Skip to main content

Acrylic Reactions — Ten-Years’ Experience

  • Conference paper
Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis

Summary

Sixteen cases of adverse reactions to acrylics seen over a 10-year period reflect the increasing use of these chemicals for industrial and consumer application. Fourteen patients had contact dermatitis typically of the hands and/or face (11 allergic, 1 irritant, and 2 undetermined) and two had nail dystrophy. Sources of the acrylics were nail chemicals (5 cases), adhesives (3 cases), research laboratories (3 cases), dental acrylics (3 cases), histology embedding medium (1 case), and printing plates (1 case). Eleven cases were occupational. Highest patch-test reactivity rates were for THFMA, HPMA, EGDMA, HDDA, and TMPTM. In screening for acrylic allergy MMA, n-AA and PEGDMA are suggested as a minimum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belsito DV (1987) Contact dermatitis to ethyl-cyanoacrylate-containing glue. Contact Dermatitis 17:234–236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bjorkner B (1984) Sensitizing capacity of ultraviolet cured acrylic compounds. Thesis, Department of Occupational Dermatology, University of Lund, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher AA (1986) Contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 555–560 and 652-653.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher AA (1986) Reactions to acrylic bone cement in orthopedic surgeons. Cutis 37: 425–426.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher AA (1980) Cross reactions between methyl methacrylate monomer and acrylic monomers presently used in acrylic nail preparations. Contact Dermatitis 6: 345–368.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Froines JR, Garabrant DH (1986) Quantitative evaluation of manicurists’ exposure to methyl, ethyl and isobutyl methacrylate during production of synthetic fingernails. Appl Ind Hyg 1: 70–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hiipakka D, Samimi B (1987) Exposure of acrylic fingernail sculptors to organic vapors and methacrylate dusts. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 48: 230–237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanerva L, Verkkala E (1986) Electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry of toxic and allergic effects of methylmethacrylate on the skin. Arch Toxicol [Suppl] 9: 456–459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lozewicz S, et al. (1985) Occupational asthma due to methyl methacrylate and cyanoacrylates. Thorax 40: 836–839.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Malten KE (1987) Old and new, mainly occupational dermatological problems in the production and processing of plastics. In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology, 2nd edn, chapt 31. Yearbook, Chicago, pp 290–340.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Malten KE (1987) Printing plate manufacturing processes. In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology, 2nd edn, chapt 34. Yearbook, Chicago, pp 351–366.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mathias CGT, et al. (1979) Contact dermatitis and gastrointestinal symptoms from hydroxyethylmethacrylate. Br J Dermatol 100: 447–449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patch Testing in Dermatology (1984) American Academy of Dermatology, Evanston, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rajaniemi R (1986) Clinical evaluation of occupational toxicity of methyl methacrylate monomer to dental technicians. J Soc Occup Med 36: 56–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ranchoff R, Taylor JS (1985) Contact dermatitis to anaerobic sealants. J Am Acad Dermatol 13: 1015–1020.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rietschel RL (1986) Contact allergens in ultraviolet-cured acrylic resin systems. Occup Med: State of the Art Reviews 1: 301–306.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rycroft RR (1977) Contact dermatitis from acrylic compounds. Br J Dermatol 96: 685–687.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor JS (1986) Adhesives, gums and resins. In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact dermatitis, chapt 37. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 644–674.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Taylor, J.S. (1989). Acrylic Reactions — Ten-Years’ Experience. In: Frosch, P., Dooms-Goossens, A., Lachapelle, JM., Rycroft, R.J.G., Scheper, R.J. (eds) Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74299-6_73

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74299-6_73

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74301-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74299-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics