrence, identification and preliminary characterisation of gynoecism in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Indian J Agric Sci 72:348–349
Ram D, Kumar S, Verma A, Rai M (2004) Variability Analysis of Underutilized Nutritive Vegetable Kartoli: Indian collection. Cucurbit Genetics Coop Rpt 27:66–68
Ramachandran C (1978) Genetic variability, correlation studies and path coefficient analysis in bitter gourd. Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala, India, Dissertation
Ranipse SA, Kole PN, Desale GV, Desai UT (1992) Heterosis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). South Indian Hortic 40:313–315
Rasul MG, Okubo H (2002) Genetic diversity in teasel gourd (Momordica dioica Roxb.). Bangladesh J Plant Breed Genet 15:9–15
Rasul MG, Hiramatsu M, Okubo H (2004) Morphological and physiological variation in kakrol Momordica dioica Roxb. J Fac Agric Kyushu Univ 49:1–11
Rasul MG, Hiramatsu M, Okubo H (2007) Genetic relatedness (diversity) and cultivar identification by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers in teasel gourd (Momordica dioica Roxb.). Sci Hortic 111:271–279
Rasul MG, Mian MAK, Cho Y, Ozaki Y, Okubo H (2008) Application of plant growth regulators on the parthenocarpic fruit development in teasel Gourd (Kakrol, Momordica dioica Roxb.) J Fac Agr Kyushu Univ 53: 39–42
Rebecca G, Jessica (2011) Sex expression in cucurbits. In Kole C (ed) Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Cucurbits, Science Publishers pp 353–375
Reyes MEC, Rasco ET (1994) Induction and inheritance of restricted vine growth mutant in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Philipp J Crop Sci 19:3
Roubik DW (1995) Pollination of cultivated crops in the tropics. FAO Agric Bull 118, Publication Division, FAO
Roy RP (1985) Cytogenetics of cucurbits. In: National Symposium on Cytogenetics Research: Achievements and Relevance. Organized by Indian Society of Genetics & Plant Breeding, Dept of Genetics, Osmania University, Hyderabad. August 5–8, 1985
Roy RP, Thakur V, Trivedi RN (1966) Cytogenetical studies in Momordica. J Cytol Genet 1:30–40
Saito K (1957) Studies on the induction and utilization of polyploidy in some cucurbits. II. On polyploidy plants of Momordica charantia. Japan J Breed 6:217
Sanwal SK, Kozak M, Kumar S, Singh B, Deka BC (2011) Yield improvement through female homosexual hybrids and sex genetics of sweet gourd (Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng.). Acta Physiol Plant 33:1991–1996
Schaefer H, Renner SS (2010) A three-genome phylogeny of Momordica (Cucurbitaceae) suggests seven returns from dioecy to monoecy and recent long-distance dispersal to Asia. Mol Phylogenet Evol 54:553–560
Seshadri VS, Parthasarathi VA (2002) Cucurbits. In: Bose TK, Som MG (eds) Vegetable Crops in India. Naya Prakash, Calcutta, India, pp 91–164
Shikhalia VR, Sachan SCP, Singh DP (1990) Studies on floral biology and fruit-set in spine gourd (Momordica dioica Roxb.). Punjab Hortic J 30:179–184
Sikdar B, Shafiullah M, Chowdhury AR, Sharmin N, Nahar S, Joarder OI (2005) Agrobacterium-mediated GUS expression in bitter gourd (M. charantia L.). Biotechnol 4:149–152
Singh H (1978) Parthenocarpy in Trichosanthes dioica Roxb. and Momordica dioica Roxb. Curr Sci 47:735
Singh AK (1979) Cucurbitaceae and polyploidy. Cytologia 44:897–905
Singh AK (1990) Cytogenetics and evolution in the Cucurbitaceae In: Bates DM, Robinson RW, Jeffrey C (eds.) Biology and Utilization of Cucurbitaceae, Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York and London, pp 10–28
Singh B, Joshi S (1980) Heterosis and combining ability in bitter gourd. Indian J Agric Sci 50:558–561
Singh HN, Srivastava JP, Prasad R (1977) Genetic variability and correlation studies in bitter gourd. Indian J Agric Sci 47:604
Singh NJ, Khattra AS, Thakur JC (1997) Heterobeltiosis in bitter gourd. Haryana J Hortic Sci 26:291–296
Singh AK, Pandey UB, Singh M (2000) Studies on heterosis in bitter gourd. Veg Sci 27:158–161
Singh NJ, Khattra AS, Thakur JC (2001) Studies on heterosis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Haryana J Hortic Sci 30:224–227
Singh AK, Behera TK, Chandel D, Sharma P, Singh NK (2007) Assessing genetic relationships among bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) accessions using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 82:217–222
Sinha S, Debnath B, Guha A, Sinha RK (2001) Sex linked polypeptides in dioecious Momordica dioica. Cytologia 66:55–58
Sirohi PS, Choudhary B (1978) Heterosis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Veg Sci 4:107–115
Somnath CA (2008) Stability analysis of some promising bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) hybrids. Dissertation, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Bangalore, India
Srinivasan K (1991) Pest management in cucurbits – An overview of work done under AICVIP. In: Group Discussion of Entomologists Working in the Coordinated Projects of Horticultural Crops, 28–29 January 1991. Central Institute of Horticulture for Northern Plains, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India pp 44–52
Sultana RS, Rahman MM (2012) Cells structure and morphogenesis of embryogenic aggregates in suspension culture of bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.) Int. J Biosci 2:97–105
Sundaram V (2007) Hayman’s diallel analysis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) under salt stress. Asian J Hortic 2:80–86
Sundaram V (2009) Evaluation of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) hybrids under salinity. Agric Sci Digest 29:63–65
Tewari D, Ram HH (1999) Heterosis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Veg Sci 28:106–108
Tewatia AS, Dhankhar BS (1996) Inheritance of resistance to melon fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia). Indian J Agric Sci 66:617–620
Tewatia AS, Dhankar BS, Dhankar SK (1997) Growth and yield characteristics of melon fruit fly resistant and highly susceptible genotypes of bitter gourd-A note. Haryana J Hortic Sci 25:253–255
Thakur JC, Khattra AS, Brar KS (1992) Comparative resistance to fruit fly in bitter gourd. Haryana J Hortic Sci 21:285–288
Thakur JC, Khattra AS, Brar KS (1994) Stability analysis for economic traits and infestation of melon fruit fly (Dacus cucurbitae) in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) Indian J Agric Sci 64: 378–381
Thakur JC, Khattra AS, Brar KS (1996) Correlation studies between economic traits, fruit fly infestation and yield in bitter gourd. Punjab Veg Growers 31:37–40
Thiruvengadam M, Mohamed SV, Yang CH, Jayabalan N (2006) Development of an embryogenic suspension culture of bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.). Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 109:123–129
Thiruvengadam M, Praveen N, Chung IM (2012) An efficient Agrobacterium tumefaciens -mediated genetic transformation of bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.). Australian J Crop Sci 6:1094–1100
Thomas TD (2008) The effect of in vivo and in vitro applications of ethrel and GA3 on sex expression in bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.). Euphytica 164:317–323
Trivedi RN, Roy RP (1973) Cytogenetics of Momordica charantia and its polyploids. Cytologia 38:317–325
Vahab MA, Peter KV (1993) Crossability between Momordica charantia and Momordica dioica. Cucurbit Genetics Coop Rpt 16:84
Vijay OP, Jalikop SH (1980) Production of parthenocarpic fruit growth regulators in teasel gourd (Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng). Indian J Hortic 37:167–169
Vijay OP, Jalikop SH, Nath P (1977) Studies on floral biology in kakrol (Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng.). Indian J Hortic 34:284–288
Wang QM, Zeng GW (1996) Effects of gibberellic acid and cycocel on sex expression of Momordica charantia. J Zhejiang Agric Univ 22:541–546
Wang QM, Zeng GW (1997a) The effect of phytohormones and polyamines on sexual differentiation of Momordica charantia. Acta Hortic Sinica 24:48–52
Wang QM, Zeng GW (1997b) Hormonal regulation of sex differentiation on Momordica charantia L. J Zhejiang Agric Univ 23:551–556
Wang QM, Zeng GW (1997c) Morphological and histochemical study on sex differentiation on Momordica charantia. J Zhejiang Agric Univ 23:149–153
Wang QM, Zeng GW (1998) Study of specific protein on sex differentiation of Momordica charantia. Acta Bot Sin 40:241–246
Wang QM, Zeng GW, Jiang YT (1997) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on sex expression of Momordica charantia. China Veg 1:1–4
Wangari KB, Phadnis BA (1971) Flowering behavior of colchicines induced autotetraploids in cucurbits. Sci Cult 37:574–576
Yonemori S, Fujieda K (1985) Sex expression in Momordica charantia L. Sci Bull College Agric, Univ of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 32:183–187
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bharathi, L.K., John, K.J. (2013). Crop Improvement. In: Momordica genus in Asia - An Overview. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1032-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1032-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, India
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1031-3
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1032-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)