Zusammenfassung
Um positive Effekte auf den Wissens- und Kompetenzerwerb von Lernenden zu bewirken, bedarf technologiegestütztes Lernen häufig einer sorgfältigen instruktionalen Anleitung. In kooperativen Lernsettings kann diese über die Vorgabe von Kooperationsskripts realisiert werden, die den Lernenden innerhalb einer Kleingruppe unterschiedliche Lernaktivitäten und/oder Kooperationsrollen vorgeben und auf diese Weise die Zusammenarbeit strukturieren. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die empirische Forschung zu Kooperationsskripts für das technologiegestützte Lernen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. D. (Hrsg.). (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (S. 1–25). New York: Springer.
Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2010). Online moderation of synchronous e-argumentation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 259–282.
Asterhan, C. S., Schwarz, B. B., & Gil, J. (2012). Small-group, computer-mediated argumentation in middle-school classrooms: The effects of gender and different types of online teacher guidance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 375–397.
Bär, D., Biemann, C., Gurevych, I., & Zesch, T. (2012). Ukp: Computing semantic textual similarity by combining multiple content similarity measures. Proceedings of the first joint conference on lexical and computational semantics-volume 1: Proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and volume 2: Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on semantic evaluation (S. 435–440). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457.
Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Gómez-Sánchez, E., Vega-Gorgojo, G., Dimitriadis, Y. A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., & Jorrín-Abellán, I. M. (2008). Gridcole: A tailorable grid service based system that supports scripted collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 51(1), 155–172.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2010). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: Comparing scripting by assigning roles with regulation by cross-age peer tutors. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 349–360.
Demetriadis, S., Egerter, T., Hanisch, F., & Fischer, F. (2011). Peer review-based scripted collaboration to support domain-specific and domain-general knowledge acquisition in computer science. Computer Science Education, 21(1), 29–56.
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Hrsg.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (S. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 5–23.
Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl & J. Haake (Hrsg.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning (S. 275–301). New York: Springer.
Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 1–13.
Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder & S. Barnes (Hrsg.), Technology-enhanced learning (S. 3–19). Dordrecht: Springer.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66.
Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015). Structuring peer assessment: Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 315–325.
Haake, J. M., & Pfister, H. R. (2010). Scripting e distance-learning university course: Do students benefits from net-based scripted collaboration? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(2), 191–210.
Hadwin, A. F., Miller, M., & Webster, E. A. (2013). CSCL group planner (version 3.0). Victoria: University of Victoria.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Ruiz-Requies, I., & Rubia-Avi, B. (2006). COLLAGE: A collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 58.
Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2014). Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students. Computers & Education, 71, 133–152.
Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39.
Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Veermans, M. (2008). Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 122–135.
Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 15–27.
Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohätälä, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 43, 39–51.
King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl & J. M. Haake (Hrsg.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (S. 14–37). New York: Springer.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 211–224.
Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (eingereicht). Methoden des Lernens. Erscheint. In D. Urhahne, M. Dresel & F. Fischer (Hrsg.), Psychologie für den Lehrerberuf. Berlin: Springer.
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts–a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185.
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 708–721.
Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. (2014). Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement. Learning and Instruction, 32, 22–36.
Kollar, I., Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2018). Scaffolding and scripting (computer-supported) collaborative learning. In F. Fischer, C. Hmelo-Silver, S. Goldman & P. Reinmann (Hrsg.), International handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353.
Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 123–144.
Laru, J., Järvelä, S., & Clariana, R. B. (2012). Supporting collaborative inquiry during a biology field trip with mobile peer-to-peer tools for learning: A case study with K-12 learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(2), 103–117.
Miao, Y., & Koper, R. (2007). An efficient and flexible technical approach to develop and deliver online peer assessment. In C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 7th computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL 2007) conference ‚Mice, Minds, and Society‘, July (S. 502–511). New Jersey: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Miller, M., & Hadwin, A. (2015). Scripting and awareness tools for regulating collaborative learning: Changing the landscape of support in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 573–588.
Mu, J., Stegmann, K., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C., & Fischer, F. (2012). The ACODEA framework: Developing segmentation and classification schemes for fully automatic analysis of online discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 285–305.
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79–106.
Noroozi, O., Teasley, S. D., Biemans, H. J., Weinberger, A., & Mulder, M. (2013). Facilitating learning in multidisciplinary groups with transactive CSCL scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 189–223.
Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2017). Promoting argumentation competence: Extending from first- to second-order scaffolding through adaptive fading. Educational Psychology Review, 1–24.
Pai, H. H., Sears, D. A., & Maeda, Y. (2015). Effects of small-group learning on transfer: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 79–102.
Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality. Instructional Science, 43(5), 591–614.
Pea, R. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.
Perna, L. W., Ruby, A., Boruch, F. R., Wang, N., Scull, J., Seher, A., & Evans, C. (2014). Moving through MOOCs: Understanding the progression of users in massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 421–432.
Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.
Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 15–22.
Ronen, M., Kohen-Vacs, D., & Raz-Fogel, N. (2006). Adopt & adapt: Structuring, sharing and reusing asynchronous collaborative pedagogy. In ICLS ’06: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning sciences (S. 599–605). Bloomington: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem-solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.
Rummel, N., Mullins, D., & Spada, H. (2012). Scripted collaborative learning with the cognitive tutor algebra. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 307–339.
Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seidel, N. (2013). Peer Assessment und Peer Annotation mit Hilfe eines videobasierten CSCL-Scripts. DeLFI 2013–Die 11. e-Learning Fachtagung Informatik der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., 83–94. Bonn: gesellschaft für informatik.
Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421–447.
Stegmann, K., Weinberger, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer,F. (2012). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learining environment. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297–323.
Strijbos, J. W. (2011). Assessment of (computer-supported) collaborative learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 59–73.
Strijbos, J. W., & De Laat, M. F. (2010). Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 495–505.
Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 265–269.
Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo & B. Burge (Hrsg.), Discourse, tools and reasoning (S. 361–384). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsovaltzi, D., Puhl, T., Judele, R., & Weinberger, A. (2014). Group awareness support and argumentation scripts for individual preparation of arguments in Facebook. Computers & Education, 76, 108–118.
Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Designing automated adaptive support to improve student helping behaviors in a peer tutoring activity. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 279–306.
Wang, X., Kollar, I., & Stegmann, K. (2017). Adaptable scripting to foster regulation processes and skills in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12, 153–172.
Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39.
Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2011). From guided to self-regulated performance of domain-general skills: The role of peer monitoring during the fading of instructional scripts. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 746–756.
Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2014). Lernen in Gruppen. In T. Seidel & A. Krapp (Hrsg.), Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 277–296). Weinheim: Beltz.
Weimer, M., Gurevych, I., & Mühlhäuser, M. (2007). Automatically assessing the post quality in online discussions on software. Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the ACL on interactive poster and demonstration sessions (S. 125–128). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 506–515.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. H. (Hrsg.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kiemer, K., Wekerle, C., Kollar, I. (2020). Kooperationsskripts beim technologieunterstützten Lernen. In: Niegemann, H., Weinberger, A. (eds) Handbuch Bildungstechnologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54368-9_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54368-9_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54367-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54368-9
eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)