Zusammenfassung
Die Revolutionierung des Bildungswesens ist nicht nur das Gebot der Stunde, sondern auch das Sprungbrett für eine mühelose, papierlose Wissensvermittlung auf verschiedenen akademischen Ebenen. Die vorangegangenen Kapitel können als Vorstufe dessen betrachtet werden, was in diesem Kapitel behandelt wird. Die durch die Pandemie hervorgerufene Beschränkung hat der menschlichen Gesellschaft die grundlegenden Rechte auf Bewegung und Interaktion entzogen und uns damit auf das neue „Normal“ vorbereitet. Die Neukonzeption von Lehrplänen und Pädagogik als wesentliche Quelle für die Wiedergeburt eines fortschrittlichen Bildungssystems ist weltweit wieder zum Vorschein gekommen, und das Eintreten dafür mit der Kraft innovativer Technologie hat seine Wurzeln geschlagen. Auch wenn dies eine Herausforderung sein mag, so wurde doch bereits ein umfassender Leitfaden für die Umstrukturierung der Gesellschaft als Ganzes auf den Weg gebracht. In diesem Kapitel wird Folgendes aufzuzeigen versucht: (1) verschiedene Möglichkeiten, wie eine Neuformulierung des Lehrens und Lernens erfolgen kann; (2) die Überprüfung des traditionellen Prozesses und seiner Nachteile in Krisenzeiten; (3) den pragmatischen Ansatz des digitalen Lernens; sowie (4) das Zusammenwirken verschiedener Ressourcen, um nur einige zu nennen. Am wichtigsten ist, dass wir ein besseres Heute schaffen müssen, um eine qualifizierte Jugend auf das Morgen vorzubereiten, und dies muss durch die Bereitstellung eines effektiven Lehrplans und die effizientere Nutzung von Bildungsressourcen geschehen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Wilson, P. S. (1971). Interest and discipline in education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Dewey, J. (1971). The child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Counts, G. S. (1932). Dare the school build new social order. New York, NY: The John Day Company.
Bobbitt, J. F. (1918). The curriculum. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Cheng-Man Lau, D. (2001). Analyzing the curriculum development process: Three models. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, 9(1), 29–44.
Jackson, P. (1992). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialists. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 3–40). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Eco-Schools (2020a). About eco-schools. https://www.ecoschools.global/how-does-it-work.
Gadotti, M. (2010). Reorienting education practices towards sustainability. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4(2), 203–211.
Scott, W. (2009). Judging the effectiveness of a sustainable school: A brief exploration of issues. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(1), 33–39.
Greene, M. (1995). Art and imagination: Reclaiming the sense of possibility. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(5), 378–382.
Ramirez, F. O., & Ventresca, M. (1992). Building the institution of mass schooling. In B. Fuller & R. Runinson (Eds.), The political construction of education (pp. 20–59). New York, NY: Praeger.
Harwell, D. (2020). Mass school closures in the wake of the coronavirus are driving a new wave of student surveillance. Washington Post, 1 April. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/04/01/online-proctoring-college-exams-coronavirus/. Accessed 22 April 2020.
Bates, T., & Sangrà, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: strategies for transforming teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2011). Meaningful learning with technology (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Cuban, L. (2004). The blackboard and the bottomline. Why schools can’t be businesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.
Cuban, L., & Jandrić, P. (2015). The dubious promise of educational technologies: Historical patterns and future challenges. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(3–4), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753015579978.
Knox, J., Williamson, B., & Bayne, S. (2020). Machine behaviourism: Future visions of ‚learnification‘ and ‚datafication‘ across humans and digital technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1623251.
Manolev, J., Sullivan, A., & Slee, R. (2019). The datafication of discipline: ClassDojo, surveillance and a performative classroom culture. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1558237.
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366.
Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and learning analytics – It’s a DELICATE issue. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge – LAK ‘16 (pp. 89–98). https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883893.
Corrin, L., Kennedy, G., French, S., Shum, B., Simon, K., Pardo, A., West, D., Mirriahi, N., & Colvin, C. (2019). The ethics of learning analytics in Australian higher education. A Discussion Paper. https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/research/research-projects/edutech/the-ethical-use-of-learning-analytics. Accessed 15 June 2020.
Prinsloo, P. (2019). Learning analytics: Mapping a critique and agenda. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 20–24.
Tsai, Y., Perrotta, C., & Gašević, D. (2019). Empowering learners with personalised learning approaches? Agency, equity and transparency in the context of learning analytics. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45, 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1676396.
Teräs, H. & Teräs, M. (2019). Student-centered learning analytics development in higher education: Initial observations from needs analysis. In J. Theo Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning (pp. 488–492). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of computing in education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/210419/. Accessed 15 June 2020.
Williamson, B. (2020b). New pandemic edtech power networks. Code acts in education, 1 April. https://codeactsineducation.wordpress.com/2020/04/01/new-pandemic-edtech-power-networks/. Accessed 22 April 2020.
Fernback, J. (2018). Academic/digital work: ICTs, knowledge capital, and the question of educational quality. tripleC, 16(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v16i1.878.
Fuchs, C. (2020a). Communicative socialism/digital socialism. tripleC, 18(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1144.
Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the age of digital reason. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital Dialogues. New York: Bloomsbury.
Suoranta, J., & Vadén, T. (2010). Wikiworld. London: Pluto.
Bulfin, S., Johnson, N., & Bigum, C. (Eds.). (2015). Critical perspectives on technology and education. New York: Palgrave.
Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Eynon, R., Ferreira, G., Knox, J., Macgilchrist, F., & Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2020a). What’s next for Ed-Tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1694945.
Selwyn, N., Pangrazio, L., Nemorin, S., & Perrotta, C. (2020b). What might the school of 2030 be like? An exercise in social science fiction. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1694944.
Williamson, B. (2020). Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e)valuation of higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1737556.
Suoranta, J. (2020). Critical pedagogy and Wikilearning. In S. Steinberg & B. Down (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of critical pedagogies (pp. 1126–1138). London: Sage.
Giroux, H. A. (2020b). The plague of neoliberalism and the politics of pandemics. In B. Evans (Ed.), The quarantine files. Thinkers in Self-Isolation. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Review of Books. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/quarantine-files-thinkers-self-isolation/. Accessed 15 May 2020.
Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed (50th Anniversary ed.). New York: Bloomsbury.
Fuchs, C. (2020b). Communication and capitalism: A critical theory. London: University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book45.
Spinney, L. (2017). Pale rider: The Spanish flu of 1918 and how it changed the world. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
Summers, W. C. (2012). The great Manchurian plague of 1910–1911: The geopolitics of an epidemic disease. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jardine, D. (2012). Pedagogy left in peace: Cultivating free spaces in teaching. New York, NY: Continuum Books.
Arendt, H. (1969). Between past and future. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Aoki, T. T. (2005). Curriculum implementation as instrumental action and as situational praxis. In W. F. Pinar & R. L. Irwin (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 89–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hershock, P. (2012). Valuing diversity: Buddhist reflections or realizing a more global equitable future. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Fowler, L. C. (2006). A curriculum of difficulty: Narrative research in education and the practice of teaching. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Miller, J. (2005). Sounds of silence breaking: Women, autobiography, curriculum. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Pitt, A. (2003). The play of the personal: Psychoanalytic narratives of feminist education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
United Nations General Assembly. (2015, September 25). Resolution 70/1: Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
Butler, D., Leahy, M., Twining, P., Akoh, B., Chtouki, Y., Farshadnia, S., et al. (2018). Education systems in the digital age: The need for alignment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 473–494.
Erstad, O., & Voogt, J. (2018). The twenty-first century curriculum: issues and challenges. In J. Voogt, et al. (Eds.), Second handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 19–36). Springer International Handbooks of Education. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_1. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.
Walsh, T. (2018). Towards an overview of a redeveloped primary school curriculum: Learning from the past, learning from others. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.
Lawton, D. (1989). Education, culture and the national curriculum. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Ontwikkelteam Digitale Geletterdheid. (2019). Concept-eindproduct van het Ontwikkelteam Digitale geletterdheid. Den Haag: Curriculum.nu.
Gil, J. (2020). A pandemia e o capitalismo numérico [The pandemic and numerical capitalism]. Público. https://www.publico.pt/2020/04/12/sociedade/ensaio/pandemia-capitalismo-numerico-1911986.
UNESCO (2015a). Rethinking education. Towards a global common good? Paris: UNESCO.
Marope, P. T. M. (2017). Reconceptualizing and repositioning curriculum in the 21st century: A global paradigm shift. Geneva: UNESCO IBE.
OECD (2019a). OECD learning compass 2030. Paris: OECD.
Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Macdonald, B. J. (1995). Theory as a prayerful act. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Pinar, W. (2019). Moving images of eternity: George Grant’s critique of time, teaching, and technology. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2019). The curious promise of educationalising technological unemployment: What can places of learning really do about the future of work? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376.
Peters, M.A., and P. Jandrić. 2019. AI, human evolution, and the speed of learning. In Artificial intelligence and inclusive education: Speculative futures and emerging practices, ed. J. Knox, Y. Wang, and M. Gallagher, 195–206. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8161-4_12.
Pinar, W. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pinar, W. (2012). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Schwab, J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. The School Review, 78(1), 1–23.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Kliebard, H. M. (1970). Reappraisal: The Tyler rationale. The School Review, 78(2), 259–272.
Camus, A. (1991). The plague. New York, NY: Vintage Books. (Original work published in 1947).
Tay, L. Y., Melwani, M., Ong, J. L., & Ng, K. R. (2017). A case study of designing technology-enhanced learning in an elementary school in Singapore. Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1350737
International Association for K-12 Online Learning. (2011). National standards for quality online teaching (Version 2). Vienna, VA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.inacol.org/resource/inacol-national-standards-for-quality-online-teaching-v2
Morse, J. M. (2010). Simultaneous and sequential qualitative mixed method designs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364741
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A Panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219914708.
Bovill, C., & Woolmer, C. (2019). How conceptualisations of curriculum in higher education influence student-staff co-creation in and of the curriculum. Higher Education, 78, 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0349-8.
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4.
Bovill, C. (2020b). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79, 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w.
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2019b). „More than just a student“: How co-creation of the curriculum fosters Third Spaces in ways of working, identity, and impact. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3727.
Matthews, K. E., Cook-Sather, A., & Healey, M. (2018). Connecting learning, teaching, and research through student-staff partnerships: Toward universities as egalitarian learning communities. In V. C. H. Tong, A. Standen, & M. Sotiriou (Eds.), Shaping Higher Education with Students (pp. 23–29). London: UCL Press.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bovill, C. (2020a). Co-creating learning and teaching: Towards relational pedagogy in higher education. St Albans: Critical Publishing.
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2019a). Creativity and collaboration: An exploration of empathy, inclusion, and resilience in co-creation of the curriculum. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 2(3), 199–213.
Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2018). Digital technologies for promoting „student voice“ and co-creating learning experience in an academic course. Instructional Science, 46(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9436-y.
Kaur, A., Awang-Hashim, R., & Kaur, M. (2019). Students’ experiences of co-creating classroom instruction with faculty – A case study in Eastern context. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(4), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1487930.
Riddell, J., Gadoury-Sansfaçon, G.-P., & Stoddard, S. (2021). Building institutional capacities for students as partners in the design of COVID classrooms. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4603.
Fawns, T., Aitken, G., & Jones, D. (2019). Online Learning as Embodied, Socially Meaningful Experience. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00048-9.
Jandrić, P. 2019. We-think, we-learn, we-act: The trialectic of postdigital collective intelligence. Postdigital Science and Education 1 (2): 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00055-w.
Jandrić, P., T. Ryberg, J. Knox, N. Lacković, S. Hayes, J. Suoranta, M. Smith, A. Steketee, M.A. Peters, P. McLaren, D.R. Ford, G. Asher, C. McGregor, G. Stewart, B. Williamson, and A. Gibbons. 2019. Postdigital dialogue. Postdigital Science and Education 1 (1): 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0011-x.
Burnapp, D., Farmer, R., Hansen Reese, S. V., & Stepniak, A. (2018). Co-creation, contexts, and complexity: A case study concerning blended learning. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21100/jeipc.v4i1.649.
Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2019). Networked learning and postdigital education. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0029-0
Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2016). Co-creating curriculum in higher education: Promoting democratic values and a multidimensional view on learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1120734.
Bron, J., Bovill, C., & Veugelers, W. (2016). Students experiencing and developing democratic citizenship through curriculum negotiation: The relevance of Garth Boomer’s approach. Curriculum Perspectives, 36(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00155-3.
Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff Student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551.
Bovill, C., & Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: Exploring desirability and possibility. In C. E. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning (ISL) 18: Global theories and local practices: Institutional, disciplinary and cultural variations (pp. 176–188). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula: An example of good practice in higher education? In E. Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The Student Engagement Handbook: Practices in Higher Education (pp. 461–475). Emerald Group Publishing.
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2020). An exploration of how curriculum co-creation advances student and staff aims for Scottish higher education. PhD Dissertation. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. https://doi.org/10.7488/era/496.
Kuh, G. D. (2010). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Jandrić, P., Hayes, D., Truelove, I., Levinson, P., Mayo, P., Ryberg, T., Monzó, L.D., Allen, Q., Stewart, P.A., Carr, P.R., Jackson, L., Bridges, S., Escaño, C., Grauslund, D.,Mañero, J., Lukoko, H.O., Bryant, P., Fuentes Martinez, A., Gibbons, A., Sturm, S., Rose, J., Chuma, M.M., Biličić, E., Pfohl, S., Gustafsson, U., Arantes, J.A., Ford, D.R., Kihwele,J.E., Mozelius, P., Suoranta, J., Jurjević, L., Jurčević, M., Steketee, A., Irwin, J., White, E.J., Davidsen, J., Jaldemark, J., Abegglen, S., Burns, T., Sinfield, S., Kirylo, J.D., BatareloKokić, I., Stewart, G.T., Rikowski, G., Lisberg Christensen, L., Arndt, S., Pyyhtinen, O., Reitz, C., Lodahl, M., Humble, N., Buchanan, R., Forster, D.J., Kishore, P., Ozoliņš, J.,Sharma, N., Urvashi, S., Nejad, H.G., Hood, N., Tesar, M., Wang, Y., Wright, J., Brown, J.B., Prinsloo, P., Kaur, K., Mukherjee, M., Novak, R., Shukla, R., Hollings, S., Konnerup,U., Mallya, M., Olorundare, A., Achieng-Evensen, C., Philip, A.P., Hazzan, M.K., Stockbridge, K., Komolafe, B.F., Bolanle, O.F., Hogan, M., Redder, B., Sattarzadeh, S.D., Jopling,M., SooHoo, S., Devine, N., & Hayes, S. (2020). Teaching in The Age of Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(2), 1069–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00169-6.
Jandrić, P., Hayes, D., Levinson, P., Lisberg Christensen, L., Lukoko, H. O., Kihwele, J. E., Brown, J. B., Reitz, C., Mozelius, P., Nejad, H. G., Fuentes Martinez, A., Arantes, J. A., Jackson, L., Gustafsson, U., Abegglen, S., Burns, T., Sinfield, S., Hogan, M., Kishore, P., Carr, P. R., Batarelo Kokić, I., Prinsloo, P., Grauslund, D., Steketee, A., Achieng-Evensen, C., Komolafe, B. F., Suoranta, J., Hood, N., Tesar, M., Rose, J., Humble, N., Kirylo, J. D., Mañero, J., Monzó, L. D., Lodahl, M., Jaldemark, J., Bridges, S. M., Sharma, N., Davidsen, J., Ozoliņš, J., Bryant, P., Escaño, C., Irwin, J., Kaur, K., Pfohl, S., Stockbridge, K., Ryberg, T., Pyyhtinen, O., SooHoo, S., Hazzan, M. K., Wright, J., Hollings, S., Arndt, S., Gibbons, A., Urvashi, S., Forster, D. J., Truelove, I., Mayo, P., Rikowski, G., Stewart, P. A., Jopling, M., Stewart, G. T., Buchanan, R., Devine, N., Shukla, R., Novak, R., Mallya, M., Biličić, E., Sturm, S., Sattarzadeh, S. D., Philip, A. P., Redder, B., White, E. J., Ford, D. R., Allen, Q., Mukherjee, M., & Hayes, S. (2021). Teaching in the Age of COVID-19—1 Year Later. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 1073–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00243-7.
Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. Paris: OECD.
Malin, H. (2018). Teaching for purpose: Preparing students for lives of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2131–2.
APA [American Psychological Association] (2020). Human behavior in the time of COVID-19: Learning from psychological science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/human-behavior-in-the-time-of-covid-19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sinha, A. (2023). Warum müssen wir die akademischen Praktiken neu gestalten und wie geht das?. In: Sinha, A. (eds) Neugestaltung der Pädagogik und der Lehrplanpraxis im Hinblick auf den Online-Unterricht. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39609-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39609-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39608-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39609-1
eBook Packages: Education and Social Work (German Language)