Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Monographs in Mathematics ((SMM))

  • 1440 Accesses

Abstract

The last twenty years of the nineteenth century witnessed a rapid progress in the theory of complex functions, summed up in the monumental treatises of Émile Picard1 (1891–1896) and Camille Jordan2(1893–1896). The development of the theory of integral functions, started by Karl Weierstrass (1876) and rounded up by Jacques Hadamard (1893), revived the interest in Riemann’s memoir and forced attempts to use these new developments to solve questions left open by Riemann.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Picard, Charles Émile (1856–1941), Professor in Toulouse (1879–1881) and in Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jordan, Camille (1838–1922), Professor in Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  3. According to E.Landau (1903a) this name of the equivalent theorems 5.8 and 5.13 appears first in its German form Primzahlsatz in the thesis of H.von Schaper (1898).

    Google Scholar 

  4. According to S.Mandelbrojt (1967) Hadamard was actually in posession of Jensen’s formula before Jensen but did not not publish it, since he could not find for it any important application.

    Google Scholar 

  5. In fact its order equals 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baillaud,Bourget 1905,II,452–457.

    Google Scholar 

  7. This paper of von Mangoldt is a good example of exactness and thoroughness in manipulating nonabsolutely convergent series and integrals. It largely exceeded the standard of his time, which can be observed by reading Cahen (1894) or Stieltjes (1885a, 1885b, 1889), and seems to be one of the first papers having these qualities.

    Google Scholar 

  8. According to Landau (1920) this result is due to Bohr alone.

    Google Scholar 

  9. von Mangoldt denoted this function by L(n). The notation ∧(n) and the name ‘Mangoldt’s function’ was introduced later, possibly first in Landau’s book (Landau 1909a), since previously Landau (e.g. in Landau 1903a) used the notation L(n) for it. This function has been used earlier for other purposes by Bougaieff (1888a,b) and Césaro (1888).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See the proof of Theorem 5.4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. “I proved for the first time ...that the function ζ(s) does not have roots of the form 1 + ßi. Mr Hadamard, before knowing about my research, also found the same theorem in a simpler way.”

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hadamard’s original proof omits this observation; the proof is so easy that possibly he regarded it as evident.

    Google Scholar 

  13. “We shall see that by modifying slightly the author’s analysis one can establish the same result rigorously.”

    Google Scholar 

  14. We have simplified here the notation used by Vallée-Poussin, who did not utilize the function ∧(n).

    Google Scholar 

  15. It seems that it was J.J.Sylvester (1892, footnote) who first observed that (5.30) is a consequence of the asymptotic equality of θ(x) and x.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bernays, Isaak Paul (1888–1977), Professor in Göttingen and Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  17. This theorem is an analogue for Dirichlet series of the Vivanti-Pringsheim theorem (Pringsheim 1894, Vivanti 1893), stating that any function whose Maclaurin series has positive coefficients must have a singularity at the intersection of the positive real half-line with its circle of convergence.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fekete, Michael (1886–1957), Professor in Budapest and Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wintner, Aurel Friedrich (1903–1964).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Here we simplify slightly, without changing the main idea, the original argument of de la Vallée-Poussin who performed his computation conserving all terms in the expressions considered.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Proofs may be found in Titchmarsh (1951), Chandrasekharan (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vinogradov, Ivan Matveevich (1891–1983), Professor in Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  23. The proof of this result contains a small oversight, a correction of which can be found in a footnote on p. 272 of Landau (1912a).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt, Erhard (1876–1959), Professor in Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A simple proof is given in Landau (1910).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Narkiewicz, W. (2000). The Prime Number Theorem. In: The Development of Prime Number Theory. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13157-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13157-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08557-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-13157-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics