Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of Soviet Constructivism Experience in Urban Planning of a Contemporary City for Digitized Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Ethics and Digitization

Part of the book series: Wirtschaftsethik in der globalisierten Welt ((WGW))

Abstract

The aim of the research is to make a portrait of the smart city describing digital trends of the present time, applying the constructivist principles of the past and taking into account opinions of various stakeholders. The dwellers of the smart city today are information society, which lives a digitalized way of life; city equips us with the latest technologies and forces to utilize them both in work and leisure. Yet, some inhabitants are not ready for this digital challenge. We suggest using an ethics-wise approach which presupposes considering opinions of all stakeholders—city dwellers, construction engineers, businessmen, government bodies, etc. We should also look back to the past and study the experience of the Soviet constructivism in architecture of the twentieth century, when creation of new spaces could satisfy all needs of industrial society and transfer this experience to urban planning of today’s smart city. Methods of research include analysis of theoretical sources on ethics, sociology, urban development, stakeholders’ positions, history of architecture; semi-structured interviews of city’s inhabitants and an expert in urban planning. The outcome of research is suggestions to design a creative space for a remote district of the smart city, which satisfies the needs of digitized society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albino, V., U. Berardi, and R. Dangelico. 2015. Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology 22 (1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare, M. 1992. Suburban Communities. Annual Review of Sociology 18: 475–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, L., and A. Harris. 2018. Engineering Cities: Mediating Materialities, Infrastructural Imaginaries and Shifting Regimes of Urban Expertise. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42 (2): 244–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanova, O., ed. 2013. Vdali ot gorodov. Zhizn’ postsovetskoj derevni [Away from the cities. Life in the post-Soviet village]. SPb: Aletejja.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botcharov, Y., Kudriavtsev, O. 1972. Planirovochnaja struktura [Planning structure of the city]. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, M. 2005. The Imaginary Real World of Cyber Cities. OASE № 66 Nai Publishers, 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslavskij, A. 2016. Kakoj mozhet byt’ rossijskaja suburbanizacija? [What could be the Russian suburbanization?]. Mir Rossii. Sociologija. Etnologija [The World Is Russia. Sociology. Ethnology], no 1, pp. 79–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 1996. Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrads, U. 1970. Programs and Manifestoes on Twentieth Century Architecture. London: Lund Humphries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, M. 2013. Smart Cities: Governing, Modelling and Analysing the Transition. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drexler, A. 1979. Transformations in Modern Architecture. New York: Graphic society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, T. 2014. Chto takoe antropologija [What is anthropology?]. Moscow: HSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fava, S. 1956. Suburbanism as a Way of Life. American Sociological Review 21 (1): 34–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, J., Y. Zhou, and F. Wu. 2008. New Trends of Suburbanization in Beijing since 1990: From Government-led to Market-oriented. Regional Studies 42 (1): 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferriss, H. 1986. The Metropolis of Tomorrow. New York: Princeton Architectural Press and the Avery Library, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, R. 1994. Urbanity and Suburbanity: Rethinking the ‘Burbs. American Quarterly 46 (1): 35–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class. New York: Harper Business.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, D., and M. Featherstone, eds. 1997. Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garreau, J. 1991. Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gideon, A., and V. Clay-Giedion. 1982. Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition. Cambridge: Havard college.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. 2011. Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, B., and N. Low. 2000. Cities as Consumers of Worlds Environment. In Consuming Cities: The Urban Environment in the Global Economy after the Rio Declaration, ed. N. Low, B. Gleeson, I. Elander, and R. Lidskog, 1–29. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldobina, L., and P. Orlov. 2017. BIM Technology and Experience of their Introduction into Educational Process for Training Bachelor Students of Major 08.03.01 «Construction». Zapiski Gornogo Instituta. 224: 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubchikov, O., Mahrova, A., Felps, N. 2010a. Sovremennye process urbanzatsii v Podmoskovie: phenomen okrainnogo goroda [Modern process of urbanization in Podmoskovie: phenomenon of the suburbs]. Gradostroitelstvo, #4, pp. 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubchikov, O., A. Mahrova, and N. Felps. 2010b. Primenenie koncepcii “okrainnogo goroda” dlja analiza sovremennyh processov urbanizacii v RF (na primere g. Himki) [The application of the concept of “suburban city” to the analysis of contemporary urbanization processes in the Russian Federation (on the example of the city of Khimki)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta [The Moscow University Herald], Serija 5. Geografija, No 3: 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goman, I., and I. Oblova. 2018. Teaching Ethical decisions’ Making to Students Specializing in Economy. 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference. SGEM 18 (604): 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., and S. Marvin. 2001. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, A. 2010. Frameworks for Citizen Responsiveness: Towards a Read/Write Urbanism. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, A. 2013. Against the Smart City. New York: Do projects.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorichev, K. 2013. V teni bol’shogo goroda. Social’noe prostranstvo prigoroda [In the shadow of the big city. The social space of the suburb]. Irkutsk: Ottisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorichev, K. 2015. Voobrazhennoe soobshhestvo: konstruirovanie lokal’nosti v neinstitualizirovannom prostranstve prigoroda [Imagined community: constructing the locality in deinstitualization space of the suburb]. Labirint. Zhurnal social’no-gumanitarnyh issledovanij [Maze. The journal of socio-humanitarian studies], 1:46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorichev, K. 2016. Diversity of the Suburb: Suburbanization in Siberian Region (the case of Irkutsk).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. 1991. Qualitative methods in management research. Newbury park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutnov, A. 1984. Evolutsia Gradostroitel’stva [The evolution of urban planning]. M.: Stroiizdat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., and B. Lee. 2010. How Diverse Are US Suburbs? Urban Studies 47 (1): 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. 2011. Suburban Beijing Housing and Consumption in Contemporary China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (5): 1083–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermanowicz, J. 2002. The Great Interview: 25 Strategies for Studying People in Bed. Qualitative Sociology 25 (4): 479–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, J. 2018. Politics of the Ring: Limits to public participation in engineering practice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42 (2): 334–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, R. 2008. Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up? City 12 (3): 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homann, K. 2016. Theory Strategies of Business Ethics 37–57. In Order Ethics: An Ethical Framework for the Social Market Economy, ed., Luetge, C., Mukjeri, N., 366. Springer International Publishing: Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, O. 2012. Reading Architecture. A visual lexicon: Laurence King Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art And Architecture. Milton Park: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K. 1985. Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. 1997. The Entrepreneurial City: Re-imagining Localities, Redesigning Economic Governance or Restructuring Capital. In Transforming Cities, ed. N. Jewson and S. McGregor, 28–41. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kladivo, P., P. Roubínek, Z. Opravil, and M. Nesvadbová. 2015. Suburbanization and Local Governance – Positive and Negative Forms: Olomouc Case Study. In Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, no 27, ed. D. Szymańska and K. Rogatka, 95–107. Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimanova, M., Stadnikov, V. 2016. The Quality of Maintenance of Inner-Block Territories in the Context of Parcellation of Multi-Family Housing Blocks in Tolyatti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N. 2002. Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces. London: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koolhas, R. 1997. Delirious New York. New York: The Monacelli Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, A. 1985. Constructivist Architecture in the USSR. London: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosareva, N., Polidi, T., Puzanov, A. 2015. Zhilishnaya Politika i Economika v Rossii: Rezul’tati i Strategiya Razvitiya [Housing policy and economy in Russia: results and development strategy]. M.: HSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozhaeva, L. 1987. Morfotipy Zastroiki Tsentra Moskvi [The morphotypes of construction of the Moscow government]. Arkhitektura SSSR 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, C. 2000. The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovation. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Corbusier, C. 2019. When the cathedrals were white. Moscow: Garage (tranls.in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leetmaa, K., and T. Tammaru. 2007. Suburbanization in Countries in Transition: Destinations of Suburbanizers in the Tallinn Metropolitan Area. Geografiska Annaler, Series b, Human Geography 89 (2): 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space / Trans. by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. 1996. Writings on Cities / Trans and ed. by E. Kofman, E. Lebas. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefevr, A. 2014. Prostranstvo. Social’nyj produkt i potrebitel’naja stoimost’ [Space. Social product and use value]. Sociologija Vlasti [sociology of Power] 2: 190–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D., D. Parisi, M. Taquino, et al. 2010. Residential Segregation in New Hispanic Destinations: Cities, Suburbs, and Rural Communities Compared. Social Science Research 39 (2): 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J., and H. Molotch. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovink, G. 2009. Dynamics of critical Internet culture. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. 2003. Behind the Gates: Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. 2016. Contractarian Foundations of Order Ethics. In Order Ethics: An Ethical Framework for the Social Market Economy, ed., Luetge, C., Mukjeri, N., 366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M. 1994. Reading the Suburbs. American Quarterly 46 (1): 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. 2003. The Organizational Complex: Architecture, Media and Corporate Space. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuire, S. 2006. Technology // Theory, Culture and Society. Special Issue: New Encyclopaedia Project “problematizing Global Knowledge”. 25 (2/3): 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikelbank, B. 2004. A Typology of U.S. Suburban Places. Housing Policy Debate 15 (4): 935–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. 2012. Not All Suburbs Are the Same: The Role of Character in Shaping Growth and Development in Three Chicago Suburbs. Urban Affairs Review 49 (5): 652–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. 1995. City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mosco, V. 2004. The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power, and Cyberspace. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mosin, I. 2017. All about styles and trends in contemporary art, 112. St Petersburg: SZKO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostafavi, M., and G. Doherty, eds. 2010E. Ecological Urbanism. Baden: Lars Müller and Harvard Graduate School of Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, T., Pardo, T. 2011. “Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions.” Proceedings 12th Conference on Digital Government Research, College Park, MD, June 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, M. 2006. Transmitting architecture: The Transphysical city.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, D. 1997. Narratives and Spaces: Technology and the Construction of American Culture. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, J., and U. Gasser. 2008. Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papastergiadis, N. 2000. The Turbulence of Migration: Globalization, Deterritorialization, and Hybridity. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquet, G. 2001. Smart Communities. LAC Carling Government’s Review 3 (5): 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. 2005. Struggling with the Creative Class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (4): 740–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 2002. Neo-Liberalising Space. Antipode 34 (3): 380–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penz, T. 1997. Cinema and Architecture. Melies, Mallet-Stevens, Multimedia / Ed. by F. Penz, M. Thomas. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, N., and W. Fulong, eds. 2011. International Perspectives on Suburbanization: A Post-Suburban World? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, N., A. Wood, and D. Valler. 2010. A post-suburban world? An outline of a research agenda. Environment and Planning A 42: 366–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, L. 2000. New Communication Technologies—A Conduit for Social Inclusion. Information, Communication & Society 3 (1): 39–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picon, A. 2003. Architecture and the Virtual Towards a New Materiality? Thesis, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, 3:25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picon, A. 2015a. “The Limits of Intelligence. On the Challenges Faced by Smart Cities”, in New Geographies, № 7, “Geographies of information”, 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picon, A. 2015b. Smart Cities: A Spatialised Intelligence. – Wiley, 168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picon, A. 2018. Urban Infrastructure, Imagination and Politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42 (2): 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pojani, D. 2013. From Squatter Settlement to Suburb: The Transformation of Bathore. Albania. Housing Studies 28 (6): 805–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polese, M., and R. Stren. 2000. The Social Sustainability of Cities: Diversity and the Management of Change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quilley, S. 2000. Manchester First: From Municipal Socialism to the Entrepreneurial City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (3): 601–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. 2001. ‘Rethinking Communities: Aligning Technology & Governance’. LAC Carling Government’s Review, Special Edition:6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, S. 1998. The Situationist City. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarüütel, A., S. Selvig, and A. Holt-Jensen. 2010. Urban Sprawl and Suburban Development Around Pärnu and Tallinn, Estonia. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift Norwegian Journal of Geography 64: 152–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite, D., ed. 1999. The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Cities. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S., S. Fina, and S. Siedentop. 2015. Post-socialist Sprawl: A Cross-Country Comparison. European Planning Studies 23 (7): 1357–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. 2000. The Cultural Economy of Cities: Essays on the Geography of Image-producing Industries. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. Mobile Technologies of the City. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J., and F. Wu. 2013. Moving to the Suburbs: Demand-Side Driving Forces of Suburban Growth in China. Environment and Planning A 45 (8): 1823–1844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, D. 1999. Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Breitbach, C., Buckman, S., and Essex, J. 2000. From World Cities to Gateway Cities: Extending the Boundaries of Globalization Theory. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 4(3), 317–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, D. 1995. Geographies of Exclusion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, J., ed. 2002. Mobile: The Art of Portable Architecture, 127. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simitch, A., and V. Warke. 2014. The Language of Architecture. 26 principles Every Architect Should Know. Beverly: Rockport Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State and Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smigiel, C., and I. Brade. 2011. Suburbanisierung im östlichen Europa im Zeitalter neoliberaler Stadtentwicklung. disP. The Planning Review 2: 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, O. 1996. Paper Cities: Visual Thinking in Urban Planning. Cultural Geographies 3 (3): 249–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, O., T. Paasche, and F. Klauser. 2014. Smart Cities as Corporate Storytelling. City 18 (3): 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolovskij, S. 2014. Gorodskaja povsednevnost’, subkul’tury i rossijskaja gorodskaja jetnografija [Urban everyday life, subcultures and urban Ethnography Russian]. Etnometodologija [Ethnomethodology], 18 M.: Nasledie MMK, 122–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solnit, R., and S. Schwartzenberg. 2000. Hollow City: The Siege of San Francisco and the Crisis of Urban America. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparr, J., K. Knipfer, and F. Willems. 2016. How Leaders can get the Most of Formal Training: The Significance of Feedback-Seeking and Reflection as Informal Learning Behaviours, 1–26. Wiley Periodicals: Human Resource Development Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. 1993. Urban Regimes and the Capacity to Govern: A Political Economy Approach. Journal of Urban Affairs 15: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorns, D. 2002. The Transformation of Cities: Urban Theory and Urban Life. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A. 2013. Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trutnev, E. 2011. Logika razvertyvanija sistemy pravovogo gradoupravlenija Moskvy: chemopasno i chem polezno proshloe dlja budushhego? [Logic of developing the legal town-planning regulation in Moscow: what is the danger of the past for the future?]. Proyekt Rossiya 62:12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trutnev, E. 2014a. Gorodskaya sreda: vozdeystvue pravovuh norm na povutcheniye katchestva [The urban environment: legal aspects]. Mosow: The Institute for Urban economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trutnev, E. 2014b. Sbalansirovannost’ goroda: pravovye aspekty [The balanced city: legal aspects]. Gorodskoj al’manah, Vypusk 6. Moscow: The Institute for Urban economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valletta, W. 1997. Ob investicionno-stroitel’noj dejatel’nosti v Moskve i N’ju-Jorke [Investment activities in Moscow and Ney-York]. Arhitekturnyj Vestnik 4: 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vladimirov, V., Savarenskaya, T., Smoliar, I. 1999. Gradostroitel’stvo kak sistema nauchnyh znanij [Urban development planning as a system of science]. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walks, A. 2013. Suburbanism as a Way of Life, Slight Return //. Urban Studies 50 (8): 1471–1488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. 2002. Theories of the Information Society. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. 2001. Physical Place and Cyber Place: THe Rise of Networked Individualism //. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25: 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, J., and T. Hartmann. 2017. How Digitizing Building Information Transforms The Built Environment. Building Research and Information 45 (6): 591–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., and N. Phelps. 2011. (Post)suburban Development and State Entrepreneurialism in Beijing’s Outer Suburbs. Environment and Planning A 43 (2): 410–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. 2010. Gated and Packaged Suburbia: Packaging and Branding Chinese Suburban Residential Development. Cities 27 (5): 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J., and Y. Guo. 2014. Fragmented Peri-urbanisation Led by Autonomous Village Development under Informal Institution in High-density Regions: The Case of Nanhai, China. Urban Studies 51 (6): 1120–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J., and T. Hu. 2009. Disordered Land-Rent Competition in China’s Periurbanization: Case Study of Beiqijia Township Beijing. Environment and Planning A 41 (7): 1629–1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J., and L. Ma. 2000. Economic Restructuring and Suburbanization in China. Urban Geography 21 (3): 205–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russland

    Iuliia Goman & Nikolai Roslov

Authors
  1. Iuliia Goman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nikolai Roslov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iuliia Goman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität München, München, Germany

    Christoph Lütge

  2. Technische Universität München, München, Germany

    Matthias Uhl

  3. Technische Universität München, München, Germany

    Alexander Kriebitz

  4. Technische Universität München, München, Germany

    Raphael Max

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Goman, I., Roslov, N. (2022). Use of Soviet Constructivism Experience in Urban Planning of a Contemporary City for Digitized Society. In: Lütge, C., Uhl, M., Kriebitz, A., Max, R. (eds) Business Ethics and Digitization. Wirtschaftsethik in der globalisierten Welt. J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64094-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64094-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-64093-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-64094-4

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation