Skip to main content

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl der Begriff des Co-Brandings relativ neu ist, existieren bereits eine Reihe unterschiedlicher Definitionen. Dabei lassen sich sieben inhaltliche Schwerpunkte in der Literatur identifizieren:

  1. 1.

    Alle Kooperationen zwischen Marken,

  2. 2.

    Leistungsmarkierung durch mehrere Marken,

  3. 3.

    Sichtbare Markenzusammenarbeit,

  4. 4.

    Verbindung starker Marken,

  5. 5.

    Unterschiedliche Organisationen,

  6. 6.

    Langfristigkeit,

  7. 7.

    Brancheneingrenzung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Abell, M./Cookson, B. (1997): Beware the Pitfalls of Co-Branding, in: Managing Intellectual Property, o. Jg., o. Nr., S. 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarth, C. (2000a): Effects of Brand-and Product-Fit on the Evaluation of Cobranding, in: Proceedings of the 29th EMAC Conference, Rotterdam (CD-ROM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarth, C. (2000b): Methoden zur Markenfitanalyse, in: Planung und Analyse, o. Jg., Nr. 5, S. 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarth, C. (2001a): Markenpolitik, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarth, C. (2001b): Co-Branding, in: Werbeforschung und Praxis, 46. Jg., Nr. 1, S. 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarth, C. (2002): Methode der Replikation - diskutiert am Beispiel des Co-Branding-Kausalmodells von Simonin/Ruth ( 1998 ), Arbeitspapier des Lehrstuhl für Marketing der Universität Siegen, Siegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarth, C. (2003a): Wirkungen des Co-Branding, Habil. (in Vorbereitung).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarth, C. (2003b): Erfolgsfaktoren des Co-Branding - Ergebnisse einer www-gestützten Befragung, Arbeitspapier des Lehrstuhl für Marketing (in Vorbereitung).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarth, C./Turgay, D. (2002): Einfluss der Werbung auf die Co-Brand- Beurteilung, Arbeitspapier des Lehrstuhl für Marketing der Universität Siegen, Siegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarth, C./Vetter, I. (2003): Zweisamkeit der Markenpolitik, in: Markenartikel, 65. Jg., Nr. 2, S. 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C.U. (1996): Brand Alliances, in: Absatzwirtschaft, 39. Jg., Nr. 4, S. 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackett, T./Russel, N. (1999): What is Co-Branding?, in: Blackett, T./Boad, B. (Hrsg.), Co-Branding, Houndmills u.a., S. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boad, B. (1999a): Co-Branding Opportunities and Benefits, in: Blackett, T./Boad, B. (Hrsg.), Co-Branding, Houndmills u.a., S. 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boad, B. (1999b): The Risks and Pittfalls of Co-Branding, in: Blackett, T./Boad, B. (Hrsg.), Co-Branding, Houndmills u.a., S. 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J.M. (1997): Hotel-Restaurant Co-Branding, in: Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, o. Jg., Nr. 3, S. 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boush, D.M. (2001): Marken als Kategorien, in: Esch, F.-R. (Hrsg.), Moderne Markenführung, 3. Aufl., Wiesbaden, S. 809–824.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cegarra, J.-J./Mlchel, G. (2000): Co-Branding, in: http://www.panoramix.univ-parisl.fr/ GREGOR/2000–02.htm (Zugriff am 08.08.2001).

  • Cooke, S./Ryan, P. (2000): Global and Transnational Brand Alliances, in: Pils, J./Stewart, D.W. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the International Marketing Educators’ Conference „Marketing in a Global Economy“, Buenos Aires (CD-ROM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, R./Schlifter, J.M. (2001): Dynamische Allianzen, in: Markenartikel, 63. Jg., Nr. 2, S. 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, K.K./Keller, K.L. (2002): The Effects of Ingredient Branding on Strategies on Host Brand Extendibility, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 1, S. 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, P.H./Han, J.Y./Herr, P.M./Ijiri, Y. (1992): Strategies for Leveraging Master Brands, in: Marketing Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, S. 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontanari, M. (1996): Kooperationsgestaltungsprozesse in Theorie und Praxis, Diss., Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freter, H./Baumgarth, C. (2001): Ingredient Branding, in: Esch, F.-R. (Hrsg.), Moderne Markenführung, 3. Aufl., Wiesbaden, S. 315–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, R.P. (1997): Co-Branding in Advertising, in: Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, S. 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjicharalambous, C. (2001): Show me Your Friends and I Will Teil You Who You Are, Diss., Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J.A. (1991): The Combination of Prototype Concepts, in: Schwanenflugel, P.J. (Hrsg.), The Psychology of Word Meanings, Hillsdale, S. 91–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958): The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hem, L.E./Lines, R./Gronhaug, K. (2000): Factors Influencing Perceived Similarity Between Established Brands and Brand Extensions, in: Proceedings of the 29th EMAC Conference, Rotterdam (CD-ROM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyer, C./Tikoo, S. (1995): Effect of Cobranding on Consumer Product Elevations, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, S. 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher, A./Riesenbeck, H. (2002): Markenpersönlichkeit: Warum passt Günter Jauch zu Krombacher?, in: Akzente, o. Jg., o. Nr., Dezember, S. 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüttermann, M.U. (1991): Chancen und Risiken des Co-Branding, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiszewski C./Kwee, L./Meyvis T. (2001): Brand Alliances, Arbeitspapier der University of Florida, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiszewski, C./Osselaer, S.M.J. V. (2000): A Connection Model of Brand Quality Associations, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37, No. 3, S. 331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, C./Gabott, M./Chernatony, L.D. (2001): A Taxonomy of Brand Linkages, in: http://business.ac.uk/business/papers/taxonomy (Zugriff am 20.12.2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. (2003): Strategie Brand Management, 2. Aufl., Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A./Davis, J./Levin, I. (1996): Theoretical and Empirical Linkages Between Consumers’ Responses to Different Branding Strategies, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, S. 296–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I./Levin, A.M. (2000): Modeling the Role of Brand Alliances in the Assimilation of Product Evaluations, in: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 1, S. 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1982): The Structure of Value: Accounting for Taste, in: Clark, M.S./ Fiske, S.T. (Hrsg.): Affect and Cognition, Hillsdale, S. 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, E. (1995): Similarity and The Moderating Role of Involvement in the Evaluation of Brand Extensions, Diss., Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccarthy, M.S./Norris, D.G. (1999): Improving Competitve Position Using Branded Ingredients, in: Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, S. 267–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthuskrishnan, A.V./Weitz, B.A. (1991): Role of Product Knowledge in Evaluation of Brand Extension, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, S. 407–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munzinger, U./Schmidt, A. (1996): Planung der Kommunikation, in: Weidner, L. (Hrsg.), Kommunikationspraxis, Landsberg/Lech, S. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlwein, M./Scheele, T.P. (1994): Co-Branding, in: Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 23. Jg., Nr. 11, S. 577–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • O.V. (1998): Branding Franchising, in: Food Service, o. Jg., Nr. 3, S. 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C.E./Tannenbaum, P.H. (1955): The Principle of Congruity in the Prediction of Attitüde Change, in: Psychological Review, Vol. 62, No. 1, 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osselaer, S.M.J. V./Janiszewski, C. (2001): Two Ways of Learning Brand Association, Arbeitspapier der University of Chicago und University of Florida, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C.W./Jun, S.Y./Shocker, A.D. (1996): Composite Branding Alliances, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33, No. 4, S. 453–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, A./Griese, U. (1999): Markenführung mit dem semiometrischen Ansatz, in: Planung und Analyse, o. Jg., Nr. 4, S. 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priemer, V.M. (2000): Bundling im Marketing, Diss., Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A.R. (1997): Strategie Brand Alliances, in: Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, S. 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A.R./Rueckert, R.W. (1994): Brand Alliances as Signals of Product Quality, in: Sloan Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 3, S. 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A.R./QU, L./Rueckert, R.W. (1999): Signaling Unobservable Product Quality Through a Brand Ally, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36, No. 2, S. 258–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E./Mervis, C.B./Gray, W.D./Johnson, D.M./Boyes-Bream, P. (1976): Basic Objects in Natural Categories, in: Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 2, S. 382–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueckert, R.W./Rao, A.R./Benavent, C. (1994): Alliances de Marques, in: Decisons Marketing, o. Jg., Nr. 1, S. 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttenberg, A./Kavitzky, A./Oren, H. (1995): Compositioning, in: Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 3, No. 3, S. 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samu, S./Krishnan, H.S./Smith, R.E. (1999): Using Advertising Alliances for New Product Introduction, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63, No. 1, S. 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shocker, A.D. (1995): Positive and Negative Effects of Brand Extensions and Co-Branding, in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, S. 432–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B.L./Ruth, J.A. (1998): Is a Company Known by the Company It Keeps?, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 35, No. 1, S. 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.E./Osherson, D.N./Rips, L.J./Keane, M. (1988): COMBINING PROTOTYPES, IN: COGNITIVE SCIENCE, VOL. 12, NO. 4, S. 485–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spethmann, B./Benezra, K. (1994): Co-Brand or Be Damned, in: Brandweek, Nr. 21, S. 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A.L. (1995): Cobranding just Starting in Europe, in: Marketing News, Vol. 29, No. 4, S. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidyanathan, R./Aggarwal, P. (2000): Strategie Brand Alliances: Implications of Ingredient Branding for National and Private Brands, in: Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 9, No. 4, S. 214–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, R./Mahajan, V. (1997): Products with Branded Components, in: Marketing Science, Vol. 16, No. 2, S. 146–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, R./Mahajan, V./Muller, E. (2000): Dynamic Co-marketing Alliances, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 17, No. 1, S. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, K.E./Tansuhaj, P. (1999): A Consumer Perspective on Foreign Market Entry, in: Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 11, No. 2, S. 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachendorf, F./Baumgarth, C. (2002): Preisbereitschaften und Kaufabsichten für Co-Brands, Arbeitspapier des Lehrstuhl für Marketing der Universität Siegen, Siegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walchi, S.B. (1996): The Effects of Between Partner Congruity on Consumer Evaluation of Co-Branded Products, Diss., Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, J.H. (1999): An Evaluation of Co-Branding, Diss., Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, J.H./Till, B.D./Prilluck, R. (2000): Co-Branding, in: Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 17, No. 7, S. 591–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiezorek, H./Wallinger, A. (1997): Wachstum mit Gewinn, Stuttgart und Frankfurt/ Main.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baumgarth, C. (2004). Co-Branding. In: Bruhn, M. (eds) Handbuch Markenführung. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01557-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01557-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-663-01558-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-01557-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics