Abstract
Today, two forms of visualization of needles or any other interventional device are possible: active visualization and passive visualization. The first is a technically ambitious procedure owing to the need for equipment, such as a second high-frequency channel, and special hard- and software for superimposing the actively visualized device on an MR image. The second method is the traditional way of performing intervention in radiology by using the direct depiction of the device itself in an X-ray beam or of the artifact it causes in sonography or computed tomography (Duckwiler et al. 1989; Fischer et al. 1994; Lufkin et al. 1987). The advantage of this concept is its straightforwardness, because no specialized hardware or software is necessary. In passive visualization of needles in MRI some difficulties can be encountered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Duckwiler G, Lufkin RB, Teresi L, Spickler E, Dion J, Vinuela F, Bentson J, Hanafee W (1989) Head and neck lesions: MR-guided aspiration biopsy. Radiology 170:519–522
Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Keating D, Bruhn H, Döler W, Oestmann JW, Grabbe E (1994) MR-guided biopsy of suspect breast lesions with a simple stereotaxic add-on device for surface coils. Radiology 192:272–273
Frahm C, Gehl HB, Melchert UH, Weiss HD (1996) Visualization of magnetic resonance compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 19:335–340
Hendrick RE, Russ PD, Simon JH (1993) MRI: principles and artifacts. Raven Press, New York, pp 144–179
Lufkin R, Teresi L, Hanafee W (1987) New needle for MR-guided aspiration cytology of the head and neck. AJR 149:380–382
Lufkin R, Teresi L, Chiu L, Hanafee W (1988) A technique for MR-guided needle placement. AJR 151:193–196
Mueller PR, Stark DD, Simeone JF, Saini S, Butch RJ, Edelman RR, Wittenberg J, Ferrucci JT (1986) MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 161:605–609
New PFJ, Rosen BR, Brady TJ, Buonanno FS, Kistler JP, Burt CT, Hinshaw WS, Newhouse JH, Pohost GM, Taveras JM (1983) Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and non-ferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 147:139–148
Wesbey G, Edelman RR, Harris R (1990) Artifacts in MR-imaging: description, causes, and solutions. In: Edelman RR, Hesselink JR (eds). Clinical magnetic resonance imaging. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 74–108
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gehl, HB., Frahm, C. (1998). Passive Visualization of Needles. In: Debatin, J.F., Adam, G. (eds) Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60272-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60272-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64329-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60272-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive