Zusammenfassung
Eine Entscheidungssituation wurde in Kap. 1 dadurch charakterisiert, dass eine Person mindestens zwei Optionen sieht, zwischen denen sie eine Wahl treffen will (oder soll oder muss). Optionen stellen also die wesentliche Komponente von Entscheidungsproblemen dar. Andere Komponenten von Entscheidungsproblemen sind die vom Entscheider antizipierten Konsequenzen dieser Handlungsoptionen, seine Bewertungsmaßstäbe, seine Werte, Ziele und Gründe sowie solche Ereignisse in der Umwelt, die durch ihn nicht kontrollierbar sind, aber einen Einfluss darauf haben, welche Konsequenzen sich tatsächlich ergeben. Im ersten Abschnitt dieses Kapitels erläutern wir die wichtigsten Komponenten von Entscheidungsproblemen.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 53–63.
Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 139–166.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding (4. Aufl.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2012). Judgment in managerial decision making (8. Aufl.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Betsch, T., & Haberstroh, S. (Hrsg.). (2005). The routines of decision making. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brehmer, B. (1980). In one word: not from experience. Acta Psychologica, 45(1–3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(80)90034-7.
Clemen, R. (1996). Making hard decisions. An introduction to decision analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.
Connolly, T., Arkes, H., & Hammond, K. R. (Hrsg.). (2000). Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Corbin, R. M. (1980). Decisions that might not get made. In T. S. Wallsten (Hrsg.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (S. 47–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dörner, D. (1976). Problemlösen als Informationsverarbeitung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Eisenführ, F., Weber, M., & Langer, T. (2010). Rationales Entscheiden (5. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.
Fischhoff, B. (1996). The real world: What good is it? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0024.
Gigerenzer, G. (2015). Simply rational. Decision making in the real world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Hrsg.). (2002). Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Goldstein, W. M., & Hogarth, R. M. (1997). Judgment and decision research: some historical context. In W. M. Goldstein, & R. M. Hogarth (Hrsg.), Research on judgment and decision making: Currents, connections, and controversies (S. 3–65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hastie, R. (2001). Problems for judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 653–683. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.653.
Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2010). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making (2. Aufl.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Hennen, L., Petermann, T., & Schmitt, J. J. (1996). Genetische Diagnostik – Chancen und Risiken: Der Bericht des Büros für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung zur Genomanalyse. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15(8), 534–539.
Hertwig, R., & Erev, I. (2009). The description-experience gap in risky choice. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(12), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004.
Holler, M. J., & Illing, G. (2009). Einführung in die Spieltheorie (7. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Hrsg.). (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kayten, P. J. (1994). The accident investigator’s perspective. In E.L. Wiener, B.G. Kanki, R. L. Helmreich, E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Hrsg.), Cockpit resource management (S. 283–314). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking. A path to creative decision making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–655.
Koehler, D. J., & Harvey, N. (Hrsg.). (2004). Blackwell handbook of judgment & decision making. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557–558.
Leon, D. (1996). Endstation Venedig. Zürich: Diogenes.
Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (Hrsg.). (2006). The construction of preference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Loewenstein, G. (Hrsg.). (2007). Exotic preferences: Behavioral economics and human motivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Montgomery, H. (1983). Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: towards a process model of decision making. In P. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Hrsg.), Analysing and aiding decision processes (S. 343–369). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Owens, D. K., Shachter, R. D., & Nease, R. F. (1997). Representation and analysis of medical decision problems with influence diagrams. Medical Decision Making, 17(3), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9701700301.
Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Reason, J. (1990). Human error. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Reb, J., & Connolly, T. (2009). Myopic regret avoidance: feedback avoidance and learning in repeated decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 182–189.
Schneider, S. L., & Shanteau, J. (Hrsg.). (2003). Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schönpflug, M., & Schönpflug, U. (1995). Psychologie: Allgemeine Psychologie und ihre Verwirklichung in der Entwicklungs-, Persönlichkeits- und Sozialpsychologie (3. rev. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.
Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: Ecco.
Shafir, E. (Hrsg.). (2004). Preference, belief, and similarity. Selected writings by Amos Tversky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.
Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Svenson, O. (1990). Some propositions for the classification of decision situations. In K. Borcherding, O. I. Larichev, & D. M. Messick (Hrsg.), Contemporary issues in decision making (S. 17–32). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Svenson, O. (1996). Decision making and the search for fundamental psychological regularities: what can be learned from a process perspective? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0026.
Wu, G., Zhang, J., & Gonzalez, R. (2004). Decision under risk. In N. Harvey, & D. J. Koehler (Hrsg.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 399–423). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Yates, F. J. (1990). Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking. Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.
Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J. Forgas (Hrsg.), Feeling and thinking (S. 31–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pfister, H.R., Jungermann, H., Fischer, K. (2017). Grundbegriffe. In: Die Psychologie der Entscheidung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53038-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53038-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53037-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53038-2
eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)