Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rezeption von Wissenschaft — mit Besonderem Fokus auf Bio- und Gentechnologie und Konfligierende Evidenz

  • Chapter
Biotechnologie-Kommunikation

Part of the book series: acatech DISKUSSION ((ACATECHDISKUSSION))

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Cutachten stellen wir zunächst eine Verortung der Herausforderung Wissenschaftsrezeption an, indem wir verschiedene Kontextfaktoren von Wissenschaftsrezeption ausführen (Abschnitt 2). Im folgenden Abschnitt (3) fokussieren wir auf die Analyseebene des Rezipienten. Hierbei betrachten wir zentrale Personenvariablen, die aus kognitionspsychologischer Sicht die Rezeption von Information beeinflussen sowie auch, sofern möglich, Modelle, wie diese Variablen positiv beeinflusst werden können (Modelle zur Einstellungsänderung und zum Conceptual Change). Soweit in der Literatur verfügbar, werden die verschiedenen Variablen anhand von Studien zur Bio- und Gentechnologie exemplarisch weiter ausgeführt. Im Abschnitt 4 stellen wir verschiedene Aspekte des zu rezipierenden Inhalts heraus. Bei diesen beziehen wir uns insbesondere auf solche Aspekte, die bei kontrovers diskutierten, konflikthaften Themen von besonderer Bedeutung sind, wiederum mit besonderem Fokus auf Studien zur Bio- und Centechnologie. Im letzten Abschnitt des Cutachtens (5) leiten wir aus unseren Forschungsschwerpunkten einige Empfehlungen zur Verbesserung der Wissenschaftsrezeption ab und skizzieren mögliche weitere Forschungsfragen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. Lederman, N. C. (2000): “Improving Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature”. In: International Journal of Science Education, 22, 2000, S. 665–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allum, N. Sturgis, R/ Tabourazi, D. Brunton-Smith, I.: “Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis”. In: Public Understanding of Science, 17, 2008, S. 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H. Wänke, M. Bohner, C. Fellhauser, R. F. Schwarz, N. (1994). „Need for Cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben”. In: Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 1994, S. 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blöbaum, B. Nölleke, D.: Journalism and Scientific Evidence. (Conference Public Understanding and Public Engagement with Science 2011, New York City), New York, 2011 — Tagungspapier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth-Butterfield, S. Cooke, R/ Andrighetti, A. Casteel, B/ Lang, T. Pearson, D. Rodriquez, B: “Simultaneous Versus Exclusive Processing of Persuasive Arguments and Cues”. In: Communication Quarterly, 42, 1994, S. 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm, C. Pfister, H.: “Consequences, morality, and time in environmental risk evaluation”. In: Journal of Risk Research, 8: 6, 2005, S. 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredahl, L. Crunert, K. C. Frewer, L. J.: “Consumer Attitudes and Decision-Making with Regard to Genetically Engineered Food Products — A _Review of the Literature and a Presentation of Models for Future Research”. In: Journal of Consumer Policy, 21, 1998, S. 251–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R. Jucks, R. Rambow, R.: „Experten-Laien-Kommunikation im Wissensmanagement”. In: Reinmann, G. Mandl, H. (Hrsg.): Der Mensch im Wissensmanagement: Psychologische Konzepte zum besseren Verständnis und Umgang mit Wissen, Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2004, S. 176–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R. Kienhues, D. Porsch, T. (2010): “Who Knows What and Who Can We Believe? Epistemological Beliefs are Beliefs About Knowledge (Mostly) to be Attained From Others”. In: Bendixen, L. D. Feucht, F. G. (Hrsg.): Personal Epistemology in the Classroom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S. 163–193.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R. Kienhues, D. Stahl, E.: “Knowledge and Epistemological Beliefs: An Intimate but Complicate Relationship”. In: Khine, M. S. (Hrsg.): Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs, New York: Springer, 2008, S. 423–441.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R. Rambow, R.: „Die Verständigung zwischen Experten und Laien: Das Beispiel Architektur”. In: Schulz, W. K. (Hrsg.): Expertenwissen:Soziologische, psychologische und pädagogische Perspektiven, Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 1998, S. 49–65.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R. Rambow, R. Nueckles, M.: “Expertise and Estimating What Other People Know: The Influence of Professional Experience and Type of Knowledge”. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 2001, S. 317–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budner, S.: “Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable”. In: Journal of Personality, 30, 1962, S. 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T. Petty, R. E.: “The Need For Cognition”. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1982, S. 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S.: “Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion”. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1980, S. 752–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A. Brewer, W. R: “The Role of Anomalous data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction”. In: Review of Educational Research, 63, 1993, S. 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W.: “Wicked Problems”. In: Management Science, 14, 1967, B141–B142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. Pinch, T: Der Golem der Forschung. Wie unsere Wissenschaft die Natur erfindet, Berlin: Berlin Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U. Kimmerle, J.: ‘A Systemic and Cognitive View on Collaborative Knowledge Building with Wikis”. In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 2008, S. 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, K. M. Coleman, C. I. Henyan, N. N. Kluger, J. White, C. M.: “Statins and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis”. In: JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 2006, S. 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole, J. A. Sinatra, C. M.: “Reconceptualizing Change in Cognitive Construction of Knowledge”. In: Educational Psychologist, 33, 1998, S. 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R. V/ Doyle, A.: Risk and Morality, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M.: ‘An Investigation of the Relationship between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude toward that Object”. In: Human Relations, 16, 1963, S. 233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, L. J. Scholderer, J. Bredahl, L: “Communicating about the Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods: The Mediating Role of Trust”. In: Risk Analysis, 23, 2003, S. 1117–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S. M. / Dunwoody, S. Rogers, C. L. (Hrsg.): Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugelsang, J. A. Stein, C. B. Creen, A. E. Dunbar, K. N.: “Theory and Data Interactions of the Scientific Mind: Evidence from the Molecular and the Cognitive Laboratory”. In: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 2004, S. 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clenberg, A. M. McDaniel, M. A.: “Mental Models, Pictures, and Text: Integration of Spatial and Verbal Information”. In: Memory & Cognition, 20, 1992, S. 458–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halatchliyski, I. Kimmerle, J. Cress, U.: “Divergent and Convergent Knowledge Processes on Wikipedia”. In: Spada, H. Stahl, C. Miyake Law, N. (Hrsg.): Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice (CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings, Vol. II), Hongkong: International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2011, S. 566–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. W. Boccaletti, S. House, L: “Risk Perceptions of Urban Italian and United States Consumers for Genetically Modified Foods”. In: Ag Bio Forum, 7, 2004, S. 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. Brossard, D. Scheufele, D.: “Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research”. In: International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 2008, 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, L. Lusk, J. Jaeger, S. Traill, W. B. Moore, M. Valli, C. Morrow, B/ Yee, W. M. S.: “Objective and Subjective Knowledge: Impacts on Consumer Demand for Genetically Modified Foods in the United States and the European Union”. In: Ag Bio Forum, 7, 2004, S. 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I. Weiss, W.: “The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness”. In: Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 1951, S. 635–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynd, C. R. “Refutational Texts and the Change Process”. In: International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 2001, S. 699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynd, C. R. McWorther, Y. Phares, V. Suttles, W.: “The Role of Instructional Variables in Conceptual Change in High School Physics Topics”. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1994, S. 933–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. J. Spiro, R. J.: “Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: An Empirical Investigation”. In: Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 1995, S. 301–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juanillo, N. K: “The Risks and Benefits of Agricultural Biotechnology: Can Scientific and Public Talk Meet?” American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2001, S. 1246–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajanne, A. Pirttil-Backman, A. M.: “Laypeople’s Viewpoints about the Reasons for Expert Controversy Regarding Food Additives”. In: Public Understanding of Science, 8, 1999, S. 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M Scholes, R. J.: “Effects of Preexisting Beliefs, Epistemological Beliefs, and Need for Cognition on Interpretation of Controversial Issues”. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 1996, S. 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C Stein, C. Webb, L. Billings, V. D. Rozenbilt, L: “Discerning the Division of Cognitive Labor: An Emerging Understanding of How Knowledge is Clustered in Other Minds”. In: Cognitive Science, 32, 2008, S. 259–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kienhues, D. Bromme, R.: “Beliefs about Abilities and Epistemic Beliefs — Aspects of Cognitive Flexibility in Information Rich Environments”. In: Elen, J. Stahl, E. Bromme, R. Clarebout G. (Hrsg.): Links Between Beliefs and Cognitive Flexibility: Lessons Learned, New York: Springer, 2011, S. 105–124.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kienhues, D. Bromme, R. Stahl, E.: “Changing Epistemological Beliefs: The Unexpected Impact of Short-Term Interventions”. In: British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 2008, S. 545–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. Paek, H.-J.: “Information Processing of Genetically Modified Food Messages under Different Motives: An Adaptation of the Multiple-Motive Heuristic-Systematic Model”. In: Risk Analysis, 29, 2009, S. 1793–1806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M. Kitchener, K. S.: Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M. Kitchener, K. S.: “The Reflective Judgment Model: Twenty Years of Research on Epistemic Cognition”. In: Hofer, B. K. Pintrich, P. R. (Hrsg.): Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002, S. 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A.: “Intervening Effects of Knowledge, Morality, Trust, and Benefits on Support for Animal and Plant Biotechnology Applications”. In: Risk Analysis, 27, 2007, S. 1553–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. Musgrave, A. (Hrsg.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauriola, M. Levin, I. P.: “Personality Traits and Risky Decision-Making in a Controlled Experimental Task: An Exploratory Study”. In: Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 2001, S. 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macer, D. R. J.: “Perception of Risks and Benefits of in vitro Fertilization, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology”. In: Social Science & Medicine, 38, 1994, S. 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H.: Dealing with Risk: Why the Public and the Experts Disagree on Environmental Issues, London: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, C. Wynne, B. Simmons, P. Weldon, S.: Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe. URL: http://csec.lancs.ac.uk/archive/pabe/docs/pabe_finalreport.pdf [Stand: 12.04.2012].

  • Mason, L. Boscolo, P.: “Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change”. In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 2004, S. 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. P. Castel, A. D.: “Seeing is Believing: The Effect of Brain Images on Judgments of Scientific Reasoning”. In: Cognition, 107, 2008, S. 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. Clough, M. P. Almazroa, H.: “The Role and Character of the Nature of Science in Science Education”. In: McComas, W. F. (Hrsg.): The Nature of Science in Science Education, Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1998, S. 3–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijnders, A. Midden, C. Olofsson, A. Öhman, S. Matthes, J. Bondarenko, O/ Rusanen, M.: “The Role of Similarity Cues in the Development of Trust in Sources of Information about CM Food”. In: Risk Analysis, 29, 2009, S. 1116–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milde, J. Hölig, S.: „‘Das Bild ist stärker als das Wort’ — Selektions-und Darstellungskriterien von TV-Wissenschaftsjournalisten beim Thema Molekulare Medizin”. In: Ruhrmann, G. Milde, J. Zillich, A. F. (Hrsg.): Molekulare Medizin und Medien. Zur Darstellung und Wirkung eines kontroversen Wissenschaftsthemas, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2011, S. 71–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. K. Mason, L: “Changing Knowledge and Beliefs”. In: Alexander, P. A. Winne, P. H. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Educational Psychology, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2006 (2. Aufl.), S. 305–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S.: “How We Know — and Sometimes Misjudge — What Others Know: Imputing One’s Own Knowledge to Others”. In: Psychological Bulletin, 125, 1999, S. 737–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, M. Scheufele, D.: “What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions”. In: American Journal of Botany, 96, 2009, 1767–1778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. Phillips, L. Korpan, C: “University Students’ Interpretation of Media Reports of Science and its Relationship to Background Knowledge, Interest, and Reading Difficulty”. In: Public Understanding of Science, 12, 2003, S. 123–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J. Novick, S.: “Alternative Frameworks, Conceptual Conflict, and Accomodation: Toward a Principled Teaching Strategy”. In: Instructional Science, 11, 1982, S. 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD: Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy A Framework for PISA 2006, Paris: OECD, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peel, J.: The Precautionary Principle in Practice: Environmental Decision Making and Scientific Uncertainty. Annandale: The Federation Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. Simmons, R.: “Patterns of Misunderstanding: An Integrative Model for Science, Math, and Programming”. In: Review of Educational Research, 58, 1988, S. 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E. Cacioppo, J. T: Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, New York: Springer, 1986.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, H.-R. Böhm, C: „Brennpunkt: BSE — Sozialpsychologische Aspekte eines umstrittenen Risikos”. In: Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32, 2001, S. 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R.: “Future Challenges and Directions for Theory and Research on Personal Epistemology”. In: Hofer, B. K. Pintrich, P. R. (Hrsg.): Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W. Pidgeon, N. F: “Trust in Risk Regulation: Cause or Consequence of the Acceptability of CM Food?” In: Risk Analysis, 25, 2005, S. 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W. Pidgeon, N. F: “Exploring the Structure of Attitudes toward Genetically Modified Food”. In: Risk Analysis, 26, 2006, S. 1707–1719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porsch, T. Bromme, R.: “Effects of Epistemological Sensitization on Source Choices”. In: Instructional Science, 39, 2011, S. 805–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, G. Alvermann, D.: “Role of Epistemological Beliefs and Learned Helplessness in Secondary School Students’ Learning Science Concepts from Text”. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 1995, S. 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, G. Pan, J.: ‘A Comparison of Epistemological Beliefs and Learning from Science Text between American and Chinese High School Students”. In: Hofer, B. K. Pintrich, R R. (Hrsg.): Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002, S. 365–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. Levine, D.: “Credibility and Trust in Risk Communication”. In: Kasperson, R. E. Stallen, P. J. M. (Hrsg.): Communicating Risks to the Public. International Perspectives, Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1991, S. 175–218.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Retzbach, A. Marschall, J. Rahnke, M. Otto, L. Maier, M.: “Public Understanding of Science and the Perception of Nanotechnology: The Roles of Interest in Science, Methodological Knowledge, Epistemological Beliefs, and Beliefs about Science”. In: Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13: 12, 2011, S. 6231–6244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, T. Schmid, S.: “Epistemological Beliefs and Epistemic Strategies in Self-Regulated Learning”. In: Metacognition and Learning, 5, 2010, S. 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J. Hovland, C. I.: “Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Components of Attitudes”. In: Rosenberg, M. J. Hovland, C. I. McCuire, W. J. Abelson, R. R/ Brehm J. W. (Hrsg.): Attitude Organization and Change, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1960, S. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. Prenzel, M. Carstensen, C. H. Senkbeil, M. Croß, K.: Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung in Deutschland. Methoden und Ergebnisse von PISA 2000, Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhrmann, C. Milde, J. Zillich, A. F. (Hrsg.): Molekulare Medizin und Medien. Zur Darstellung und Wirkung eines kontroversen Wissenschaftsthemas, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. Zeidler, D. L: “Patterns of Informal Reasoning in the Context of Socioscientific Decision Making”. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 2005, S. 112–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W.: “Conceptual Change”. In: Rost, D. H. (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie, Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags Union, 1998, S. 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W.: Pädagogische Psychologie, Weinheim: Beltz Verlag, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W. Vosniadou, S. Carretero, M. (Hrsg.): New Perspectives on Conceptual Change, Amsterdam: Pergamon, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M.: ‘An Emerging Conceptualization of Epistemological Beliefs and their Role in Learning”. In: Garner, R. Alexander, P. A. (Hrsg.): Beliefs About Text and About Text Instruction, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994, S. 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, J. Scheufele, D. Lee, E.: ‘Attitudes about Agricultural Biotechnology and Genetically Modified Organisms”. In: Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 2001, S. 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M. Pintrich, P. R.: Intentional Conceptual Change, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, P. Shepherd, R. Frewer, L. J.: “Gene Technology, Food Production, and Public Opinion: A UK Study”. In: Agriculture and Human Values, 11, 1994, S. 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J. Feltovich, P. J. Coulson, R. L: “Two Epistemic World-Views: Prefigurative Schemas and Learning in Complex Domains”. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1996, S. 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahlberg, D. Frey, D.: „Das Elaboration-Likelihood-Modell von Petty und Cacioppo”. In: Frey, D. Frle, M. (Hrsg.): Theorien der Sozialpsychologie, Bern: Verlag Hans Huber, 1993 (2. Aufl.), S. 327–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomm, E. Bromme, R.: “‘It should at least seem scientific!’ Textual Features of’ scientificness’ and their Impact on Lay Assessments of Online Information”. In: Science Education, 2012, i. E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo, C. W.: “Heuristic-Systematic Information Processing and Risk Judgment”. In: Risk Analysis, 19, 1999, S. 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rompay, T. J. L. de Vries, P. W. van Venrooij, X. G.: “More than Words: On the Importance of Picture-Text Congruence in the Online Environment”. In: Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24, 2010, S. 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdurme, A. Viaene, J.: “Exploring and Modeling Consumer Attitudes towards Genetically Modified Food”. In: Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 6, 2003, S. 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vileila-Vila, M. Costa-Font, J. Mossialos, E. “Consumer Involvement and Acceptance of Biotechnology in the European Union: A Specific Focus on Spain and the UK”. In: International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29, 2005, S. 108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S.: “What can Persuasion Research Tell Us about Conceptual Change that we Did Not Already Know?” In: International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 2001, S. 731–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldmann, M. R. Hagmayer, Y: “Seeing Versus Doing: Two Modes of Accessing Causal Knowledge”. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 2005, S. 216–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weare, C. Lin, W.-Y: “Content Analysis of the World Wide Web: Opportunities and Challenges”. In: Social Science Computer Review, 18, 2000, S. 272–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. M. Kruglanski, A. W.: “Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure”. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1994, S. 1049–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, P.: „Welche Öffentlichkeiten hat die Wissenschaft?” In: Zetzsche, I. (Hrsg.): Wissenschaftskommunikation. Streifzug durch ein, neues’ Feld, Bonn: Lemmens, 2004, S. 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. Evans, G. Leppard, R/ Syrette, J.: “Reactions to Genetically Modified Food Crops and How Perception of Risks and Benefits Influences Consumers’ Information Gathering”. In: Risk Analysis, 24, 2004, S. 1311–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L. Walker, K. A. Ackett, W. A. Simmons, M. L.: “Tangled up in Views: Beliefs in the Nature of Science and Responses to Socioscientific Dilemmas”. In: Science Education, 86, 2002, S. 343–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Rainer Bromme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dorothe Kienhues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. acatech — Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften, Germany

    Marc-Denis Weitze

  2. Universität Bielefeld, Germany

    Alfred Pühler

  3. Deutsches Museum, Germany

    Wolfgang M. Heckl

  4. Universität Potsdam, Germany

    Bernd Müller-Röber

  5. Universität Stuttgart, Germany

    Ortwin Renn

  6. Universität Bielefeld, Germany

    Peter Weingart

  7. Helmholtz Zentrum München, Germany

    Günther Wess

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bromme, R., Kienhues, D. (2012). Rezeption von Wissenschaft — mit Besonderem Fokus auf Bio- und Gentechnologie und Konfligierende Evidenz. In: Weitze, MD., et al. Biotechnologie-Kommunikation. acatech DISKUSSION. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33994-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation