Abstract
The institutional design of the Strasbourg system that has evolved over the last decades is an expression of contemporary debates surrounding the system’s very nature and purpose. The current debate primarily bears on the range of choices that the Council of Europe faces in adapting to the changes in Europe, which largely have been caused by its expansion to cover nearly all post-Communist States of Central and Eastern Europe since the 1990s.
Research fellow at the Chair of Public Law and Philosophy of Law at the University of Mannheim. The author wishes to thank Armin von Bogdandy, Hans-Joachim Cremer, Isabel Feichtner, Ingo Venzke and the Dienstagsrunde at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law in Heidelberg for their helpful comments and discussion. Comments are welcome at markus.fyrnys@web.de
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fyrnys, M. (2012). Expanding Competences by Judicial Lawmaking: The Pilot Judgment Procedure of the European Court of Human Rights. In: von Bogdandy, A., Venzke, I. (eds) International Judicial Lawmaking. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, vol 236. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29587-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29587-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29586-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29587-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)