Zusammenfassung
Wer Marketing betreibt, versucht systematisch andere Personen durch gezielte Kommunikationen zu beeinflussen. Die Steuerung des Verhaltens von Personen erfolgt nicht nur durch Werbung für jegliche Produkte und/oder Dienstleistungen. Viele Institutionen betreiben (Massen-) Kommunikation mit dem gleichen Ziel: Schulen, Universitäten, Parteien, Regierungen, Kirchen, Behörden, Demagogen und andere Institutionen mehr. Entsprechend groß war schon immer das Interesse daran, mögliche Gesetzesmäßigkeiten zu finden. Daher ist die Suche nach Gesetzen in der Marktkommunikation, deren Einhaltung entweder Voraussetzung für die Wirksamkeit dieser Kommunikation ist oder der Optimierung der gewünschten Effekte derartiger Aktivitäten förderlich sein kann, einer der zentralen Aspekte in der Marketing-Forschung und -Praxis. Für die Praxis angestrebt werden allgemein verwendbare Grundregeln. Diese wären nichts anderes als in die Praxis transferierte Theorien, welche, wenn sie für alle Kommunikationsprobleme in allen Situationen in Raum und Zeit gleichermaßen Gültigkeit hätten (das ist die wesentliche, zentrale Anforderung an „allgemein-gültige Grundregeln“), Theorien mit maximalem Geltungsbereich wären. Wir hätten dann sog. „Immer-und-überall-wenn-dann-Aussagen“ vor uns.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Abelson R P and Lesser G S (1959) The Measurement of Persuasibility in Children. In I L Janis, C I Hovland et al, Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven: 141–166
Allyn J and Festinger L (1961) The Effectiveness of Unanticipated Persuasive Communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 35–40
Aronson E and Golden B W (1962)The Effect of Relevant and Irrelevant Aspects of Communicator Credibility on Opinion Change. Journal of Personality, 30,135–146
Aronson E, Turner J A and Carlsmith J M (1963) Communication Credibility and Communication Discrepancy as Determinants of Opinion Change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 31–36
Barton B(1980) Das Betrachren von Anzeigen. In Interview und AAnalyse, 7.,254–257
Beck K H and Frankel A (1981) A Conceptualization of Threat Communications and Protective Health Behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 204–217
Berkowitz L (Ed.) (1964, 1967, 1970 ) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. I, III, V. New York
Brehm J W (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance, New York, London
Capon N and Hulbert J (1973) The Sleeper Effect–An Awakening. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 333–358
Chaiken S and Eagly A H (1976) Communication Modality as a Determinand of Message Persuasiveness and Message Comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 605–614
Cohen A R (1957) Need for Cogition and Order of Communications as Determinants of Opinion Change. In C I Hovland, W Mandell, E H Campbell et al. The order of Presentation in Persuasion. New Haven: 79–97
Cohen A R (1959) Some Implications of S elf-Esteem for Social Influence. In I L Janis, C L Hovland et al, Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven: 102–120
Cohen A R (1964) Attitude Change and Social Influence. New York, London
v. Cranach M, Irle M und Vetter M (1965) zur Analyse des Bumerang-Effektes, Größe und Richtung der Änderung sozialer Einstellungen als Funktion ihrer Verankerung in Wertsystemen. Psychologische Forschung, 28, 535–561
Eagly A H (1978) Sex Differences in Influenceability. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 86–116
Eagly A H and Carli L L (1981) Sex of Researchers and Sex-Typed Communications as Determi-
nants of Sex Differences in Influenceability: A Meta-Analyses of Social Influence Studies.
Psychological Bulletin, 90,1–20
Eagly A H and Warren R (1976) Intelligence, Comprehension, and Opinion Change. Journal of Personality, 44, 225–242
Eagly A H, Wood W and Fishbaugh L (1981) Sex Differences in Conformity: Surveillance by the Group as a Determinant of Male Nonconformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 384–394
Etgar M and Goodwin S A (1982) One-Sided versus Two-Sided Comparative Message Appeals for New Brand Introductions. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 460–465
Faison E W J (1961) Experimental Comparison of the Efectiveness of One-Sided and Two-Sided Mass Communications on the Influence of Economic Attitudes. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Berkley
Festinger L and Maccoby N (1964) On Resistance to Persuasive Communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 359–366
Festinger L (1954) A Theory of Social Comparison Processes Human Relations, 7, 117–140 Frey D (1979) Einstellungsforschung: Neuere Ergebnisse der Forschung über Einstellungsänderungen. Marketing, ZFP, 1, 31–45
Gibson L D (1983) Not Recall. Journal of Advertising Research, 23, No. 1, 39–46
Giffin K (1967) The Contribution of Studies of Source Credibility to a Theory of Interpersonal Trust in the Communication Process. Psychological Bulletin, 68, No. 2, 104–120
Gillig P M and Greenwald A G (1974) Is it Time to Lay the Sleeeper Effekt to Rest? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 132–139
Grabitz H J and Haisch J (1982) Subjective Hypotheses in Diagnosis Problems. In M. Irle (Ed.) Studies in Decision Making. Social Psychological and Socio-Economic Analyses. Berlin, New York: 235–279
Haaland G A and Venkatesan M (1968) Resistance to Persuasive Communications: An Examina- tion of the Distraction Hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9,167–170
Haley R I, Richardson J and Baldwin B M (1984) The Effects of Nonverbal Communications in Television Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 24, No. 4,11–18
Harmon R R and Coney K A (1982) The Persuasive Effects of Source Credibility in Buy and Lease Situations. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 255–260
Heesacker M, Petty R E and Cacioppo J T (1983) Field Dependence and Attitude Change: Source Credibility Can Alter Persuasion by Affecting Message-Relevant Thinking. Journal of Personality, 51, 653–665
Hovland C I and Janis I L (1959) Summery and Implications for Future Research. In I. L. Janis, C. I. Hovland et al, Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven: 225–254
Hovland C I, Janis I L and Kelley H H (1953) Communication and Persuasion. Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven
Hovland C I, Lumsdaine A A and Sheffield F D (1949) Experiments on Mass Communication. Princeton
Hovland C I and Mandell W (1952) An Experimental Comparison of Conclusion-Drawing by the Communicator and by the Audience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 581–588
Hovland C I, Mandell W and Campbell E H et al (1957) The Order of Presentation in Persuasion. New Haven
Hovland C I and Weiss W (1951) The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–649
Irle M (Hrsg.) (1973) Texte aus der experimentellen Sozialpsychologie. Darmstadt, Neuwied
Irle M (1975) Lehrbuch der Sozialpsychologie. Göttingen, Toronto, Zürich
Irle M (1978) Theorie, empirische Forschung und Praxis in der Sozialpsychlogie. In ders. (Hrsg.), Kursus der Sozialpsychologie. Darmstadt, Neuwied: 15–28
Irle M (Hrsg.) (1978) Kursus der Sozialpsychologie. Darmstadt, Neuwied
Irle M (Ed.) (1982) Studies in Decision Making. Social Psychological and Socio-EconomicAnalyses. Berlin, New York
Irle M (Ed.) (1982) Studies in Decision Making. Social Psychological and Socio-EconomicAnalyses. Berlin, New York
Irle M (Hrsg.) (1983) Marktpsychologie, 1. Halbb. Göttingen, Toronto, Zürich
Janis I L (1967) Effects of Fear Arousal on Attitude Change. Recent Developments in Theory and Experimental Research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 3. New York: 166–224
Janis I L and Feschbach S (1953) Effects of Fear-Arousing Communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 78–92. (dt. in M Irle, Hrsg., Texte aus der experimentellen Sozialpsychologie, Neuwied, Darmstadt: 1973, 224–257 )
Janis I L and Field P B (1959) A Behavioral Assessment of Persuasibility: Consistency of Individual Differences. In Janis I L, Hovland C I et al, Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven: 29–54, (a)
Janis I L and Field P B (1959) Sex Differences and Personality Factors Related to Persuasibility. In Janis I L, Hovland C I et al, Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven: 55–68, (b)
Janis I L, Hovland C I et al (1959) Personality and Persuasibility. New Haven
Johnson H H and Scileppi J A (1969) Effects of Ego-Involvement Conditions on Attitude Change to High and Low Credibility Communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 31–36
Kapferer J N and Laurent G (1985/1986) Consumer Involvement Profiles: An New Practical Approach to Consumer Involvement. Journal of Advertising Research, 25, No. 6, 48–56
Kelman H C and Hovland C I (1953) „Reinstatement“ of the Communicator in Delayed Measure-ment of Opinion Change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 327–335
Kiesler C A and Kiesler S B (1964) Role of Forewarning in Persuasive Communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 547–549
Kotler P (1982) Marketing-Management, Analyse, Planung und Kontrolle (4. Aufl.), Stuttgart Kroeber-Riel W. (1984) Konsumentenverhalten ( 3. Aufl. ), München
Leventhal H (1970) Findings and Theory in the Study of Fear Communications. In L Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 5. New York: 119–186
Lindzey G and Aronson E (Eds.) (1985) Handbock of Social Psychology, Vol. II, (3rd Ed.) New York ( 2nd Ed. Reading: 1969, Vol. III )
Luchins A S (1957) Primacy-Recency in Impression Formation. In C I Hovland, W Mandell, E H Campbell et al, The Order of Presentation in Persuasion. New Haven: 33–61
Madden T J and Weinberger M G (1984) Humor in Advertising: A Practitioner View. Journal of Advertising Research, 24, No. 4, 23–29
Mähling F W (1983) Manipulation des Konsumenten durch suggestive Werbung? Markenartikel, 53, 8–21
Mc Guire W J (1964) Inducing Resistance to Persuasion, Some Contemporary Approaches. In L Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 1. New York, 191–229
Mc Guire W J (1985) Attitudes and Attitude Change. In G Lindzey, E Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. II, (3rd. Ed.). New York, 233–346, (2nd Ed. Reading: 1969,136–314, Vol. I II )
Mc Guire W J and Papageorgis D (1962) The Effect of Forewarning in Developing Resistance to Persuasion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 24–34
Mullen B (1984) Social Psychological Models of Impression Formation Among Consumers. The Journal of Socuial Psychology, 124, First half, 65–77
Olson D, Schlinger M J and Young C (1982) How Consumer React to New-Product Ads. Journal of Advertising Research, 22, No. 3, 24–30
O’Quin K and Aronoff J (1981) Humor as a Technique of Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 349–357
Popper K R (1979) Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie. Tübingen Popper K R (1982) Logik der Forschung ( 7. Aufl. ). Tübingen
Robertson T S, Zielinski J, and Ward S (1984) Consumer Behavior. Glenview
Rogers R W (1975) A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change. Journal of Psychology, 91, 93–114
v. Rosenstiel L und Ewald G (1979) Marktpsychologie. Bd. I I, Psychologie der absatzpolitischen Instrumente. Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln, Mainz
Shannon C and Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana Sherif M and Hovland C I ( 1961 ) Social Judgement. New Haven
Sherif C W, Sherif M and Nebergall R E (1965) Attitude and Attitude Change. The Social Judgement-Involvement Approach. Philadelphia
Simons H W, Berkowitz N N and Moyer R J (1970) Similitary, Credibility, and Attitude Change: A Review and a Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 73, No. 1, 1–16
Sternthal B and Craig S (1973) Humor in Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 37, No. 4, 12–18
Tannenbaum P H (1967) The Congruity Principle Revisited: Studies in the Reduction, Induction, and Generalization of Persuasion. In L Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 3. New York, 271–320
Triandis H C (1975) Einstellungen und Einstellungsänderungen. Weinheim
Unger F (1983) Public Relations im Kommunikations-Mix. Markenartikel, 45, 351–355
Upmeyer A (1985) Soziale Urteilsbildung. Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln, Mainz
Venkatesan M and Haaland G A (1968) Divided Attention and Television Commercials: An Experimental Study. Journal of Marketing Research, 5, 203–205
Walster E, Aronson E and Abrahams D (1966) On Increasing the Persuasiveness of a Low Prestige Communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 325–342
Walster E and Festinger L (1962) Teh Effectiveness of „Overheard“ Persuasive Communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 395–402
Zajonc R B (1968) Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1–27
Zimbardo P G, Ebbesen E B and Maslach C (1977) Influencing Attitudes and Changing Behavior. Reading
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Unger, F. (1986). Grundlagen in Kommunikation und Beeinflussung. In: Unger, F. (eds) Konsumentenpsychologie und Markenartikel. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93621-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93621-0_2
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-93622-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-93621-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive