Skip to main content

Physicochemical Methods for Detection of Occupational Contact Allergens

  • Chapter
Handbook of Occupational Dermatology

Abstract

Many allergens are widely used in both environmental and occupational products. In many cases, it is difficult to know all the ingredients of a product since most products are not sufficiently labeled. To diagnose and prevent allergic contact dermatitis, the demonstration of allergens in products from the patient’s environment is important. Chemical analysis of a product can make it possible to demonstrate the presence or absence of known allergens. Simple spot tests or documented analytical methods, such as thin-layer chromatography (TLC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC), and atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS), can be used. Moreover, with chemical methods, the purity of a substance can be checked and new allergens can be isolated and identified. Advanced methods such as mass spectrometry (MS), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and infrared spectrophotometry (IR) are often required to identify isolated allergens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruze M, Fregert S (1993) Chemical skin burns. In: Menné T, Maibach HI (eds) Hand eczema book. Boca Raton, Florida, pp 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feigl F, Anger V (1972) Spot tests in inorganic analysis, 6th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feigl F, Anger V (1966) Spot tests in organic analysis, 7th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF Jr (eds) (1995) Fisher’s Contact Dermatitis, 4th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, PP 857

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (1997) Reference test method for release of nickel from products intended to come into direct and prolonged contact with the skin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fregert S, Trulsson L (1978) Simple methods for demonstration of epoxy resin of bisphenol A type. Contact Dermatitis 4:69–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dahlquist I, Fregert S, Gruvberger B (1980) Reliability of the chromotropic acid method for qualitative formaldehyde determination. Contact Dermatitis 6:357–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fregert S, Dahlquist I, Gruvberger B (1984a) A simple method for detection of formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 10:132–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Adams RM, Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Maibach HI (1976) Water solubility of zinc Chromate primer paints used as antirust agents. Contact Dermatitis 6:357–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruze M, Gruvberger B, Hradil E (1990) Chromate sensitization and elicitation from cement with iron sulfate. Acta Derm Venereol 70:160–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fregert S, Gruvberger B (1972) Chemical properties of cement. Berufsdermatosen 20:238–248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fregert S, Gruvberger B (1973) Factors decreasing the content of water-soluble Chromate in cement. Acta Derm Venereol 53:267–270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Heijer A (1972) Sensitization to chromium and cobalt in processing of sulphate pulp. Acta Derm Venereol 52:221–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ingber A, Gammelgaard B, David M (1998) Detergents and bleaches are sources of chromium contact dermatitis in Israel. Contact Dermatitis 38:101–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lachapelle JM, Lauwerys R, Tennstedt D, Andanson J, Benezra C, Chabeau G, Ducombs G, Foussereau J, Lacroix M, Martin P (1980) Eau de Javel and prevention of Chromate allergy in France. Contact Dermatitis 6:107–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Spruit D, Malten KE (1975) Occupational cobalt and chromium dermatitis in an offset printing factory. Dermatológica 151:34–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tandon R, Aarts B (1993) Chromium, nickel and cobalt contents of some Australian cements. Contact Dermatitis 28:201–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wahlberg JE, Lindstedt G, Einarsson Ö (1977) Chromium, cobalt and nickel in Swedish cement, detergents, mould and cutting oils. Berufsdermatosen 25:220–228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wass U, Wahlberg JE (1991) Chromated steel and contact allergy. Recommendation concerning a “threshold limit value” for the release of hexavalent chromium. Contact Dermatitis 24:114–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Knudsen BB, Larsen E, Egsgaard H, Menné T (1993) Release of thiurams and carbamates from rubber gloves. Contact Dermatitis 28:63–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fregert S, Gruvberger B (1978) Solubility of cobalt in cement. Contact Dermatitis 4:14–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bruze M, Fregert S (1983) Studies on purity and stability of photopatch test substances. Contact Dermatitis 9:33–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bruze M, Fregert S, Gruvberger B (1984) Occurrence of para-aminobenzoic acid and benzocaine as contaminants in sunscreen agents of para-aminobenzoic acid type. Photo-dermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1:277–285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bruze M, Gruvberger B, Thulin I (1990) PABA, benzocaine, and other PABA esters in sunscreens and after-sun products. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 7:106–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Andersen KE, Nielsen GD, Flyvholm M-A, Fregert S, Gruvberger B (1983) Nickel in tap water. Contact Dermatitis 9: 140–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bang Pedersen N, Fregert S, Brodelius P, Gruvberger B (1974) Release of nickel from silver coins. Acta Derm Venereol 54:231–234

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fischer T, Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Rystedt I (1984a) Contact sensitivity to nickel in white gold. Contact Dermatitis 10: 23–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fischer T, Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Rystedt I (1984b) Nickel release from ear piercing kits and earrings. Contact Dermatitis 10:39–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bergh M, Menné T, Karlberg A-T (1994) Colophony in paper-based surgical clothing. Contact Dermatitis 31:332–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ehrin E, Karlberg A-T (1990) Detection of rosin (colophony) components in technical products using an HPLC technique. Contact Dermatitis 23:359–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Karlberg A-T, Gäfvert E, Meding B, Stenberg B (1996) Airborne contact dermatitis from unexpected exposure to rosin (colophony). Contact Dermatitis 35:272–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Karlberg A-T, Magnusson K (1996) Rosin components identified in diapers. Contact Dermatitis 34:176–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Karlberg A-T, Gäfvert E, Lidén C (1995) Environmentally friendly paper may increase risk of hand eczema in rosin-sensitive persons. J Am Acad Dermatol 33:427–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Meding B, Ahman M, Karlberg A-T (1996) Skin symptoms and contact allergy in woodwork teachers. Contact Dermatitis 34:185–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rastogi SC, Schouten A, de Kruijf N, Weijland JW (1995) Contents of methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, butyl-, and benzylpara-ben in cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 32:28–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Seventh Commission Directive 96/45/EC of 2 July 1996 relating to methods of analysis necessary for checking the composition of cosmetics products (1996) Identification and determination of 2-phenoxyethanol, i-phenoxypropan-2ol, methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl and benzyl 4-hydroxybenzoate in cosmetic products. Official J Eur Cummunities £213:9–15

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kaniwa M-A, Isama K, Nakamura A, Kantoh H, Itoh M, Ichikawa M, Hayakawa R (1994) Identification of causative chemicals of allergic contact dermatitis using a combination of patch testing in patients and chemical analysis. Application to cases from industrial rubber products. Contact Dermatitis 30:20–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kaniwa M-A, Momma J, Ikarashi Y, Kojima S, Nakamura A, Nakaji Y, Kurokawa Y, Kantoh H, Itoh M (1992) A method for identifying causative chemicals of allergic contact dermatitis using a combination of chemical analysis and patch testing in patients and animal groups: application to a case of rubber boot dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 27:166–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaniwa M-A, Isama K, Nakamura A, Kantoh H, Itoh M, Miyoshi K, Saito S, Shono M (1994) Identification of causative chemicals of allergic contact dermatitis using a combination of patch testing in patients and chemical analysis. Application to cases from rubber footwear. Contact Dermatitis 30:26–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Fregert S, Meding B, Trulsson L (1984b) Demonstration of epoxy resin in stoma pouch plastic. Contact Dermatitis 10:106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jenkinson HA, Burrows D (1987) Pitfalls in the demonstration of epoxy resins. Contact Dermatitis 16:226–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hansson C (1994) Determination of monomers in epoxy resin hardened at elevated temperature. Contact Dermatitis 31: 333–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Oxholm A, Heidenheim M, Larsen E, Batsberg W, Menné T (1990) Extraction and patch testing of methylcinnamate, a newly recognized fraction of balsam of Peru. Am J Contact Dermat 1:43–46

    Google Scholar 

  44. Blom G (1959) Formaldehyde contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 39:450–453

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gryllaki-Berger M, Mugny Ch, Perrenoud D, Pannatier A, Frenk E (1992) A comparative study of formaldehyde detection using chromotropic acid, acetylacetone and HPLC in cosmetics and household cleaning products. Contact Dermatitis 26:149–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sheretz EF (1992) Clothing dermatitis: Practical aspects for the clinician. Am J Contact Dermat 3:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stonecipher MR, Sherertz EF (1993) Office detection of formaldehyde in fabric: Assessment of methods and update on frequency. Am J Contact Dermat 4:172–174

    Google Scholar 

  48. Benassi CA, Semenzato A, Bettero A (1989) High-Perfor-mance Liquid Chromatographic determination of free formaldehyde in cosmetics. J Ghromatogr 464:387–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bergendorff O, Ezzelarab M, Wallengren J, Hansson C (1994) Airborne contact dermatitis from formaldehyde released from heated plastic polymers. Am J Contact Dermat 5:223–225

    Google Scholar 

  50. Flyvholm M-A, Hall BM, Agner T, Tiedemann E, Greenhill P, Vander Veken W, Freeberg FE, Menné T (1997) Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients. Contact Dermatitis 36:26–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Karlberg A-T, Skare L, Lindberg I, Nyhammar E (1998) A method for quantification of formaldehyde in the presence of formaldehyde donors in skin-care products. Contact Dermatitis 38:20–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rastogi SC (1995) Analysis of fragrances in cosmetics by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J High Resol Chroma-togr 18:653–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Rastogi SC, Johansen JD, Menné T (1996) Natural ingredients based cosmetics. Content of selected fragrance sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis 34:423–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gruvberger B, Bruze M, Tammela M (1998) Preservatives in moisturizers on the Swedish market. Acta Derm Venereol 78:52–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kreilgárd B (1996) Pharmacia Research Hilleröd Denmark, personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gruvberger B, Persson K, Björkner B, Bruze M, Dahlquist I, Fregert S (1986) Demonstration of Kathon CG in some commercial products. Contact Dermatitis 15:24–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Rastogi SC (1990) Kathon CG and cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 22:155–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Henriks-Eckerman M-L, Kanerva L (1997) Gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric purity analysis of acrylates and methacrylates used as patch test substances. Am J Contact Dermat 8:20–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Dooms-Goossens A, Bruze M, Buysse L, Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Stals H (1995) Contact allergy to allyl glycidyl ether present as an impurity in 3-glycidyloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, a fixing additive in silicone and polyurethane resins. Contact Dermatitis 33:17–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Dahlquist I, Fregert S (1980) Contact allergy to atranorin in lichens and perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 6:111–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Guthrie WG (1984) Analysis of bronopol in water-based lotion. Provisional HPLC method. The Boots Company PLC, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wahlberg JE (1977) Routine patch testing with cadmium chloride. Contact Dermatitis 3:293–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Rastogi SC, Johansen SS (1995) Comparison of high-performance liquid chromatographic methods for the determination of i,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane in cosmetic products. J Chromatogr A 692:53–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Kerre S, Devos L, Verhoeve L, Bruze M, Gruvberger B, Dooms-Goossens A (1996) Contact allergy to diethylthiourea in a wet suit. Contact Dermatitis 35:176–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Schouten A, Vermeiden M (1994) The determination of dimethyloldimethylhydantoin (DMDMH) in cosmetic products. TNO Nutrition and Food Research report V 94:608

    Google Scholar 

  66. Meding B, Baum H, Bruze M, Roupe G, Trulsson L (1990) Allergic contact dermatitis from diphenylthiourea in Vulkan heat retainers. Contact Dermatitis 22:8–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Fregert S, Trulsson L, Zimerson E (1982) Contact allergic reactions to diphenylthiourea and phenylisothiocyanate in PVC adhesive tape. Contact Dermatitis 8:38–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Bruze M, Fregert S (1983) Allergic contact dermatitis from ethylene thiourea. Contact Dermatitis 9:208–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Karlberg A-T, Dooms-Goossens A (1997) Contact allergy to oxidized d-limonene among dermatitis patients. Contact Dermatitis 36:201–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Karlberg A-T, Magnusson K, Nilsson U (1992) Air oxidation of d-limonene (the citrus solvent) creates potent allergens. Contact Dermatitis 26:332–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Bruze M, Edman B, Niklasson B, Möller H (1985) Thin-layer chromatography and high pressure liquid chromatography of musk ambrette and other nitro musk compounds including photopatch studies. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photo-med 2:295–302

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Bruze M, Gruvberger B (1985) Contact allergy to photo products of musk ambrette. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2:310–314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Bruze M, Persson L, Trulsson L, Zimerson E (1986) Demonstration of contact sensitizers in resins and products based on phenol-formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 14:146–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Arisu K, Hayakawa R, Ogino Y, Matsunaga K, Kaniwa M-A (1992) Tinuvin P in a spandex tape as a cause of clothing dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 26:311–3161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Björkner B, Niklasson B (1997) Contact allergy to the UV absorber Tinuvin P in a dental restorative material. Am J Contact Dermat 8:6–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Niklasson B, Björkner B (1989) Contact allergy to the UV-absorber Tinuvin P in plastics. Contact Dermatitis 21:330–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Kaniwa M-A, Isama K, Nakamura A, Kantoh H, Hosono K, Itoh M, Shibata K, Usuda T, Asahi K, Osada T, Matsunaga K, Ueda H (1994) Identification of causative chemicals of allergic contact dermatitis using a combination of patch testing in patients and chemical analysis. Application to cases from rubber gloves. Contact Dermatitis 31:65–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gruvberger, B., Bruze, M., Fregert, S. (2000). Physicochemical Methods for Detection of Occupational Contact Allergens. In: Kanerva, L., Wahlberg, J.E., Elsner, P., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07677-4_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07677-4_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-07679-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07677-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics