Abstract
We say that a polynomial f(x 1,...,x n ) is indecomposable if it cannot be written as a product of two polynomials that are defined over disjoint sets of variables. The polynomial decomposition problem is defined to be the task of finding the indecomposable factors of a given polynomial. Note that for multilinear polynomials, factorization is the same as decomposition, as any two different factors are variable disjoint.
In this paper we show that the problem of derandomizing polynomial identity testing is essentially equivalent to the problem of derandomizing algorithms for polynomial decomposition. More accurately, we show that for any reasonable circuit class there is a deterministic polynomial time (black-box) algorithm for polynomial identity testing of that class if and only if there is a deterministic polynomial time (black-box) algorithm for factoring a polynomial, computed in the class, to its indecomposable components.
An immediate corollary is that polynomial identity testing and polynomial factorization are equivalent (up to a polynomial overhead) for multilinear polynomials. In addition, we observe that derandomizing the polynomial decomposition problem is equivalent, in the sense of Kabanets and Impagliazzo [1], to proving arithmetic circuit lower bounds for NEXP.
Our approach uses ideas from [2], that showed that the polynomial identity testing problem for a circuit class \(\mathcal C\) is essentially equivalent to the problem of deciding whether a circuit from \(\mathcal C\) computes a polynomial that has a read-once arithmetic formula.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kabanets, V., Impagliazzo, R.: Derandomizing polynomial identity tests means proving circuit lower bounds. Computational Complexity 13(1-2), 1–46 (2004)
Shpilka, A., Volkovich, I.: Read-once polynomial identity testing. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual STOC, pp. 507–516 (2008)
Gathen, J.v.z., Gerhard, J.: Modern computer algebra. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Kaltofen, E.: Polynomial factorization: a success story. In: ISSAC, pp. 3–4 (2003)
Gathen, J.v.z.: Who was who in polynomial factorization. In: ISSAC, vol. 2 (2006)
Kayal, N.: Derandomizing some number-theoretic and algebraic algorithms. PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India (2007)
Agrawal, M., Kayal, N., Saxena, N.: Primes is in P. Annals of Mathematics 160(2), 781–793 (2004)
Mulmuley, K., Vazirani, U., Vazirani, V.: Matching is as easy as matrix inversion. Combinatorica 7(1), 105–113 (1987)
Schwartz, J.T.: Fast probabilistic algorithms for verification of polynomial identities. JACM 27(4), 701–717 (1980)
Zippel, R.: Probabilistic algorithms for sparse polynomials. In: Symbolic and algebraic computation, pp. 216–226 (1979)
DeMillo, R.A., Lipton, R.J.: A probabilistic remark on algebraic program testing. Inf. Process. Lett. 7(4), 193–195 (1978)
Klivans, A., Spielman, D.: Randomness efficient identity testing of multivariate polynomials. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual STOC, pp. 216–223 (2001)
Agrawal, M., Biswas, S.: Primality and identity testing via chinese remaindering. JACM 50(4), 429–443 (2003)
Lipton, R.J., Vishnoi, N.K.: Deterministic identity testing for multivariate polynomials. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual SODA, pp. 756–760 (2003)
Agrawal, M.: Proving lower bounds via pseudo-random generators. In: Sarukkai, S., Sen, S. (eds.) FSTTCS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3821, pp. 92–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Raz, R., Shpilka, A.: Deterministic polynomial identity testing in non commutative models. Computational Complexity 14(1), 1–19 (2005)
Dvir, Z., Shpilka, A.: Locally decodable codes with 2 queries and polynomial identity testing for depth 3 circuits. SIAM J. on Computing 36(5), 1404–1434 (2006)
Kayal, N., Saxena, N.: Polynomial identity testing for depth 3 circuits. Computational Complexity 16(2), 115–138 (2007)
Arvind, V., Mukhopadhyay, P.: The monomial ideal membership problem and polynomial identity testing. In: Proceedings of the 18th ISAAC, pp. 800–811 (2007)
Karnin, Z.S., Shpilka, A.: Deterministic black box polynomial identity testing of depth-3 arithmetic circuits with bounded top fan-in. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual CCC, pp. 280–291 (2008)
Saxena, N., Seshadhri, C.: An almost optimal rank bound for depth-3 identities. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual CCC (2009)
Dvir, Z., Shpilka, A., Yehudayoff, A.: Hardness-randomness tradeoffs for bounded depth arithmetic circuits. SIAM J. on Computing 39(4), 1279–1293 (2009)
Agrawal, M., Vinay, V.: Arithmetic circuits: A chasm at depth four. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual FOCS, pp. 67–75 (2008)
Arvind, V., Mukhopadhyay, P.: Derandomizing the isolation lemma and lower bounds for circuit size. In: Goel, A., Jansen, K., Rolim, J.D.P., Rubinfeld, R. (eds.) APPROX and RANDOM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5171, pp. 276–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Kayal, N., Saraf, S.: Blackbox polynomial identity testing for depth 3 circuits. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), (32) (2009)
Shpilka, A., Volkovich, I.: Improved polynomial identity testing for read-once formulas. In: APPROX-RANDOM, pp. 700–713 (2009)
Karnin, Z.S., Mukhopadhyay, P., Shpilka, A., Volkovich, I.: Deterministic identity testing of depth 4 multilinear circuits with bounded top fan-in. In: Proceedings of the 42th Annual STOC (2010)
Saxena, N., Seshadhri, C.: From sylvester-gallai configurations to rank bounds: Improved black-box identity test for depth-3 circuits. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) (013) (2010)
Heintz, J., Schnorr, C.P.: Testing polynomials which are easy to compute (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the 12th annual STOC, pp. 262–272 (1980)
Raz, R.: Multi-linear formulas for permanent and determinant are of super-polynomial size. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual STOC, pp. 633–641 (2004)
Raz, R.: Multilinear NC 1 ≠ Multilinear NC 2. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual FOCS, pp. 344–351 (2004)
Raz, R., Shpilka, A., Yehudayoff, A.: A lower bound for the size of syntactically multilinear arithmetic circuits. SIAM J. on Computing 38(4), 1624–1647 (2008)
Raz, R., Yehudayoff, A.: Lower bounds and separations for constant depth multilinear circuits. In: IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 128–139 (2008)
Hancock, T.R., Hellerstein., L.: Learning read-once formulas over fields and extended bases. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual COLT, pp. 326–336 (1991)
Bshouty, N.H., Hancock, T.R., Hellerstein, L.: Learning arithmetic read-once formulas. SIAM J. on Computing 24(4), 706–735 (1995)
Kaltofen, E., Koiran, P.: On the complexity of factoring bivariate supersparse (lacunary) polynomials. In: ISSAC, pp. 208–215 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shpilka, A., Volkovich, I. (2010). On the Relation between Polynomial Identity Testing and Finding Variable Disjoint Factors. In: Abramsky, S., Gavoille, C., Kirchner, C., Meyer auf der Heide, F., Spirakis, P.G. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6198. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14165-2_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14165-2_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14164-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14165-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)