Summary
The aim of this paper is to show that labour-market outcomes related to holding a job are not valid measures of the relative impact of different programmes, while better performing measures are those related to holding jobs reaching given quality standards. For this purpose, we develop a simple job-search model: graduates decide whether to accept a job offer depending on the utility of the different options. If graduates with better work prospects are more selective than others, it can be shown that neither the exit rate from unemployment, nor the probability of being employed at a given time, are necessarily higher for those coming from “the best” university programmes. On the other hand, under mild conditions, neither the waiting time for a job reaching given quality standards nor the probability of having a “good job” depend on individual behaviour, but only on work opportunities: this makes the latter indicators better measures of external effectiveness. Nevertheless, while crosssectional data suffice for assessment of the working condition, evaluation of the waiting time for a “good job” requires longitudinal data.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
ANGRIST J., KRUEGER A. (1991) Does compulsory attendance affect schooling and earnings? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4): 979–1014.
BIGGERI L., BINI M., GRILLI L. (2001) The transition from university to work: a multilevel approach to the analysis of the time to obtain the first job, J.R.S.S. A, 164(2): 293–305.
BORJAS G.J. (1999) Labor Economics, McGraw Hill, New York.
BRATTI M., MC KNIGHT A., NAYLOR R., SMITH J. (2004) Higher education outcomes, graduate employment and university performance indicators, J.R.S.S. A, 167(3): 475–496.
BRAUNS H., GANGL M., SHERER S. (2001) Education and unemployment: patterns of labour market entry in France, the United Kingdom and West Germany. TSER Project: Comparative Analysis of Transitions from Education to Work in Europe (http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/catewe).
CHECCHI D. (1997) La diseguaglianza. Istruzione e mercato del lavoro, Laterza, Bari.
COLUSSI A. (1997) Il tasso di rendimento dell’istruzione in Italia. In: ROSSI N. (ed) L’istruzione in Italia: solo un pezzo di carta? Il Mulino, Bologna: 255–275.
ECKSTEIN Z., WOLPIN K. I. (1995) Duration to first job and the return to schooling: estimates from a search matching model, Review of Economic Studies, 62(2): 263–286.
GIOMMI A., PRATESI M. (2001) Speranza differenziale di occupazione dei laureati e dei diplomati di scuola superiore a Firenze. In: FABBRIS L. (ed) Captor 2000: Qualità della didattica e sistemi computer-assisted, CLEUP, Padova: 273–284.
GOLDSTEIN H., SPIEGELHALTER D.J. (1996) League tables and their limitations: statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance, J.R.S.S. A, 159(3): 385–443.
GORI E., MEALLI F., RAMPICHINI C. (1993) Indicatori di efficienza ed efficacia per la valutazione dell’attività di formazione professionale, Statistica, 3: 501–533.
HARMON C., WALKER I. (1995) Estimates of the economic returns to schooling, American Economic Review, 85(5): 1278–1286.
IANNELLI C. (2001) School effects on youth transitions in Ireland, Scotland and the Netherlands. TSER Project: Comparative Analysis of Transitions from Education to Work in Europe (http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/catewe).
ISTAT (2004) I laureati e lo studio. Inserimento professionale dei laureati. Indagine 2001, Istat, Roma.
JENSEN P., WESTERGARD-NIELSEN N. C. (1987) A search model applied to the transition from education to work, Review of Economic Studies, LIV(179): 461–472.
LOGAN J. A. (1996) Opportunity and choice in socially structured labor markets, American Journal of Sociology, 102(1): 114–160.
MCFADDEN D. (1974) The measurement of urban travel demand, Journal of Public Economics, 3: 303–328.
MULLER W., SHAVIT Y. (1998) The institutional embeddedness of the stratification process. In: SHAVIT Y., MULLER W. (eds) From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
NGUYEN A.N., TAYLOR J. (2003) Transition from school to first job: the influence of educational attainment, Lancaster University Management School, Working Paper 2003/009.
OECD (1998) Employment Outlook, OECD, Paris.
PORCU M., TEDESCO N. (2004) Dall’Università al lavoro: analisi dei tempi di passaggio dei laureati dell’Ateneo di Cagliari. In: AURELI-CUTILLO E. (ed) Strategie metodologiche per lo studio della transizione Università-lavoro, CLEUP, Padova: 281–296.
RAMPICHINI C., PETRUCCI A. (2001) La ricerca della prima occupazione: un modello di durata per i laureati dell’Ateneo fiorentino. In: FABBRIS L. (ed) Captor 2000: Qualità della didattica e sistemi computer-assisted, CLEUP, Padova: 257–272.
VAN DER VELDEN R.K.W., WOLBERS M.H.J. (2001) The integration of young people in the labour market within the European Union: the role of institutional settings. TSER Project: Comparative Analysis of Transitions from Education to Work in Europe (http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/catewe).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Contini, D. (2007). Is the Length of the First Job Search Spell a Valid Measure of External Effectiveness of University Programmes?. In: Fabbris, L. (eds) Effectiveness of University Education in Italy. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1751-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1751-5_17
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1749-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1751-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)