Skip to main content

The Galileo System for Implantation of Total Knee Arthoplasty

  • Chapter
Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery

Abstract

The following factors are essential for the long-term success of knee implants:

  • Correct three-dimensional placement of the implant [1,4,5,8,10,12].

  • Exact ligament balancing to ensure equal-sized, rectangular flexion and extension gaps [7].

The Galileo system is a modern, practical navigation system with an integrated mini-robot. A ligament tension measuring device additionally permits ligament tension to be measured in flexion and then applied to the extension gap using a computer-controlled mini-robot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT (1993) The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated specimen. Clin Orthop 287:177.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis.Clin Orthop 286:40–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Broers H, Hemken H, Luhmann T, Ritschl P (2002) Photogrammetric calibration of a C-arm X-ray system as a verification tool for orthopaedic navigation systems. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 56:338–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty.Clin Orthop 356: 144–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eckhoff DG, Metzger RG, Vandewalle MV (1995) Malrotation associated with implant alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty.Clin Orthop 321:28–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Farris PM, Ritter MA, Keating EM (1988) Sagittal plane positioning of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3: 355–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Insall J, Easley M (2001) Surgical techniques and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall J, Scott N (eds) Surgery of the knee, vol 2, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 1553–1620.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709–714.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Milner CE, Soames RW (1998) A comparison of four in vivo methods of measuring tibial torsion. J Anat 193:139–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Olcot CW, Scott RD (1999) The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotaing during total knee arthroplasty.Clin Orthop 367:39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ritschl P, Zettl R, Fuiko R (2002) Precision measurement of the navigated, reconstructed mechanical axis on implanting a total knee prosthesis. Description of method and results. Poster 2nd annual meeting of the International Society for Computer assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS), June 19–22, 2002, Santa Fe, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Medino JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 299: 153–156.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stiehl JB, Abbott BD (1995) Morphology of the transepicondylar axis and its application in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthoplastyl 10:785–789.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 321: 168–172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshioka Y, Siu DW, Scudamore RA, Cooke TD (1989) Tibial anatomy and functional axes. J Orthop Res 7:132–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ritschl, P., Machacek, J.F., Fuiko, R., Zettl, R., Kotten, B. (2004). The Galileo System for Implantation of Total Knee Arthoplasty. In: Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59290-4_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59290-4_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63922-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59290-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics