Abstract
In the previous chapter deliberative public engagement towards technology policy was presented as a necessary means to achieve democratically legitimate and socially robust outcomes when risks, costs and other social and environmental benefits and burdens are distributed asymmetrically between social groups and ecological systems. The arguments within this book are grounded in a normative ethical commitment to deliberative democratic control of technology governance despite the various drawbacks associated with representativeness and legitimacy discussed in chapter 1. The grounding assumption is that pluralistic involvement of heterogeneous publics in participatory Technology Assessment (PTA) can assure that decisions are substantively fairer than those that are based upon technical expertise alone. Public trust in institutions gained through fair and open decision-making may help to foster broader acceptance of controversial technology proposals when they would have been otherwise objected to. At the very least, the processes and methods of PTA legitimise public objections, in the sense that they are transparent to decision-makers and based upon a process of justification through open deliberation. This procedural fairness aspect of decision-making has been shown under certain circumstances to alleviate public scepticism towards implementing institutions and to build public support for decisions taken, even when they are politically unpopular amongst an affected community (Gross 2007; Renn et al. 1996). However, though it provides opportunities to enhance democratic legitimacy, this should not be confused with an assessment of the ethics of technology policy and practice, as these two facets are ontologically distinct.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Allenby, B.R.: Engineering and Ethics for an Anthropogenic Planet. In: Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering, pp. 7–28. National Academies Press, Washington DC (2004)
Baylis, F.: Expert Testimony by Persons Trained in Ethical Reasoning: The Case of Andrew Sawatzky. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28, 224–231 (2000)
Bijker, W.E.: Do Not Despair: There Is Life after Constructivism. Science, Technology and Human Values 18(1), 113–138 (1993)
Blackburn, S.: Relativism. In: LaFollette, H. (ed.) Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2000)
Callon, M., Hughes, T.P.: Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis. In: Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T.J. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, pp. 83–103. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)
Caplan, A.: If I were a rich man could I buy a pancreas? Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1994)
Dunn, R.: Moral Psychology and Expressivism. European Journal of Philosophy 12(2), 178–198 (2004)
Flanagan, M., Howe, D., Nissenbaum, H., Weckert, J.: Embodying Values in Technology: Theory and Practice. In: van den Hoven, J. (ed.) Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Gross, C.: Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy 35(5), 2727–2736 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013
Haidt, J., Koller, S., Dias, M.: Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 613–628 (1993)
Hume, D.: Treatise on Human Nature: of Virtue and Vice in General. Oxford University Press (1739)
Imwinkelried, E.J.: Expert Testimony by Ethicists: What Should be the Norm? The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33(2), 198–221 (2005)
Johnson, D.G., Powers, T.M.: Ethics and Technology: A Program for Future Research. In: Mitcham, C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, pp. xxvii–xxxv. Thompson Gale, Farmington Hills (2005)
Kekes, J.: Moral Imagination, Freedom and the Humanities. American Philosophical Quarterly 28(2), 101–111 (1991)
Keulartz, J., Korthals, M., Schermer, M., Swierstra, T.E.: Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture. In: The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol. 3. Kluwer, Dodrecht (2002)
Kheel, M.: From Heroic to Holistic Ethics: The Ecofeminist Challenge. In: Gaard, G. (ed.) Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature, pp. 243–271. Temple University Press, Philadelphia (1993)
Latour, B.: Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, London (1987)
Latour, B.: We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead (1993)
Latour, B.: La science en action: introduction à la sociologie des sciences (Science in action: introduction to the sociology of science). Gallimard, Paris (1995)
Latour, B.: On Recalling ANT. In: Law, J., Hassard, J. (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After, pp. 15–25. Blackwell, Oxford (1999)
Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
Law, J., Hassard, J.: Actor Network Theory and After. Blackwell, Oxford (1999)
MacIntyre, A.: After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana (1984)
Magnani, L.: Morality in a Technological World: Knowledge as Duty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)
Miah, A.: Genetics, Cyberspace and Bioethics: Why not a public engagement with ethics? Public Understanding of Science 14(4), 409–421 (2005)
Mitcham, C.: Thinking Through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)
Nussbaum, M.: The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
Paula, L.: Ethics: the key to public acceptance of biotechnology? Biotechnology and Development Monitor 47, 22–23 (2001)
Phillips, D.L.: Equality, justice and rectification: an exploration in normative sociology. Academic Press, London (1979)
Pojman, L.P.: Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont (1995)
Radder, H.: Normative reflections on constructivist approaches to science and technology. Social Studies of Science 22(1), 141–173 (1992)
Raiffa, H.: The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
Rawls, J.: Reply to Habermas. The Journal of Philosophy 92(3), 132–180 (1995)
Reber, B.: The Ethics of Participatory Technology Assessment. Technikfolgenabshätzung - Theorie und Praxis 2(15), 73–81 (2006)
Renn, O., Webler, T., Kastenholz, H.: Procedural and Substantive Fairness in Landfill Siting: A Swiss Case Study. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 7(2), 145–168 (1996)
Roeser, S., Asveld, L.: The Ethics of Technological Risk. Earthscan, London (2008)
Schmidt, C.W.: The Yuck Factor When Disgust Meets Discovery. Environmental Health Perspectives 116(12), 524–527 (2008)
Shrage, L.: Interpretative Ethics, Cultural Relativism and Feminist Theory. In: Shrage, L. (ed.) Moral Dilemmas of Feminism, pp. 162–184. Routledge, London (1994)
Siegetsleitner, A.: Ethics in Trouble: A Philosopher’s Role in Moral Practice and the Expert Model of National Bioethics Commissions. In: Garner, B., Pavlenko, S., Shaheen, S., Wolanski, A. (eds.) Cultural and Ethical Turns: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Culture, Politics and Ethics, pp. 41–50. Inter-disciplinary Press, Oxford (2011)
Turner, S.: What is the Problem With Experts? Social Studies of Science 31(1), 123–149 (2001)
Van De Poel, I.: Ethics, Technology Assessment and Industry. TA-Datenbank-Nachrichten 2(10), 51–61 (2001)
Walsham, G.: Actor-Network Theory and IS research: Current status and Future Prospects. In: Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Information Systems and Qualitative Research, pp. 466–480. Chapman and Hall, London (1997a)
Walsham, G.: Actor-Network Theory and IS Research: Current Status and Future Prospects. In: Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Information Systems and Qualitative Research. Chapman & Hall, London (1997b)
Werhane, P.H.: Moral Imagination and Systems Thinking. Journal of Business Ethics 38, 33–42 (2002)
Winner, L.: Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 18(3), 362–378 (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cotton, M. (2014). Ethics and Technology. In: Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 13. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45088-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45088-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45087-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45088-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)