Abstract
In the previous chapter I asserted that the participatory assessment of socially and ethically contentious technologies (SECT) must pay attention to three meta-ethical considerations. Firstly, that a technology ethics must pay attention to the influential role of technological artefacts in shaping social moral values, and in inhibiting and enabling the moral actions of individuals embedded within complex actor-networks. Secondly, that the application of normative ethical theories in a classical metaphysics-down-to-practical matters way is insufficient to ensure a balanced range of judgements that reflect the broad plurality of moral perspectives present within society. And thirdly, that the judgements of experts, be they scientists or moral philosophers is contested, as they possess no special insight into moral matters and hence the control of technology policy through expert judgement represents an alternative form of technocratic control.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Ajzner, J.: Some of the Problems of Rationality, Understanding, and Universalistic Ethics. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24(4), 466–485 (1994)
Apel, K.O.: Understanding and explanation: a transcendental-pragmatic perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge (1984) (trans. Warnke, G.)
Aristotle: 350 B.C./2000. Nichomachean Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000) (trans. Crisp, R.)
Bargh, J.A., Chartrand, T.L.: The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist 54(7), 462–479 (1999)
Beauchamp, T.L.: On Eliminating the Distinction Between Applied Ethics and Ethical Theory. The Monist. 67, 514–531 (1984)
Beck, U.: Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity. Sage, London (1996)
Beekman, V., Brom, F.W.A.: Ethical Tools to Support Systematic Public Deliberations About the Ethical Aspects of Agricultural Biotechnologies. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20(1), 3–12 (2007)
Brandt, R.B.: A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1979)
Brandt, R.B.: The Science of Man and Wide Reflective Equilibrium. Ethics 100, 259–278 (1990)
Caspary, W.R.: Dewey on Democracy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (2000)
Cohen, S.: The Nature of Moral Reasoning: The Framework and Activities of Ethical Deliberation, Argument, and Decision-Making. Oxford University Press, Melbourne (2004)
Daniels, N.: Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics. Journal of Philosophy 76(5), 256–282 (1979)
Daniels, N.: From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. In: Summer, L.W., Boyle, J. (eds.) Philosophical Perspective in Bioethics. Toronto University Press, Toronto (1996a)
Daniels, N.: Justice and justification: Reflective equilibrium in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996b)
Daniels, N.: Reflective Equilibrium. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2003), http://www.seop.leeds.ac.uk/archives/spr2004/entries/reflective-equilibrium/ (accessed June 1, 2012)
Des Jardins, J.R.: Ethics, Energy, and Responsibilities to Future Generations. In: Des Jardins, J.R. (ed.) Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont (1997)
Evans, D.: Emotions as Aids and Obstacles in Thinking About Risky Technologies. In: Roeser, S. (ed.) Emotions and Risky Technologies, pp. 81–88. Springer, Dordrecht (2010)
Farber, D.A.: Eco-pragmatism: Making Sensible Environmental Decisions in an Uncertain World. University of Chicago Press, London (1999)
Foucault, M.: The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. Routledge, London (2002)
Goodman, N.: Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1955)
Greene, J., Haidt, J.: How (and where) does moral judgement work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(12), 517–523 (2002)
Habermas, J.: Theory of Communicative Action. Reason and the Rationalization of Society, vol. 1. Beacon Press (1984) (trans. McCarthy, T.)
Habermas, J.: The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987) (trans. Lawrence, F.G.)
Habermas, J.: Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991) (trans. Lenhart, C., Weber Nicholson, S.)
Habermas, J.: Justification and application: remarks on discourse ethics. Polity Press, Cambridge (1993) (trans. Cronin, C.)
Habermas, J.: On the pragmatics of communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
Haidt, J.: The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108, 814–834 (2001)
Haidt, J.: The moral emotions. In: Davidson, R.J., Scherer, K.R., Goldsmith, H.H. (eds.) Handbook of Affective Sciences, pp. 852–870. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)
Hare, R.M.: Rawls’ Theory of Justice. Philosophical Quarterly 23, 144–155 (1973)
Harris, J.: Immortal Ethics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1019, 527–534 (2004)
Held, D.: Whose Agenda? Ethics versus Cognitive Science. In: May, L., Friedman, M., Clark, A. (eds.) Mind and Morals: Essays on Cognitive Science and Ethics. MIT Press, London (1996)
Hume, D.: Treatise on Human Nature: Of Virtue and Vice in General. Oxford University Press (1739)
James, W.: The Meaning of Truth. In: Buckhardt, F.H. (ed.) Essays in Philosophy: The Works of William James. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)
James, W.: The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life. In: The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1979)
Joas, H.: Pragmatism and Social Theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993)
Johnson, J.: Habermas on Strategic and Communicative Action. Political Theory 19(2), 181–203 (1991)
Kaiser, M., Millar, K., Forsberg, E.M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S.: Developing the ethical matrix as a decision support framework: GM fish as a case study. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20(1), 53–63 (2007)
Kant, I.: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten). Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1785/1998)
Kohlberg, L.: Stage and sequence: the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In: Goslin, D.A. (ed.) Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, pp. 347–480. Rand McNally, London (1969)
Kohlberg, L.: The psychology of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages. Harper & Row, London (1984)
Kohlberg, L.: The Claim to Moral Adequacy of a Highest Stage of Moral Judgment. The Journal of Philosophy 70(18), 630–646 (1973), doi:10.2307/2025030
Light, A., Katz, E.: Environmental Pragmatism. Routledge, London (1996)
Lyons, D.: The nature and soundness of contract and coherence arguments. In: Reading Rawls, Critical Studies of “A Theory of Justice”, pp. 141–169. Stanford University Press (1989)
MacIntyre, A.: Does Applied Ethics Rest on a Mistake? The Monist 67, 489–513 (1984)
Miller, R.B.: Without Intuitions. Metaphilosophy 31(3), 231–250 (2000)
Minteer, B.A.: Intrinsic Value for Pragmatists? Environmental Ethics 23(1), 57–75 (2001)
Nisbett, R., Wilson, T.: Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84, 231–259 (1977)
Parker, K.A.: Public Hearings / Hearing Publics: A Pragmatic Approach to Applying Ethics. In: Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy Annual Meeting, The Pragmatism Cybrary, Vanderbuilt University (1993)
Parking, A.: On the Practical Relevance of Habermas’s Theory Communicative Action. Social Theory and Practice 22(3), 417–442 (1996)
Perrow, C.: Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999)
Piaget, J.: The Moral Development of the Child. Free Press, London (1965)
Pizarro, D.A., Bloom, P.: The Intelligence of the Moral Intuitions: Comment on Haidt. Psychological Review 110(1), 193–196 (2003)
Plato: Timaeus. Bobbs-Merrili, Indianapolis (1949) (trans. Jowett, B.)
Rawls, J.: The Independence of Moral Theory. In: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association (1974)
Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice, 2nd Aufl. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)
Rosenthal, S.B.: Charles Pierce’s Pragmatic Pluralism. State University of New York, New York (1994)
Sagoff, M.: The Economy of the Earth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)
Schneider, W.: Automaticity in complex cognition (2003), http://coglab.psy.cmu.edu/index_main.html (accessed June 1, 2012)
Schneider, W., Chein, J.M.: Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science (27), 525–559 (2003)
Schroeter, F.: Reflective Equilibrium and Anti-theory. Nous 38(1), 110–134 (2004)
Skolleerhorn, E.: Habermas and Nature: The Theory of Communicative Action for Studying Environmental Policy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41(5), 155–174 (1998)
Solomon, R.C.: The philosophy of emotions. In: Lewis, M., Haviland, J. (eds.) Handbook of Emotions. Guildford Press, London (1993)
Sylvan, R.: Is there a need for a new environmental ethic? In: Light, A., Royston III, H. (eds.) Environmental Ethics: An Anthology. Blackwell, Malden (2003)
Thompson, P.B.: Pragmatism and Policy: The Case of Water. In: Light, A., Katz, E. (eds.) Environmental Pragmatism. Routledge, London (1996)
van Es, R.: Negotiating Ethics as a Two Level Debate. In: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Boston, MA (1998)
Varner, G.E., Gilbertz, S.J., Rai Paterson, T.: Teaching Environmental Ethics as a Method of Conflict Management. In: Light, A., Katz, E. (eds.) Environmental Pragmatism. Routledge, London (1996)
Villa, D.R.: Postmodernism and the Public Sphere. American Political Science Review 86(3), 712–721 (1992)
Webler, T.: “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick. In: Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P. (eds.) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1995)
Wenz, P.: Environmental Ethics Today. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)
Wood, J.: The Global anti-fracking movement: What it wants, how it operates and what next. Control Risks Group, London (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cotton, M. (2014). Pragmatism, Public Deliberation and Technology Ethics. In: Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 13. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45088-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45088-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45087-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45088-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)