Abstract
Women’s representation in senior leadership positions continues to be significantly lower than that of men, however, a small proportion of women do manage to break through the glass ceiling. This research summary provides a review of research into the glass cliff phenomenon whereby women who do break through the glass ceiling disproportionally occupy risky and precarious leadership positions. The summary explores multiple reasons for the glass cliff including an organizational desire to signal change and gender stereotypical leadership beliefs. We also question the explanation that women might be particularly drawn to risky leadership positions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barreto, M., Ryan, M., & Schmitt, M. (2009). The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Brown, E. R., Diekman, A. B., & Schneider, M. C. (2011). A change will do us good: Threats diminish typical preferences for male leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 930–941.
Bruckmüller, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 433–451.
Bruckmüller, S., Ryan, M. K., Rink, F., & Haslam, A. (2014). Beyond the glass ceiling: Exploring and explaining the glass cliff in order to inform organizational policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 8, 202–232.
Catalyst. (2015). 2014 Catalyst census: Women board directors. New York: Catalyst.
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Eagly, A. H., & Sczesny, S. (2009). Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed? In M. Barreto, M. K. Ryan & M. T. Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 21–48). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Eagly, A. H., Koenig, A. M., Mitchell, A. A., & Risitkari, T. (2011). Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616–642.
Elacqua, T. C., Beehr, T. A., Hansen, C. P., & Webster, J. (2009). Managers’ beliefs about the glass ceiling: Interpersonal and organizational fators. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 285–294.
Ellemers, N., Rink, F., Derks, B., & Ryan, M. K. (2012). Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this). Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 163–187.
Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 530–546.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.
Judge, E. (2003). Women on board: Help or hindrance? The Times, 11, 21.
Morgenroth, T. (2012). Signaling change: What companies hope to gain from appointing women to glass cliff positions (Unpublished diploma thesis). Technical University Dresden: Germany.
NPR (2014). http://www.npr.org/2014/05/19/313996720/in-jill-abramsons-firing-was-the-glass-cliff-to-blame. Accessed 25 June 2015.
Pillai, R. (1996). Crisis and the emergence of charismatic leadership in groups: An experimental investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 543–562.
Rink, F., Ryan, M. K., & Stoker, J. I. (2012). Influence in times of crisis: Exploring how social and financial resources affect men’s and women’s evaluations of glass cliff positions. Psychological Science, 23, 1306–1313.
Rink, F., Ryan, M. K., & Stoker, J. I. (2013). Clarifying the precariousness of the glass cliff: How social resources and gender stereotypes affect the evaluation of leaders in times of crisis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 381–392.
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16, 81–90.
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding women’s appointment to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 549–572.
Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., & Postmes, T. (2007). Reactions to the glass cliff: Gender differences in the explanations for the precariousness of women’s leadership positions. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, 182–197.
Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., & Bongiorno, R. (2011). Think crisis–think female: Glass cliffs and contextual variation in the think manager–think male stereotype. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 470–484.
Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95–100.
Van Vugt, M., De Cremer, D., & Janssen, D. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18, 19–23.
Vinnicombe, S., Doldor, E., & Turner, C. (2014). The Female FTSE Board Report 2014: Crossing the finish line. http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/8365. Accessed 25 June 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Ryan, M., Stoker, J. (2015). The Glass Cliff: Understanding the Precariousness of Women’s Leadership Position and the Underlying Mechanisms. In: Welpe, I., Brosi, P., Ritzenhöfer, L., Schwarzmüller, T. (eds) Auswahl von Männern und Frauen als Führungskräfte. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09469-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09469-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-09468-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-09469-0
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)