Abstract
Life Cycle Assessment is a recognized method to assess the environmental impact of a product, of product alternatives and of deviations from different life cycle designs. Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) databases support the modelling by providing the necessary inventory data. This study aims to better understand deviations and potential inconsistencies between inventory databases causing effects on the life cycle assessment results. The production of an electric motor used in electro-mobility applications such as electric vehicles is modelled using GaBi Thinkstep software and three different life cycle inventory databases, namely Ecoinvent, GaBi professional, and the European Life Cycle Database (ELCD). Starting from the ReCiPe single score results, the analysis moves through corresponding endpoint and midpoint indicators to identify reasons for deviations. Despite some limitations, the results show both similarities and differences. Overall, it may be assumed that results deviate to a degree that can change the resulting assessment.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
[1] Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G et al. (2011) Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 45(1): 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101316v
[2] Krozer J, Vis JC (1998) How to get LCA in the right direction? Journal of Cleaner Production 6(1): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-6526(97)00051-6
[3] BMWi (2016) BMWi - Rahmenbedingungen und Anreize: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft. Accessed 02 Sep 2016
[4] Rodríguez C, Ciroth A (2016) Adaption LCA software to LCI databases and vice versa. Ökobilanzwerkstatt, Pforzheim
[5] Speck R, Selke S, Auras R et al. (2016) Life Cycle Assessment Software: Selection Can Impact Results. Journal of Industrial Ecology 20(1): 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12245
[6] Speck R, Selke S, Auras R et al. (2015) Choice of Life Cycle Assessment Software Can Impact Packaging System Decisions. Packag. Technol. Sci. 28(7): 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2123
[7] Herrmann IT, Hauschild MZ (2012) Improving life cycle assessment methodology for the application of decision support: Focusing on the statistical value chain. Dissertation. Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kgs. Lyngby
[8] Lüdemann L, Feig K (2014) Vergleich von Softwarelösungen für die Ökobilanzierung: Eine softwareergonomische Analyse. Logistics-journal.de. https://www.logistics-journal.de/not-reviewed/2014/09/3991. Accessed 09 Sep 2016
[9] Garraín D, Fazio S, La Rúa C de et al. (2015) Background qualitative analysis of the European reference life cycle database (ELCD) energy datasets - part II: Electricity datasets. Springerplus 4: 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0812-2
[10] Fazio S, Garraín D, Mathieux F et al. (2015) Method applied to the background analysis of energy data to be considered for the European Reference Life Cycle Database (ELCD). Springerplus 4: 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0914-x
[11] Takano A, Winter S, Hughes M et al. (2014) Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: A case study on building assessment. Building and Environment 79: 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.04.025
[12] Quandel AM (2015) Ökologische Bewertung. Manipulationsspielräume und ihre Eingrenzung. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen
[13] Dietz J, Helmers E (2015) Ökobilanzierung von Elektrofahrzeugen: Abschlussbericht im Modul 8a, Teil A
[14] Helmers E, Dietz J, Hartard S (2017) Electric car life cycle assessment based on real-world mileage and the electric conversion scenario. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(1): 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0934-3
[15] Notter DA, Gauch M, Widmer R et al. (2010) Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles. Supporting Information. Environ Sci Technol 44(17): 6550–6556. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903729a
[16] Fischknecht R, Jungbluth N (2007) Overview and Methodology: Ecoinvent Report No. 1, Dübendorf
[17] Klöpffer W, Grahl B (2009) Ökobilanz (LCA) - Ein Leitfaden für Ausbildung und Beruf. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
[18] Habermacher F (2011) Modelling Material Inventories and Environmental Impacts of Electric Passenger Cars: Com pariosn of LCA results between electric and conventional vehicle scenarios. Master Thesis,, ETH Zurich
[19] Ecoinvent Why ecoinvent. http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/buy-a-licence/why-ecoinvent/why-ecoinvent.html. Accessed 12 Jun 2018
[20] Hischier R (2011) ecoinvent - eine konsistente, transparente und qualitätsgesicherte Hintergrunddatenbank für Ökobilanzen & Co. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 83(10): 1590–1596. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201100137
[21] Thinkstep (2018) GaBi LCA Datenbanken. http://www.gabi-software.com/deutsch/databases/gabi-databases/. Accessed 12 Jun 2018
[22] Baitz M, Makishi Colodel C, Kupfer T et al. (2014) GaBi Database & Modelling Principles 2014. http://www.gabisoftware.com/fileadmin/gabi/Modelling_Principles/GaBi_Modelling_Principles_2014.pdf. Accessed 12 Jun 2018
[23] European Commission (2013) Background analysis of the quality of the energy data to be considered for the European Reference Life Cycle Database (ELCD). http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/Final-Report-CIEMAT.pdf. Accessed 12 Jun 2018
[24] European Commission (2018) ELCD Discontinuation. http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ELCD3/. Accessed 12 Jun 2018
[25] Thinkstep Lifecycle Assessment LCA Software: GaBi Software. http://www.gabi-software.com. Accessed 19 Aug 2016
Acknowledgments
Matthias Kalverkamp was financially supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the Globaler Wandel Research Scheme (Grant No. 01LN1310A). Furthermore, the authors are grateful to Johannes Dietz and Eckard Helmers for providing insights into the modelling of their study; the latter being the basis for a joint study on LCI database comparison (forthcoming).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kalverkamp, M., Karbe, N. (2019). Comparability of Life Cycle Assessments: Modelling and Analyzing LCA Using Different Databases. In: Pehlken, A., Kalverkamp, M., Wittstock, R. (eds) Cascade Use in Technologies 2018. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57886-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57886-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57885-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-57886-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)