Zusammenfassung
Die Schutzverantwortung (Responsibility to Protect, R2P) wird in diesem Aufsatz als ein umfassendes politisches Konzept verstanden. Es bündelt rechtliche, ethische und politische Normen, Prinzipien und Überlegungen in Bezug auf den Schutz des Menschen vor schwersten Menschenrechtsverletzungen. Indem es diese neu zu denken, zu interpretieren und zu verknüpfen sucht, wird das Ziel verfolgt, bestehende Spannungen und Widersprüche – zwischen dem Souveränitätsprinzip, Gewalt- und Interventionsverbot auf der einen und bestehenden völkerrechtlichen Normen zum Schutz des Individuums vor schwersten Menschenrechtsverletzungen auf der anderen Seite – aufzulösen (vgl. Arnauld 2015, S. 64ff.; Luck 2008, S. 53; Mabera und Spies 2016, S. 214f.).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Aboagye, Festus. 2012. South Africa and R2P: More State Sovereignty and Regime Security than Human Security? In The Responsibility to Protect – From Evasive to Reluctant Action, hrsg. von der Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung, dem Institute for Security Studies, der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung und dem South African Institute of International Affairs, 29–52. Johannesburg: United Litho.
Aboobaker, Shanti. 2017. At War With the West. http://amabhungane.co.za/article/2017-05-28-at-war-with-the-west. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.
Afrikanische Union (AU). 2000. Constitutive Act of the African Union. http://www.achpr.org/instruments/au-constitutive-act/. Zugegriffen: 10. Oktober 2018.
Afrikanische Union (AU). 2005. The Common African Position on the Proposd Reform of the United Nations: The Ezulwini Consensus. http://www.un.org/en/africa/osaa/pdf/au/cap_screform_2005.pdf. Zugegriffen: 19. Oktober 2018.
Almeida, Paula Wojcikiewcz. 2017. Brazil’s Inconsistent Approach towards International Organizations and R2P. In Southern Democracies and the Responsibility to Protect. Perspectives from India, Brazil and South Africa, hrsg. von Daniel Peters und Dan Krause, 71–100. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Arnauld, Andreas von. 2015. Werdende Norm oder politisches Konzept? Zur völkerrechtlichen Einordnung der Responsibility to Protect. In Schutzverantwortung in der Debatte: Die „Responsibility to Protect“ nach dem Libyen-Dissens, hrsg. von Michael Staack und Dan Krause, 55–76. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
Banerjee, Dipankar. 2012. India and R2P: Reconciling the Tension Between Intervention and State Sovereignty. In The Responsibility to Protect – From Evasive to Reluctant Action. The Role of Global Middle Powers, hrsg. von der Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung, dem Institute for Security Studies, der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung und dem South African Institute of International Affairs, 91–100. Johannesburg: United Litho.
Benner, Thorsten. 2013. Brazil as a Norm Entrepreneur: The „Responsibility While Protecting“-Initiative. https://www.gppi.net/fileadmin/user_upload/media/pub/2013/Benner_2013_Working-Paper_Brazil-RWP.pdf. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.
Bush, George H. W. 1992. State of the Union. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/01/29/us/state-union-transcript-president-bush-s-addressstate-union.html. Zugegriffen: 10. Oktober 2018.
Charbonneau, Louis. 2011. U.N. Chief Defends NATO From Critics of Libya War. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-libya-nato-un-idUSTRE7BD20C20111214. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.
Dembinski, Matthias. 2016. Regionale Sicherheitsorganisationen als Barrieren oder Bausteine globalen Regierens. https://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/HSFK/hsfk_publikationen/report0716.pdf. Zugegriffen: 16. Oktober 2018.
Dembinski, Matthias. 2017. Procedural Justice and Global Order: Explaining African Reaction to the Application of Global Protection Norms. European Journal of International Relations 23(4): 809–832.
Deng, Francis M., Sadikiel Kimaro, Terrence Lyons, Donald Rothchild und I. William Zartman (Hrsg.). 1996. Sovereignty as Responsibility. Conflict Management in Africa. Washington, D.C. Brookings Institution Press.
Esterhuyse, Abel. 2016. The South African Threat Agenda: Between Political Agendas, Perceptions and Contradictions. S+F. Sicherheit und Frieden – Security and Peace 34 (3): 191–197.
Evans, Gareth. 2013. Protecting Civilians Responsibly. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/gareth-evanson-moves-by-china-and-other-brics-countries-to-embrace-humanitarian-intervention. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.
Ganguly, Sumit. 2013. India in the Liberal Order. http://www.transatlanticacademy.org/publications/india-liberal-order. Zugegriffen: 23. September 2018.
Garwood-Gowers, Andrew. 2012. China and the „Responsibility to Protect“: The Implications of the Libyan Intervention. Asian Journal of International Law 2 (2): 375–393.
Garwood-Gowers, Andrew. 2013. The BRICS and the Responsibility to Protect: Lessons From the Libyan and Syrian Crises. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/59649/. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.
Garwood-Gowers. 2016. China’s „Responsible Protection“ Concept: Reinterpreting the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Military Intervention for Humanitarian Purposes. Asian Journal of International Law 6 (1): 89–118.
Geldenhuys, Deon. 2010. South Africa: The Idea-Driven Foreign Policy of a Regional Power. In Regional Leadership in the Global System. Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, hrsg. von Daniel Flemes, 151–167. Burlington: Ashgate.
Golovnina, Marina und Michael Georgy. 2011. West in „Mediaeval Crusade“ on Gaddafi, Putin says. https://www.reuters.com/article/ozatp-libya-idAFJOE72K0DF20110321. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.
Herz, Monica. 2013. Assumptions on Intervention and Security in South America. In South America and Peace Operations. Coming of age, hrsg. von Kai Michael Kenkel, 25–44. New York: Routledge.
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). 2001. The Responsibility to Protect. http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf. Zugegriffen: 8. Oktober 2018.
Jaganathan, Madhan Mohan. 2017. It’s more than What It Seems: Understanding India’s Perspective on „Responsibility to Protect“. In Southern Democracies and the Responsibility to Protect. Perspectives from India, Brazil and South Africa, hrsg. von Daniel Peters und Dan Krause, 41–70. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Jaganatha, Madhan Mohan und Gerrit Kurtz. 2014. Singing the Tune of Sovereignty? India and the Responsibility to Protect. Conflict, Security and Development 14(4): 461–487.
Kenkel, Kai Michael. 2013. Introduction: Diversity Within a Common Culture: South America and Peace Operations. In South America and Peace Operations. Coming of Age, hrsg. von Kai Michael Kenkel, 1–22. New York: Routledge.
Kenkel, Kai Michael und Christina G. Stefan. 2016. Brazil and the Responsibility While Protecting Initiative: Norms and the Timing of Diplomatic Support. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 22 (1): 41–58.
Kikoler, Naomi. 2014. Supporting African Solutions to African Problems – IBSA and the Implementation of Article 4 (h). In Africa and the Responsibility to Protect: Article 4 (h) of the African Union Constitutive Act, hrsg. von Dan Kuwali and Viljoen Frans, 325–337. London: Routledge.
Kozyrev, Vitaly 2016. Harmonizing „Responsibility to Protect“: China’s Vision of a Post-Sovereign World. International Relations 30 (3): 328–345.
Krause, Dan. 2015. Und sie bewegt sich doch! Indiens Haltung zur Responsibility to Protect. In Schutzverantwortung in der Debatte: Die „Responsibility to Protect“ nach dem Libyen-Dissens, hrsg. von Michael Staack und Dan Krause, 181–215. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
Krause, Dan. 2017. Still on Board? South Africa and the Responsibility to Protect. In Southern Democracies and the Responsibility to Protect. Perspectives from India, Brazil and South Africa, hrsg. von Daniel Peters und Dan Krause, 181–210. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Kreß, Claus und Benjamin Nussberger. 2017. Pro-Democratic Intervention in Current International Law: The Case of The Gambia in January 2017. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 4 (2): 239–252.
Kurowska, Xymena. 2014. Multipolarity as Resistance to Liberal Norms: Russia’s Position on Responsibility to Protect. Conflict, Security and Development 14 (4): 489–508.
Landsberg, Chris. 2010. Pax South Africana and the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect 2 (4): 436–457.
Landsberg, Chris and Candice Moore. 2012. South Africa’s Libya Vote: How is Foreign Policy Decided? New Agenda, South African Journal of Social and Economic Policy 2012 (Fourth Quarter): 72–76.
Lucey, Amanda, Gustavo de Carvalho und Sibongile Gida. 2014. South Africa and the United Nations. Strengthening Opportunities for Effective Peacebuilding. https://issafrica.org/research/papers/south-africa-and-the-united-nations-strengthening-opportunities-for-effective-peacebuilding. Zugegriffen 01. November 2018.
Luck, Edward C. 2008. Der verantwortliche Souverän und die Schutzverantwortung. Auf dem Weg von einem Konzept zur Norm. Vereinte Nationen 56 (2): 51–58.
Mabera, Faith. 2016. Persönliches Interview mit dem Autor vom 9. September 2016. Pretoria: Institute for Global Dialogue.
Mabera, Faith und Tim Dunne. 2013. South Africa and the Responsibility to Protect. R2P Ideas in brief 3 (6): 1–11.
Mabera, Faith und Yolanda Spies. 2016. How Well does R2P Travel Beyond the West? In The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, hrsg. von Alex Bellamy und Tim Dunne, 208–226. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mandela, Nelson. 1990. Town Hall Meeting, June 21, 1990 in New York. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6eE9BIUfBg. Zugegriffen: 16. Oktober 2018.
Masters, Lesley. 2012. Opening the „Black Box“ – South African Foreign Policy Making. In South African Foreign Policy Review. Bd. 1, hrsg. von Chris Landsberg, Chris und Jo-Ansie van Wyk, 20–41. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa.
Mohan, C. Raja. 2003 Crossing the Rubicon: The Shaping of India’s New Foreign Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Pidd, Helen 2011 Nato Rejects Russian Claims of Libya Mission Creep. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/apr/15/nato-libya-rasmussen-medvedev-criticism. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.
Puri, Hardeep Singh. 2012. Statement by H. E. Ambassador H. S. Puri, Permanent Representative of India to the UN, An Informal Interactive Dialogue on the Report of the Secretary General on Responsibility to Protect: Timely and Decisive Action at the 66th Session of the United Nations General Assembly vom 5 September 2012 in New York. http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/India.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Oktober 2018.
Regler, Sonja. 2015. Chinas Haltung zur R2P zwischen Skepsis und Offenheit. In Schutzverantwortung in der Debatte: Die „Responsibility to Protect“ nach dem Libyen-Dissens, hrsg. von Michael Staack und Dan Krause, 229–246. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
Ribeiro Viotti, Maria Luiza. 2011. Responsibility While Protecting: Elements for the Development and Promotion of a Concept. http://www.globalr2p.org/media/files/concept-paper-_rwp.pdf. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.
Sampford, Charles und Ramesh Thakur. 2015. From the Right to Persecute to the Responsibility to Protect: Feuerbachian Inversions of Rights and Responsibilities in State-Citizen Relations In Theorising the Responsibility to Protect, hrsg. von Ramesh Thakur und William Maley, 38–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Siko, John. 2014. Inside South Africa’s Foreign Policy. Diplomacy in Africa from Smuts to Mbeki. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, Karen. 2015. R2P and the Protection of Civilians: South Africa’s Perspective on Conflict Resolution. SAIIA Policy Briefing Nr. 133. Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute.
Staack, Michael und Dan Krause (Hrsg.). 2015. Schutzverantwortung in der Debatte: Die „Responsibility to Protect“ nach dem Libyen-Dissens. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
Statista. 2018. Anteil der BRICS-Staaten am kaufkraftbereinigten globalen Bruttoinlandsprodukt (BIP) von 2008 bis 2018. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/248719/umfrage/anteil-der-bric-staaten-am-globalen-bruttoinlandsprodukt-bip/. Zugegriffen: 16. Oktober 2018.
Stewart, Carina. 2011. Russia Accuses Nato of „Expanding“ UN Libya Resolution. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/russia-accuses-nato-of-expanding-un-libya-resolution-2306996.html. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.
Swaine, Michael D. 2012. Chinese Views of the Syrian Conflict. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Swaine_CLM_39_091312_2.pdf. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.
Teitt, Sarah. 2011. The Responsibility to Protect and China’s Peacekeeping Policy. International Peacekeeping. 18 (3): 298–312.
United Nations (UN). 1958. India and People’s Republic of China: Agreement (with Exchange of Notes) on Trade and Intercourse Between Tibet Region of China and India. Signed at Peking, 29. April 1954. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20299/v299.pdf. Zugegriffen: 2. Oktober 2018.
United Nations (UN), Security Council. 1999. Statement by the Permanent Representative of the Republic of India, Mr. Kamalesh Sharma, at the 3998th meeting, 23.03.1999, S/PV.3988. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/kos%20SPV3988.pdf. Zugegriffen: 2. Oktober 2018.
United Nations (UN), Peacekeeping. 2018. Troop and Police Contributors. https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/troop-and-police-contributors. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 1994. Human Development Report 1994. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/255/hdr_1994_en_complete_nostats.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20. September 2018.
Weiss, Thomas G. 2006. R2P after 9/11 and the World Summit. Wisconsin International Law Journal 24 (3): 741–760.
Williams, Paul D. 2007. From Non-Intervention to Non-Indifference: The Origins and Development of the African Union’s Security Culture. African Affairs 106 (423): 253–279.
Wulf, Herbert. 2013. India’s Aspirations in Global Politics. Competing Ideas and Amorphous Practices. http://inef.uni-due.de/cms/files/report107.pdf. Zugegriffen: 6. Oktober 2018.
Ziegler, Charles E. 2016. Russia on the Rebound: Using and Misusing the Responsibility to Protect. International Relations 30 (3): 346–361.
Zongze, Ruan. 2012. Responsible Protection: Building a Safer World. http://www.ciis.org.cn/english/2012-06/15/content_5090912.htm. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krause, D. (2019). Responsibility to Protect – ein westliches Konzept?. In: Werkner, IJ., Marauhn, T. (eds) Die internationale Schutzverantwortung im Lichte des gerechten Friedens. Gerechter Frieden. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25538-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25538-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-25537-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-25538-1
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)