Abstract
Respecting the line between the policy areas of taxation and state aid law is important not only from the Member States’ perspectives, but also from the points of view of the European Parliament and the protection of individual rights. State aid law’s current approach to tax measures and their assessment is not in balance: The borderline to the tax policy area is blurred. It is at a constant risk of being crossed by the Commission in its effort to be the wingman of a sluggish EU tax legislator in the quest against harmful tax competition. This contribution explains why safeguarding the balance between state aid and taxes is important, what the flaws in the current approach are, how they can be modified and in how far this would make a difference for future state aid tax cases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
For more Rüffler and Steinwender (2013), p. 560.
- 3.
Schön (2012), para. 10-001.
- 4.
- 5.
For more Jaeger (2015), p. 345 passim.
- 6.
- 7.
European Commission (2014a). Consultations on the proposal were re-launched at the turn of 2015/16.
- 8.
European Commission (2015a).
- 9.
European Commission (1998), rec. 1.
- 10.
See Lane and Ersson (1999), p. 217.
- 11.
Sutter (2014), para. 5.
- 12.
Cf., e.g. Jaeger (2013), p. 693.
- 13.
For more, see Knade-Plaskacz (2013), p. 119.
- 14.
See, e.g. Jaeger (2012), p. 173.
- 15.
Case C-88/03, Portugal v Commission EU:C:2006:511, para. 20.
- 16.
E.g. Case C-452/10 P, BNP Paribas v Commission EU:C:2012:366, para. 121; Case C-159/01 Netherlands v Commission EU:C:2004:246, para. 43; Case C-279/08 P Commission v Netherlands EU:C:2011:551, para. 77; Joined Cases C-106/09 P and C-107/09 P, Commission and Spain v Government of Gibraltar and United Kingdom EU:C:2011:732, para. 146.
- 17.
Case T-210/02, British Aggregates v Commission EU:T:2006:253, paras. 114, 115.
- 18.
Case C-487/06 P, British Aggregates v Commission EU:C:2008:757, paras. 86–88.
- 19.
On the existence of selective state aid, see contribution by Schön, Tax Legislation and the Notion of Fiscal Aid—A review of Five Year of European Jurisprudence, in this volume.
- 20.
Case T-210/02 RENV, British Aggregates v Commission EU:T:2012:110, paras. 52, 102.
- 21.
Case T-512/11, Ryanair Ltd. v Commission EU:T:2014:989, paras. 80, 81.
- 22.
Case T-512/11, Ryanair Ltd. v Commission EU:T:2014:989, para. 80.
- 23.
Cf. Case C-279/08 P, Commission v Netherlands EU:C:2011:551, para. 77; Case C-452/10 P, BNP Paribas v Commission EU:C:2012:366, para. 121.
- 24.
Case T-251/11, Austria v Commission EU:T:2014:1060, para. 117.
- 25.
See Jaeger (2015), pp. 356 et seq.
- 26.
C-279/08 P, Commission v Netherlands EU:C:2011:551, paras. 62, 67.
- 27.
Case C-518/13, Eventech v The Parking Adjudicator EU:C:2015:9, para. 49.
- 28.
See, e.g. Case C-452/10 P, BNP Paribas v Commission EU:C:2012:366, para. 121.
- 29.
Including the effect of a shift in the burden of proof, see C-279/08 P, Commission v Netherlands EU:C:2011:551, para. 77.
- 30.
Case T-210/02 RENV, British Aggregates v Commission EU:T:2012:110, paras. 46–48.
- 31.
Case T-399/11 Banco Santander, SA v Commission EU:T:2014:938, paras. 52 and 53; Case T-219/10 Autogrill v Commission EU:T:2014:939, paras. 48 and 49; Appeal Case before the Court of Justice C-21/15 P.
- 32.
European Commission (2007), paras. 31 and 35.
- 33.
Case C-15/14 P Commission v MOL EU:C:2015:362, para. 60.
- 34.
European Commission (2015b).
- 35.
Cf. Case C-431/14 P Greece v Commission EU:C:2014:2418, para. 10; Joined Cases C-533/12 P and C-536/12 P SNCM v Corsica Ferries EU:C:2014:4, paras. 37 and 58, regarding the misuse of discretion.
- 36.
Joined Cases T-195/01 R and T-207/01 R, Government of Gibraltar v Commission EU:T:2002:111, para 12. See also Haslehner (2012), p. 303.
- 37.
Schön (1999), p. 915.
References
European Commission (1998) Commission Notice on the application of the State aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation (OJ C, 384, 10.12.1998)
European Commission (2007) Commission Decision of February 13, 2007 on the incompatibility of certain Swiss company tax regimes with the Agreement between the EEC and the Swiss Confederation of July 22, 1972, C(2007) 411
European Commission (2014a) Proposal for a Council Directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), COM (2011) 121/4
European Commission (2014b) Commission Press Release, State Aid: Commission extends information enquiry on tax rulings practice to all Member States, 17 December 2014, IP/14/2742
European Commission (2015a) Commission Press Release, Combating Corporate Tax Avoidance: Commission presents Tax Transparency Package, 18 March 2015, IP/15/4610 and MEMO/15/4609.
European Commission (2015b) Commission Press Release, Commission decides selective tax advantages for Fiat in Luxembourg and Starbucks in the Netherlands are illegal under EU State Aid rules, 21 October 2015 IP/15/5880
European Commission (2015c) Commission Press Release, State Aid: Commission orders Estonia and Poland to deliver missing information on tax practices; requests tax rulings from 15 Member States, 8 June 2015, IP/15/5140
Haslehner W (2011) Die Anwendbarkeit des Privatinvestortests bei Steuerbeihilfen. In: Jaeger T, Rumersdorfer (eds) Jahrbuch Beihilferecht. Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Wien, pp 273–293
Haslehner W (2012) Materielle Selektivität von Steuerbeihilfen im Lichte des Gibraltar-Urteils des EuGH. In: Jaeger T, Haslinger B (eds) Jahrbuch Beihilferecht 2012. Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Wien, pp 301–324
Jaeger T (2011) Steuerliche Maßnahmen. In: Montag F, Säcker F (eds) Münchener Kommentar Europäisches und Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht III Beihilfen- und Vergaberecht. Verlag Ch Bech, München, pp 805–851
Jaeger T (2012) Zuschüsse und Übernahme wirtschaftlicher Risiken durch den Staat aus beihilferechtlicher Sicht. In: WiR Eilmansberger T, Holoubeck M, Kalss S, Lang M, Lienbacher, Lurger B, Potacs, M, Rebhahn (eds) Finanzmarktregulierung. Linde, Wien, pp 149–182
Jaeger T (2013) Beihilfe- und Förderungsrecht. In: Holoubek M, Potacs M (eds) Öffentliches Wirtschaftsrecht I. Verlad Österreich, Wien, pp 617–733
Jaeger T (2015) From Santander to LuxLeaks – and back. Eur State Aid Law Q 14(3):345–357
Knade-Plaskacz A (2013) Enforcement of State aid law at national level: the relationship between national courts and the European Commission. Juridical Tribune 2(3):116–125
Lane J, Ersson S (1999) The new institutional politics: outcomes and consequences. Routledge, London
Mamut M (2008) Aktuelle Fragen im Bereich der Steuerbeihilfen – Mitgliedstaaten zwischen Steuerwettbewerb und Systemimmanenz steuerlicher Beihilfen. In: Jaeger T (ed) Jahrbuch Beihilferecht. NWV Verlag, Vienna, pp 177–199
Musil A (2014) Europäisches Beihilferecht und nationales Steuerrecht. Finanz-Rundschau FR, Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, Köln 21/2014, pp 953–957
Quigley C (2009) European state aid law and policy. Hart Publishing, Oxford
Rüffler F, Steinwender R (2013) Allgemeines Wettbewerbsrecht. In: Holoubek M, Potacs M (eds) Öffentliches Wirtschaftsrecht I. Verlag Österrich, Wien, pp 557–615
Schön W (1999) Taxation and state aid law in the European Union. Common Mark Law Rev 36(5):911–936
Schön W (2012) State aid in the area of taxation. In: Hancher L, Ottervanger T, Slot PJ (eds) EU state aids. Sweet & Maxwell, London, pp 321–362
Sutter F (2014) 171a. Lieferung: art 107 AEUV. In: Mayer H, Stöger K (eds) Kommentar zu EUV und AEUV. Manzche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung, Wien
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jaeger, T. (2016). Tax Incentives Under State Aid Law: A Competition Law Perspective. In: Richelle, I., Schön, W., Traversa, E. (eds) State Aid Law and Business Taxation. MPI Studies in Tax Law and Public Finance, vol 6. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53055-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53055-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53054-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53055-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)