Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Adamowicz WL, Louviere J, Williams M (1994) Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26:271–292
Auld GB, Cashore B, Newsome D (2001) A look at forest certification through the eyes of the United States wood and paper producers. Paper presented at the Global Initiative and Public Policies: First International Conference on Private Forestry in the 21st Century, Atlanta Georgia, 25–27 March
Baharuddin HJ, Simula M (1994) Certification schemes for all timber and timber products. International Tropical Timber Association, Yokohama
Bass T, Markopoules R, Grah G (2001) Certification’s impacts on forests, stakeholders and supply chains: instruments for sustainable private sector forestry services. International Institute for Environment and Development, London
Basu AK, Chau NH, Grote U (2006) Guaranteed manufactured without child labor: the economics of consumer boycotts, social labeling and trade sanctions. Review of Development Economics, forthcoming.
Basu AK (1999) Child labor: cause, consequence, and cure, with remarks on international labor standards. Journal of Economic Literature 37:1083–1119
Bei LT, Widows R (1999) Product knowledge and product involvement as moderators of the effects of information on purchase decisions: a case study using the perfect information frontier approach. Journal of Consumer Affairs 33:165–186
Ben-Akiva M, Morikawa T (1990) Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions. Transportation research 24:485–496
Bjorner TB, Hansen LG, Russell CS (2004) Environmental labeling and consumers’ choice-an empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic swan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management: forthcoming
Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL, Swait J, Williams M, Louviere J (1996) A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 18:243–253
Brown D (1999) Can consumer product labels deter foreign child labor exploitation? Department of Economics Working Paper 19, Tufts University, Department of Economics, Medford
DeShazo JR, Fermo G (2002) Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44:123–143
Ford GT, Smith RA (1987) Inferential beliefs in consumer valuations: an assessment of alternative processing strategies. Journal of Consumer Research 14:363–371
Gudmundssen E, Wessells CR (2000) Ecolabeling seafood for sustainable production: implications for fisheries management. Marine Resource Economics 15:97–113
Hanemann WM (1999) Welfare analysis with discrete choice models. In: Herriges JA, Kling CL (eds) Valuing recreation and the environment. Edward Elgar Publishers, Northampton
Hicks RL (2002) Stated preference methods for environmental management: recreational summer flounder angling in the northeastern United States. National Marine Fisheries Service, Siver springs, http://rlhick.people.wm.edu/Working_Papers/Stated%20Preference%20Final%20Report_April%2016.pdf
Hoehn, JP, Randall A (2002) The effect of resource quality information on resource injury perception and contingent values. Resource and Energy Economics 24:13–31
Holmes TP, Boyle KJ (2005) Dynamic learning and context-dependence in sequential, attribute-based, stated-preference valuation questions. Land Economics 81:114–126
Irland LC (2002) The elusive green premium. Paper presented at the Sustainable Wood Supply through Market Based Incentives Workshop, Orono, 17 May
James D (2000) Justice and Java: coffee in a fair trade market. NACLA Report to the Americas 34:11–42
Johnson RD, Levin IP (1985) More than meets the eye: the effects of missing information on purchasing evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 12:169–177
Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) Stated choice methods: analysis and applications with a contribution by Adamowicz W, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, New York and Melbourne
Mazzotta J, Opaluch JJ (1995) Decision making when choices are complex: a test of Heiner’s hypothesis. Land Economics 71:500–515
Mitchell RC, Carson, RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method resources for the future. RFF Press, Washington DC
Murray DL, Reynolds T, Taylor PL (2003) One cup at a time: poverty alleviation and fair trade coffee in Latin America. The Ford Foundation, New York
Nimon W, Beghin JC (1999) Are eco-labels valuable? Evidence from the apparel industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81:801–811
O’Brien KA, Teisl MF (2004) Eco-information and its effect on consumer values for environmentally certified forest products. Journal of Forest Economics 10:75–96
Roe B, Levey AS, Derby BM (1999) The impact of health claims on consumer search and product evaluation outcomes: results from FDA experimental data. Journal of Public Policy and Management 18:89–105
Ross W, Creyer EH (1992) Making inferences about missing information: the effects of existing information. Journal of Consumer Research 19:14–25
Scammon DL (1977) Information load and consumers. Journal of Consumer Research 4:148–155
Sedjo RA, Swallow SK (2002) Voluntary eco-labeling and the price premium. Land Economics 78:272–284
Stecklow S, White E (2004) At what price virtue? At some retailers, ‘fair trade’ carries a very high cost stores charge big markups on goods intended to help farmers in poor countries. The Wall Street Journal, June 8:A1
Swait, J, Adamowicz W (1996) The effect of choice environment and task demands on consumer behavior: discriminating between contribution and confusion. Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta
Swait J, Louviere JJ, Williams M (1994) A sequential approach to exploiting the combined strengths of SP and RP data: application to freight shipper choice. Transportation 21:135–152
Taylor PL (2005) In the market but not of it: fair trade coffee and forest stewardship council certification as market-based social change. World Development 33:129–147
Teisl MF, Roe B, Hicks RL (2002) Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labeling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43:339–359
TransFair USA (2005) 2005 fair trade facts and figures. TransFair USA, Oakland
USEPA (1993) Status report on the use of environmental labels worldwide. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC
USEPA (1994) Determinants of effectiveness of environmental certification and labeling programs office of pollution prevention and toxics. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Waffle R (1997) Forest certification: who profits? Green certification is not needed for sustained forestry. Wood and Wood Products, September:97–101
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hicks, R.L. (2007). Performance-based Labeling. In: Grote, U., Basu, A.K., Chau, N.H. (eds) New Frontiers in Environmental and Social Labeling. Sustainability and Innovation. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1756-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1756-0_3
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1755-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1756-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)