Skip to main content

Familie in den Vereinigten Staaten

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Familiensoziologie
  • 4731 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das vorherrschende Familienverständnis in den USA des 21. Jahrhunderts ist zugleich von einem Beharren auf traditionellen Formen (Kernfamilie, Bi-Generationaliät) und einer Pluralisierung von Normen (Geschlechterrollen, gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaften) gekennzeichnet. Der Beitrag nähert sich diesem vermeintlichen Widerspruch in historischer Perspektive und untersucht, wie Familie während des gesamten 20. Jahrhunderts als „Basis der Gesellschaft“ konzipiert wurde. Zunächst wird gefragt, welche Definitionen von „Familie“ die amerikanischen Soziologinnen und Soziologen im 20. Jahrhundert entwickelten. Ein zweiter Abschnitt beschreibt die sozialhistorische Entwicklung der US-amerikanischen Familie im selben Zeitraum. Ein dritter Abschnitt diskutiert die Veränderung von Familienwerten und Gendernormen seit der zweiten Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts, indem es insbesondere nach der Bedeutung der Kategorien „Race“, „Class“, „Gender“, Sexualität und Religion für die amerikanische Familie fragt. In der Zusammenschau zeigt sich, dass sich in den USA des 20. Jahrhunderts Phasen der Dynamisierung und Pluralisierung von Familienwerten und Gendernormen mit der Forderung nach Rückkehr zur Kernfamilie und zu traditionellen Genderrollen abwechselten – abhängig vom jeweiligen politisch-moralischen Klima und der Geschwindigkeit sozialen Wandels. Dabei erscheint gerade die Kombination von Wellen des Normwandels mit Phasen der rückwärtsgewandten Selbstvergewisserung als typisch für die Anpassung einer Gesellschaft und ihrer Werte an die Herausforderungen der industriellen Moderne.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Die Studie basiert auf zwei Interview-Reihen (Constructing the Family Surveys), die 2003 und 2006 insgesamt mehr als 1500 Personen über ihre Einstellung zur Familie befragte. 2003 wurden 712 und 2006 815 repräsentativ ausgewählte Gesprächspartner befragt. Powell et al., 2010, S. 4, 222–242.

  2. 2.

    Sofern nicht anders angegeben, beziehen sich alle statistischen Informationen auf die vom US Bureau of the Census veröffentlichen Daten www.census.gov und die Daten des National Center for Health Statistics www.cdc.gov/nchs/.

  3. 3.

    Human Fertitily Database humanfertility.org.

  4. 4.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics. www.cdc.gov/nchs/.

  5. 5.

    U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 1968–2020 Annual Social and Economic Supplement: Living Arrangements of Children under 18, 1968–2020.

  6. 6.

    Money Income of Families – Median Income in Current and Constant 2001. Dollars by race and type of family: 1947 to 2001. S. 42–43 in: U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States 2003 (Hg.): Mini historical statistics.

  7. 7.

    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: Women in the Labor Force: A Data-Book, https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-databook/2020/home.htm.

  8. 8.

    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Families with own children: Employment status of parents by age of youngest child and family type, 2020–21 annual averages, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/famee.t04.htm.

  9. 9.

    Guttmacher Institute 2022. Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/. Zugegriffen 27.08.2022.

Literatur

  • Anderson, K. (1981). Wartime Women. Sex Roles, Family Relations, and the Status of Women During World War II. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, R. (2006). Perfect Motherhood: Science and Childrearing in America. Rutgers UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baca Zinn, M. (1998). Social science theorizing for Latino families in the age of diversity. In S. Coontz (Hrsg.), American families. A multicultural reader (S. 230–241). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, B. (2004). Sex in the Heartland. Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxandall, R., & Ewen, E. (2000). Picture windows: How the suburbs happened. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendroth, M. L. (2002). Growing up protestant. Parents, children, and mainline churches. Rutgers UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biblarz, T., & Stacey, J. (2010). How does the gender of parents matter? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, A. (1968). Black families in white America. Touchstone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenhorn, D. (1995). Fatherless America. Confronting our most urgent social problem. Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2005). Die männliche Herrschaft. Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boydston, J. (1994). Home and work: Housework, wages, and the ideology of labor in the Early Republic. Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocker, M. (2004). Protest – Anpassung – Etablierung. Die Christliche Rechte im politischen System der USA. Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1926). The family as a unity of interacting personalities. The Family: Journal of Social Case Work, 7, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. On the discursive limits of „sex“. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, B. A., & Heaton, T. B. (1999). Statistical handbook on the American family (2. Aufl.). Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, M. (2010). The war on welfare. Family, poverty, and politics in modern America. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatelain, M. (2021). Franchise. The Golden Arches in Black America. Liveright Pub Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2008, September 07). Public display. The picture-perfect American family? These days, it doesn’t exist. Washington Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round. The state of marriage and the family in America today. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2010). Public and private families. An introduction (6. Aufl.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B. (1965). Dark ghetto. Dilemmas of social power. Wesleyan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J., Rosaldo, M. Z., & Yanagisako, S. (1992). Is there a family? New anthropological views. In B. Thorne & M. Yalom (Hrsg.), Rethinking the family. Some feminist questions. The social origins of private life. A history of American families 1600–1900 (S. 31–48). Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coontz, S. (1988). The Social Origins of Private Life. A History of American Families 1600–1900. Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coontz, S. (1992). The Way We Never Were. American Families and the Nostalgia Trap. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coontz, S. (2011). A strange stirring. The feminine mystique and American women at the dawn of the 1960s. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchlow, D.T. (2005). Phillis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism. A Woman’s Crusade. Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, S. (1995). Roads to dominion. Right-Wing Movements and Political Power in the United States. The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowland, S. (2015). Family Values and the Rise of the Christian Right. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1908). The Negro American family. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B. (2001). Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. PICADOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash. The undeclared war against American women. Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finzsch, N. (2002). Gouvernementalität, der Moynihan-Report und die Welfare Queen im Cadillac. In J. Martschukat (Hrsg.), Geschichte schreiben mit Foucault (S. 257–282).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, N. (2017). Awakening: How Gays and Lesbians Brought Marriage Equality to America. Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, K. (2015). Wedlocked: The Perils of marriage equality. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, E. F. (1951). The Negro family in the United States. Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. W W Norton&Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, K. K. (1996). Uplifting the race. Black leadership, politics, and culture in the Twentieth Century. The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, C. P. (1909). How home conditions react upon the family. American Journal of Sociology, 14, 592–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J. (1998). Raising Baby by the Book. The Education of American Mothers. Yale UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, H. G. (1976). The black family in slavery and freedom, 1750–1925. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, M. R. (1989). American fertility in transition: New estimates of birth rates in the United States, 1900–1910. Demography, 26, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausen, K. (1992). Öffentlichkeit und Privatheit. Gesellschaftspolitische Konstruktionen und die Geschichte der Geschlechterbeziehungen. In K. Hausen & H. Wunder (Hrsg.), Frauengeschichte – Geschlechtergeschichte (S. 81–88).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, I. (Hrsg.). (2012a). Inventing the „modern American family“: Family values and social change in 20th Century US. Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, I. (2012b). Social experts and modern women’s reproduction: From „working women’s neurosis“ to the abortion debate, 1950–1980. In I. Heinemann (Hrsg.), Inventing the „modern American family“: Family values and social change in 20th Century US (S. 124–151).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, I. (2013). American family values and social change: Gab es den Wertewandel in den USA? In B. Dietz, C. Neumaier & A. Rödder (Hrsg.), Gab es den Wertewandel? Neue Forschungen zum gesellschaftlich-kulturellen Wandel seit den 1960er-Jahren (S. 269–284). Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, I. (2018). Wert der Familie: Debatten um Ehescheidung, Frauenarbeit und Reproduktion in den USA des 20. Jahrhunderts. De Gruyter Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S., & Carter, G. L. (2000). Working women in America. Split dreams. Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, E. (2021). America on Fire. The Untold History of Police Violence and Black Rebellion Since the 1960s. William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J. (2022). Sexing Religion: Sexualität, Familie und Geschlecht im amerikanischen Mainline-Protestantismus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igo, S. (2007). The averaged American. Surveys, citizens, and the making of a mass public. Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igra, A. (2007). Wives without husbands. Marriage, desertion, and welfare in New York, 1900–1935. The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1989). Kultureller Umbruch. Wertewandel in der westlichen Welt. Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K. (1985). Crabgrass frontier. The suburbanization of the United States. Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferis, J. L. (2011). Armed for Life: The Army of God and Anti-Abortion Terror in the United States. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, D., & Leroy, J. (Hrsg.). (2021). Histories of Racial Capitalism. Columbia UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, S. (2021). Divorce, American Style. Fighting for Women’s Economic Citizenship in the Neoliberal Era. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson, I. (2005). When affirmative action was white. The untold history of racial inequality in Twentieth-Century America. W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerber, L. (1980). Women of the republic: Intellect and ideology in revolutionary America. The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler-Harris, A. (1982). Out to Work. A History of Wage-Earning Women in the United States. Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, E. (1902). Das Jahrhundert des Kindes. (Englische Ausgabe 1909. The century of the child. Orginalausgabe 1900. Barnets åhundrade.). Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd-Taylor, M. (1994). Mother-work. Women, child welfare and the state, 1890–1930. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd-Taylor, M. (2001). Eugenics, sterilization and the modern marriage in the USA. The strange career of Paul Popenoe. Gender and History, 13, 298–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd-Taylor, M. (2017). Fixing the Poor: Eugenic Sterilization and Child Welfare in the Twentieth Century. John Hopkins UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd-Taylor, M., & Umanski, L. (1998). Bad mothers. The politic of blame in Twentieth-Century America. New York UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, B. (2000). Black working wives. Pioneers of the American family revolution. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R. (1997). The Modernization of Fatherhood. A Social and Political History. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R. (2004). The culture of fatherhood in the fifties. A closer look. Journal of Family History, 29, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1977). Haven in a heartless world. The family besieged. W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1978). The culture of narcissism. American life in an age of diminishing expectations. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, R., & Wuthnow, R. (1983). The new Christian right. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, G. (2014). In terms of childlessness, U.S. ranks near the top worldwide. Pew Research Center. http://pewrsr.ch/1bDZfz2. Zugegriffen am 17.03.2014.

  • Livingston, G., & Cohn, D. (2010). The new demography of American motherhood. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/05/06/the-new-demography-of-american-motherhood/. Zugegriffen am 07.04.2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1929). Middletown. A study in contemporary American culture. Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, R. S.,& Lynd, H. M. (1937). Middletown in transition. A study in cultural conflicts. Harcourt, Brace and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackert, N. (2012). „But recall the kinds of parents we have to deal with…“ – Juvenile delinquency, interdependent masculinity and the government of families in the Postwar U.S. In I. Heinemann (Hrsg.), Inventing the modern American Family. Family values and social change in 20th Century United States (S. 196–219).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1913). The family among Australian aborigines. A sociological study. University of London Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martschukat, J. (2013). Die Ordnung des Sozialen. Väter und Familien in der amerikanischen Geschichte seit 1770. Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. (2003). The rise of the new woman. The women’s movement in America, 1875–1930. Ivan R. Dee, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, D. G., & De Hart, J. S. (1993). Sex, gender, and the politics of ERA. A state and the nation. Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGirr, L. (2001). Suburban warriors. The origins of the New American right. Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzl, J. M. (2003). „Mother’s little helper“: The crisis of psychoanalysis and the Miltown resolution. Gender & History, 15, 228–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerowitz, J. (1994). Beyond the feminine mystique. A reassessment of Postwar mass culture, 1946–1958. In J. Meyerowitz (Hrsg.), Not June Cleaver. Women and gender in Postwar America, 1945–1960 (S. 229–262). Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezey, N. (2008). New choices, new families. How lesbians decide about motherhood. John Hopkins UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. (1983). A prison of expectation. The family in Victorian culture. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. (2001). Regulating the American family. In J. M. Hawes & E. I. Nybakken (Hrsg.), Family and society in American history (S. 9–36).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. (2004). Huck’s raft. A history of American childhood. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S., & Kellog, S. (1988). Domestic revolutions. A social history of American family life. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P. (1967). The Negro family: The case for national action. In L. Rainwater & W. L. Yancey (Hrsg.), The Moynihan report and the politics of controversy: A trans-action social science and public policy report. Including the full text of The Negro Family: The case for national action by Daniel P. Moynihan (S. 39–124).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. The Free Press/Collier-Macmillan Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. (2010). Not in this family. Gays and the meaning of kinship in Postwar North America. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadasen, P. (2005). Welfare warriors. The welfare rights movement in the United States. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadasen, P., Mittelstadt, J., & Chappell, M. (Hrsg.). (2009). Welfare in the United States. A history with documents, 1935–1996. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Day, R. (1994). The family and family relationships, 1500–1900. England, France and the United States of America. Red Globe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, W. L. (1967). Divorce in the Progressive Era. Littlehampton Book Services Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbeck, A. (2012). „The enemy within“: African American motherhood and the crack baby crisis. In I. Heinemann (Hrsg.), Inventing the „modern American family“: Family values and social change in 20th Century US (S. 155–176). Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbeck, A. (2019). At the heart of it all: Discourses on the Reproductive Rights of African American Women. De Gruyter Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1942). Age and sex in the social structure of the United States. American Sociological Review, 7, 604–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1943). The kinship system of the contemporary United States. American Anthropologist, 45, 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1955). The American family: Its relations to personality and the social structure. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Hrsg.), Family, socialization and interaction process (S. 3–33). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. T. (2010). Freedom is not enough. The Moynihan report and America’s struggle over black family life from LBJ to Obama. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1993). American family decline, 1960–1990. A review and appraisal. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1996). Life without father. Compelling new evidence that fatherhood and marriage are indispensable for the good of children and society. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, P. P., & Disney, D. C. (1960). Can this marriage be saved? Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B., Bolzendahl, C., Geist, C., & Steelman, L. C. (2010). Counted out. Same sex relations and Americans’ definitions of family. Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L., & Yancey, W. (Hrsg.). (1967). The Moynihan report and the politics of controversy: A transaction social science and public policy report. Including the full text of The Negro family: The case for national action by Daniel P. Moynihan. MITPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, G. (1991). Divorce. An American tradition. Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roesch, C. (2012). „Americanization through homemaking“. Mexican American mothers as major factors in Americanization programs. In I. Heinemann (Hrsg.), Inventing the „modern American family“: Family values and social change in 20th Century US (S. 59–81). Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roesch, C. (2013). Macho man? Repräsentationen mexikanischer Familienstrukturen durch Sozialexperten, Sozialarbeiter und Bürgerrechtsaktivisten in den USA, 1940–1980. In G. Metzler (Hrsg.), Das Andere denken. Repräsentationen von Migration in Westeuropa und den USA im 20. Jahrhundert (S. 87–118). Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roesch, C. (2015). Macho Men and Modern Women: Mexican Immigration, Social Experts and Changing Family Values in the 20th Century United States. De Gruyter Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, M. (1980). The use and abuse of anthropology. Reflections on feminism and cross cultural understanding. Signs, 5, 392–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, R. (1982). Beyond separate spheres. Intellectual roots of modern feminism. Yale UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, G. J. (1997). „Go after the women“: Americanization and the Mexican immigrant woman, 1915–1929. In R. Apple & J. Golden (Hrsg.), Mothers and motherhood: Readings in American history (S. 475–494). Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, J. (2005). Choice and Coercion. Birth Control, Sterilization and Abortion in Public Health and Welfare. The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, J. (2015). Abortion after Roe. UNC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, D. (Hrsg.). (2010). Raising Citizens in the „Century of the Child”. The United States and German Central Europe in Comparative Perspective. Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solinger, R. (2001). Beggars and choosers. How the politics of choice shapes adoption, abortion, and welfare in the United States. Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solinger, R., & Ross, L. (2017). Reproductive justice. An introduction. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (1990). Brave new families. Stories of domestic upheaval in late Twentieth-Century America. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (1996). In the name of the family. Rethinking family values in the postmodern age. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (2011). Unhitched – Love, marriage, and family values from West Hollywood to Western China. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrels, M. E., Bould, S., & Nicholas, L. J. (1994). The feminization of poverty in the United States: Gender, race, ethnicity, and family factors. Journal of Family Issues, 15, 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, A. M. (2005). Eugenic nation: Faults and frontiers of better breeding in Modern America. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, A. M. (2019). Proud boys and the white ethnostate. How the Alt-Right is warping the American imagination. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, A. M., & Markel, H. (2002). Formative years. Children’s health in the United States, 1880–2000. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strecker, E. (1946). Their mother’s sons: The psychiatrist examines an American problem. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, W. (1909). The family and social change. The American Journal of Sociology, 14, 577–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K-Y. (2019). Race for Profit. How Banks and the Real Estate Industry Undermined Black Homeownership. The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troy, G. (2005). Morning in America. How Reagan invented the 1980s. Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler May, E. (1980). Great expectations. Marriage and divorce in Post-Victorian America. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler May, E. (2010). America and the pill. A history of the promise, peril, and liberation. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, E. S. (1998). On the pill. A social history of oral contraceptives, 1950–1970. John Hopkins UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, N. P. (1977). Mother, the Invention of Necessity. Doctor Benjamin Spock’s Baby and Child Care American Quarterly, 29(5), 519–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. (2000). To have and to hold. Marriage, the baby boom and social change. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, L. J. (1985). The divorce revolution. The unexpected social and economic consequences for women and children in America. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, B. (1966). The cult of true womanhood: 1820–1860. American Quarterly, 18, 151–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, C. (1992). God’s warriors. The John Hopkins UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, C. (1996). Onward Christian soldiers? The religious right in American politics. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R., & Evans, J. H. (Hrsg.). (2002). The quiet hand of God. Faith-based activism and the public role of mainline Protestantism. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, P. (2007). (first edition 1943). Generation of vipers. Rinehart & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, P. (2012). American marriage. A political institution. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, M. (2015). After Roe. The Lost History of the Abortion Debate. Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Heinemann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heinemann, I. (2023). Familie in den Vereinigten Staaten. In: Arránz Becker, O., Hank, K., Steinbach, A. (eds) Handbuch Familiensoziologie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35219-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35219-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-35218-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-35219-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics