Abstract
This chapter investigates differences in the nature and relevance of interpersonal political communication for individual participation in elections that differ in their political saliency. The analysis uses survey data collected in Germany in national and European Parliamentary (EP) election campaigns to examine these differences. Results bring support to the thesis that first- and second-order election campaigns differ in the level of political engagement that they entail. Citizens engage more often in political conversations at the time of national compared to EP election campaigns. More frequent engagement in political conversations and the presence of a partner of political discussion who intends to vote and whose vote choice is known are positive correlates of one’s decision to cast a vote in national but not EP elections.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, Christopher J., & Paskeviciute, Aida (2005). Macro-Politics and Micro-Behavior Mainstream Politics and the Frequency of Political Discussion in Contemporary Democracies. In: Alan S. Zuckerman (Ed.), The Social Logic of Politics. Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior (pp. 228-248). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Arceneaux, Kevin (2006). Do Campaigns Help Voters Learn? A Cross-National Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 36 (1), 159-173.
Beck, Paul Allen, Dalton, Russell J., Greene, Steven, & Huckfeldt, Robert (2002). The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choices. American Political Science Review 96 (1), 57-73.
Bennett, Stephen E., Flickinger, Richard S., & Rhine, Staci L. (2000). Political talk over here over there, over time. British Journal of Political Science 30 (1), 99-119.
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., & McPhee, William N. (1954). Voting. A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
de Vreese, Claes H., & Semetko, Holli A. (2004). News matters: Influences on the vote in the Danish 2000 euro referendum campaign. European Journal of Political Research 43 (5), 699-722.
de Vreese, Claes H., Banducci, Susan A., Semetko, Holli A., & Boomgaarden, Hajo G. (2006). The News Coverage of the 2004 European Parliamentary Election Campaign in 25 Countries. European Union Politics 7 (4), 477-504.
de Vreese, Claes H., Lauf, Edmund, & Peter, Jochen (2007) The media and European parliament elections: second-rate coverage of a second-order event? In: Wouter van der Brug, & Cees van der Eijk (Eds.), European Elections and Domestic Politics. Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future (pp. 116-130). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Eveland, William P., & Hively, Myiah Hutchens (2009). Political Discussion Frequency Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation. Journal of Communication 59 (2), 205-224.
Faas, Thorsten, & Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (2010). Voters’ Political Conversations During the 2005 German Parliamentary Election Campaign. In: Michael R. Wolf, Laura Morales, & Ken’ichi Ikeda (Eds.), Political Discussion in Modern Democracies. A Comparative Perspective (pp. 99-116). London: Routledge.
Flickinger, Richard S., & Studlar, Donley T. (2007). One Europe, many electorates? Models of turnout in European Parliament elections after 2004. Comparative Political Studies 40 (4), 383-404.
Franklin, Mark N., & van der Eijk, Cees (Eds.) (1996). Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Granovetter, Mark S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6), 1360–1380.
Hansen, Kasper M., & Pedersen, Rasmus Tue (2014). Campaigns Matter: How Voters Become Knowledgeable and Efficacious During Election Campaigns. Political Communication 31 (2), 303-324.
Hardy, Bruce W., & Scheufele, Dietram A. (2009). Presidential Campaign Dynamics and the Ebb and Flow of Talk as a Moderator: Media Exposure, Knowledge, and Political Discussion. Communication Theory 19 (1), 89-101.
Hopmann, David Nicolas (2012). The Consequences of Political Disagreement in Interpersonal Communication: New Insights from a Comparative Perspective. European Journal of Political Research 51 (2), 265-287.
Horan, Patrick (1971). Social Positions and Political Cross-Pressures: A Re-Examination. American Sociological Review 36 (4), 650-660.
Huckfeldt, Robert, & Sprague, John (1995). Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication. Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, Ron, & Pattie, Charles (2006). Putting Voters in Their Place. Geography and Elections in Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kenny, Christopher (1998). The behavioral consequences of political discussion: Another look at discussant effects on vote choice. The Journal of Politics 60 (1), 231-244.
Klofstad, Casey A. (2011). Civic Talk. Peers, Politics, and the Future of Democracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Klofstad, Casey A., McClurg, Scott D., & Rolfe, Meredith (2009). Measurement of Political Discussion Networks. A Comparison of Two “Name Generator” Procedures. Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (3), 462-483.
Knoke, David (1990). Political Networks. The Structural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kwak, Nojin, Williams, Ann E., Wang, Xiaoru, & Lee, Hoon (2005). Talking Politics and Engaging Politics: An Examination of the Interactive Relationships Between Structural Features of Political Talk and Discussion Engagement. Communication Research 32 (1), 87-111.
Lake, Ronald La Due, & Huckfeldt, Robert (1998). Social Capital, Social Networks, and Political Participation, Political Psychology 19 (3), 567-584.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, & Gaudet, Hazel (1968). The People’s Choice. How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, 3rd Edition. New York/London: Columbia University Press.
Leighley, Jan E. (1990). Social Interaction and Contextual Influences On Political Participation. American Politics Research 18 (4), 459-475.
McClurg, Scott D. (2003). Social Networks and Political Participation: The Role of Social Interaction in Explaining Political Participation. Political Research Quarterly 56 (4), 449-464.
McClurg, Scott D. (2006). The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3), 737-754.
Morales, Laura (2010). Getting a Single Message? The Impact of Homogeneous Political Communication Contexts in Spain in a Comparative Perspective. In: Michael R. Wolf, Laura Morales, & Ken’ichi Ikeda (Eds.), Political Discussion in Modern Democracies. A Comparative Perspective (pp. 201-222). London: Routledge.
Morey, Alyssa C., Eveland Jr, William P., & Hutchens, Myiah J. (2012). The “Who” Matters: Types of Interpersonal Relationships and Avoidance of Political Disagreement. Political Communication 29 (1), 86-103.
Mutz, Diana C. (2002). The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science 46 (4), 838-855.
Mutz, Diana C. (2006). Hearing the Other Side. Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nir, Lilach (2005). Ambivalent Social Networks and Their Consequences for Participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17 (4), 423-442.
Nir, Lilach (2011). Disagreement and Opposition in Social Networks: Does Disagreement Discourage Turnout? Political Studies 59 (3), 674-692.
Nir, Lilach (2012). Cross-National Differences in Political Discussion: Can Political Systems Narrow Deliberation Gaps? Journal of Communication 62 (3), 553-570.
Partheymüller, Julia, & Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (2012). A “Social Logic” of Demobilization: The Influence of Political Discussants on Electoral Participation at the 2009 German Federal Election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 22 (4), 457-478.
Petithomme, Mathieu (2012). Second-Order Elections, but Also ‘Low-Cost ’Campaigns? National Parties and Campaign Spending in European Elections: A Comparative Analysis. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13 (2), 149-168.
Rattinger, Hans, Rossteucher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Wessels, Bernhard, & Wolf, Christof (2014a). Long-term Online Tracking, T24 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5724. Data file version 1.0.0.
Rattinger, Hans, Rossteucher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Wessels, Bernhard, & Wolf, Christof (2014b). Long-term Online Tracking, T21 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5721. Data file version 3.0.0.
Reif, Karlheinz, & Schmitt, Hermann (1980). Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research 8 (1), 3-44.
Rolfe, Meredith (2012). Voter Turnout: A Social Theory of Political Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenstone, Steven J., & Hansen, John Mark (1993). Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Scheufele, Dietram A., Nisbet, Matthew C., Brossard, Dominique, & Nisbet, Erik C. (2004). Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation. Political Communication 21 (3), 315-338.
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, & Mackenrodt, Christian (2010). Social networks and mass media as mobilizers and demobilizers: A study of turnout at a German local election. Electoral Studies 29 (3), 392-404.
Sinclair, Betsy (2012). The Social Citizen. Peer Networks and Political Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stockemer, Daniel (2012). Citizens’ support for the European Union and participation in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics 13 (1), 26-46.
Tenscher, Jens (2013). First-and second-order campaigning: Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Communication 28 (3), 241-258.
Tenscher, Jens, Mykkänen, Juri, & Moring, Tom (2012). Modes of Professional Campaigning. A Four-Country Comparison in the European Parliamentary Elections. The International Journal of Press/Politics 17 (2), 145-168.
Tóka, Gábor (2010). The Impact of Everyday Political Talk on Involvement, Knowledge and Informed Voting. In: Michael R. Wolf, Laura Morales, & Ken’ichi Ikeda (Eds.), Political Discussion in Modern Democracies. A Comparative Perspective (pp. 129-144). London: Routledge.
van der Brug, Wouter, & van der Eijk, Cees (Eds.) (2007). European Elections and Domestic Politics. Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Wolf, Michael R., Morales, Laura, & Ikeda, Ken’ichi (Eds.) (2010). Political Discussion in Modern Democracies. A Comparative perspective. London: Routledge.
Zuckerman, Alan S., Dasovic, Josip, & Fitzgerald, Jennifer (2007). Partisan Families: The Social Logic of Bounded Partisanship in Germany and Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zuckerman, Alan S. (Ed.) (2005). Returning to the Social Logic of Politics. Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lup, O. (2016). Interpersonal political communication in election campaigns in a comparative perspective. In: Tenscher, J., Rußmann, U. (eds) Vergleichende Wahlkampfforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12977-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12977-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-12976-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-12977-4
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)