Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anforderungen an ein Modellierungswerkzeug für SOM

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geschäftsprozessorientierte Systementwicklung

  • 6496 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Einsatz und die Verbreitung von Modellierungsmethoden werden maßgeblich von der Verfügbarkeit adäquater Modellierungswerkzeuge beeinflusst. Für die Implementierung solcher Werkzeuge bedarf es einer formalisierten und umfassenden Anforderungsspezifikation. In diesem Artikel wird der methodischer Ansatz MuVieMoT vorgestellt, der ausgehend von einer Analyse der Komponenten einer Modellierungsmethode schrittweise eine formalisierte Anforderungsspezifikation in Form eines Konzeptuellen Designs entwickelt. Ein praktisches Beispiel zeigt die Anwendbarkeit des Ansatzes. Dabei werden schrittweise Anforderungen an ein SOM-Modellierungswerkzeug identifiziert und spezifiziert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.adoxx.org. Zugegriffen am 22.03.2016.

  2. 2.

    http://www.omilab.org. Zugegriffen am 22.03.2016.

  3. 3.

    http://www.omilab.org/web/muviemot. Zugegriffen am 24.03.2016.

Literatur

  • Boehm BW (1988) A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer 21(5):61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bork D (2015a) A development method for the conceptual design of multi-view modeling tools with an emphasis on consistency requirements. Dissertation, University of Bamberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork D (2015b) Using conceptual modeling for designing multi-view modeling tools. In: Proceedings of the 21st Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS), Puerto Rico, 13–15 Aug 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork D, Fill HG (2014) Formal aspects of enterprise modelling methods: a comparison framework. In: Sprague RH et al (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2014 (HICSS’2014). IEEE Computer Society Press, Big Island/Hawaii, S 3400–3409

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bork D, Karagiannis D (2014) Model-driven development of multi-view modelling methods: the MuVieMoT approach. In: Holzinger A et al (Hrsg) 9th international conference on software paradigm trends (ICSOFT-PT), Science and Technology Publications, Setúbal, Portugal, S IS-11–IS-23

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork D, Sinz EJ (2010) Design of a SOM business process modelling tool based on the ADOxx meta-modelling platform. In: Lara J et al (Hrsg) Pre-proceedings of the 4th international workshop on graph-based tools. University of Twente, Enschede, S 90–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork D, Sinz EJ (2011) Ein Multi-View-Modellierungswerkzeug für SOM-Geschäftsprozessmodelle auf Basis der Meta-Modellierungsplattform ADOxx. In: Sinz EJ et al (Hrsg) Dienstorientierte IT-Systeme für hochflexible Geschäftsprozesse, Bd 9. University of Bamberg Press, Bamberg, S 369–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork D, Sinz EJ (2013) Bridging the gap from a multi-view modelling method to the design of a multi-view modelling tool. Enterp Model Inf Syst Archit (EMISA) 8(2):25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bork D, Buchmann RA, Karagiannis D (2015) Preserving multi-view consistency in diagrammatic knowledge representation. In: Zhang S et al (Hrsg) Knowledge science, engineering and management – 8th international conference, KSEM 2015, Chongqing, S 177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkkemper S (1996) Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Inf Software Technol 38(4):275–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann RA, Karagiannis D (2015) Agile modelling method engineering: lessons learned in the ComVantage research project. In: The practice of enterprise modeling. Springer International Publishing, Cham, S 356–373

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AM (1993) Software requirements: objects, functions, and states. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ferstl OK, Sinz EJ (2013) Grundlagen der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 7. Aufl. Oldenbourg, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferstl OK, Sinz EJ, Bork D (2016) Tool support for the semantic object model. In: Karagiannis D, Mayr HC, Mylopoulos J (Hrsg) Domain-specific conceptual modelling: concepts, methods and tools. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, S 291–309, in press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fill HG, Karagiannis D (2013) On the conceptualisation of modelling methods using the ADOxx meta modelling platform. Ent Model Inf Sys Archit Int J 8(1):4–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank U (2011) Some guidelines for the conception of domain-specific modelling languages. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on enterprise modelling and information systems architectures, Lecture Notes in Informatics, Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn S 93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank U (2013) Domain-specific modeling languages: requirements analysis and design guidelines domain. Engineering, product lines, languages, and conceptual models. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, S 133–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank U, Strecker S, Fettke P, vom Brocke J, Becker J, Sinz EJ (2014) Das Forschungsfeld „Modellierung betrieblicher Informationssysteme“ – Gegenwärtige Herausforderungen und Eckpunkte einer zukünftigen Forschungsagenda. Wirtschaftsinformatik 56(1):49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann B (2015) Die Unternehmensarchitektur als Instrument der strategischen Kontrolle. Dissertation, University of Bamberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Heß M, Frank U, Kaczmarek M, Podleska L, Täger G (2014) On the requirements analysis process for domain-specific languages in the realm of multi-perspective hospital modelling. In: Heinrich et al. (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on the interrelations between requirements engineering and business process management (REBPM), IEEE, Karlskrona, Sweden S 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MJ (1995) Software requirements & specifications: a lexicon of practice, principles and prejudices. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D (2015) Agile modeling method engineering. In: Proceedings of the 19th panhellenic conference on informatics. ACM, New York, S 5–10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D, Schwab M (2012) An engineering approach for the design of hybrid modelling methods. Enterprise information systems. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, S 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis D, Buchmann RA, Bork D (2016) Managing consistency in multi-view enterprise models: an approach based on semantic queries. In: Proceedings of the 24th European conference on information systems (ECIS’2016), Research Papers, Paper 53

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos J (1982) Conceptual modelling and telos. In: Loucopoulos P et al (Hrsg) Conceptual modeling, databases and case: an integrated view of information systems development. Wiley, New York, S 49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Pütz C, Sinz EJ (2010) Modellgetriebene Ableitung von BPMN-Workflowschemata aus SOM-Geschäftsprozessmodellen. In: Mayr et al. (Hrsg) Tagungsband Modellierung, Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Bonner Köllen Verlag S 253–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce WW (1970) Managing the development of large software systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE Western electronic show and convention WESCON, IEEE Los Angeles, USA, S 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi H, Nonaka I (1986) The new product development game. Harv Bus Rev 64(1):137–146

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Group Knowledge Engineering, University of Vienna, Wien, Österreich

    Dominik Bork

Authors
  1. Dominik Bork
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Bork .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät WIAI, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany

    Thomas Benker

  2. Fakultät WIAI, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany

    Carsten Jürck

  3. Fakultät WIAI, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany

    Matthias Wolf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bork, D. (2016). Anforderungen an ein Modellierungswerkzeug für SOM. In: Benker, T., Jürck, C., Wolf, M. (eds) Geschäftsprozessorientierte Systementwicklung. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14826-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation