Skip to main content

The Controversy Between Bayesians and Classicists

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Probability, Statistical Optics, and Data Testing

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Information Sciences ((SSINF,volume 10))

  • 1534 Accesses

Abstract

A mathematical science ordinarily admits of two (or more) possible routes to a solution. This is also true in statistics, with one notable exception. There are two fundamentally different approaches to solving certain statistical problems. These are the Bayesian and Classical1 approaches. Both camps have strong and vocal partisans, and both approaches give correct answers within their frameworks. As is usual in great controversies, the argument arises out of a difference in point of view.

The reader may already surmise a bias on the part of this author, and indeed all others who describe the opposition viewpoint as “Classical.” To paraphrase the late J.R. Oppenheimer, “The word ‘Classical’ means only one thing in science: it’s wrong!”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Weber: Historical Aspects of the Bayesian Controversy (University of Arizona, Tucson 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Papoulis: Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes (McGraw-Hill, New York 1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Parzen: Modern Probability Theory and Its Applications (Wiley, New York 1960)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. B.R. Frieden: Found. Phys. 16, 883 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Additional Reading

  • Good, I. J.: “The Bayesian Influence, or How to Sweep Subjectivism Under the Carpet,” in Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, Vol. II, ed. by W.L. Harper, C.A. Hooker (Reidel, Boston 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes, E. T.: “Confidence Intervals vs Bayesian Intervals”, in preceding reference

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frieden, B.R. (2001). The Controversy Between Bayesians and Classicists. In: Probability, Statistical Optics, and Data Testing. Springer Series in Information Sciences, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56699-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56699-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41708-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56699-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics