Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 46))

Abstract

A graph is a pair (V, R), where V is a set and R is a relation on V. The elements of V are thought of as vertices of the graph and the elements of R are thought of as the edges Similarly, any fuzzy relation ρ on a fuzzy subset μ of a set V can be regarded as defining a weighted graph, or fuzzy graph, where the edge (x, y) ∈ V × V has weight or strength ρ(x, y) ∈ [0, 1]. In this chapter, we shall use graph terminology and introduce fuzzy analogs of several basic graph-theoretical concepts. For simplicity, we will consider only undirected graphs through out this chapter unless otherwise specified. Therefore, all fuzzy relations are symmetric and all edges are regarded as unordered pairs of vertices. We abuse notation by writing (x, y) for an edge in an undirected graph (V, R), where x, yV. (We need not consider loops, that is, edges of the form (x, x); we can assume, if we wish, that our fuzzy relation is reflexive.) Formally, a fuzzy graph G = (V, μ, ρ) is a nonempty set V together with a pair of functions μ: V → [0, 1] and μ: V × V → [0, 1] such that for all x, y in V, ρ(x, y) ≤ μ(x) ∧ μ(y). We call μ the fuzzy vertex set of G and ρ the fuzzy edge set of G, respectively. Note that ρ is a fuzzy relation on μ. We will assume that, unless otherwise specified, the underlying set is V and that it is finite. Therefore, for the sake of notational convenience, we omit V in the sequel and use the notation G = (μ,ρ). Thus in the most general case, both vertices and edges have membership value. However, in the special case where μ(x) = 1, for all xV, edges alone have fuzzy membership. So, in this case, we use the abbreviated notation G = (V, ρ). The fuzzy graph H = (v,τ) is called a partial fuzzy subgraph of G = (μ, ρ) if vμ and τρ. Similarly, the fuzzy graph H = (P, v, τ) is called a fuzzy subgraph of G = (V, μ, ρ) induced by P if PV, v(x) = μ(x) for all xP and τ(x, y) = ρ(x, y) for all x, yP. For the sake of simplicity, we sometimes call H a fuzzy subgraph of G. It is worth noticing that a fuzzy subgraph (P, v, τ) of a fuzzy graph (V, μ, ρ) is in fact a special case of a partial fuzzy subgraph obtained as follows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arya, S.P. and Hazarika, D., Functions with closed fuzzy graph, J. Fuzzy Math. 2: 593–600, 1994.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Berge, C., Theorie des Graphes et ses Applications, Dunod, Paris, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharya, P., Some remarks on fuzzy graphs, Pattern Recognition Letters 6: 297–302, 1987.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhattacharya, P. and Suraweera, An algorithm to compute the supremum of max-min powers and a property of fuzzy graphs, Pattern Recognition Letters 12: 413–420, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhutani, K.R., On automorphisms of fuzzy graphs, Pattern Recognition Letters 9: 159–162, 1989.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cerruti, U., Graphs and fuzzy graphs, Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes 123–131, North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Q. J., Matrix representations of fuzzy graphs (Chinese), Math. Practice Theory 1: 41–46, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crain, W.L., Characterization of fuzzy interval graphs, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 68: 181–193, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. De Luca, A., and Termini, S., A definition of a non-probabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy sets theory, Inform. and Control 20: 301–312, 1972.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Delgado, M. and Verdegay, J.L., and Vila, M.A., On fuzzy tree definition, European J. Operational Res. 22: 243–249, 1985.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dodson, C.T.J., A new generalization of graph theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 6: 293–308, 1981.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois, D. and H. Prade, H., Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Theory and Applications, Academic Press, New York,1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fishburn, P.C., Interval Orders and Interval Graphs, Wiley, New York, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Fulkerson, D.R. and O.A. Gross, O.A., Incidence matrices and interval graphs, Pacific J. Math. 5: 835–855, 1965.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilmore, P.C. and Hoffman, A.J., A characterization of comparability graphs and of interval Graphs, Canad. J. Math. 16: 539–548, 1964.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Ghoul, M., Folding of fuzzy graphs and fuzzy spheres, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 58: 355–363, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Ghoul, M., Folding of fuzzy torus and fuzzy graphs, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 80: 389–396, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Halpern, J., Set adjacency measures in fuzzy graphs, J. Cybernet. 5: 77–87, 1976.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Harary, F., On the group of the composition of two graphs, Duke Math. J. 26: 29–34, 1959.