Abstract
The question of this essay, shaped by a changing historical moment of a digital age, examines the old as garnering renewed importance. The text is old wine ever vital and now rediscovered in new wine skins of a digital age. This essay invites a creative opening for a historically important standpoint: the necessity of the understanding the rhetorical importance of the lecture as testimony in an era of technological change. The digital world in this case permits the old to find new energy and purpose in a changing rhetorical environment where the constant of text (that which matters) propels both a traditional and an ever-changing technological world. In a digital world of blurred issues of time, space, and speaker/audience, one must ask a basic question: Is there a rhetorical rationale for reliance on the lecture in a digital and information age? I contend that the connecting link between the lecture as a traditional form of rhetoric and digital modalities is the notion of text.
Marshall McLuhan (1993) considered the lecture a “hot medium,” which suggests that it excludes and denies participation. He advocated forms of education that include and invite active engagement, “cool media.” He wanted education to forego telling and invoke participatory discernment. “McLuhan advocated discovery learning, whereby students would find things out for themselves by working collaboratively on topics that interested them” (Kuskis, 2011, p. 319). The demand for a cool medium that invokes high participation made the lecture a prime enemy. The traditional assumption about the lecture is that it invites passive learning through mere knowledge transfer. In 1967, McLuhan contended that the lecture was finished. His criticism is not without numerous supporters. A simple search for the death of the lecture renders 31,000 titles since McLuhan’s announcement. However, the death of the lecture in reality aligns with the famous quote from Mark Twain, “The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated” (quoted from Messent, 2007, p. 22). The exaggeration for Twain was two-fold: he was not dead and he did not offer the quote attributed to him (Messent, 2007). Concurrently, I contend that the lecture is not dead and repetitive predictions about its demise exaggerate reality. In a media age, the lecture acts as a testimony accessible to a much larger world.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future. New York: The Viking Press.
Arnett, R. C. (2014). A Rhetoric of Sentiment: The House the Scots Built. In R. C. Arnett & P. Arneson (Eds.), Philosophy of Communication Ethics: Alterity and the Other (pp. 25-54). Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Christians, C. G. & Traber, M. (1997). Communication ethics and universal values. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dato, K. (1956). The pressure to lecture. The Journal of Higher Education 27(7), 364-366.
Drucker, S. J. & Gumpert, G. (2008). The global communication environment of heroes. In S. J. Drucker & G. Gumpert (Eds.), Heroes in a global world (pp. 1-16). Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case for public moral argument. Communication Monographs 51, 1-22.
Fransman, J. & Andrews, R. (2012). Rhetoric and the politics of representation and communication in the digital age. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(2), 125-130.
Helfand, D.J. (2016). A survival guide to the misinformation age: Scientific habits of mind. New York: Columbia University Press.
Innis, H. (1991). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Jubien, P. (2012). A phenomenology of the podcast lecture. Explorations in Media Ecology 1(1), 73-85.
Kane, C. L. & Peters, J. D. (2010). Speaking into the iPhone: An interview with John Durham Peters, or ghostly cessation for the digital age. Journal of Communication Inquiry 34(2), 119-133.
Kant, I. (1996). Practical philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1798/2012). Lectures on Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuskis, A. (2011). Marshall McLuhan as educationist: Institutional learning in the postliterate era. Explorations in Media Ecology 10(3&4), 313-333.
Levinas, E. (1961/1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1990). Three rival versions of moral enquiry: Encyclopaedia, genealogy, and tradition. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Messent, P. (2007). The Cambridge introduction to Mark Twain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McLuhan, M. (1969). Counterblast. Berkeley: Gingko Press, Incorporated.
McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pinchevski, A. (2012). The audiovisual unconscious: Media and trauma in the video archive for Holocaust testimonies. Critical Inquiry 39, 142-166.
Ramsey, R. E. (2015). Letters on the hermeneutic education of dwelling. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 6(1), 77-90.
Stan, C. (2016). Listening with mental doors ajar, interpassive learning, political correctness: Rethinking the lecture today. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 7(1), 91-97.
Taylor, C. (1992). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Teigas, D. (1995). Knowledge and hermeneutic understanding: A study of the Habermas- Gadamer debate. Bucknell: Bucknell University Press.
Zhang, M. (2011). Inspiring American and global audiences: The rhetorical power of Randy Pausch’s last lecture in the digital age. China Media Research 7(1), 57-64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arnett, R.C. (2018). The Lecture as Testimony: In a Technological Age. In: Kergel, D., Heidkamp, B., Telléus, P., Rachwal, T., Nowakowski, S. (eds) The Digital Turn in Higher Education. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19925-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19925-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-19924-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-19925-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)