Abstract
Profiling and automated decision-making may pose risks to individuals. Possible risks that flow forth from profiling and automated decision-making include discrimination, de-individualisation and stereotyping. To mitigate these risks, the right to privacy is traditionally invoked. However, given the rapid technological developments in the area of profiling, it is questionable whether the right to informational privacy and data protection law provide an adequate level of protection and are effective in balancing different interests when it comes to profiling. To answer the question as to whether data protection law can adequately protect us against the risks of profiling, I will discuss the role of data protection law in the context of profiling and automated decision-making. First, the specific risks associated with profiling and automated decision-making are explored. From there I examine how data protection law addresses these risks. Next I discuss possible limitations and possible drawbacks of data protection law when it comes to the issue of profiling and automated decision-making. I conclude with several suggestions to for making current data protection law more effective in dealing with the risks of profiling. These include more focus on the actual goals of data processing and ‘ethics by design’.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Barbaro, M., Zeller, T.: A face is exposed for AOL searcher no. 44177179. New York Times (2006), online version via: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/technology/09aol.html (last visited: December 28, 2011)
Borking, J.J.F.M.: Privacyrecht is code. Kluwer, Deventer (2010) (in Dutch)
Blok, P.: Het Recht op Privacy. Boom Juridische uitgevers, Den Haag (2002) (in Dutch)
Bygrave, L.: Minding the machine: article 15 of the EC data protection directive and automated profiling. Computer Law & Security Report 17, 17–24 (2001)
Custers, B.H.M.: Data Mining with Discrimination Sensitive and Privacy Sensitive Attributes. In: Proceedings of ISP 2010, International Conference on Information Security and Privacy, Orlando, Florida, July 12/14 (2010)
Hildebrandt, M.: Defining Profiling: A New Type of Knowledge? In: Hildebrandt, M., Gutwirth, S. (eds.) Profiling the European Citizen, Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Springer Science (2008)
van den Hoven, J.: Privacy and the Varieties of Informational Wrongdoing. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, Special Issue 1 (June 1999)
van den Hoven, J.: Information Technology, Privacy and the Protection of Personal Data. In: van den Hoven, J., Weckert, J., et al. (eds.) Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, pp. 301–332. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Lessig, L.: Code 2.0. Perseus Book Group, New York (2006)
Ohm: Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization. UCLA Law Review 57, 1701–1777 (2010)
Schermer, B.W.: Software Agents, Surveillance, and the Right to Privacy: a Legislative Framework for Agent-enabled Surveillance, PhD. Thesis. Leiden University (2007)
Schwarz, Solove: The PII Problem: Privacy and a new concept of personal identifiable information. New York University Law Review 86, 1814 (2011)
Terstegge, J.: Back to basics: privacy ethics (2009), http://jeroenterstegge.blogspot.com (last visited: December 28, 2011)
Vedder, A.: KDD: The challenge to individualism. Ethics and Information Technology 1(4) (December 1999)
Verwer, Calders: Three Naive Bayes Approaches for Discrimination-Free Classification. In: Data Mining: Special Issue with Selected Papers from ECML-PKDD 2010. Springer (2010)
Zwenne, G.J.: Over persoonsgegevens en IP-adressen, en de toe komst van privacywetgeving. In: Mommers, L., Franken, H., Klaauw, F., van der Herik, H., van der Zwenne., G.-J. (eds.) Het Binnenstebuiten, Liber Amicoru m Aernout Schmidt, pp. 321–341. Universiteit Leiden (2010) (in Dutch)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schermer, B. (2013). Risks of Profiling and the Limits of Data Protection Law. In: Custers, B., Calders, T., Schermer, B., Zarsky, T. (eds) Discrimination and Privacy in the Information Society. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30487-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30487-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30486-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30487-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)