Abstract
Electron backscattering and transmission through thin films have been simulated by the Monte-Carlo method. Instead of the backscattering coefficient we calculated Niedrig’s coefficient C N = η/(N 1 Z 2 d 1/2), where rj is the backscattering coefficient, N 1 is the number of atoms in a volume unit, Z is atomic number, and d1/2 is the film thickness giving a value for the backscattering coefficient of half that for a bulk specimen. In the case of electron transmission, the most probable energy loss, W p , was found. The calculations were carried out for Al, Cu, and Au, the former for 10–100 keV primary energy and in the 50–2000 µg/ cm2 film thickness range, the latter for a primary energy of 20keV and in the 150–650 µg/cm2 film thickness range. Tables calculated by means of the Hartree-Fock atom function were used for simulating elastic scattering, and several models of inelastic scattering were employed — the modified Bethe model and models with exponential and hyperbolic shapes of energy losses (with or without electron deflection at scattering). Our findings were compared with published experimental results. In the case of Niedrig’s coefficient, an exact comparison was impossible. Nevertheless, for the systems studied best agreement between calculated and experimental values of W p was reached when using the model containing the hyperbolic shape of energy loss, (usually without deflection during scattering). This result provided an opportunity, when combined with previous assessments of elastic models, to improve the accuracy of calculation for future employment of the Monte-Carlo method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Reichelt, A. Engel, Ultramicroscopy 1994, 13, 279.
D. C. Joy, J. Microscopy 1987, 147, 51.
D. F. Kyser, in: Introduction to Analytical Electron Microscopy ( J. J. Hren, J. I. Goldstein, D. C. Joy, eds.), Plenum, New York 1987, p. 199.
R Karduck, N. Ammann, W. R Rehback, Microbeam Analysis 1990 (J. R. Michael, R Ingram, eds.), San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 1990, p. 21.
R. Shimizu, Z.-J. Ding, Rep. Progr. Phys. 1992, 55, 487.
L. Reimer, Microchimica Acta [suppl] 1996, 13, 1.
L. Reimer, E. R. Krefting, in: Use of Monte Carlo Calculations in Electron Probe Microanalysis and Scanning Electron Microscopy (K. F. J. Heinrich et al., eds.), NBS Special Publication 460, U.S. Dept. of Comm., Washington, DC, 1976, p. 45.
H. Seidel in: Rasterelektronen-mikroskopie (L. Reimer, G. Pfefferkorn, eds.), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1983, p. 38.
H. Kulenkampff, W. Spyra, Z Phys. 1954, 137, 416
H. Kanter, Ann. Physik 1957, 20, 144.
V. Stary, Microchimica Acta [Suppl.] 1996, 13, 559.
H. Niedrig, J. Appi Phys. 1982, 53, R15.
H. Niedrig, P. Sieber, Z. Angew. Phys. 1971, 31, 27.
G. Neubert, S. Rogaschewski, J. Phys. D: Appi. Phys. 1984, 17, 2439.
V. E. Cosslett, R. N. Thomas, Br. J. Appi. Phys. 1964, 75, 883, 1283.
V. E. Cosslett, R. N. Thomas, Br. J. Appi. Phys. 1965, 16, 779.
T. Dolezel, Diploma Thesis, Charles University, Prague, 1982.
M. E. Riley, C. J. MacCallum, F. Biggs, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 1975, 15, 443.
D. Liljequist, J. Phys. D: Appi. Phys. 1983, 16, 1567.
M. J. Berger, S. M. Seltzer, Nuclear Science Series Report No. 39, NAS-NRC Publication No. 1133, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, 1964, p. 205.
T. S. Rao-Sahib, D. B. Wittry, J. Appl. Phys 1974, 45, 5060.
D. C. Joy, S. Luo, Scanning 1989, 11, 176.
D. Liljequist, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1978, 11, 839.
A. Spalek, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 1982, 198, 399.
R. Shimizu, Y. Kataoka, T. Matsukawa, T. Ikuta, K. Murata, H. Hashimoto, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1975, 8, 820.
R. Shimizu, Y. Kataoka, T. Ikuta, T. Koshikawa, H. Hashimoto, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1976, 9, 101.
N. R. Draper, H. Smith, Applied Regression Analysis, Willey, New York, 1966.
L. Reimer, K. Brockmann, U. Rhein, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1978, 11, 2151.
D. L. Misell, Adv. Electr. Phys. 1973, 32, 63.
C. J. Tung, J. C. Ashley, R. H. Ritchie, Surf. Sci. 1979, 81, All.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Wien
About this paper
Cite this paper
Starý, V. (1998). Assessment of the Inelastic Scattering Model in Monte-Carlo Simulations. In: Love, G., Nicholson, W.A.P., Armigliato, A. (eds) Modern Developments and Applications in Microbeam Analysis. Mikrochimica Acta Supplement, vol 15. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7506-4_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7506-4_46
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83106-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-7506-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive