Abstract
The first part of this chapter reviews the initial steps of tooth development, involving gene expression, transcription, and growth factors. After the cascade leading from the formation of dental placodes to buds, caps, and dental papilla, the dental follicle (or dental sac) contributes to the dental organ of deciduous and permanent teeth. Epithelio-mesenchymal interactions provide reciprocal and sequential exchanges of signals through the basement membrane and cell commitment during tooth morphogenesis.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
The induction and the human dentition development takes place during embryonic, fetal, neonatal, and postnatal childhood stages of development.
Human tooth development begins with the induction of the primary dentition during the fifth week of gestation (embryogenesis). Biomineralization starts during the fourteenth week of gestation, and the permanent dentition is completed at the end of adolescence.
The tooth is composed of different tissues. The enamel, dentin, and cementum are mineralized dental tissues, whereas dental pulp is the only non-mineralized dental tissue. The dental pulp is a specialized loose connective tissue localized in the central part of the tooth.
Anatomically and functionally, the dentin (synthesized by odontoblasts) and dental pulp are considered a single entity. Both tissues are often associated as the “dentin-pulp complex.” But, biologically, this anatomical entity has no consistency.
Understanding odontogenesis is a prerequisite to be able to understand the processes involved in dentin repair. Many studies underline that genes and signaling pathways involved in the early stages of odontogenesis also play a role in the dental pulp repair process in adults [1, 2].
2 Tooth Development: The Initial Steps
The odontogenesis is associated with the initial stages of craniofacial development and is regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. The epithelium may be ectodermal or endodermal. The mesenchyme in the first branchial arch is termed ectomesenchyme because neural crest cells have migrated in it [3–5].
In mammals, the ectoderm is at the origin of the oral epithelium which gives rise to ameloblasts, responsible for dental enamel formation. Odontoblasts, cells secreting dentin, derive from the ectomesenchyme.
The neural crest cells (NCC) of the rostral hindbrain (rhombomeres 1 and 2) and caudal midbrain migrate and colonize the first branchial arch, forming the presumptive territories of the teeth, mandible, and maxilla. Combinatory expression of homeobox genes (Hox) assigns an identity to the branchial arches after NCC migration. Prior to tooth bud formation, these cells already express the LIM-homeobox-containing genes, Lhx 6 and Lhx 7, which are hallmarks of the odontogenic lineage [6].
In the mouse embryo, Hoxa2 appears to be the only homeobox gene expressed in rhombomere 2, while HOXa2 is absent in the NCC of rhombomere 1. Furthermore, the “knockout” (KO) of HOXa2 induces transformation of the skeletal elements of the second arc in those of the first arc [7]. It was noted as the absence of expression of homeotic genes in the first branchial arch [8]. This absence of expression suggests that cell fate is not “determined” at this stage, which, in term, would promote morphogenesis/differentiation of the elements of the jaw during the later stages of development.
NCCs of the first branchial arch are at the origin of the odontogenic ectomesenchyme that will interact with the oral epithelium to form presumptive territories of the incisors, canines, and molars (in humans) in each quadrant of the two jaws. The early expression of FGF8 and BMP4 in the oral epithelium allows the induction of the homeobox gene expression (Barx1, Dlx1/2, Msx1, Msx2, Alx3) in the cells of the underlying ectomesenchyme and establishes a Hox gene expression pattern specifying separate territories [9, 10].
This combinatory Hox gene expression creates a “dental homeocode” that will control the morphogenesis/differentiation. This “homeocode” assigns an identity to these “pools” of progeny cells which will form the tooth germs specific to different types of teeth and thus plays a crucial role in the spatiotemporal regulation of odontogenesis.
Tooth morphogenesis is similar to other organ’s morphogenesis formed by the cells deriving from the neural crest (tooth, hair, feathers, salivary glands, mammary glands) [11]. During the initiation of these organs, the ectoderm thickens and forms the epithelial placode that buds in the underlying mesenchyme. The interaction between the ectoderm and underlying mesenchyme provokes the condensation of mesenchyme around the epithelial bud. During morphogenesis, the mesenchyme directs the folding and the ramification of the epithelium, a crucial step for the morphogenesis of the organ.
The teeth have been used as a model extensively to illustrate the importance of ectomesenchymal interactions and particularly the role of these interactions during the morphogenesis of different types of teeth.
The molecular signals mediating these interactions belong to several conserved signalization families. Many growth factors such as FGFs (fibroblast growth factors), Wnt(s), BMPs (bone morphogenetic proteins), the Hh(s) (Hedgehog), Notch, and EDA (Ectodysplasin-A) are involved in the dental development [8, 12–30], but their exact roles are not yet clear.
Specific spatial and temporal expression of a number of homeotic genes, such as Pitx2, Pax9, Msx1/2, Lhx6, Lhx7, Dlx1/2, and Barx1, marks the induction of odontogenesis and can be used as markers of tooth development [23, 31–44]. Recently, it was suggested that Sox2 regulates the progenitor state of dental epithelial cells and that the expression patterns of Sox2 support the hypothesis that dormant capacity for continuous tooth renewal exists in mammals [45].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are emerging as important regulators of the various aspects of embryonic development, including the odontogenesis. The small noncoding RNA function is a transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. It was admitted that miRNAs have different roles in the epithelium and mesenchyme during odontogenesis. Furthermore, “microarray” and hybridization in situ analysis have identified several miRNAs having a differential expression between the incisors and molars [46–48].
Finally, although the spatiotemporal gene expression pattern was determined in the mouse embryo, the precise role of each of these actors in the development program of the tooth is far from being fully elucidated.
Next, we describe briefly the different stages during odontogenesis, without details on molecular level. There are many extensive reviews related to this topic [30, 49, 50].
3 Stages of Tooth Development
It is well established that the basic steps of tooth morphogenesis are similar in all vertebrates. After 5 weeks of development, continuous bands of thickened epithelium, horseshoe shaped, are formed around the mouth in the presumptive upper and lower jaws. These epithelium bands, named primary epithelial bands, will give rise to the dental lamina. The establishment of the dental lamina, the area that forms the teeth, precedes the initiation of individual teeth.
The key event for the initiation of tooth development is the formation of localized thickenings or dental placodes (sixth week) within the primary epithelial bands, at the site of the future dental arches in the embryonic mandible and maxilla. The basement membrane (BM) separates, even at this early stage, the epithelium from the underlying ectomesenchyme. The BM controls the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and exchanges. The interactions between the surface epithelium and underlying ectomesenchyme are crucial both for the formation of dental placodes and during various stages of odontogenesis (Fig. 1.1).
The first evidence of the future teeth appears when the epithelial cells near the basement membrane begin to multiply (four to five cell layers) and invaginate into the underlying ectomesenchyme, giving rise to the dental lamina. The ectomesenchyme starts to change composition in response and becomes more condensed. Thus, this initial epithelial invagination clearly marks the apparition of the tooth crown area and will develop through several distinct stages (bud, cap, bell stage). Tooth development is a continuous process, so clear distinction between the transition stages is not possible.
Each dental lamina is at the origin of a tooth bud (Fig. 1.2). Tooth buds of the deciduous canines and incisors are apparent in the 8-week-old human embryo, and buds of the deciduous molars are formed during the ninth week. The bud stage is characterized by the progression of ectodermal invagination in the underlying ectomesenchyme, in which cells are packed closely around the epithelial bud. This will be followed by the changes in the shape of the dental bud and formation of the dental cap (Figs. 1.2 and 1.3). The cap stage is characterized by a concavity of the epithelium that partially envelops the underlying mesenchyme. During the cap stage, the epithelial outgrowth is referred widely as the enamel organ and is related to the differentiation of the outer dental epithelium, inner dental epithelium, and the appearance of the enamel knot. Also, there is a condensation of the ectomesenchyme in the concavity of the enamel organ forming the dental papilla, at the origin of the odontoblasts and the dental pulp [51, 52] (Figs. 1.4 and 1.5).
Starting from the late cap stage and through the transition from cap to bell stage of tooth development, many developmental changes are observed. All the elements of the enamel organ are well distinguished (histodifferentiation):
-
The outer enamel epithelium located at the periphery of the cap in contact with the peridental mesenchyme.
-
The inner enamel epithelium formed by cells which are precursors of ameloblasts and which are separated from the future dental pulp by a basement membrane.
-
The stellate reticulum and the stratum intermedium, two intermediate layers of the enamel organ involved in the transcellular and intercellular transfer of precursors of enamel proteins, and in the provision of energy for these transfers (synthesis and degradation of glycogen). For some authors, the stratum intermedium differentiates during the bell stage.
-
The primary enamel knot, a transient structure situated in the center of the enamel organ that will control the morphogenesis of dental cusps and determine the final shape of the tooth [53]. Subsequently, secondary enamel knots will be formed, contributing to the formation of molar cusps. The enamel knots within epithelium are described as organizing centers composed by “clusters” of cells that secrete many morphogen signals like Shh, Wnts, FGFs, and BMPs, whose roles are not yet fully defined.
Besides the role of the enamel knots to regulate the size and shape of the teeth, the signals from the mesenchyme are also necessary for the formation and maintenance of epithelial compartments.
The cap stage is followed by the bell stage, during which the dental crown acquires its final shape (morphodifferentiation) and the formation of the cusp pattern is observed (Figs. 1.6 and 1.7).
The outer and inner enamel epithelia are continuous, and they meet at the rim of the enamel organ known as the zone of reflection or cervical loop. Extended in Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath, this cervical loop will control the formation of the root, including the root odontoblast differentiation (Figs. 1.8 and 1.9). The cervical loop progresses in apical direction, and many cell divisions sustain this preeruptive crown growth, thus delimiting increasingly the dental papilla area. In the pluricuspid teeth, the secondary enamel knots appear at the top of each cusp.
In the late bell stage, tooth morphogenesis is followed by a phase of cell differentiation of the inner enamel epithelium and of the ectomesenchymal cells at the epithelial-mesenchymal interface with the basement membrane (histodifferentiation). These cells will differentiate in pre-ameloblasts and pre-odontoblasts in order to become polarized and secreting ameloblasts and odontoblasts to form the enamel and dentin, respectively. The first layers of the enamel and dentine are visible at the end of the coronary morphogenesis. Thus, during embryogenesis, morphogenesis and differentiation are coupled. Cells acquire the competence to differentiate according to their position. Differentiation of pre-ameloblasts and odontoblasts is pre-coupled spatiotemporally to these morphogenetic movements that provide the pattern formation of the crown and the beginning of the root formation.
The condensed ectomesenchyme situated at the periphery of the enamel organ and dental papilla is referred as the dental follicle or dental sac and will give rise to the supporting dental tissues as the tooth cementum, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone. Thus, the dental follicle is involved in the formation of the root and tooth eruption (Figs. 1.5 and 1.10).
The enamel organ, the dental papilla, and the dental follicle form the dental organ or tooth germ.
In humans, there are two dentitions, deciduous and permanent (primary, temporary). The development of the deciduous dentition begins around the sixth gestational week. Then quickly, there is coexistence of deciduous and permanent dental germs, and odontogenesis ends around the age of 18–25 years by formation of the dental root and the eruption of the third permanent molars.
The development of the permanent teeth begins during the odontogenesis of deciduous teeth. The deciduous teeth are formed from the primary dental lamina. In humans, the permanent teeth develop in two ways: (1) sequentially at the lingual region of the enamel organ of each temporary tooth (successional teeth) or (2) permanent molars grow from an extension of the initial dental lamina. These are non-successional teeth.
The spatiotemporal control of dental development is orchestrated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. At the molecular level, these interactions provide reciprocal and sequential exchanges of signals through the basement membrane. These signals/morphogens are associated with the “determination” (commitment) of the cells in different territories during the morphogenesis.
References
Kitamura C, Kimura K, Nakayama T, Terashita M. Temporal and spatial expression of c-jun and jun-B proto-oncogenes in pulp cells involved with reparative dentinogenesis after cavity preparation of rat molars. J Dent Res. 1999;78(2):673–80.
Mitsiadis TA, Fried K, Goridis C. Reactivation of Delta-Notch signaling after injury: complementary expression patterns of ligand and receptor in dental pulp. Exp Cell Res. 1999;246(2):312–8.
Tucker A, Sharpe P. The cutting-edge of mammalian development; how the embryo makes teeth. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(7):499–508.
Soukup V, Epperlein HH, Horacek I, Cerny R. Dual epithelial origin of vertebrate oral teeth. Nature. 2008;455(7214):795–8.
Fraser GJ, Hulsey CD, Bloomquist RF, Uyesugi K, Manley NR, Streelman JT. An ancient gene network is co-opted for teeth on old and new jaws. PLoS Biol. 2009;7(2):e31.
Mandler M, Neubuser A. FGF signaling is necessary for the specification of the odontogenic mesenchyme. Dev Biol. 2001;240(2):548–59.
Rijli FM, Mark M, Lakkaraju S, Dierich A, Dolle P, Chambon P. A homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene. Cell. 1993;75(7):1333–49.
Cobourne MT, Sharpe PT. Tooth and jaw: molecular mechanisms of patterning in the first branchial arch. Arch Oral Biol. 2003;48(1):1–14.
McCollum MA, Sharpe PT. Developmental genetics and early hominid craniodental evolution. Bioessays. 2001;23(6):481–93.
McCollum M, Sharpe PT. Evolution and development of teeth. J Anat. 2001;199(Pt 1–2):153–9.
Pispa J, Thesleff I. Mechanisms of ectodermal organogenesis. Dev Biol. 2003;262(2):195–205.
Jernvall J, Aberg T, Kettunen P, Keranen S, Thesleff I. The life history of an embryonic signaling center: BMP-4 induces p21 and is associated with apoptosis in the mouse tooth enamel knot. Development. 1998;125(2):161–9.
Kettunen P, Karavanova I, Thesleff I. Responsiveness of developing dental tissues to fibroblast growth factors: expression of splicing alternatives of FGFR1, -2, -3, and of FGFR4; and stimulation of cell proliferation by FGF-2, -4, -8, and -9. Dev Genet. 1998;22(4):374–85.
Trumpp A, Depew MJ, Rubenstein JL, Bishop JM, Martin GR. Cre-mediated gene inactivation demonstrates that FGF8 is required for cell survival and patterning of the first branchial arch. Genes Dev. 1999;13(23):3136–48.
Dassule HR, Lewis P, Bei M, Maas R, McMahon AP. Sonic hedgehog regulates growth and morphogenesis of the tooth. Development. 2000;127(22):4775–85.
Hjalt TA, Semina EV, Amendt BA, Murray JC. The Pitx2 protein in mouse development. Dev Dyn. 2000;218(1):195–200.
Jackman WR, Draper BW, Stock DW. Fgf signaling is required for zebrafish tooth development. Dev Biol. 2004;274(1):139–57.
Mitsiadis TA, Regaudiat L, Gridley T. Role of the Notch signalling pathway in tooth morphogenesis. Arch Oral Biol. 2005;50(2):137–40.
Jarvinen E, Salazar-Ciudad I, Birchmeier W, Taketo MM, Jernvall J, Thesleff I. Continuous tooth generation in mouse is induced by activated epithelial Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(49):18627–32.
Chen S, Gluhak-Heinrich J, Martinez M, Li T, Wu Y, Chuang HH, Chen L, Dong J, Gay I, MacDougall M. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 mediates dentin sialophosphoprotein expression and odontoblast differentiation via NF-Y signaling. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(28):19359–70.
Klein OD, Lyons DB, Balooch G, Marshall GW, Basson MA, Peterka M, Boran T, Peterkova R, Martin GR. An FGF signaling loop sustains the generation of differentiated progeny from stem cells in mouse incisors. Development. 2008;135(2):377–85.
Liu F, Chu EY, Watt B, Zhang Y, Gallant NM, Andl T, Yang SH, Lu MM, Piccolo S, Schmidt-Ullrich R, Taketo MM, Morrisey EE, Atit R, Dlugosz AA, Millar SE. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling directs multiple stages of tooth morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2008;313(1):210–24.
Chen J, Lan Y, Baek JA, Gao Y, Jiang R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling plays an essential role in activation of odontogenic mesenchyme during early tooth development. Dev Biol. 2009;334(1):174–85.
Jackman WR, Yoo JJ, Stock DW. Hedgehog signaling is required at multiple stages of zebrafish tooth development. BMC Dev Biol. 2010;10:119.
Liu F, Millar SE. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in oral tissue development and disease. J Dent Res. 2010;89(4):318–30.
Lohi M, Tucker AS, Sharpe PT. Expression of Axin2 indicates a role for canonical Wnt signaling in development of the crown and root during pre- and postnatal tooth development. Dev Dyn. 2010;239(1):160–7.
Mitsiadis TA, Graf D, Luder H, Gridley T, Bluteau G. BMPs and FGFs target Notch signalling via jagged 2 to regulate tooth morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation. Development. 2010;137(18):3025–35.
Li J, Huang X, Xu X, Mayo J, Bringas Jr P, Jiang R, Wang S, Chai Y. SMAD4-mediated WNT signaling controls the fate of cranial neural crest cells during tooth morphogenesis. Development. 2011;138(10): 1977–89.
Haara O, Harjunmaa E, Lindfors PH, Huh SH, Fliniaux I, Aberg T, Jernvall J, Ornitz DM, Mikkola ML, Thesleff I. Ectodysplasin regulates activator-inhibitor balance in murine tooth development through Fgf20 signaling. Development. 2012;139(17): 3189–99.
Thesleff I. Current understanding of the process of tooth formation: transfer from the laboratory to the clinic. Aust Dent J. 2013 doi: 10.1111/adj.12102.
Chen Y, Bei M, Woo I, Satokata I, Maas R. Msx1 controls inductive signaling in mammalian tooth morphogenesis. Development. 1996;122(10):3035–44.
Mucchielli ML, Mitsiadis TA, Raffo S, Brunet JF, Proust JP, Goridis C. Mouse Otlx2/RIEG expression in the odontogenic epithelium precedes tooth initiation and requires mesenchyme-derived signals for its maintenance. Dev Biol. 1997;189(2):275–84.
Neubuser A, Peters H, Balling R, Martin GR. Antagonistic interactions between FGF and BMP signaling pathways: a mechanism for positioning the sites of tooth formation. Cell. 1997;90(2):247–55.
Mitsiadis TA, Mucchielli ML, Raffo S, Proust JP, Koopman P, Goridis C. Expression of the transcription factors Otlx2, Barx1 and Sox9 during mouse odontogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106 Suppl 1:112–6.
Tucker AS, Matthews KL, Sharpe PT. Transformation of tooth type induced by inhibition of BMP signaling. Science. 1998;282(5391):1136–8.
Tucker AS, Sharpe PT. Molecular genetics of tooth morphogenesis and patterning: the right shape in the right place. J Dent Res. 1999;78(4):826–34.
Zhao Y, Guo YJ, Tomac AC, Taylor NR, Grinberg A, Lee EJ, Huang S, Westphal H. Isolated cleft palate in mice with a targeted mutation of the LIM homeobox gene lhx8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(26): 15002–6.
Ferguson CA, Tucker AS, Sharpe PT. Temporospatial cell interactions regulating mandibular and maxillary arch patterning. Development. 2000;127(2):403–12.
Aberg T, Wang XP, Kim JH, Yamashiro T, Bei M, Rice R, Ryoo HM, Thesleff I. Runx2 mediates FGF signaling from epithelium to mesenchyme during tooth morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2004;270(1):76–93.
Tucker AS, Headon DJ, Courtney JM, Overbeek P, Sharpe PT. The activation level of the TNF family receptor, Edar, determines cusp number and tooth number during tooth development. Dev Biol. 2004;268(1):185–94.
Chen S, Rani S, Wu Y, Unterbrink A, Gu TT, Gluhak-Heinrich J, Chuang HH, Macdougall M. Differential regulation of dentin sialophosphoprotein expression by Runx2 during odontoblast cytodifferentiation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(33):29717–27.
Denaxa M, Sharpe PT, Pachnis V. The LIM homeodomain transcription factors Lhx6 and Lhx7 are key regulators of mammalian dentition. Dev Biol. 2009;333(2): 324–36.
Venugopalan SR, Li X, Amen MA, Florez S, Gutierrez D, Cao H, Wang J, Amendt BA. Hierarchical interactions of homeodomain and forkhead transcription factors in regulating odontogenic gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(24):21372–83.
Sharpe PT. Homeobox genes and orofacial development. Connect Tissue Res. 1995;32(1–4):17–25.
Juuri E, Jussila M, Seidel K, Holmes S, Wu P, Richman J, Heikinheimo K, Chuong CM, Arnold K, Hochedlinger K, Klein O, Michon F, Thesleff I. Sox2 marks epithelial competence to generate teeth in mammals and reptiles. Development. 2013;140(7): 1424–32.
Michon F, Tummers M, Kyyronen M, Frilander MJ, Thesleff I. Tooth morphogenesis and ameloblast differentiation are regulated by micro-RNAs. Dev Biol. 2010;340(2):355–68.
Jheon AH, Li CY, Wen T, Michon F, Klein OD. Expression of microRNAs in the stem cell niche of the adult mouse incisor. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24536.
Oommen S, Otsuka-Tanaka Y, Imam N, Kawasaki M, Kawasaki K, Jalani-Ghazani F, Anderegg A, Awatramani R, Hindges R, Sharpe PT, Ohazama A. Distinct roles of MicroRNAs in epithelium and mesenchyme during tooth development. Dev Dyn. 2012;241(9):1465–72.
Thesleff I. Epithelial-mesenchymal signalling regulating tooth morphogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(Pt 9):1647–8.
Thesleff I. Developmental biology and building a tooth. Quintessence Int. 2003;34(8):613–20.
Goldberg M. La dent normale et pathologique. Bruxelles: De Boeck University; 2001.
Nanci A. Ten cate’s oral histology. Development, structure, and function. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2008.
Jernvall J, Thesleff I. Reiterative signaling and patterning during mammalian tooth morphogenesis. Mech Dev. 2000;92(1):19–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dimitrova-Nakov, S., Goldberg, M. (2014). Pulp Development. In: Goldberg, M. (eds) The Dental Pulp. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55160-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55160-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55159-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55160-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)