Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unwirksamkeit, Schaden und nicht intendierte Folgen der Implementierung von Interventionen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Zukunft der Pflege

Zusammenfassung

Einfach und eingängig klingt das Mantra Muir Grays (1997). Natürlich, so sollte es sein, zum Wohle der Empfänger von Pflege- und Gesundheitsleistungen. Wie allzu oft in Medizin, Pflege und Gesundheitsversorgung bestätigt, können aber gut gemeinte und harmlos oder segensreich erscheinende Behandlungen in der Summe eher schädlich sein. Ethisch gefordert ist vor der Einführung einer (vermeintlichen) Innovation stets eine sorgsame Überprüfung des Nutzen-Schaden-Verhältnisses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Bachner D, Haas W, Schaffner S, Semlitsch B, Uhl C, Weiß R. (20019): Evidence-based Leitlinie „Sturzprophylaxe für ältere und alte Menschen in Krankenhäusern und Langzeitpflegeeinrichtungen“. 2009. Online-Ressource (Zugriff 27.6.2014): http://www.ebn.at/cms/dokumente/10154106_5081774/7dd7df8a/Leitline_Langversion_Jan_09.pdf

  • Balzer K, Bremer M, Schramm S, Lühmann D, Raspe H. (2012): Sturzprophylaxe bei älteren Menschen in ihrer persönlichen Wohnumgebung. Schriftenreihe Health Technology Assessment (HTA) 2012; 116 (1. Aufl.). Online-Ressource (Zugriff 27.6.2014): http://portal.dimdi.de/de/hta/hta_berichte/hta255_bericht_de.pdf

  • Balzer K, Junghans A, Behncke A, Lühmann D. (2013): Literaturanalyse. Expertenstandard Sturzprophylaxe in der Pflege. 1. Aktualisierung 2013. Deutsches Netzwerk für Qualitätsentwicklung

    Google Scholar 

  • in der Pflege (Hrsg.) (2013): Online-Ressource (Zugriff 28.06.2014): http://www.wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de/fileadmin/groups/607/Literaturstudie_Akt_Sturz-prophylaxe_Langfassung.pdf

  • Battles JB, Lilford RJ. (2003): Organizing patient safety research to identify risks and hazards. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12 Suppl 2: ii2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleijlevens M, Hendriks M, van Haastregt J, van Rossum E, Kempen G, Diederiks J, Crebolder H, van Eijk J. (2008): Process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: a process evaluation. BMC Public Health 2008; 8: 332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. (2000): Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000; 321: 694–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, Howells DW, Ioannidis JP, Oliver S. (2014): How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 2014; 383: 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R, Glucksman E, Jackson S, Swift C. (1999): Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M (2008): Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: a1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig D, McDaid C, Fonseca T, Stock C, Duffy S, Woolacott N. (2009): Are adverse effects incorporated in economic models? An initial review of current practice. Health Technol Assess 2009; 13: 1-71, 97–181, iii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsches Netzwerk für Qualitätsentwicklung in der Pflege (Hrsg.) (2013): Expertenstandard Sturzprophylaxe in der Pflege. Osnabrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsches Netzwerk für Qualitätsentwicklung in der Pflege (2014): Beiträge zur Implementierung von Expertenstandards aus der Praxis. Veröffentlichungs-Liste zu den Expertenstandards des DNQP. Osnabrück. Online-Ressource (Zugriff 11.06.2014): http://www.wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de/fileadmin/groups/607/Literaturliste_-_Beitraege_zur_Implementierung_von_Expertenstandards.pdf

  • Forbes D, Thiessen EJ, Blake CM, Forbes SC, Forbes S. (2013): Exercise programs for people with dementia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 12, Art. No.: CD006489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gøtzsche PC (1996): Blinding during data analysis and writing of manuscripts. Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer N, Foman NA, MacDonald R, Dorrian J, Fitzgerald P, Rutks I, Wilt TJ (2013): Advanced wound care therapies for nonhealing diabetic, venous, and arterial ulcers: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013, 159: 532–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks MR, Bleijlevens MH, van Haastregt JC, Crebolder HF, Diederiks JP, Evers SM, Mulder WJ, Kempen GI, van Rossum E, Ruijgrok JM, Stalenhoef PA, van Eijk JT (2008) Lack of effectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall-prevention program in elderly people at risk: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56: 1390–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman K, Chen J, Cretikos M, Bellomo R, Brown D, Doig G, Finfer S, Flabouris A, (2005): MERIT study investigators (2005). Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 2091–2097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson A, Kirkham JJ, Tudur-Smith C, Gamble C (2013):Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e003436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann T, Glasziou P, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, Altman D, Barbour V, Macdonald H, Johnston M, Lamb S, Dixon-Woods M, McCulloch P, Wyatt J, Chan A, Michie S. (2014): Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014; 348: g1687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbach A. (2014): Die Implementierung des nationalen Expertenstandards zum Schmerzmanagement in der Pflege aus der Sicht examinierter Pflegefachkräfte: Eine komparative Evaluationsstudie in Einrichtungen der stationären Altenpflege in Baden-Württemberg. Pflege 2014; 27: 51–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis JP1, Lau J. (2001): Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. JAMA 2001; 285: 437–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis JP. Adverse events in randomized trials: neglected, restricted, distorted, and silenced. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 1737–1739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis JP, Mulrow CD, Goodman SN (2006): Adverse events: the more you search, the more you find. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 298–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis JPA, Evans SJW, Gotzsche PC, O’Neill RT, Altman DG, Schulz K, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group (2004): Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT Statement. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 781–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen-Flügel K. (2004): Integratives Dekubitusmanagement : Gemeinsames Qualitätsprojekt der DRK Schwesternschaft Essen e. V. und AirSystems Medizinische Produkte GmbH, 2.Teil. Die Schwester Der Pfleger 2004; 43/7: 504–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvinen TLN, Sihvonen R, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Malmivaara A, Paavola M, Schünemann HJ, Guyatt GH. (2014): Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias. J Clin Epidemiol, Biostatistics 2014; 67: 769–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolley DJ, Wright R, McGowan S, Hickey MB, Campbell DA, Sinclair RD, Montgomery KC. (2004): Preventing pressure ulcers with the Australian Medical Sheepskin: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust. 2004; 180: 324–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice A, Covinsky K, Berlin J. (1999): Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann D. (2012): Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerse N, Butler M, Robinson E, Todd M. (2004): Fall prevention in residential care: a cluster, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 52: 524–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkevold M, Bronken BA, Martinsen R, Kvigne K. (2012): Promoting psychosocial well-being following a stroke: developing a theoretically and empirically sound complex intervention. Int J Nurs Stud 2012; 49: 386–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köpke S, Meyer G. (2006): The Tinetti test. Babylon in geriatric assessment. Z Gerontol Geriat 2006; 39: 288–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köpke S, Gerlach A, Möhler R, Haut A, Meyer G. (2009): Leitlinie FEM – Evidenzbasierte Praxisleitlinie. Vermeidung von freiheitseinschränkenden Maßnahmen in der beruflichen Altenpflege. Universität Hamburg & Universität Witten/Herdecke. Online-Ressource (Zugriff 17.7.2014): http://www.leitlinie-fem.de/downloads/LeitlinieFEM.pdf

  • Köpke S, Meyer G. (2011): Sturzrisikoassessment. In: Reuschenbach B, Mahler C (Hrsg.): Pflegebezogene Assessmentinstrumente. Hans Huber, Bern, Göttingen, Toronto, Seattle: 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köpke S, Mühlhauser I, Gerlach A, Haut A, Haastert B, Möhler R, Meyer G (2012): Effect of a Guideline-based Multi-Component Intervention on Use of Physical Restraints in Nursing Homes. A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2012; 307: 2177–2184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koczy P, Becker C, Rapp K, Klie T, Beische D, Büchele G, Kleiner A, Guerra V, Rißmann U, Kurrle S, Bredthauer, D. (2011): Effectiveness of a Multifactorial Intervention to Reduce Physical Restraints in Nursing Home Residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59: 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koczy P, Klie T, Kron M, Bredthauer D, Rissmann U, Branitzki S, Guerra V, Klein A, Pfundstein T, Nikolaus T, Sander S, Becker C. (2005): Effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention to reduce physical restraints in nursing home residents with dementia. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2005; 38: 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kottner J, Gefen A. (2012): Incidence of pressure ulcers as primary outcomes in clinical trials: a comment on McInnes et al. (2012). Int J Nurs Stud 2012; 49: 372–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan S, Montgomery K, Jolley D, Wright R. (2000): The role of sheepskins in preventing pressure ulcers in elderly orthopaedic patients. Primary Intention 2000; 8: 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer G, Köpke S (2009): Vitamin D and falls. Information on harm is missing. Letter. BMJ 2009; 339: b4395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer G, Köpke S. (2009): Assessment des Sturzrisikos älterer Menschen: Methodische und klinische Betrachtungen sowie kritische Würdigung des STRATIFY Instrumentes. In: Bartholomeyczik S, Halek M (Hrsg.): Assessmentinstrumente in der Pflege. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Schlütersche, Hannover, 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer G, Köpke S, Haastert B, Mühlhauser I. (2009): Comparison of a fall risk assessment tool with nurses’ judgement alone: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 2009; 38: 417–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mistiaen P, Achterberg W, Ament A, Halfens R, Huizinga J, Montgomery K, Post H, Spreeuwenberg P, Francke AL. (2010): The effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: a prospective multicenter randomized-controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857). Wound Repair Regen. 2010; 18: 572–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möhler R, Richter T, Köpke S, Meyer G (2011): Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints in long-term geriatric care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011; Issue 2, Art. No.: CD007546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhler R, Bartoszek G, Meyer G. (2013): Quality of reporting of complex healthcare interventions and applicability of the CReDECI list – a survey of publications indexed in PubMed. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009): The PRISMA Group: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. (2010): CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller B. (2004): Implementierung des nationalen Dekubitusprohylaxestandards am Beispiel eines Krankenhauses der Maximalversorgung. Die Schwester Der Pfleger 2004; 43/6: 410–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir-Gray JA. (1997): Evidence-Based Healthcare: How to Make Health Policy and Management Decisions. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubert TR, Fischer M, Toellner-Bauer U. (2005): Algorithmen sorgen für Transparenz. Pflegezeitschrift 2005; 57: 376–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederhauser A, VanDeusen Lukas C, Parker V, Ayello EA, Zulkowski K, Berlowitz D. (2012): Comprehensive programs for preventing pressure ulcers: a review of the literature. Adv Skin Wound Care 2012; 25: 167–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes J, Gough D, Lewin S, Mayhew A, Michie S, Pantoja T, Petticrew M, Pottie K, Rehfuess E, Shemilt I, Shepperd S, Sowden A, Tugwell P, Welch V. (2013): A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 1262–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver D, Daly F, Martin F, McMurdo M. (2004): Risk factors and risk assessment tools for falls in hospital in-patients: a systematic review Age Ageing 2004; 33: 122–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver D. (2008): Falls risk-prediction tools for hospital inpatients. Time to put them to bed? Age Ageing 2008; 37: 248–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver D, Papaioannou A, Giangregorio L, Thabane L, Reizgys K, Foster G. (2008): A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the STRATIFY tool for prediction of falls in hospital patients: how well does it work? Age Ageing 2008; 37: 621–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira T, Horwitz R, Ioannidis J. (2012): Empirical evaluation of very large treatment effects of medical interventions. JAMA 2012; 308: 1676–1684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad V, Vandross A, Toomey C, Cheung M, Rho J, Quinn S, Chacko SJ, Borkar D, Gall V, Selvaraj S, Ho N, Cifu A. (2013): A decade of reversal: an analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices. Mayo Clin Proc 2013; 88: 790–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitrou I1, Boutron I, Ahmad N, Ravaud P. (2009): Reporting of safety results in published reports of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 1756–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raeder K, Siegmund U, Grittner U, Dassen T, Heinze C. (2010): The use of fall prevention guidelines in German hospitals – a multilevel analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2010; 16: 464–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Meijel B Gamel C van Swieten-Duijfjes B Grypdonck MH. (2004): The development of evidence-based nursing interventions: methodological considerations. J Adv Nurs 2004; 48: 84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DH, Sanderson M, Brazzelli M, Greig CA, Mead GE. (2013): Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 10, Art. No.: CD003316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D for the CONSORT Group (2011): CONSORT 2010: Aktualisierte Leitlinie für Berichte randomisierter Studien im Parallelgruppen-Design. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2011; 136: e20–e23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepperd S, Lewin S, Straus S, Clarke M, Eccles MP, Fitzpatrick R, Wong G, Sheikh A. (2009): Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soban LM, Hempel S, Munjas BA, Miles J, Rubenstein LV. (2011): Preventing pressure ulcers in hospitals: A systematic review of nurse-focused quality improvement interventions. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011; 37: 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires JE, Valentine JC, Grimshaw JM. Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66: 1215–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang R1, Colley L, Lynd LD. (2009): Inadequate statistical power to detect clinically significant differences in adverse event rates in randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 609–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilborn D, Grittner U, Dassen, T, Kottner J. (2010): The National Expert Standard Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Nursing and pressure ulcer prevalence in German health care facilities: a multilevel analysis. J Clin Nurs 2010a; 19: 3364–3371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilborn D, Dassen T. (2010): Pressure ulcer prevention in German healthcare facilities: adherence to national expert standard? J Nurs Care Qual 2010b; 25: 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolke R, Hennings D, Scheu P. (2007): Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation in der Pflege: Analyse von Kosten und Nutzen der Einführung des Nationalen Expertenstandards Dekubitusprophylaxe in der Pflege in einer Stationären (Langzeit-) Pflegeeinrichtung. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2007; 40: 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolke R. (2011): Kosten-Nutzen Analyse zum Nationalen Expertenstandard „Förderung der Harnkontinenz in der Pflege“. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement 2011; 16: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolke R, Elsbernd A, König M. (2012): Expertenstandard Kontinenzförderung. Studie belegt Wirksamkeit. Die Schwester Der Pfleger 2012; 51/06: 564–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorzela L, Golder S, Liu Y, Pilkington K, Hartling L, Joffe A, Loke Y, Vohra S. (2014): Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review. BMJ 2014; 348: f7668.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Halle, Deutschland

    Gabriele Meyer, Steffen Fleischer & Almuth Berg

  2. Lübeck, Deutschland

    Katrin Balzer & Sascha Köpke

  3. Hamburg, Deutschland

    Doris Wilborn

Authors
  1. Gabriele Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katrin Balzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Doris Wilborn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Steffen Fleischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Almuth Berg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sascha Köpke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Meyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule für Soziale Arbeit der Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz, Olten, Switzerland

    Peter Zängl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meyer, G., Balzer, K., Wilborn, D., Fleischer, S., Berg, A., Köpke, S. (2015). Unwirksamkeit, Schaden und nicht intendierte Folgen der Implementierung von Interventionen. In: Zängl, P. (eds) Zukunft der Pflege. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08137-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08137-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-08136-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-08137-9

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation