Abstract
The author investigates the relationship between gender research and society in the current context of neo-liberal and managerial universities. In this context of the new governance of science, research is expected to actively interact with society and to be involved in transdisciplinary problem-solving in close collaboration with various social actors (Slaughter and Leslie 1997; Gibbons et al. 1994; Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 1998). The article provides an in-depth empirical study of the relationship between gender research and society by analysing a recent public controversy in Norway that unveiled different social actors’ definitions and expectations of gender research. The study focuses on the different views and perceptions that different actors had of the relationship between gender research and society during this unusually large public controversy. The analysis is conducted through a close reading of newspaper articles, articles in scholarly journals and blog posts. The article highlights the diverse understandings of the relationship between gender research and society, and hence strengthens claims that a transformation is taking place in universities from detached research systems to more interactive ones. The academic community as a whole, including gender researchers, can benefit from learning about the rhetorical strategies of the social world of gender research in this debate to maintain and change the public image of the interaction between science and society.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Albert, Mathieu. 2003. Universities and the Market Economy: The Differential Impact on Knowledge Production in Sociology and Economics. Higher Education 45 (2): 147–182.
Albert, Mathieu, and Wendy McGuire. 2014. Understanding Change in Academic Knowledge Production in a Neoliberal Era. In Fields of Knowledge: Science, Politics and Publics in the Neoliberal Age, ed. by Scott Frickel and David J. Hess, 33–57. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Ashmore, Malcolm, Steven D. Brown and Katie Macmillan. 2005. Lost in the Mall with Mesmer and Wundt: Demarcations and Demonstrations in the Psychologies. Science, Technology & Human Values 30 (1): 76–110.
Blais, Melissa, and Francis Dupuis-Déri. 2012. Masculinism and the Antifeminist Countermovement. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest 11 (1): 21–39.
Bjerrum Nielsen, Harriet. 2010. Kriterier i forskning. [Criteria in Research]. Aftenposten, 26.3.2010: 5.
Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge Direct Editions.
Brante, Thomas, Steven Fuller and William Lynch. Eds. 1993. Controversial Science. From Content to Contention. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Cassidy, Angela. 2007. The (Sexual) Politics of Evolution. Popular Controversy in the Late 20th-Century United Kingdom. History of Psychology 10 (2): 199–226.
Cassidy, Angela. 2008. Communicating the Social Sciences. In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, ed. by Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench, 225–236. London, New York: Routledge.
Clarke, Adele, and Teresa Montini. 1993. The Many Faces of RU486: Tales of Situated Knowledges and Technological Contestations. Science, Technology & Human Values 18 (1): 42–78.
Clarke, Adele, and Susan Leigh Star. 2008. The Social Worlds Framework: A Theory/Methods Package. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch and Judy Wajcman, 113–137. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Derichs, Claudia, and Dana Fennert. 2015. Women’s Movements and Countermovements. The Quest for Gender Equality in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Engelhart, H. Tristram, and Arthur L. Caplan. 1987. Scientific Controversies. Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eriksson, Mia. 2013. “Wronged White Men”: The Performativity of Hate in Feminist Narratives about Anti-Feminism in Sweden. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 21 (4): 249–263.
Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff. 1998. The Endless Transition: A “Triple Helix” of University-Industry-Government Relations. Minerva 36 (3): 203–208.
Fahnestock, Jeanne. 1997. Arguing in Different Forums: The Bering Crossover Controversy. In Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies, ed. by Randy Allen Harris, 53–67. Mahwah: Hermagoras Press.
Fahnestock, Jeanne. 2009. The Rhetoric of the Natural Sciences. In The SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies, ed. by Andrea A. Lunsford, Kirt H. Wilson and Rosa A. Eberly, 175–195. Los Angeles: Sage.
Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Gibbons, Michael, Camilla Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
Giebel, Katja, and Gert Röhrborn. 2015. Anti-Gender Movements on the Rise? Strategising for Gender Equality in Central and Eastern Europe. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Godin, Benoit. 1998. Writing Performative History: The New “New Atlantis”? Social Studies of Science 28 (3): 465–483.
Grauerholz, Liz, and Lori Baker-Sperry. 2007. Feminist Research in the Public Domain. Risks and Recommendations. Gender and Society 21 (2): 272–294.
Griffin, Gabriele. 2009. The “Ins” and “Outs” of Women’s/Gender Studies: A Response to Reports of Its Demise in 2008. Women’s History Review 18 (3): 485–496.
Gullvåg Holter, Øystein. 2010. Mellom forskjell og makt. [Between Difference and Power]. Aftenposten, 6.4.2010: 5.
Gundersen, Kristian. 2010. Kjønnsforskning tatt på alvor. [Gender Research Taken Seriously]. Dagbladet, 23.3.2010: 57.
Helland, Frode. 2014. Rasisme Uten Rasister i Norge. Agora: Journal for metafysisk Spekulasjon 32 (3–4): 108–143.
Hemmings, Clare. 2011. Why Stories Matter. The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
Hess, David, Steve Breyman, Nancy Campbell and Brian Martin. 2008. Science, Technology, and Social Movements. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. by Edward D. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch and Judy Wajcman, 473–498. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hessels, Laurens K., and Harro van Lente. 2008. Re-thinking New Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda. Research Policy 37 (4): 740–760.
Hjernevask. 2017. “Hjernevask” – English subtitles. Brainwashing in Norway. Dailymotion. http://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/x1xv47_BrainwashingInNorway_hjernevask-english/1#video=xp0tg8. Accessed: May 10, 2017.
Idunn. Online database. Accessed via University of Oslo Library, June–July 2015.
Jacobi, Anders, Lars Klüver and Mikko Rask. 2009. Relevant Research in a Knowledge Democracy: Citizens Participation in Defining Research Agendas for Europe. Paper for the International Conference Towards Knowledge Democracy, Consequences for Science, Politics and Media, Leiden, Netherlands, 25–27 August 2009.
Johansson, Evelina, and Mona Lilja. 2013. Understanding Power and Performing Resistance: Swedish Feminists, Civil Society Voices, Biopolitics and “Angry” Men. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 21 (4): 264–279.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2010. The Mirage of Space between Nature and Nurture. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kleinman, Daniel L., Jason Delborne, Karen A. Cloud-Hansen and Jo Handelsman. 2010. Controversies in Science and Technology Volume 3: From Evolution to Energy. New Rochelle: Mary Ann Liebert Inc. Publishers.
Labinger, Jay A., and Harry Collins. 2001. The One Culture? A Conversation about Science. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Lie, Merete. 2011. Brainwashing: Taking Another Turn with Biology. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 19 (1): 53–58.
Listhaug, Sylvi. 2010. Ikke i mitt navn! [Not in My Name!]. Dagsavisen, 8.3.2010: 5.
Lødrup, Julie. 2010. Vi skylder kvinnekampen alt. [We Owe the Women’s Movement Everything]. Dagsavisen, 10.3.2010: 4.
Martin, Brian, Evelleen Richards and Peter Scott. 1991. Who’s a Captive? Who’s a Victim? Response to Collins’s Method Talk. Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (2): 252–255.
Miettinen, Reijo, Juha Tuunainen and Terhi Esko. 2015. Epistemological, Artefactual and Interactional-Institutional Foundations of Social Impact of Academic Research. Minerva 53 (3): 257-277.
Mysterud, Iver. 2011. Ekko fra en nyttig Hjernevask. [Echoes from an Advantageous Brainwash]. Naturen 135 (5): 235–240.
Nelkin, Dorothy. 1979. Controversy. Politics of Technical Decisions. Beverly Hills, London: Sage.
Pereira, Maria do Mar. 2012. “Feminist Theory Is Proper Knowledge, But?…”: The Status of Feminist Scholarship in the Academy. Feminist Theory 13 (3): 283–303.
Pötzsch, Holger. 2010. Kunstige konflikter [Artificial Conflicts]. Klassekampen, 8.3.2010: 16.
Retriever. Online database. Accessed via University of Oslo Library, June–July 2015.
Salmon, Merrilee H. 2000. Anthropology: Art or Science? A Controversy about the Evidence for Cannibalism. In Scientific Controversies. Philosophical and Historical Perspectives, ed. by Peter Machamer, Marcello Pera and Aristides Baltas, 199–212. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scharff, Christina. 2013. Schröder versus Schwarzer? Analysing the Discursive Terrain of Media Debates about Feminism. Feminist Media Studies 14 (5): 837–852.
Segerstråle, Ullica. 2000. Beyond the Science Wars. The Missing Discourse about Science and Society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Skeggs, Beverley. 2008. The Dirty History of Feminism and Sociology: Or the War of Conceptual Attrition. Sociological Review 56 (4): 670–690.
Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.
Tuunainen, Juha. 2005. Contesting a Hybrid Firm at a Traditional University. Social Studies of Science 35 (2): 173–210.
Tuunainen, Juha. 2013. Science Transformed? Reflections on Professed Changes in Knowledge Production. In Organisations, People and Strategies in Astronomy (OPSA 2), ed. by André Heck, 43–71. Duttelheim: Venngeist.
Vuolanto, Pia. 2015. Boundary Work and Power in the Controversy over Therapeutic Touch in Finnish Nursing Science. Minerva 53 (4): 359–380.
Vuolanto, Pia. 2017. The Universities’ Transformation Thesis Revisited: A Case Study of the Relationship between Nursing Science and Society. Science and Technology Studies 30 (2): 34–52.
Widerberg, Karin. 2006. Disciplinization of Gender Studies. Old Questions, New Answers? Nordic Strategies in the European Context. Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies 14 (2): 131–140.
WMASAW. 2013. What Men Are Saying about Women. Hooray!!! Nordic Countries Defund Gender Ideology. http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.fi/2013/04/hooray-nordic-countries-defund-gender.html. Accessed: February 3, 2017.
Ylijoki, Oili-Helena. 2003. Entangled in Academic Capitalism? A Case-Study on Changing Ideals and Practices of University Research. Higher Education 45 (3): 307–335.
Ylijoki, Oili-Helena, Anu Lyytinen and Liisa Marttila. 2011. Different Research Markets: A Disciplinary Perspective. Higher Education 62 (6): 721–740.
Åsberg, Cecilia, and Lynda Birke. 2010. Biology Is a Feminist Issue: Interview with Lynda Birke. European Journal of Women’s Studies 17 (4): 413–423.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vuolanto, P. (2018). The Relationship between Gender Research and Society in the Norwegian Brainwash Controversy of 2010–2011. In: Kahlert, H. (eds) Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19853-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19853-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-19852-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-19853-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)