Skip to main content

Perkutane Eingriffe des oberen Harntraktes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Komplikationen in der Urologie
  • 1227 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Perkutane Eingriffe des oberen Harntraktes sind in erfahrenen Händen sicher und komplikationsarm. Zum Spektrum der häufigsten Komplikationen gehören neben fieberhaften Infektionen auch transfusionspflichtige Blutungen. Seltener werden thorakale und abdominale Organverletzungen oder auch ausgedehnte Perforationen des Hohlsystems beschrieben. Die Kenntnis der im vorliegenden Kapitel beschriebenen Komplikationen, deren Häufigkeit, Ursachen und Behandlung stellen das Basiswissen für jeden Urologen dar, der perkutane Eingriffe des oberen Harntraktes durchführt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Cheng F, Yu W, Zhang X, Yang S, Xia Y, Ruan Y (2010) Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones. J Endourol 24:1579–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huusmann S et al. (2018) Pressure study of two miniaturised amplatz sheaths of 9.5 F and 12 F outer diameter for minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP): an ex vivo organ model measurement.Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group. Aktuelle Urol 50(1):71–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karami H, Mazloomfard MM, Lotfi B, Alizadeh A, Javanmard B (2013) Ultrasonography-guided PNL in comparison with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the management of large proximal ureteral stone. Int Braz J Urol 39(1):22–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil MI, Alliston JT, Bauer-Erickson JJ, Davis R, Bissada NK, Kamel MH (2019) Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 3-organ-sparing procedures in urothelial cancer of upper tract, bladder and urethra. Int Urol Nephrol 51(11):1903–1911

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingler HC, Kramer G, Lodde M, Dorfinger K, Hofbauer J, Marberger M (2003) Stone treatment and coagulopathy. Eur Urol 43(1):75–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriazis I et al. (2015) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 33:1069–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahme S et al. (2008) Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL? Urologe A 47(5):563–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mariappan P, Smith G, Bariol SV, Moussa SA, Tolley DA (2005) Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. J Urol 173(5):1610–1614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin X et al. (2000) Severe Bleeding after Nephrolithotomy: results of hyperselective embolization. Eur Urol 37:136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE, Preminger GM (2001) Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 166:1242–1246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhayel Y et al. (2017) Tract Sizes in Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 72(2):220–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • S2k-Leitlinie (2019) zur Diagnostik, Therapie und Metaphylaxe der Urolithiasis – Registernummer 043–025, gültig bis 30.05.2024

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling D et al. (2009) Minimally invasive percutaneous treatment of lower pole stones with a diameter of 8 to 15 millimeters. Aktuelle Urol 40(6):351–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A, Hakenberg OW, Liatsikos E, Nagele U, Tolley D et al. (2012) Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol 61(1):146–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Türk C, Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petřík A, Seitz C, Thomas AK (2019) EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. (Limited Update March 2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Seitz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Seitz, C. (2021). Perkutane Eingriffe des oberen Harntraktes. In: Kranz, J., Anheuser, P., Steffens, J.A. (eds) Komplikationen in der Urologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60625-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60625-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-60624-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-60625-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics