Abstract
Assessment of colon transit time is the most useful tool to evaluate disorders of colonic motility. It is especially helpful in making a pathologic diagnosis and for planning management in patients with complaints of constipation. Currently, several techniques for assessing colon transit time are available. Assessment of colon transit by radio-opaque markers has been most widely used. This study is simple and inexpensive, as well as reliable. However, it requires good compliance on the part of the patient, produces radiation exposure, and does not measure the transit of a true meal [1–3].
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction and General Considerations
Colon transit study is indicated to measure total and segmental colonic transit times in patients with complaints of constipation, and may help in evaluating the results of medical or surgical treatment for colonic motility disorders. This study is contraindicated in pregnancy and bowel obstruction.
Radio-Opaque Markers
Radio-opaque markers can be obtained commercially or can be made by cutting Levine tubes. Commercially prepared markers are plastic beads or rings that are usually ingested in a capsule. Two kinds of radio-opaque markers, KolomarkTM (M.I.Tech., Pyongtaik, Korea) [4] and Sitzmarks® (Konsyl Pharmaceuticals, Fort Worth, TX, USA) [5] are commonly used in Korea. Each single capsule contains 20 or 24 radio-opaque markers, respectively (Fig. 3.1).
Patient preparation
Any special preparation of patients is not required prior to the colon transit study by radio-opaque markers. All contrast material, if any, should be cleared from the colon, and no other study should be scheduled for the duration of the study. Patients should be instructed to continue their usual diet and activities, including their usual medications. Colon transit study, however, should be performed with patients off their usual laxatives, enemas, or other medications known to affect gastrointestinal motility [6].
Methods
After Hinton et al. [7] first described the measurement of gut transit through ingestion of radio-opaque markers in 1961, there have been many methods to assess colon transit time using these markers. The techniques can be divided into two categories: (1) single-capsule technique and (2) multiple-capsule technique.
Single-Capsule Technique
Subjects are asked to ingest 20 (or 24) radio-opaque markers in a single capsule at a specific time (usually 8 or 9 a.m.). Abdominal X-rays are then taken in supine position at 24-h intervals until all markers are defecated [8]. This method, however, is time-consuming, inconvenient, and produces greater radiation exposure. A simplified method of single-capsule technique involves one abdominal X-ray on day 6, or 120 h after marker ingestion (Fig. 3.2) [9].
Multiple-Capsule Technique
Subjects are asked to ingest capsules containing 20 (or 24) radio-opaque markers daily at a specific time (usually 8 or 9 a.m.) for three sequential days. Abdominal X-rays are taken on day 4 (four-day method) [10], or on days 4 and 7 (seven-day method) [11]. The four-day method is useful in selecting constipated patients with delayed colon transit but it does not give relevant information on severity of delayed transit. The seven-day method can be used in selecting patients with severely delayed transit [12]. An additional abdominal X-ray can be taken on day 10 in those patients with markers still present on day 7 (Fig. 3.3a, b) [13].
Interpretation
Interpretation is based on the number of markers present in three colonic segments on the abdominal X-ray: right colon, left colon, and rectosigmoid colon. Markers located to the right of the vertebral spinous processes above a line from the fifth lumbar vertebrae to the pelvic outlet are assigned to the right colon. Markers to the left of the vertebral spinous processes and above an imaginary line from the fifth lumbar vertebrae to the anterior superior iliac crest are assigned to the left colon. Markers inferior to a line from the pelvic outlet on the right and the superior iliac crest on the left are assigned to the rectosigmoid colon [8]. Abdominal X-rays should include the diaphragms and the pubis to ensure that all markers in the colon are visualized (Fig. 3.4).
Calculations
Mean transit time of the markers in a single-capsule technique is calculated in the following way [8]:
where N is the number of given markers, n i is the number of markers present on abdominal X-ray obtained at time t i , t is the time elapsed from ingestion of markers to time where abdominal X-ray is taken and t 0 = 0, \( \left[\frac{t\left(i+1\right)-t\left(i-1\right)}{2}\right] \) is the time interval between successive abdominal X-rays, and j is the number of abdominal X-rays obtained.
When the single-capsule technique using 20 (or 24) markers in a capsule is performed and successive abdominal X-rays are taken at 24-h intervals, the above formula can be simplified into:
where n is the number of markers present on each abdominal X-ray, and j is the number of abdominal X-rays obtained.
When the multiple-capsule technique using 20 (or 24) markers in a capsule is performed, the same simplified formula can be used if markers are given at 24-h intervals.
Single-Capsule Technique
Delayed transit is defined when more than 20 % of markers retained on day 6 abdominal X-ray (Table 3.1) [9].
Multiple-Capsule Technique
Mean transit times in each colonic segment and through the entire colon are calculated by multiplying the number of markers by 1.2 (or 1.0 when using a capsule containing 24 markers) (Tables 3.2 and 3.3).
Considerations in Interpretation
The stool pattern and frequency during the study period need to be as usual to show representative colon transit. If not, repeating the study should be considered.
Patients may be found with abnormal transit time for any one colonic segment, but not the total colon. There can be a variation of transit times from day to day in colonic segments and, therefore, delayed transit in one colonic segment can only be considered abnormal if the total colon transit is also delayed [6].
Colon transit appears to be different for different populations, depending upon race, ethnicity, and dietary habit. The method and normative data of one population, therefore, may not be applicable to another population. Colon transit should be standardized and validated for an individual population [14].
Method to Study Colonic Transit in Populations with Faster Colon Transit
In some populations with faster colonic transit, such as among Indian, a conventional method of ingesting a marker every 24 h and then obtaining abdominal radiograph on the fourth day may not be appropriate. Hence, a modified method has been standardized for populations with rapid gut transit. In this method, 20 radio-opaque markers have to be ingested each time at 0 h, 12 h and 24 h. Subsequently, abdominal radiographs are obtained once at 36 h and once at 60 h. Using receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves, the best cut-off values that differentiated healthy subjects from patients with transit disorders at 36 and 60 h was 30 and 14 markers, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic accuracy, and area under the ROC curve at 36 h were 90 %, 82 %, 90 %, 82 %, 87 % and 0.9 %, respectively; the corresponding values at 60 h were 95 %, 100 %, 100 %, 92 %, 97 % and 0.99 %, respectively.
Conclusion
Slow colonic transit is an important cause of chronic constipation. Colon transit study by radio-opaque markers is a simple and popular technique to evaluate colon transit time. It not only gives an assessment of transit across the whole colon, but also gives an idea about segmental colon transit. The popular method of assessing colon transit involves administration of multiple radio-opaque markers (typically 20 each time) three times (at 0, 24 and 48 h) and obtaining an abdominal radiograph on the 4th and 7th day. However, in some populations with rapid gut transit time, this protocol may have to be modified to reduce the interval between ingestion of the markers and time of abdominal radiograph.
References
Bouchoucha M, Prado J, Chtourou L, Devroede G, Atanassiu C, Benamouzig R. Non-compliance does not impair qualitative evaluation of colonic transit time. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23:103–8.
Maqbool S, Parkman HP, Friedenberg FK. Wireless capsule motility: comparison of the SmartPill GI monitoring system with scintigraphy for measuring whole gut transit. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2167–74.
Kim ER, Rhee PL. How to interpret a functional or motility test - colon transit study. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;18:94–9.
Kim JE, Rhee PL, Kim YH, et al. The development of Kolomark™, A Korean radio-opaque marker for measuring colon transit time. Korean J Gastrointest Motil. 1999;5:136–9.
Rao SS. Constipation: evaluation and treatment of colonic and anorectal motility disorders. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007;36:687–711, x.
Lin HC, Prather C, Fisher RS, Meyer JH, Summers RW, Pimentel M, et al. Measurement of gastrointestinal transit. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:989–1004.
Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE, Young AC. A new method for studying gut transit times using radioopaque markers. Gut. 1969;10:842–7.
Arhan P, Devroede G, Jehannin B, Lanza M, Faverdin C, Dornic C, et al. Segmental colonic transit time. Dis Colon Rectum. 1981;24:625–9.
Evans RC, Kamm MA, Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE. The normal range and a simple diagram for recording whole gut transit time. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992;7:15–7.
Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, MacCarty RL, Beart RW, Wolff BG. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology. 1987;92:40–7.
Wald A. Colonic and anorectal motility testing in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:2109–15.
Lee JH, Rhee PL, Suh SW, et al. Comparison of 4-day and 7-day methods in the evaluation of colon transit time. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2001;38:241–6.
Chaussade S, Khyari A, Roche H, Garret M, Gaudric M, Couturier D, et al. Determination of total and segmental colonic transit time in constipated patients. Results in 91 patients with a new simplified method. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34:1168–72.
Ghoshal UC, Sengar V, Srivastava D. Colonic transit study technique and interpretation: Can these be uniform globally in different populations with non-uniform colon transit time? J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;18:227–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Min, Y.W., Rhee, PL. (2016). Colonic Transit Study by Radio-Opaque Markers. In: Ghoshal, U. (eds) Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Motility and its Disorders. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0822-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0822-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-0821-1
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-0822-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)