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Harary, F., Graph Theory, Addison Wesley, Third printing, October 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jacobson, M.S., McMorris, F.R. and Scheinerman, E.R., General results on tolerance intersection graphs, J. Graph Theory 15: 573–577, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaufmann, A., Introduction a la Theorie des sons-ensembles flous, Vol. 1, Masson Paris, 41–189, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leenders, J.H., Some remarks on an article by Raymond T. Yeh and S.Y. Bang dealing with fuzzy relations: Fuzzy relations, fuzzy graphs, and their applications to clustering analysis, Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes (Proc. U.S.-Japan Sem., Univ. Calif., Berkeley, Calif., 1974), 125–149, Simon Stevin 51:93–100, 1977/78.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Luo, C.S., Decomposition theorems and representation theorems in fuzzy graph theory (Chinese), J. Xinjiang Univ. Nat. Sci. 3: 27–33, 1986.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Luo, C.S., The theorems of decomposition and representation for fuzzy graphs, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 42: 237–243, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. McAllister, L.M.N., Fuzzy intersection graphs, Intl. J. Computers in Mathematics with Applications 5: 871–886, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marczewski, E., Sur deux Propriétés des Classes d’ensembles, Fund. Math. 33: 303–307, 1945.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. McKee,T.A., Foundations of intersection graph theory, Utilitas Math. 40: 77–86, 1991.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Mordeson, J. N., Fuzzy line graphs, Pattern Recognition Letters 14: 381–384, 1993.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Mordeson, J.N. and Nair, P.S, Cycles and cocycles of fuzzy graphs, Inform. Sci. 90: 39–49, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Mordeson, J.N. and Peng, C-S, Operations on fuzzy graphs, Inform. Sci. 79: 159–170, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Mori, M. and Kawahara, Y., Fuzzy graph rewritings, Theory of rewriting systems and its applications (Japanese) 918: 65–71, 1995.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Roberts, F., Discrete Mathematical Models Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,1976.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rosenfeld, A., Fuzzy graphs, In: L. A. Zadeh, K. S. Fu, M. Shimura, Eds., Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications, 77–95, Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roubens, M. and Vincke, P., Linear fuzzy graphs, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 10: 79–86, 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Sabidussi, G., The composition of graphs, Duke Math. J. 26: 693–696, 1959.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Sabidussi, G., Graph multiplication, Math. Z. 72: 446–457, 1960.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Sabidussi, G., The lexicographic product of graphs, Duke Math. J. 28: 573–578, 1961.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Sarma, R. D. and Ajmal, N., Category N and functions with closed fuzzy graph, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 63: 219–226, 1994.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Shannon, A., Atanassov, K., Intuitionistic fuzzy graphs from t-,13- and tß-levels, Notes IFS 1: 32–35, 1995.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Sunitha, M.S. and Vijayakumar, A., A characterization of fuzzy trees, Inform. Sci. 113: 293–300, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Sunouchi, H. and Morioka, M., Some properties on the connectivity of a fuzzy graph (Japanese), Bull. Sci. Engrg. Res. lab. Waseda Univ. no. 132, 70–78, 1991.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Takeda, E., Connectvity in fuzzy graphs, Tech. Rep. Osaka Univ. 23: 343–352, 1973.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Tong, Z. and Zheng, D., An algorithm for finding the connectedness matrix of a fuzzy graph, Congr. Numer. 120: 189–192, 1996.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu, L. G. and Chen, T.P., Some problems concerning fuzzy graphs (Chinese), J. Huazhong Inst. Tech. no 2, Special issue on fuzzy math, iv, 58–60, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yeh, R.T. and Bang, S.Y., Fuzzy relations, fuzzy graphs, and their applications to clustering analysis, In: L. A. Zadeh, K. S. Fu, M. Shimura, Eds., Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications, 125–149, Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zadeh, L.A., Similarity relations and fuzzy ordering, Inform. Sci. 3: 177–200, 1971.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Zimmermann, H.J., Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications KluwerNijhoff, Boston,1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mordeson, J.N., Nair, P.S. (2000). Fuzzy Graphs. In: Mordeson, J.N., Nair, P.S. (eds) Fuzzy Graphs and Fuzzy Hypergraphs. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 46. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1854-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1854-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2471-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1854-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics