Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Always on – Grenzen ziehen zwischen Arbeits- und Privatleben in der digitalisierten Arbeitswelt

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fehlzeiten-Report 2021

Part of the book series: Fehlzeiten-Report ((FEHLREPORT,volume 2021))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Allen TD, Cho E, Meier LL (2014) Work–family boundary dynamics. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav 1(1):99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen TD, Golden TD, Shockley KM (2015) How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychol Sci Public Interest 16(2):40–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amstad FT, Meier LL, Fasel U et al (2011) A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. J Occup Health Psychol 16(2):151–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arlinghaus A, Nachreiner F (2014) Health effects of supplemental work from home in the European Union. Chronobiol Int 31(10):1100–1107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth BE, Kreiner GE, Fugate M (2000) All in a day’s work: boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad Manag Rev 25(3):472–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayyagari R, Grover V, Purvis R (2011) Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Q 35(4):831–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes BB, Briggs TE, Huff JW et al (1999) Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: a meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. J Appl Psychol 84(4):496–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber LK, Santuzzi AM (2015) Please respond ASAP: workplace telepressure and employee recovery. J Occup Health Psychol 20(2):172–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett RC, Hyde JS (2001) Women, men, work, and family: an expansionist theory. Am Psychol 56(10):781–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braukmann J, Schmitt A, Ďuranová L et al (2017) Identifying ICT-related affective events across life domains and examining their unique relationships with employee recovery. J Bus Psychol 33(4):529–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Brummelhuis LL, Bakker AB, Hetland J et al (2012) Do new ways of working foster work engagement? Psicothema 24(1):113–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byron K (2005) A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. J Vocat Behav 67(2):169–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen A, Karahanna E (2014) Boundaryless technology: understanding the effects of technology-mediated interruptions across the boundaries between work and personal life. AIS THCI 6(2):16–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini RB, Trost MR (1998) Social influence: social norms, conformity and compliance. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske S, Lindzey G (Hrsg) The handbook of social psychology, 4. Aufl. McGraw-Hill, New York, S 151–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper CL, Lu L (2019) Excessive availability for work: good or bad? Charting underlying motivations and searching for game-changers. Hum Resour Manag Rev 29(4):100682

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain TL, Stevens SC (2018) Family-supportive supervisor behaviors: a review and recommendations for research and practice. J Organ Behav 39(7):869–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day A, Paquet S, Scott N et al (2012) Perceived information and communication technology (ICT) demands on employee outcomes: the moderating effect of organizational ICT support. J Occup Health Psychol 17(4):473–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day A, Barber LK, Tonet J (2019) Information communication technology and employee well-being: understanding the “iParadox triad” at work. In: Landers RN (Hrsg) The Cambridge handbook of technology and employee behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, New York, NY, S 580–607

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti E, Derks D, Lieke L et al (2014) New ways of working: impact on working conditions, work–family balance, and well-being. In: Korunka C, Hoonakker P (Hrsg) The impact of ICT on quality of working life. Springer, Dordrecht, S 123–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Derks D, Bakker AB (2010) The impact of E-mail communication on organizational life. Cyberpsychology 4(1):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Derks D, Ten Brummelhuis LL, Zecic D et al (2014a) Switching on and off …: Does smartphone use obstruct the possibility to engage in recovery activities? Eur J Work Organ Psychol 23(1):80–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derks D, Van Duin D, Tims M et al (2014b) Smartphone use and work-home interference: the moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement. J Occup Organ Psychol 88(1):155–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derks D, Van Mierlo H, Schmitz EB (2014c) A diary study on work-related smartphone use, psychological detachment and exhaustion: examining the role of the perceived segmentation norm. J Occup Health Psychol 19(1):74–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dettmers J (2017) How extended work availability affects well-being: the mediating roles of psychological detachment and work-family-conflict. Work Stress 31(1):24–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettmers J, Biemelt J (2018) Always available—the role of perceived advantages and legitimacy. J Manag Psychol 33(7/8):497–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettmers J, Bamberg E, Seffzek K (2016a) Characteristics of extended availability for work: the role of demands and resources. Int J Stress Manag 23(3):276–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettmers J, Vahle-Hinz T, Bamberg E et al (2016b) Extended work availability and its relation with start-of-day mood and cortisol. J Occup Health Psychol 21(1):105–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eurofound (2020) Europäische Erhebung über die Arbeitsbedingungen – Datenvalidierung. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/de/data/european-working-conditions-survey. Zugegriffen: 31. März 2021

  • Fenner GH, Renn RW (2004) Technology-assisted supplemental work: construct definition and a research framework. Hum Resour Manag 43(2/3):179–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenner GH, Renn RW (2010) Technology-assisted supplemental work and work-to-family conflict: the role of instrumentality beliefs, organizational expectations and time management. Hum Relat 63(1):63–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke F, Felfe J, Pundt A (2014) The impact of health-oriented leadership on follower health: development and test of a new instrument measuring health-promoting leadership. GHRM 28(1/2):139–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagger MA, Luszczynska A (2014) Implementation intention and action planning interventions in health contexts: state of the research and proposals for the way forward. Appl Psychol Health Well Being 6(1):1–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer LB, Kossek EE, Yragui NL et al (2009) Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB). J Manag 35(4):837–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassler M, Rau R, Hupfeld J et al (2016) Iga.Report 23: Auswirkungen von ständiger Erreichbarkeit und Präventionsmöglichkeiten. Teil 2: Auswirkungen von ständiger Erreichbarkeit und Präventionsmöglichkeiten. Initiative für Gesundheit und Arbeit, Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • DGB-Index Gute Arbeit (2015) Arbeitsbedingte Belastung und Beanspruchung. Wie die Beschäftigten den Zusammenhang beurteilen. Ergebnisse einer Sonderauswertung zum DGB-Index Gute Arbeit für die Jahre 2012–14. DGB, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa SL, Lang KR (2005) Managing the paradoxes of mobile technology. Inf Syst Manag 22(4):7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kattenbach R, Demerouti E, Nachreiner F (2010) Flexible working times: effects on employees’ exhaustion, work-nonwork conflict and job performance. Career Dev Int 15(3):279–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingma S (2019) New ways of working (NWW): work space and cultural change in virtualizing organizations. Cult Organ 25(5):383–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knecht M, Wiese BS, Freund AM (2016) Going beyond work and family: a longitudinal study on the role of leisure in the work-life interplay. J Organ Behav 37(7):1061–1077

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Koch AR, Binnewies C (2015) Setting a good example: supervisors as work-life-friendly role models within the context of boundary management. J Occup Health Psychol 20(1):82–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek EE (2016a) Implementing organizational work–life interventions: toward a triple bottom line. Community Work Fam 19(2):242–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek EE (2016b) Managing work-life boundaries in the digital age. Organ Dyn 45(3):258–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause A, Baeriswyl S, Berset M et al (2015a) Selbstgefährdung als Indikator für Mängel bei der Gestaltung mobil-flexibler Arbeit: Zur Entwicklung eines Erhebungsinstruments. Wirtschaftspsychologie 17(1):49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause A, Berset M, Peters K (2015b) Interessierte Selbstgefährdung – von der direkten zur indirekten Steuerung. ASU 50(3):164–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner GE (2006) Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: a person-environment fit perspective. J Organ Behav 27(4):485–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner GE, Hollensbe EC, Sheep ML (2009) Balancing borders and bridges: negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Acad Manag J 52(4):704–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanaj K, Johnson RE, Barnes CM (2014) Beginning the workday already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 124(1):11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RA, Barnes-Farrell JL (2010) Development and initial evaluation of an enhanced measure of boundary flexibility for the work and family domains. J Occup Health Psychol 15(3):330–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RA, Barnes-Farrell JL, Bulger CA (2010) Advancing measurement of work and family domain boundary characteristics. J Vocat Behav 77(3):447–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowall A, Kinman G (2017) The new nowhere land? A research and practice agenda for the “always on” culture. JOEPP 4(3):256–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menz W, Pauls N, Pangert B (2016) Arbeitsbezogene erweiterte Erreichbarkeit: Ursachen, Umgangsstrategien und Bewertung am Beispiel von IT-Beschäftigten. Wirtschaftspsychologie 2:55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer C, Hofmann J (2021) Arbeiten in der Zukunft. Bleibt das Homeoffice nach der Corona-Krise? https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/wirtschaft/corona-homeoffice-pandemie-arbeit-100.html. Zugegriffen: 31. März 2021

  • Middleton CA, Cukier W (2006) Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage. Eur J Inf Syst 15(3):252–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll MP, Brough P, Timms C et al (2010) Engagement with information and communication technology and psychological well-being. In: Perrewé PL, Ganster DC (Hrsg) New developments in theoretical and conceptual approaches to job stress, Bd. 8. Emerald Group, Bingley, S 269–316

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ohly S, Latour A (2014) Work-related smartphone use and well-being in the evening: the role of autonomous and controlled motivation. J Pers Psychol 13(4):174–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Olafsen AH, Bentzen M (2020) Benefits of psychological detachment from work: does autonomous work motivation play a role? Front Psychol 11:824

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Papasabbas L, Pfuderer N (2021) Die Megatrends nach Corona: Zeit für eine Revision. https://www.zukunftsinstitut.de/artikel/megatrends-nach-corona-zeit-fuer-eine-revision/. Zugegriffen: 31. März 2021

  • Parasuraman S, Greenhaus JH (2002) Toward reducing some critical gaps in work-family research. Hum Resour Manag Rev 12(3):299–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Park Y, Fritz C, Jex SM (2011) Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: the role of communication technology use at home. J Occup Health Psychol 16(4):457–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rennecker J, Godwin L (2005) Delays and interruptions: a self-perpetuating paradox of communication technology use. Inf Organ 15(3):247–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruderman M, Braddy P, Hannum K et al (2016) Making your life work. A new approach to increasing your effectiveness on and off the job. http://cclinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/makingyourlifework.pdf. Zugegriffen: 31. März 2021 (Center for Creative Leadership)

  • Schröder C, Entringer TM, Goebel J et al (2020) Vor dem Covid-19-Virus sind nicht alle Erwerbstätigen gleich. SOEP papers on multidisciplinary panel data research, no. 1080. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmueller EW (2000) Will new information and communication technologies improve the’codification’of knowledge? Ind Corp Chang 9(2):361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer GM, Cameron L, Garrett L (2017) Alternative work arrangements: two images of the new world of work. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav 1:473–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2021) Erwerbstätige, die von zu Hause aus arbeiten. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Arbeit/Arbeitsmarkt/Qualitaet-Arbeit/Dimension-3/home-office.html. Zugegriffen: 31. März 2021

  • Straub C (2012) Antecedents and organizational consequences of family supportive supervisor behavior: a multilevel conceptual framework for research. Hum Resour Manag Rev 22(1):15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Tausig M, Fenwick R (2001) Unbinding time: alternate work schedules and work-life balance. JFEI 22:101–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Towers I, Duxbury L, Higgins C et al (2006) Time thieves and space invaders: technology, work and the organization. J Organ Chang Manag 19(5):593–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Liu Y, Parker SK (2020) How does the use of information communication technology affect individuals? A work design perspective. Acad Manag Ann 14(2):695–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wepfer AG, Allen TD, Brauchli R et al (2018) Work-life boundaries and well-being: does work-to-life integration impair well-being through lack of recovery? J Bus Psychol 3(6):727–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese BS, Seiger CP, Schmid CM et al (2010) Beyond conflict: functional facets of the work–family interplay. J Vocat Behav 77(1):104–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes SM, Barber LK, Rogers AP (2017) Development and validation of the workplace interruptions measure. Stress Health 34(1):102–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule für Angewandte Psychologie, Institut Mensch in komplexen Systemen, Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz FHNW, 4600, Olten, Schweiz

    Ida Ott, Julia Widler & Dr. Michaela Knecht

  2. Institut de Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, Université de Neuchâtel, 2000, Neuchâtel, Schweiz

    Prof. Dr. Laurenz Linus Meier

Authors
  1. Ida Ott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julia Widler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dr. Michaela Knecht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Prof. Dr. Laurenz Linus Meier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ida Ott or Julia Widler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Deutschland

    Bernhard Badura

  2. FB I Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin, Deutschland

    Antje Ducki

  3. Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO), Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Helmut Schröder

  4. Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK, Berlin, Deutschland

    Markus Meyer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ott, I., Widler, J., Knecht, M., Meier, L.L. (2021). Always on – Grenzen ziehen zwischen Arbeits- und Privatleben in der digitalisierten Arbeitswelt. In: Badura, B., Ducki, A., Schröder, H., Meyer, M. (eds) Fehlzeiten-Report 2021. Fehlzeiten-Report, vol 2021. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63722-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63722-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63721-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63722-7

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation