Summary
Sixteen cases of adverse reactions to acrylics seen over a 10-year period reflect the increasing use of these chemicals for industrial and consumer application. Fourteen patients had contact dermatitis typically of the hands and/or face (11 allergic, 1 irritant, and 2 undetermined) and two had nail dystrophy. Sources of the acrylics were nail chemicals (5 cases), adhesives (3 cases), research laboratories (3 cases), dental acrylics (3 cases), histology embedding medium (1 case), and printing plates (1 case). Eleven cases were occupational. Highest patch-test reactivity rates were for THFMA, HPMA, EGDMA, HDDA, and TMPTM. In screening for acrylic allergy MMA, n-AA and PEGDMA are suggested as a minimum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belsito DV (1987) Contact dermatitis to ethyl-cyanoacrylate-containing glue. Contact Dermatitis 17:234–236.
Bjorkner B (1984) Sensitizing capacity of ultraviolet cured acrylic compounds. Thesis, Department of Occupational Dermatology, University of Lund, Sweden.
Fisher AA (1986) Contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 555–560 and 652-653.
Fisher AA (1986) Reactions to acrylic bone cement in orthopedic surgeons. Cutis 37: 425–426.
Fisher AA (1980) Cross reactions between methyl methacrylate monomer and acrylic monomers presently used in acrylic nail preparations. Contact Dermatitis 6: 345–368.
Froines JR, Garabrant DH (1986) Quantitative evaluation of manicurists’ exposure to methyl, ethyl and isobutyl methacrylate during production of synthetic fingernails. Appl Ind Hyg 1: 70–74.
Hiipakka D, Samimi B (1987) Exposure of acrylic fingernail sculptors to organic vapors and methacrylate dusts. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 48: 230–237.
Kanerva L, Verkkala E (1986) Electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry of toxic and allergic effects of methylmethacrylate on the skin. Arch Toxicol [Suppl] 9: 456–459.
Lozewicz S, et al. (1985) Occupational asthma due to methyl methacrylate and cyanoacrylates. Thorax 40: 836–839.
Malten KE (1987) Old and new, mainly occupational dermatological problems in the production and processing of plastics. In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology, 2nd edn, chapt 31. Yearbook, Chicago, pp 290–340.
Malten KE (1987) Printing plate manufacturing processes. In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology, 2nd edn, chapt 34. Yearbook, Chicago, pp 351–366.
Mathias CGT, et al. (1979) Contact dermatitis and gastrointestinal symptoms from hydroxyethylmethacrylate. Br J Dermatol 100: 447–449.
Patch Testing in Dermatology (1984) American Academy of Dermatology, Evanston, Illinois
Rajaniemi R (1986) Clinical evaluation of occupational toxicity of methyl methacrylate monomer to dental technicians. J Soc Occup Med 36: 56–59.
Ranchoff R, Taylor JS (1985) Contact dermatitis to anaerobic sealants. J Am Acad Dermatol 13: 1015–1020.
Rietschel RL (1986) Contact allergens in ultraviolet-cured acrylic resin systems. Occup Med: State of the Art Reviews 1: 301–306.
Rycroft RR (1977) Contact dermatitis from acrylic compounds. Br J Dermatol 96: 685–687.
Taylor JS (1986) Adhesives, gums and resins. In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact dermatitis, chapt 37. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 644–674.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Taylor, J.S. (1989). Acrylic Reactions — Ten-Years’ Experience. In: Frosch, P., Dooms-Goossens, A., Lachapelle, JM., Rycroft, R.J.G., Scheper, R.J. (eds) Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74299-6_73
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74299-6_73
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74301-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74299-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive