Skip to main content

Complexity Issues and New Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid

  • Conference paper
Multicriteria Analysis

Abstract

This paper is an introduction to the present chapter and aims to outline a framework within which all the included papers find a common conceptual thread while some terminological differences exist These reflect the complexity that is inherent to any decision aiding process in a real organisational context, a complexity which does not tolerate, for various validity reasons, a mutilating simplification that is often imposed by classical mathematical approaches. A need of new tools which might favorize a more mature and integrated development of the analyst’s activities, within cultural contexts other than those hypothesized by the classical assumptions of OR/DA, is also underlined. This permits one to recall some new trends of MCDA research which are, at the moment, found in literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackoff, R.L. The future of operational research is past. Journal of Operational Research Society 30, 2, pp 93–104, 1979a.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ackoff, R.L. Resurrecting the future of operational research. Journal of Operational Research Society 30, 3, pp 189–199, 1979b.

    Google Scholar 

  3. AFCET (ed). Aide a la decision dans Vorganisation. Paris 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bana e Costa, C.A.. Les problematiques de I’aide a la decision: Vers Venrichissement de la trilogie choix-tri-rangement. To appear in RAIRO Recherche Operationnelle 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bana e Costa, C.A., Vincke, P. Multiple Criteria Decision Aid: an Overview. Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Bana e Costa (ed). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 3–14, 1990.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertier P., de Montgolfier J. Approche multicritere desproblemes de decision. Edition Hommes et Techniques, Suresnes 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bowen, K. A conflict approach to the modelling of problems of and in organisations. Operational Research ’81, J.P.Brans (ed). North-Holland, Amsterdam 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bowen, K. Research on decision-aiding: how to be a DSS. In [20], pp 510–517, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bouyssou, D. Approches descriptives et constrictives d’aide a la decision -Fondements et comparaisons. These de 3e Cycle, Universite de Paris-Dauphine, Paris 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bouyssou, D., Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukias, A.A "Manifesto" for the new MCDA era. Journal of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis 2, pp 125–127, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Courbon, J.C. Processus de decision et aide a la decision. Economies et Societes. Serie Sciences de Gestion. XVI, 1455-1476, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Flood, R.L., M.C. Jackson. Creative problem solving - Total System Intervention. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hatchuel, A., Molet, H. Rational modelling in understanding and aiding human decisions: About two case studies. European Journal of Operational Research 24, pp 178–186, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heurgon, E. OR in the firm: an alternative design. European Journal of Operational Research 7, pp 183–190, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirsch, G., Jacquet-Lagreze, E., Moscarola, J., Roy, B. Description d’un processus de decision. Cahiers du LAMSADE, Universite de Paris-Dauphine, Paris 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Humphrey, P., Svenson, O., Vari, A. (eds). Analysing and Aiding Decision Processes. North-Holland, Amsterdam 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keen, P.G.W. Decision Support Systems: The next decade. Decision Support Systems 3, pp. 253–265, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Landiy, M., J.L. Malouin, M. Oral. Model validation in Operations Research. European Journal of Operational Research 14, pp 207–220, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lockett, A G., Islei, G. (eds). Improving Decision Making in Organisations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moscarola, J. Efficiency of decision, how to assist decision-making in the organization. Operational Research ’81. J.P.Brans (ed). North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 91–103, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Norese, M.F., Ostanello A. Planning processes and technician intervention: an integrated approach. Sistemi Urbani 2, pp 247–259, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ostanello, A. Decision processes and models - Some basic elements for a multicriteria analysis (in Italian). Levrotto & Bella, Torino 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ostanello, A. Efficacy evaluation of a technician intervention, between a problem formulated and reality observed (in Italian). Tecnologie e Enti Locali. V.Tagliasco and M.T.Torti (eds). SIAG Publ., Genova, pp 135–147, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ostanello, A. Action evaluation and action structuring. Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. C.A.Bana e Costa (ed). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 36–57, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ostanello, A. Validation Aspects of a Prototype Solution Implementation to solve a Complex MC Problem. Invited paper at the Xlth International Conference on MCDA, Coimbra 1994. (In this book)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenhead, J. (ed). Rational analysis for a problematic world: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. John Wiley ans Sons, London 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roy, B. Methodologie Multicritere d’Aide a la Decision. Economica, Paris 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Roy B. Decision Science or Decision-Aid Science?. European Journal of Operational Research 66, pp 297–303, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roy, B., Vanderpooten, D. The European School of MCDA: A historical review. To appear in Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tomlinson, R., Kiss, I. (eds), Rethinking the process of Operational Research and Systems Analysis. Pergamon, Oxford 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Walsham, G. Implementation of operational research: Some lessons from Organisation Theory. Invited paper IFQRS’90, Athens, June 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ostanello, A. (1997). Complexity Issues and New Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. In: Clímaco, J. (eds) Multicriteria Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60667-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60667-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64500-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60667-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics