Skip to main content

Power and Policies in and by the Arts—Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Arts and Power

Part of the book series: Kunst und Gesellschaft ((KUGE))

  • 409 Accesses

Abstract

The introduction to this book sketches the sociological preoccupation with concepts of domination and power in society. The following chapters discuss (a) the power of social structures on the arts and (b) the power of the arts on social structures. The newer terms for understanding these interactions come from postcolonial and intersectional sociology, as inequalities in the arts arise from multiple and interwoven processes of discrimination. Sociological analyses of the arts seek to uncover these power-laden processes, deconstruct established structures, and recognize artistic practices as practices of power. In doing so, it is important to distinguish between power and domination. Either the arts are dominated by rulers external to the arts and their institutionalized structures, or the arts are able to turn the tables and exercise domination via their legitimacy advantage, for example by shaping taste. The politics of cultural production, on the other hand, must be examined as a relationship between power and the arts. The breakdown of the book is presented with chapters in three sections, “Establishing and De-establishing Power in the Arts,” “Arts and the Power of Social Structures,” and “Arts and the Dominance of Political (Dis)Order.” The reciprocal perspectives of “power in the arts” and “power through the arts” are presented through a two-dimensional model whose first dimension is characterized by “domination versus power” and whose second dimension is characterized by “structural constraint versus volitional agency.” All the articles can be placed in this coordinate system of domination (structure) and power (agency), regardless of whether they stand for negative (hegemonic, totalitarian, unjust) or positive (egalitarian, grassroots, balancing) social purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This statement might be regarded as contradictory to Bourdieu’s field theory. However, this power of coercion (i.e., heteronomy) loses influence when and if the actors of the attacked art field retreat into their artistic autonomy and deny the heteronomous, economically or politically usurped culture content the status of “art”.

  2. 2.

    What is acknowledged as an artistic practice, and what is not, is another common example of how brokers and persisting conventions in different art worlds exert a certain power to define the field. In order to point to these processes, we refer to artistic practices or the arts and not to a more open term such as cultural practices, as all described practices in the different chapters are considered and labelled as artistic/art in their respective fields.

  3. 3.

    We must admit that even though we intended to cover so far under-represented geographical areas and include them in a more or less mainstream research volume such as this one (“mainstream” meaning being published in English by a global publisher such as Springer, covering mostly research of “Western” art practices), the alignment of the chapters appears to be still quite “Western-centric”. Reflecting on what it means to curate and publish this volume also entails acknowledging both the constructiveness of an equal “geographical representation” as well as the power-laden processes in the field of international academic publishing.

References

  • Alexander, Victoria D. 2020. Sociology of the arts: Exploring fine and popular forms. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amīn, Khālid and Laamiri Mohammed (eds.). 2010. Performing cultural diversity; Critiquing postcolonialism (1st ed). Tetouan: Université Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Research Group of Performance Studies (Series: Conferences and colloquia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amīn, Khālid. 2014. Postcolonial Modernity: Theatre in Morocco and the Interweaving Loop. In The politics of interweaving performance cultures. Beyond postcolonialism, eds. Erika Fischer-Lichte, Torsten Jost and Saskya Iris Jain, 25–41. Oxford: Routledge Advances in Theatre and Performance Studies Vol. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Elijah. 2015. “The White Space”. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 1(1): 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649214561306.

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2005. Structure, Culture and Agency. In The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture, eds. Mark D. Jacobs and Nancy Weiss Hanrahan, 17–34. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. London: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S. 2008 [1982]. Art worlds. 25th Anniversary edition, updated and expanded. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, Christoph, Cornelia Kastelan, Valérie Knoll and Ulf Wuggenig (eds.). 2015. Art in the Periphery of the Center. Sternberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Below, Irene and Beatrice von Bismarck (eds.). 2005. Schriftenreihe des Ulmer Vereins, Verband für Kunst- und Kulturwissenschaften e. V: N.F., Bd. 1. Globalisierung, Hierarchisierung: Kulturelle Dominanzen in Kunst und Kunstgeschichte. Jonas-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, Theresa and Thomas Burkhalter (eds.). 2012. Out of the absurdity of life: Globale Musik (1. Aufl.). Traversion

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhambra, Gurminder K. 2007. Rethinking modernity: Postcolonialism and the sociological imagination. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230206410.

  • Bhambra, Gurminder K. 2014. Connected Sociologies. Theory for a Global Age Series. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544377.

  • Bhambra, Gurminder K., Dalia Gebrial and Kerem Nişancıoğlu (eds.). 2018. Decolonising the university. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatcă, Manuela and Sérgio Costa. 2016. Postcolonial sociology: A research agenda. In Global connections. Decolonizing European sociology: Transdisciplinary approaches, eds. Encarnacion Gutiérrez Rodriguez, Manuela Boatcă and Sérgio Costa, 13–31. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatcă, Manuela, Sina Farzin and Julian Go. 2018. Postcolonialism and Sociology: E-Mail-Debate. SOZIOLOGIE 47(4): 423–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc and Laurent Thévenot. 1991. De la justification: les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 2010. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge classics. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, Lara and Ulf Wuggenig. 2005. Cultural Globalization Between Myth and Reality: The Case of the Contemporary Visual Arts. ART-E-FACT Strategies of Resistance (4). http://artefact.mi2.hr/_a04/lang_en/theory_buchholz_en.htm.

  • Buden, Boris. 2012. Towards the Heterosphere: Curator as Translator. In Performing the curatorial: Within and beyond art, ed. Maria Lind, 23–46. Sternberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buurman, Nanne, Sarah Dornhof, Birgit Hopfener and Barbara Lutz. 2018. Situating Global Art: An Introduction. Image: Vol. 89. In Situating Global Art: Topologies – Temporalities – Trajectories, eds. Sarah Dornhof, Nanne Buurman, Birgit Hopfener and Barbara Lutz, 11–32. transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caceres, Imayna, Sunanda Mesquita and Sophie Utikal. 2017. Anti*Colonial Fantasies/ Decolonial Strategies: A Conversation. In Kuratieren als antirassistische Praxis, eds. Natalie Bayer, Belinda Kazeem-Kamiński and Nora Sternfeld, 201–211. Edition Angewandte. De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1(8): 139–167. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8.

  • Cusick, Suzanne G. 2006. Music as torture / Music as weapon. Trans 10, Revista transcultural de Musica, SIBE. http://www.sibetrans.com/trans/articulo/152/music-as-torture-music-as-weapon.

  • Davida, Dena, Marc Pronovost, Véronique Hudon and Jane Gabriels (eds.). 2019. Curating Live Arts: Global Perspectives on Theory and Practice. Berghahn Books Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Bone, Rainer. 2018. Die “Economie des conventions”—Grundlagen und Entwicklungen der neuen französischen Wirtschaftssoziologie. 2. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-658-21062-5.pdf.

  • Durkheim, Émile and Marcel Mauss. (1903). De quelques formes primitives de classification. Contribution à l’étude des représentations collectives. Année sociologique, 6, wiederabgedruckt in: Mauss, M. (1971). Essais de sociologie, Paris, Ed. de Minuit (Coll. Points). doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3538416.

  • Eymard-Duvernay, François. 1989. Conventions de qualité et formes de coordination. Revue économique 40(2): 329–359. https://doi.org/10.2307/3502117.

  • Foucault, Michel. 2019. Power: the essential works of Michel Foucault 1954‒1984. Penguin UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaupp, Lisa. 2020. ‘The West’ vs. ‘The Rest’? Festival Curators as Gatekeepers for Sociocultural Diversity, in Managing Culture: Exchange in a Global World, eds. Victoria Durrer and Raphaela Henze, 127–153, Palgrave MacMillan, Sociology of the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24646-4.

  • Gaupp, Lisa. 2021. How to Curate Diversity and Otherness in Global Performance Art, in Diversity and Otherness. Transcultural Insights into Norms, Practices, Negotiations, eds. Lisa Gaupp and Giulia Pelillo-Hestermeyer 289–320, De Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9788366675308/html?lang=en.

  • Gaupp, Lisa, Anna Abramjan, Frida Merve Akinay, Katharina Hilgert, Anna Catharina Mulder, Rebecca Schmidt, Viviane Schnitzler, Ole Thurich, Lucas Tiemon and Swantje Wurl, 2020. Curatorial practices of the ‘Global’: Toward a Decolonial Turn in the Museum in Berlin and Hamburg? Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy, Special Issue: Museum – Politics – Management. 2020(2), 107–138, doi:https://doi.org/10.14361/zkmm-2020-0205.

  • Griswold, Wendy. 2013. Cultures and Societies in a Changing World. Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotjahn, Rebecca and Freia Hoffmann (eds.). 2002. Geschlechterpolaritäten in der Musikgeschichte des 18. bis 20. Jahrhunderts, Centaurus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez Rodriguez, Encarnacion. 2016. Decolonizing Postcolonial Rhetoric, in Global connections. Decolonizing European sociology: Transdisciplinary approaches. eds. Gutierrez Rodriguez, Encarnacion, Manuela Boatcă and Sérgio Costa, 49–67, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Freia and Eva Rieger. 1992. Von der Spielfrau zur Performance-Künstlerin, Furore-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchberg, Volker. 2007. Cultural consumption analysis: Beyond structure and agency. Cultural Sociology, 1(1), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lena, Jennifer C. 2019. Entitled: Discriminating tastes and the expansion of the arts. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizé, Wenceslas. 2016. Artistic work intermediaries as value producers: Agents, managers, tourneurs and the acquisition of symbolic capital in popular music. Poetics, 59, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.07.002.

  • Luhmann Niklas. 1970. Soziologie als Theorie sozialer Systeme, in Soziologische Aufklärung, Niklas Luhmann, Vol. 1, 113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, Achille J. 2001. On the Postcolony, University of California Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.02640.0001.001.

  • Mbembe, Achille J. 2016. Decolonizing the university: New directions. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 15(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022215618513.

  • McClary, Susan 2002. Feminine Endings: Music, Gender, and Sexuality, University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678.

  • Nye, Joseph. 2004. Soft power: the means to success in world politics, Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres da Silva, Glaucia and Konstantin Hondros (eds.). 2019. Music practices across borders: (E)Valuating space, diversity and exchange (Music and Sound Culture). Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popitz, Heinrich. 2017. Phenomena of power. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieberg, Fred. 1991. Musik und Macht. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter Julia and Paula-Irene Villa (eds.). 2012. Postkoloniale Soziologie: Empirische Befunde, theoretische Anschlüsse, politische Intervention. Postcolonial studies, Vol 2, transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, Eva 1981. Frau, Musik und Männerherrschaft. Zum Ausschluss der Frau aus der deutschen Musikpädagogik, Musikwissenschaft und Musikausübung, Ullstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roßbach, Nikola. 2018. Achtung Zensur! Über Meinungsfreiheit und ihre Grenzen, Ullstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot, Laurent. 1984. Rules and implements: Investment in forms, Social Science Information, 23(1), 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bismarck, Beatrice, Jörn Schafaff and Thomas Weski (eds.). 2012. Cultures of the curatoria. Sternberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Osten, Marion. 2003. Einleitung, in Norm der Abweichung, eds. Marion von Osten, (Theorie: Gestaltung), Springer, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max 1958. The three types of legitimate rule, Berkeley Publications in Society and Institutions, 4(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Gaupp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gaupp, L., Barber-Kersovan, A., Kirchberg, V. (2022). Power and Policies in and by the Arts—Introduction. In: Gaupp, L., Barber-Kersovan, A., Kirchberg, V. (eds) Arts and Power. Kunst und Gesellschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37429-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37429-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-37428-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-37429-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics