Skip to main content

Abstract

The role of withdrawal in drug addiction has diminished in recent years as much research has shown the powerful effects of opiates to produce positive reinforcement. A major impetus for this conceptual framework was the observation that animals and humans could take opiates under limited access situations without any evidence of physical dependence.1 This view of a more limited role of withdrawal in addiction is reflected in the change of withdrawal being only one of seven criteria for a definition of addiction in DSM-IV2 rather than being an essential criteria for addiction.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Koob GF. Animal models of drug addiction. In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ, eds. The Fourth Generation of Progress. New York: Raven Press, 1995: 759–772.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association 1980; 278–279.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koob GF, Markou A, Weiss F et al. Opponent process and drug dependence: Neurobiological mechanisms. Semin Neurosci 1993; 5: 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dole VP. Narcotic addiction, physical dependence and relapse. N Engl J Med 1972; 286: 988–992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowinson JH. Methadone maintenance in perspective. In: Lowinson JH, Ruiz P, eds. Substance Abuse: Clinical Problems and Perspectives. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1981: 344–354.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dole VP, Nyswander M. A medical treatment for diacetylmorphine (heroin) addiction. J Am Med Assoc 1965; 193: 646–650.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dole VP, Nyswander M. Rehabilitation of heroin addicts after blockade with methadone. N Y State J Med 1966; 66: 2011–2017.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Department of Health Education,and Welfare, and the Food and Drug Administration. New drugs: Conditions for investigational use of methadone for maintenance programs for narcotic addicts. Federal Register 1970; 35: 9014–9015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gelenberg AJ, Bassuk EL, Schoonover SC. The Practitioner’s Guide to Psychoactive Drugs. 3rd ed. New York: Plenum Publishing Corp., 1991.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Himmelsbach CK. Symposium: Can the euphoric, analgetic, and physical dependence effects of drugs be separated? IV. With reference to physical dependence. Fed Proc 1943; 2: 201–203.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Collier HOJ. Cellular site of opiate dependence. Nature 1980; 283: 625–630.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koob GF, Bloom FE. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug dependence. Science 1988; 242: 715–723.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Solomon RL. The opponent-process theory of acquired motivation: The affective dynamics of addiction. In: Maser JD, Seligman MEP, eds. Psychopathology: Experimental Models. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co., 1977: 124–145.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Solomon RL, Corbit JD. An opponent-process theory of motivation: 1. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychol Rev 1974; 81: 119–145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kornetsky C, Esposito RU. Euphorigenic drugs: Effects on reward pathways of the brain. Fed Proc 1979; 38: 2473–2476.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stellar JR, Rice MB. Pharmacological basis of intracranial self-stimulation reward. In: Liebman JM, Cooper SJ, eds. The Neuro-pharmacological Basis of Reward. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989: 14–65.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schulteis G, Markou A, Gold L et al. Relative sensitivity to naloxone of multiple indices of opiate withdrawal: A quantitative dose-response analysis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994; 271: 1391–1398.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schaefer GJ, Michael RP. Morphine withdrawal produces differential effects on the rate of lever-pressing for brain self-stimulation in the hypothalmus and midbrain in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1983; 18: 571–577.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schaefer GJ, Michael RP. Changes in response rates and reinforcement thresholds for intracranial self-stimulation during morphine withdrawal. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1986; 25: 1263–1269.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gellert VF, Sparber SB. A comparison of the effects of naloxone upon body weight loss and suppression of fixed-ratio operant behavior in morphine-dependent rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1977; 201: 44–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Koob GF, Wall TL, Bloom FE. Nucleus accumbens as a substrate for the aversive stimulus effects of opiate withdrawal. Psvchopharmacology (Berlin) 1989; 98: 530–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hand TH, Koob GF, Stinus L et al. Aversive properties of opiate receptor blockade are centrally mediated and are potentiated by previous exposure to opiates. Brain Res 1988; 474: 364–368.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stinus L, Le Moal M, Koob GF. The nucleus accumbens and amygdala as possible substrates for the aversive stimulus effects of opiate withdrawal. Neuroscience 1990; 37: 767–773.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schulteis G, Markou A, Yackey M et al. Motivational consequences of naloxone-precipitated opiate withdrawal. NIDA Res Monogr 1995; 141 (2): 90. (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harris GC, Aston-Jones G. ß-adrenergic antagonists attenuate withdrawal anxiety in cocaine-and morphine-dependent rats. Psychopharmacology 1993; 113: 131–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. France CP, Woods JH. Discriminative stimulus effects of naltrexone in morphine-treated rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1989; 250: 937–943.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Emmett-Oglesby MW, Mathis DA, Moon RTY et al. Animal models of drug withdrawal symptoms. Psychopharmacology 1990; 101: 292–309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Koob GF, Stinus L, Le Moal M et al. Opponent process theory of motivation: Neurobiological evidence from studies of opiate dependence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1989; 13: 135–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vaccarino FJ, Bloom FE, Koob GF. Blockade of nucleus accumbens opiate receptors attenuates intravenous heroin reward in the rat. Psychopharmacology 1985; 86: 37–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nestler EJ. Molecular mechanisms of drug addiction. J Neurosci 1992; 12: 2439–2450.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mark GP, Rada P, Pothos E et al. Is acetylcholine release in the nucleus accumbens part of a negative reinforcement process in drug withdrawal? Abstracts of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society 1993; 2: 20. (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Baldwin HA, Rassnick S, Rivier J et al. CRF antagonist blocks alcohol withdrawal “anxiogenic” response. Psychopharmacology 1991; 103: 227–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rassnick S, Heinrichs SC, Britton KT et al. Microinjection of a corticotropin-releasing factor antagonist into the central nucleus of the amygdala.reverses anxiogenic-like effects of ethanol withdrawal. Brain Res 1993; 605: 25–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Heinrichs SC, Menzaghi F, Schulteis G et al. Suppression of corticotropin-releasing factor in the amygdala attenuates aversive consequences of morphine withdrawal. Behav Pharmacol 1995; 6: 74–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim DH, Fields HL, Barbaro NM. Morphine analgesia and acute physical dependence: Rapid onset of two opposing dose-related processes. Brain Res 1990; 516: 37–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fields HL, Heinricher MM, Mason P. Neurotransmitters in nociceptive modulatory circuits. Annu Rev Neurosci 1991; 14: 219–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Akaoka H, Aston-Jones G. Opiate withdrawal-induced hyperactivity of locus coeruleus neurons is substantially mediated by augmented excitatory acid input. J Neurosci 1991; 11: 3830–3839.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Valentino RJ, Aston-Jones GS. Physiological and anatomical determinants of locus coeruleus discharge. In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ, eds. Psychopharmacology: The Fourth Generation of Progress. New York: Raven Press, Ltd., 1995: 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wise RA, Bozarth MA. A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol Rev 1987; 94: 469–492.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Stewart J, De Wit H, Eikelboom R. Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-admininstration of opiates and stimulants. Psychol Rev 1984; 91: 251–268.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Russell MAH. What is dependence? In: Edwards G, Russell MAH, Hawks D et al, eds. Drugs and Drug Dependence. Westmead, England: Saxon House/Lexington Books, 1976: 182–187.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dole VP. Implications of methadone maintenance for theories of narcotic addiction. JAMA 1988; 260: 3025–3029.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Markou A, Weiss F, Gold LH et al. Animal models of drug craving. Psychopharmacology 1993; 112: 163–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Davis WM, Smith SG. Conditioned reinforcement as a measure of the rewarding properties of drugs. In: Bozarth MA, ed. Methods of Assessing the Reinforcing Properties of Abused Drugs. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987: 199–210.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. O’Brien CP, Greenstein R, Ternes J et al. Unreinforced self-injections: Effects of rituals and outcome in heroin addicts. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting, Problems of Drug Dependence, L.S. Harris (ed). NIDA Res Monogr 1979; 27: 275–281.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wikler A, Pescor FT. Classical conditioning of a morphine abstinence phenomenon, reinforcement of opioid-drinking behavior and “relapse” in morphine addicted rats. Psychopharmacologia 1967; 10: 255–284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wilder A. Dynamics of drug dependence: Implications of a conditioning theory of research and treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1973; 28: 611–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Goldberg SR. Stimuli associated with drug injections as events that control behavior. Pharmacol Rev 1976; 27: 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Baldwin HA, Koob GF. Rapid induction of conditioned opiate withdrawal. Neuropsychopharmacology 1993; 8: 15–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. O’Brien CP. Experimental analysis of conditioning factors in human narcotic addiction. Pharmacol Rev 1976; 27: 533–543.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wilder A, Fraser HF, Isbell M. N-allynormorphine: Effects of single doses and precipitation of acute “abstinence syndromes” during addiction to morphine, methadone or heroin in man (post-addicts). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1953; 109: 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  53. O’Brien CP, Jesta J, O’Brien TJ et al. Conditioned narcotic withdrawal in humans. Science 1977; 195: 1000–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maldonado, R., Stinus, L., Koob, G.F. (1996). The Role of Opiate Withdrawal in Addiction. In: Neurobiological Mechanisms of Opiate Withdrawal. Neuroscience Intelligence Unit. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22218-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22218-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-22220-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-22218-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics