Sozialkontakte online

Döring, Nicola

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-18016-4_8

Nicola Döring³

25k Accesses
6 Citations

Zusammenfassung

Nahezu die Hälfte der Online-Kommunikation hat interpersonalen Charakter. Wenn sich Menschen über Emails, Chats, WhatsApp-Nachrichten, Dating-Dienste, Online-Foren, Social-Networking-Plattformen und sonstige Soziale Medien austauschen, geht es immer auch um Identitätsdarstellungen, soziale Beziehungen und Gemeinschaftserleben. Der Beitrag fasst den sozialpsychologischen Forschungsstand zusammen und geht auf zentrale Fragestellungen, Theorien, Methoden und Befunde ein. Es zeigt sich, dass bei der interpersonalen Online-Kommunikation psychosoziale Chancen und Risiken meist Hand in Hand gehen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic

$34.99 /Month

Get 10 units per month
Download Article/Chapter or eBook
1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
Cancel anytime

Buy Now

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 84.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 84.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

Anderson, B., Fagan, P., Woodnutt, T., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2012). Facebook psychology: Popular questions answered by research. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026452.
Article Google Scholar
AoIR. (2012). Ethical decision – making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0). https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf.
Aretz, W., Gansen-Ammann, D.-N., Mierke, K., & Musiol, A. (2017). Date me if you can: Ein systematischer Überblick über den aktuellen Forschungsstand von Online-Dating. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 30(01), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101465.
Article Google Scholar
Ashby, G. A., O’Brien, A., Bowman, D., Hooper, C., Stevens, T., & Lousada, E. (2015). Should psychiatrists ‚Google‘ their patients? BJPsych Bulletin, 39(6), 278–283. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.114.047555.
Article Google Scholar
Azucar, D., Marengo, D., & Settanni, M. (2018). Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.018.
Article Google Scholar
Bacigalupe, G., & Bräuninger, I. (2017). Emerging technologies and family communication: The case of international students. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(4), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9437-7.
Article Google Scholar
Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21(3), 372–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609360756.
Article Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the „true self“ on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00247.
Article Google Scholar
Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394.
Best, P., Manktelow, R., & Taylor, B. (2014). Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review. Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001.
Article Google Scholar
Bitkom. (2017). Vorurteile gegenüber Online-Dating verschwinden. https://www.bitkom.org/Presse/Presseinformation/Vorurteile-gegenueber-Online-Dating-verschwinden.html. Zugegriffen am 30.01.2018.
Bolton, R. N., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., & Solnet, D. (2013). Understanding generation Y and their use of social media: A review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 24(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231311326987.
Article Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G. C., Ogburn, E. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(25), 10135–10140.
Article Google Scholar
Caers, R., de Feyter, T., de Couck, M., Stough, T., Vigna, C., & Du Bois, C. (2013). Facebook: A literature review. New Media & Society, 15(6), 982–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813488061.
Article Google Scholar
Cassidy, W., Faucher, C., & Jackson, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. School Psychology International, 34(6), 575–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313479697.
Article Google Scholar
Chesebro, J. W. (1985). Computer-mediated interpersonal communication. In B. D. Ruben (Hrsg.), Information and behavior (1. Aufl., S. 202–222). New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
Google Scholar
Conner, T. S., & Mehl, M. R. (2015). Ambulatory assessment: Methods for studying everyday life. In R. A. Scott & M. C. Buchmann (Hrsg.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (S. 1–15). Hoboken: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0010.
Chapter Google Scholar
Cook, D. M., Waugh, D., Abdipanah, M., Hashemi, O., & Abdul Rahman, S. (2014). Twitter deception and influence: Issues of identity, slacktivism and puppetry. Journal of Information Warfare, 13(1), 58–71.
Google Scholar
Culnan, M., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. Hahn Roberts & L. W. Porter (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191–233.
Google Scholar
Das, M., Ester, P., & Kaczmirek, L. (Hrsg.). (2011). Social and behavioral research and the internet: advances in applied methods and research strategies. European association of methodology series. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
De Andrea, D. C., & Carpenter, C. J. (2016). Measuring the construct of warranting value and testing warranting theory. Communication Research, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644022.
Der Spiegel (1987, 16. März). Traum vom perfekten Sklaven. Der Spiegel. http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13522414.html. Zugegriffen am 30.01.2018.
DGOF. (2014). Richtlinie für Untersuchungen in den und mittels der Sozialen Medien (Soziale Medien Richtlinie). http://ratmarktforschung.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/R11_RDMS_D.pdf. Zugegriffen am 30.01.2018.
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for E-Commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080.
Article Google Scholar
Döring, N. (2003). Sozialpsychologie des Internet: Die Bedeutung des Internet für Kommunikationsprozesse, Identitäten, soziale Beziehungen und Gruppen (2., vollst. überarb. u. erw. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Google Scholar
Döring, N. (2013). Modelle der Computervermittelten Kommunikation. In R. Kuhlen, W. Semar & D. Strauch (Hrsg.), Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Infomationswissenschaft und -praxis (6., völlig neu gefasste Aufl., S. 424–430). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110258264.424.
Döring, N. (2014a). Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-1-9.
Article Google Scholar
Döring, N. (2014b). Psychische Folgen der Internetnutzung. Psychologische Risiken und Chancen der Internetnutzung. Der Bürger im Staat, 4(2014), 261–267.
Google Scholar
Döring, N. (2017). Sozialpsychologie der Internetnutzung. In H.-W. Bierhoff & D. Frey (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Sozialpsychologie: Band 3. Kommunikation, Interaktion und soziale Gruppenprozesse (1. Aufl., S. 341–377). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Google Scholar
Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften (5., vollst. überarb., akt. u. erw. Aufl.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Drouin, M., & Landgraff, C. (2012). Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.015.
Article Google Scholar
Dwyer, R., Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. (2017). Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.007.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook „Friends“: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.
Article Google Scholar
Feldman, M. D. (2000). Munchausen by Internet: detecting factitious illness and crisis on the Internet. Southern Medical Journal, 93(7), 669–672.
Article Google Scholar
Fielding, N., Lee, R. M., & Blank, G. (Hrsg.). (2017). The SAGE handbook of online research methods (2. Aufl.). London: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522.
Article Google Scholar
Fisch, M., & Gscheidle, C. (2008). Mitmachnetz Web 2.0: Rege Beteiligung nur in Communitys. Media Perspektiven, 7, 356–364.
Google Scholar
Gatter, K., Hodkinson, K., & Kolle, M. (2016). On the differences between tinder versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study. Cogent Psychology, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1162414.
Article Google Scholar
Goldstraw, D., & Keegan, B. J. (2016). Instagram’s ‚fitspiration‘ trend and its effect on young women’s self-esteem. In AIS electronic library (Hrsg.), BLED 2016 Proceedings (Bd. 35, S. 190–198). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=bled2016.
Gosling, S. D., & Johnson, J. A. (Hrsg.). (2010). Advanced methods for conducting online behavioral research. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar
Gosling, S. D., & Mason, W. (2015). Internet research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 877–902. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015321.
Article Google Scholar
Gruschke, D. (2014). Über Post-Privacy. In C. Kappes, J. Krone & L. Novy (Hrsg.), Medienwandel kompakt 2011 – 2013. Netzveröffentlichungen zu Medienökonomie, Medienpolitik & Journalismus (S. 79–86). Springer VS: Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00849-9_12.
Chapter Google Scholar
Hall, J. A. (2014). First comes social networking, then comes marriage? characteristics of Americans married 2005–2012 who met through social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(5), 322–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0408.
Article Google Scholar
Hewson, C., Vogel, C., & Laurent, D. (2016). Internet research methods (2. Aufl.). Los Angeles/London/New Delhi: SAGE.
Book Google Scholar
Hu, X., Kim, A., Siwek, N., & Wilder, D. (2017). The Facebook paradox: Effects of Facebooking on individuals’ social relationships and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(87). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00087.
Ignatow, G., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2017). Text mining: A guidebook for the social sciences. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington /Melbourne: SAGE Publications.
Book Google Scholar
Iliev, R., Dehghani, M., & Sagi, E. (2015). Automated text analysis in psychology: Methods, applications, and future developments. Language and Cognition, 7(02), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.30.
Article Google Scholar
Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017). Older people and the use of ICTs to communicate with children and grandchildren. Transnational Social Review, 7(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2016.1277861.
Article Google Scholar
Joinson, A. N., & Dietz-Uhler, B. (2002). Explanations for the perpetration of and reactions to deception in a virtual community. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930202000305.
Article Google Scholar
Keith, B. E., & Steinberg, S. (2017). Parental sharing on the Internet: Child privacy in the age of social media and the pediatrician’s role. JAMA Pediatrics, 171(5), 413–414. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.5059.
Article Google Scholar
Khan, K. S., & Chaudhry, S. (2015). An evidence-based approach to an ancient pursuit: Systematic review on converting online contact into a first date. Evidence-Based Medicine, 20(2), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2014-110101.
Article Google Scholar
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123.
Article Google Scholar
Koch, W., & Frees, B. (2017). ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie 2017: Neun von zehn Deutschen online. Media Perspektiven, 2017(9), 434–446.
Google Scholar
Kokolakis, S. (2017). Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security, 64, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002.
Article Google Scholar
Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(15), 5802–5805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110.
Article Google Scholar
Kosinski, M., Matz, S. C., Gosling, S. D., Popov, V., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. American Psychologist, 70(6), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039210.
Article Google Scholar
Koutamanis, M., Vossen, H. G. M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Adolescents’ comments in social media: Why do adolescents receive negative feedback and who is most at risk? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 486–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.016.
Article Google Scholar
Kreager, D. A., Cavanagh, S. E., Yen, J., & Yu, M. (2014). „Where have all the good men gone?“: Gendered interactions in online dating. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 76(2), 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12072.
Article Google Scholar
Kutscher, N., & Kreß, L.-M. (2016). „Internet is the same like food“ – An empirical study on the use of digital media by unaccompanied minor refugees in Germany. Transnational Social Review, 6(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2016.1184819.
Article Google Scholar
Landers, R. N., Brusso, R. C., Cavanaugh, K. J., & Collmus, A. B. (2016). A primer on theory-driven web scraping: Automatic extraction of big data from the internet for use in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 21(4), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000081.
Article Google Scholar
Lankton, N. K., McKnight, D. H., & Tripp, J. F. (2017). Facebook privacy management strategies: A cluster analysis of user privacy behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.015.
Article Google Scholar
Leaver, T. (2017). Intimate surveillance: normalizing parental monitoring and mediation of infants online. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707192.
Article Google Scholar
Leaver, T., & Highfield, T. (2018). Visualising the ends of identity: Pre-birth and post-death on Instagram. Information, Communication & Society, 21(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1259343.
Article Google Scholar
Lemke, R., & Merz, S. (2018). The prevalence and gratification of nude self-presentation of men who have sex with men in online-dating environments: Attracting attention, empowerment, and self-verification. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 21(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0691.
Article Google Scholar
Linares, K., Subrahmanyam, K., Cheng, R., & Guan, S.-S. A. (2011). A second life within second life. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 1(3), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2011070104.
Article Google Scholar
Lutz, C., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2017). The dark side of online participation: Exploring non-, passive and negative participation. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 876–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293129.
Article Google Scholar
Malinen, S. (2015). Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.004.
Article Google Scholar
Mansfield-Devine, S. (2015). The Ashley Madison affair. Network Security, 2015(9), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-4858(15)30080-5.
Article Google Scholar
Marriott, T. C., & Buchanan, T. (2014). The true self online: Personality correlates of preference for self-expression online, and observer ratings of personality online and offline. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.014.
Article Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612441215.
Article Google Scholar
Moreno, M. A., Jelenchick, L. A., Egan, K. G., Cox, E., Young, H., Gannon, K. E., & Becker, T. (2011). Feeling bad on Facebook: depression disclosures by college students on a social networking site. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20805.
Article Google Scholar
Newitz, A. (2015). Ashley madison code shows more women, and more bots. https://gizmodo.com/ashley-madison-code-shows-more-women-and-more-bots-1727613924. Zugegriffen am 30.01.2018.
Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations and the Internet: reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 420–435.
Article Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. (2006). The 90-9-1 rule for participation inequality in social Media and online communities. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/. Zugegriffen am 30.01.2018.
Nowland, R., Necka, E. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2018). Loneliness and social Internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052.
Article Google Scholar
Park, A., Conway, M., & Chen, A. T. (2018). Examining thematic similarity, difference, and membership in three online mental health communities from reddit: A text mining and visualization approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.001.
Article Google Scholar
Paxton, A., & Griffiths, T. L. (2017). Finding the traces of behavioral and cognitive processes in big data and naturally occurring datasets. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1630–1638. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0874-x.
Article Google Scholar
Pegg, K. J., O’Donnell, A. W., Lala, G., & Barber, B. L. (2018). The role of online social identity in the relationship between alcohol-related content on social networking sites and adolescent alcohol use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 21(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0665.
Article Google Scholar
Quiroz, P. A. (2013). From finding the perfect love online to satellite dating and ‚loving-the-one-you’re near‘: A look at Grindr, Skout, Plenty of Fish, Meet Moi, Zoosk and assisted serendipity. Humanity & Society, 37(2), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597613481727.
Article Google Scholar
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community:homesteading on the electronic frontier. A William Patrick book. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online (First MIT paperback edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Richards, N. M. (2013). The dangers of surveillance. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1934–1965. https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/05/the-dangers-of-surveillance/.
Google Scholar
Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2004). Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00229.x.
Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412448050.
Article Google Scholar
Rotondi, V., Stanca, L., & Tomasuolo, M. (2017). Connecting alone: Smartphone use, quality of social interactions and well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 63, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.09.001.
Article Google Scholar
Sheer, V. C., & Chen, L. (2004). Improving media richness theory: A study of interaction goals, message valence, and task complexity in manager-subordinate communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(1), 76–93.
Article Google Scholar
Simon Rosser, B. R., West, W., & Weinmeyer, R. (2008). Are gay communities dying or just in transition? Results from an international consultation examining possible structural change in gay communities. AIDS Care, 20(5), 588–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120701867156.
Article Google Scholar
Spitzer, M. (2017). Cyberkrank! Wie das digitalisierte Leben unsere Gesundheit ruiniert. München: Droemer.
Google Scholar
Taddicken, M. (2014). The ‚privacy paradox‘ in the social web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 248–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12052.
Article Google Scholar
Tifferet, S., & Vilnai-Yavetz, I. (2018). Self-presentation in linkedIn portraits: Common features, gender, and occupational differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.013.
Article Google Scholar
Tiggemann, M., & Zaccardo, M. (2016). ‚Strong is the new skinny‘: A content analysis of #fitspiration images on Instagram. Journal of Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316639436.
Tiidenberg, K. (2014). Bringing sexy back: reclaiming the body aesthetic via self-shooting. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-1-3.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGEN: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy – and completely unprepared for adulthood and what this means for the rest of us. New York: Atria Books.
Google Scholar
Vallacher, R. R., Read, S. J., & Nowak, A. (Hrsg.). (2017). Computational social psychology. frontiers of social psychology. New York/London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Van Alstyne, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2005). Global village or cyber-balkans: Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Science, 51(6), 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0363.
Article Google Scholar
Van Eenbergen, M. C., van de Poll-Franse, L. V., Heine, P., & Mols, F. (2017). The impact of participation in online cancer communities on patient reported outcomes: Systematic review. JMIR Cancer, 3(2), e15. https://doi.org/10.2196/cancer.7312.
Article Google Scholar
Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Davis, C. A., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. In The 11th International AAAI Conference On Web and Social Media (ICWSM’17), Montreal, Canada, 15.-18. Mai 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03107.
Vogel, E. A., & Rose, J. P. (2016). Self-reflection and interpersonal connection: Making the most of self-presentation on social media. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2(3), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000076.
Article Google Scholar
Vorderer, P., & Schneider, F. M. (2017). social media and ostracism. In K. D. William & S. A. Nider (Hrsg.), Ostracism, exclusion, and rejection (S. 240–257). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Wada, M., Hurd Clarke, L., & Rozanova, J. (2015). Constructions of sexuality in later life: Analyses of canadian magazine and newspaper portrayals of online dating. Journal of Aging Studies, 32, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.12.002.
Article Google Scholar
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003.
Article Google Scholar
Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Hrsg.), The Sage handbook of interpersonal communication (S. 529–563). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Walther, J. B., van der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using facebook. Communication Research, 36(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330251.
Article Google Scholar
Wang, X., Zhao, K., & Street, N. (2017). Analyzing and predicting user participations in online health communities: A social support perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4), e130. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6834.
Article Google Scholar
Weisbuch, M., Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2009). On being liked on the web and in the „real world“: Consistency in first impressions across personal webpages and spontaneous behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 573–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.009.
Article Google Scholar
Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., & Chen, W. (2003). The social affordances of the internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x.
White, C. M., Cutello, C. A., Gummerum, M., & Hanoch, Y. (2018). A cross-cultural study of risky online self-presentation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0660.
Article Google Scholar
Whitty, M. T. (2017). Do you love me? psychological characteristics of romance scam victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0729, [vor Druck].
Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612442904.
Article Google Scholar
Wong AnKee, A., & Yazdanifard, R. (2015). The review of the ugly truth and negative aspects of online dating. Global Journal of Manaement and Business Research, 15(4), 1–7.
Google Scholar
Yee, N. (2014). The Proteus paradox: How online games and virtual worlds change us – And how they don’t. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research, 36(2), 285–312.
Article Google Scholar
Zell, A. L., & Moeller, L. (2018). Are you happy for me … on Facebook? The potential importance of „likes“ and comments. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.050.
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

IfMK (Institut für Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft), Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Deutschland
Nicola Döring

Authors

Nicola Döring
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Döring .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Wolfgang Schweiger
Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
Klaus Beck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Döring, N. (2019). Sozialkontakte online. In: Schweiger, W., Beck, K. (eds) Handbuch Online-Kommunikation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18016-4_8

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18016-4_8
Published: 28 April 2019
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-18015-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-18016-4
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Sozialkontakte online

Zusammenfassung

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Similar content being viewed by others