Skip to main content
  • 2823 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Ballübungen integrieren unzählige Aspekte des Bewegungsrepertoires eines Menschen und bewirken einen besonderen Lernprozess: Einerseits gilt es, das Gleichgewicht auf dieser ungewohnten und labilen Sitzgelegenheit zu finden und bei komplexen Bewegungsabläufen zu halten. Andererseits ermöglicht der Ball, Aspekte aus dem motorischen Lernen und der motorischen Kontrolle zu integrieren, z.B. die Lenkung der Aufmerksamkeit auf einen externen Fokus bei der Instruktion, spezielle Feedbackformen oder das Nutzen physikalischer Eigenschaften des Balls als Kontrollvariable. In diesem Kapitel wird das Erlernen der Ballübungen mit aktuellen Forschungsergebnissen über das motorische Lernen sowie die motorische Kontrolle verknüpft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Adams JA (1971) A closed-loop theory of motor learning. J Mot Behav 3(2):111–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein N (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd LA, Winstein CJ (2003) Impact of explicit information on implicit motor-sequence learning following middle cerebral artery stroke. Phys Ther 83(11):976–989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connors KA et al. (2010) Feldenkrais Method balance classes are based on principles of motor learning and postural control retraining: a qualitative research study. Physiotherapy 96(4):324–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dudel J et al. (2001) Neurowissenschaft: Vom Molekül zur Kognition, 2nd ed. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ezekiel H et al. (2000) Application of motor learning principles: the physiotherapy client as a problem solver: III Augmented feedback. Physiotherapy Canada 53(1):33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts P, Posner M (1967) Human performance. Brooks/Cole, Belmont, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillo T (2007) Motorisches Lernen. In: Spirgi-Gantert I, Suppé B (Hrsg) Die Grundlagen (FBL Klein-Vogelbach Functional Kinetics), 6. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, S. 117 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon RE (1996) Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77(8):811–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges NJ et al. (2011) Learning from the experts: gaining insights into best practice during the acquisition of three novel motor skills. Res Q Exerc Sport 82(2):178–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollmann W, Hettinger T (2000) Sportmedizin: Grundlagen für Arbeit Trainings- und Präventivmedizin, 4th ed. Schattauer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein-Vogelbach S (1976) Funktionelle Bewegungslehre, 1. Aufl. Springer, Heidelberg Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koch-Remmele C, Kreutzer R (2006) Funktionskrankheiten des Bewegungssystems nach Brüggen Diagnostik, Therapie, Eigentherapie (Physiotherapie Basics). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Magill R (2013) Motor Learning: Concepts and Applications, 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marder E, Bucher D (2001) Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements. Curr Biol 11(23):986–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNevin NH et al. (2003) Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning. Psychol Res 67(1):22–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meinel K, Schnabel G (1998) Bewegungslehre - Sportmotorik. Sportverlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Molier Bl et al. (2010) Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback: does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 32(22):1799–1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder T (2007) Das adaptive Gehirn. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Peh SY et al. (2011) Focus of attention and its impact on movement behaviour. J Sci Med Sport 14(1):70–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed »Up & Go«: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39(2): 142–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose J, Gamble J (1994) Human Walking. Williams § Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheid V, Prohl R (2009) Trainingslehre, 10th ed. Limpert, Wiebelsheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellhammer S (2002) Bewegungslehre: Motorisches Lernen aus Sicht der Physiotherapie. Urban & Fischer, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R (1991) Motor learning principles for physical therapy. In: Lister MJ (ed) Contemporary management of motor control problems: Proc II STEP Conference. Foundation of Physical Therapy, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea CH, Wulf G (1999) Enhancing motor learning through external-focus instructions and feedback. Human Movement Science 18:553–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M (2000) Motor Control: Theory and practical applications, 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Baltimore New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian SK et al. (2010) Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24(2): 113–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance J et al. (2004) EMG activity as a function of the performer’s focus of attention. J Mot Behav 36(4):450–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linden DW et al. (1993) The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Phys Ther 73(2):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstein CJ et al. (1996) Learning a partial-weight-bearing skill: effectiveness of two forms of feedback. Phys Ther 76(9):985–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu WF et al. (2011) Contextual interference and augmented feedback: is there an additive effect for motor learning? Hum Mov Sci 30(6): 1092–1101

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G (2009) Aufmerksamkeit und motorisches Lernen. Urban & Fischer, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G, Dufek JS (2009) Increased jump height with an external focus due to enhanced lower extremity joint kinetics. J Mot Behav 41(5):401-409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G et al. (2010) Increased jump height and reduced EMG activity with an external focus. Hum Mov Sci 29(3)440–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G et al. (1998) Instructions for Motor Learning: Differential Effects of Internal Versus External Focus of Attention. J Mot Behav 30(2)469–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G et al. (2009) External focus instructions reduce postural instability in individuals with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 89(2)462–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G et al. (1999) The learning advantages of an external focus of attention in golf. Res Q Exerc Sport 70(2):120–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G et al. (2002) Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. J Mot Behav 34(2):171–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G, Prinz W (2001) Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: a review. Psychon Bull Rev 8(4):648–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G et al. (2010) Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med Educ 44(1):75–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf G et al. (2003) Attentional focus on suprapostural tasks affects balance learning. Q J Exp Psychol A 56(7):1191–1211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zachry T et al. (2005) Increased movement accuracy and reduced EMG activity as the result of adopting an external focus of attention. Brain Res Bull 67(4):304–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grillo, T., Bürge, E. (2016). Einführung. In: Spirgi-Gantert, I., Suppé, B. (eds) FBL Klein-Vogelbach Functional Kinetics: Ballübungen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49478-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49478-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49477-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49478-3

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics