Summary
Skin-punch biopsies from 16 allergic and 13 irritant patch test reactions were evaluated in blind studies using a semiquantitative and qualitative histological registration of individual morphological parameters. Focal extension of inflammatory cells in allergic reactions was found to be statistically significantly different from diffuse extension in irritant reactions, while epidermal necrosis was found to be more pronounced in irritant reactions. Other variables which had a high value in histo-pathological diagnosis of allergic patch test reactions were the presence of oedema, lymphocytes and spongiosis; the presence of dermal and epidermal neutrophilic granulocytes was of value in the diagnosis of irritant patch test reactions.
Statistical analysis by correlation of 17 selected variables gave a diagnostic specificity of 87% and a sensitivity of 81% for allergic reactions. In irritant reactions, the specificity was 100% and the sensitivity 46%. By multiple regression analysis, an index could be calculated (4 × necrosis — 3 × oedema — 2→ ≥ 0 = irritant reaction and ≤ 0 = allergic reaction) for differentiation of allergic and irritant reactions. If this index was used in cases of allergic patch test reactions, all would be reported as allergic reactions while half of the irritant reactions would be reported as allergic. The semiquantitative and qualitative registration of histopathological parameters has shed light on the problem of histological differentiation of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fregert S (1981) Manual of contact dermatitis, 2nd edn. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.
Wilhelm E, Sarkany I, Calnan CD (1958) Studies in contact dermatitis. Trans St. John’s Hosp Dermatol Soc 41: 31–37.
Nater JP, Hoedemaeker PHJ (1976) Histological differences between irritant and allergic patch test reactions in man. Contact Dermatitis 2: 247–253.
Hartman A, Hoedemaeker PHJ, Nater JP (1976) Histological aspects of DNCB sensitization and challenge test. Br J Dermatol 94: 407–416.
Willis CM, Young E, Brandon DR, Wilkinson JD (1986) Immunopathological and ultrastructural findings in human allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 115: 305–316.
Baer RL, Rosenthal SA, Sims CF (1957) The allergic eczema-like reaction and primary irritant reaction. AMA Arch Dermatol 76: 549–560.
Medemica M, Rostenberg A (1971) A comparative light and electron microscopic study of primary irritant contact dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 56: 259–271.
Jidoi J, Kitano M, Urabe Y (1974) A comparative study of primary irritant and allergic contact dermatitis in guinea pigs. Hiroshima J Med Sci 23: 115–125.
Kerl H, Burg G, Braun-Falco O (1974) Quantitative and qualitative dynamics of the epidermal and cellular inflammatory reaction in primary toxic and allergic dinitrochlorobenzene contact dermatitis in guinea pigs. Arch Dermatol Forsch 249: 207–226.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Avnstorp, C., Balslev, E., Thomsen, H.K. (1989). The Occurrence of Different Morphological Parameters in Allergic and Irritant Patch Test Reactions. In: Frosch, P., Dooms-Goossens, A., Lachapelle, JM., Rycroft, R.J.G., Scheper, R.J. (eds) Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74299-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74299-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74301-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74299-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive