Abstract
This chapter discusses how travel by different travel modes is related to primarily subjective well-being but also to health or physical well-being. Studies carried out in different geographic contexts consistently show that satisfaction with active travel modes is higher than travel by car and public transport, and that satisfaction with travel is lowest for different forms of public transport. These differences are shown to be explained by a variety of factors, which stem from fundamental differences between the travel modes in terms of the intensity of physical activity, mental involvement in the act of travel itself, exposure to and interaction with the vehicle and the wider travel surroundings, and the degree of control over travel circumstances. Taken together, the overview suggests that active modes are an attractive alternative to car travel. Public transport can be a good alternative to car travel, if requirements of seat availability, accessibility, safety, and cleanliness are met. Regarding the shift from one travel mode to another, some evidence indicates that most car commuters, when switching to public transport, experience lower satisfaction with travel by car. Yet, those who experience public transport more positive than car are likely to keep using it. Other evidence suggests, however, that car commuters’ experience of public transport is better than they anticipate, but that they tend to “forget” this after some time. Switchers from car to active travel on average report higher levels of subjective well-being after the switch. Policies aimed at promoting the use of more sustainable modes should recognize that heterogeneity exists between travelers, and aim at targeting those with positive attitudes toward changing to active modes and public transport. Future research should address the dynamics in experienced travel satisfaction and mode choice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abou-Zeid, M., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2012). Travel mode switching: Comparison of findings from two public transportation experiments. Transport Policy, 24, 48–59.
Abou-Zeid, M., Witter, R., Bierlaire, M., Kaufmann, V., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2012). Happiness and travel mode switching: Findings from a Swiss public transportation experiment. Transport Policy, 19, 93–104.
Ampt, E. S. (2004). Understanding voluntary travel behaviour change. Transport Engineering in Australia, 9, 53–66.
Axhausen, K., & Gärling, T. (1992). Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: Conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems. Transport Reviews, 12, 323–341.
Bamberg, S. (2014). Psychological contributions to the development of car use reduction interventions. In T. Gärling, D. Ettema, & M. Friman (Eds.), Handbook of sustainable travel. Dordrecht: Springer.
Böcker, L., & Thorsson, S. (2014). Integrated weather effects on cycling shares, frequencies, and durations in rotterdam, the Netherlands. Weather, climate, and society, 6(4), 468–481.
Brownstone, D., & Small, K. A. (2005). Valuing time and reliability: Assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(4), 279–293.
Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 290–314.
Byrne, B. (2010) Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge, NY.
Brög, W., Erl, E., Ker, I., Ryle, J., & Wall, R. (2009). Evaluation of voluntary travel behaviour change: Experiences from three continents. Transport Policy, 16, 281–292.
Cao, J. (2013). The association between light rail transit and satisfactions with travel and life: Evidence from Twin cities. Transportation, 40, 921–933.
Carrasco, J. A., Miller, J. E., & Roorda, J. M. (2005). A tour-based model of travel mode choice. Transportation, 32, 399–422.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 119–139). New York: Pergamon.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305.
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy: A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.
Du Toit, L., Cerin, E., Leslie, E., & Owen, N. (2007). Does walking in the neighbourhood enhance local sociability?. Urban Studies, 44, 1677–1695.
Ekkekakis, P., Backhouse, S. H., Gray, C., & Lind, E. (2008). Walking is popular among adults but is it pleasant? A framework for clarifying the link between walking and affect as illustrated in two studies, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 246–264.
Ettema, D., & Smajic, I. (2015). Walking, places and wellbeing. The Geographical Journal, 181(2), 102–109.
Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Olsson, L. E., & Fujii, S. (2012). How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 215–222.
Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L. E., & Fujii, S. (2011). Satisfaction with travel and subjective wellbeing: Development and tests of a measurement tool. Transportation Research Part F, 14, 167–175.
Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L. E., & Friman, M. (2010). Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44, 723–732.
Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L. E., Friman, M., & Moerdijk, S. (2013). The road to happiness: Measuring Dutch car drivers’ satisfaction with travel. Transport Policy, 27, 171–178.
Ettema, D., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (Eds.). (1997). Activity-based approaches to travel analysis. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Eurostat (2012). Europe in figures. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Fellesson, M., & Friman, M. (2008). Perceived satisfaction with public transport services in nine European cities. Journal of Transportation Research Forum, 47, 93–103.
Friman, M., Fujii, S., Ettema, D., Gärling, T., & Olsson, L. E. (2013). Psychometric analysis of the satisfaction with travel scale. Transportation Research Part A, 48, 132–145.
Gatersleben, B. (2014). Our handbook.
Gatersleben, B. (2007). Affective and symbolic aspects of car use.
Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2007). Affective appraisals of the daily commute: Comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclists, walkers and users of public transport. Environment and behavior, 39, 416–431.
Grannis R (2009), From the ground up. Translating Geography into Community through neighbor networks, Princeton University Press.
Hartig, T. (2007). Congruence and conflict between car transportation and psychological restoration. In T. Gärling & L. Steg (Eds.), Threats from car traffic to the quality of urban life: Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 103–122). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Heinen, E., Van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 30, 59–96.
Hensher, D. A. (2000). Urban public transport challenges. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 1, 47–62.
Hess, S., Daly, A., Rohr, C., & Hyman, G. (2007). On the development of time period and mode choice models for use in large scale modelling forecasting systems. Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, 41, 802–826.
Housholds National Travel Survey. (2013). Statistics South Africa. P0320. Pretoria: South Africa.
Jain, J., & Lyons, G. (2008). The gift of travel time. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(2), 81–89.
Jakobsson Bergstad, C., Gamble, A., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., et al. (2012). Influences on subjective well-being of affect associated with routine out-of-home activities. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 7, 49–62.
Jakobsson Bergstad, C., Gamble, A., Hagman, O., Polk, M., & Gärling, T. (2011). Affective-symbolic and instrumental-independence psychological motives mediating effects of socio-demographic variables on daily car use. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 33–38.
Jakobsson, C. (2007). Instrumental motives for private car use. In T. Gärling & L. Steg (Eds.), Threats from car traffic to the quality of urban life: Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 205–217). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.
Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kahneman, D. (2000a). Evaluation by moments: Past and future. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 693–708). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D. (2000b). Experienced utility and objective happiness: A moment-based approach. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values and frames (pp. 673–692). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38), 16489–16493.
Kahneman, D., & Sugden, R. (2005). Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 161–181.
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method (DRM). Science, 306, 1776–1780.
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375–405.
Kent, J. L. (2014). Still Feeling the Car–The Role of Comfort in Sustaining Private Car Use, Mobilities, 1–22.
Krueger, A. B., &Schkade, D. A. (2008). The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics 92, 1833–1845.
Kuppens, P., Tuerlinckx, F., Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2013). The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 917–940.
Leyden, K. M., Goldberg, A., & Michelbach, P. (2011). Understanding the pursuit of happiness in ten major cities. Urban Affairs Review, 47, 861–888.
Loewenstein, L., & Ubel, P. A. (2008). Hedonic adaptation and the role of decision andexperience utility in public policy. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1795–1810.
Lyubomirsky, S. (2011). Hedonic adaptation to positive and negative experiences. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 200–226). New York: Oxford University Press.
Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. (2013). Does distance matter? Exploring the links among values, motivations and satisfaction in walking trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 50, 198–208.
Martin, A., Goryakin, Y., & Suhrcke, M. (2014). Does active commuting improve psychological wellbeing? Longitudinal evidence from eighteen waves of the British Household Panel Survey. Preventive Medicine, Available online August 23, 2014.
McFadden, D. (2001). Disaggregate behavioral travel demand’s RUM side—a 30 years retrospective. In D. A. Hensher (Ed.), Travel behavior research (pp. 17–63). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
McMahon, D. M. (2008). The pursuit of happiness in history. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 80–93). New York: Guildford Press.
Mees, P. (2010). Transport for suburbia: Beyond the automobile age. London: Earthscan.
Mokhtarian, P. L., (2005). Travel as a desired end, not just a means. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2), 93–96.
Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (2001). How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35, 695–719.
Mokhtarian, P. L., Salomon, I., & Redmond, L. S. (2001). Understanding the demand for travel: It’s not purely ‘derived’. Innovation, 14, 355–380.
Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. US: Island Press.
Newman, J. P., & Bernardin, L. V. (2010). Hierarchical ordering of nests in a joint mode and destination choice model. Transportation, 37, 677–688.
Novaco, R. W., & Gonzales, O. I. (2009). Commuting and well-being. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), Technology and well-being (pp. 174–205). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Novaco, R. W., Stokols, D., & Milanesi, L. (1990). Objective and subjective dimensions of travel impedance as determinants of commuting stress. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 231–257.
Olsson, L. E., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Fujii, S., Lekedal, H., & Friman, M. (2011). Relationship between satisfaction with daily travel and subjective well-being in three urban areas in Sweden: Description of survey questionnaire, sample characteristics, and preliminary results. Karlstad University Studies, 2011:23, Karlstad, Sweden.
Olsson, L. E., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., & Fujii, S. (2013). Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Social Indicators Research, 111(1), 255–263.
Ory, D. T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). When is Getting there Half the Fun? Modeling the Liking for Travel. Transportation Research Part A, 39, 97–123.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.
Pedersen, T., Friman, M., & Kristensson, P. (2011). Affective forecasting: Predicting and experiencing satisfaction with public transportation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(8), 1926–1946.
Pucher, J., & Kurth, C. (1996). Verkehrsverbund: The success of regional public transport in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Transport Policy, 2, 279–291.
Rapino, M. A., & Field, A. K. (2012). Mega commuting in the U.S. Time and distance in defining long commutes using the 2006-2010 American Community Survey. Poster presented at the Presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (APPAM) Fall Conference, Baltimore, MD, November 8–10, 2012.
Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Hartig, T. (2013). Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users. Transport Policy, 25, 119–127.
Richter, J., Friman, M., & Gärling, T. (2011). Soft transport policy measures: Gaps of knowledge and research needs. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5, 199–215.
Rissel, C., Curac, N., Greenaway, M., & Bauman, A. (2012). Physical activity associated with public transport use—a review and modelling of potential benefits. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9, 2454–2478.
Rodríguez, D.A., S. Aytur., A. Forsyth et al. (2008), Relation of modifiable neighborhood attributes to walking. Preventive medicine 47(3), pp.260–264.
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.
Saelens, B.E., & Handy, S.L. (2008), Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 40(7 SUPPL.1), pp.S550–S566.
Schkade, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 9, 340–346.
Schwartz, N., Kahneman, D., & Xu, J. (2009). Global and episodic reports of hedonic experience. In R. Belli, F. Stafford & D. Alwin (eds.), Calendar and Diary Methods in Life Course Research, (pp. 156–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schwarz, N., & Xu, J. (2011). Why don't we learn from poor choices? The consistency of expectation, choice, and memory clouds the lessons of experience. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 142–145.
UITP database. (2012). Statistics brief—World metro figures. Retrieved September 22, 2014.
Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford Press.
St-Louis, E., Manaugh, K., van Lierop, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2014). The happy commuter: A comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes. Transportation Research Part F, 26, 160–170.
Steg, L. (2005). Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2), 147–162.
Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S. S., & DeVries, M. W. (1999). Ecological momentary assessment. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 26–39). New York: Russell-Sage.
Sugiyama, T., Leslie, E., Giles-Corti, B., Owen, N. (2008). Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: Do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships?. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 1–6.
Suzuki, H., Fujii, S., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Olsson, L. E., & Friman, M. (2014). Rules for aggregating satisfaction with stages of work commute. Transportation, 41, 495–506.
Ubel, P. A., Loewenstein, G., & Jepson, C. (2005). Disability and sunshine: Can hedonic predictions be improved by drawing attention to focusing illusion or emotional adaptation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 111–123.
Västfjäll, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Kleiner, M. (2002). The measurement of core affect: A Swedish self-report measure. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 19–31.
Västfjäll, D., & Gärling, T. (2007). Validation of a Swedish short self-report measure of core affect. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 233–238.
Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Boston: Reidel.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1063–1070.
Wen, L. M., & Rissel, C. (2008). Inverse associations between cycling to work, public transport, and overweight and obesity: Findings from a population based study in Australia. Preventive Medicine, 46, 29–32.
Whitzman, C., Tranter, P. J. (2012), Children’s independent mobility and active travel: The relative influence of social, built and policy environments, paper presented in AAG Annual Meeting, February 2012, New York.
Willis, D., Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. (2013). Uniquely satisfied: Exploring cyclists trip satisfaction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 18, 136–147.
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 345–411.
Yik, M., Russell, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2011). A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion, 11, 705–731.
Ziegler, F., Schwanen, T. (2011), ‘I like to go out to be energized by different people’: An exploratory analysis of mobility and wellbeing in later life. Ageing and Society, 31, 758–781.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E. (2016). Travel Mode Use, Travel Mode Shift and Subjective Well-Being: Overview of Theories, Empirical Findings and Policy Implications. In: Wang, D., He, S. (eds) Mobility, Sociability and Well-being of Urban Living. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48184-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48184-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48183-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48184-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)