Abstract
Thymectomy is relatively indicated and most frequently performed in patients with the autoimmune disease myasthenia gravis. In particular, the indication for thymectomy, as well as the long-term improvement of myasthenia gravis, may depend on patient-derived factors such as gender, age, the severity of myasthenia, the duration of symptoms, the interval between diagnosis and thymectomy, the presence/absence of a thymoma, the serologic investigation (anti–acetylcholine receptor [anti-AChR], anti–muscle-specific kinase [anti-MuSK], or no antibodies), the amount of medication and necessity of immunosuppression, and other comorbidities. There is an absolute indication for thymectomy in patients with thymoma, an epithelium-derived tumor of the anterior mediastinum that may or may not be accompanied by myasthenia gravis. Other rare indications are ectopic mediastinal intrathymic parathyroid glands and different forms of multiple endocrine neoplasia with anticipated thymic carcinoma.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Introduction
Thymectomy is relatively indicated and most frequently performed in patients with the autoimmune disease myasthenia gravis. In particular, the indication for thymectomy, as well as the long-term improvement of myasthenia gravis, may depend on patient-derived factors such as gender, age, the severity of myasthenia, the duration of symptoms, the interval between diagnosis and thymectomy, the presence/absence of a thymoma, the serologic investigation (anti–acetylcholine receptor [anti-AChR], anti–muscle-specific kinase [anti-MuSK], or no antibodies), the amount of medication and necessity of immunosuppression, and other comorbidities. There is an absolute indication for thymectomy in patients with thymoma, an epithelium-derived tumor of the anterior mediastinum that may or may not be accompanied by myasthenia gravis. Other rare indications are ectopic mediastinal intrathymic parathyroid glands and different forms of multiple endocrine neoplasia with anticipated thymic carcinoma.
The anatomic location of the thymus gland between the neck and the mediastinum, as well as the stage of medical development, led to controversy in the first half of the twentieth century regarding whether to use a transcervical or transsternal approach to thymectomy. However, all the knowledge gained during subsequent decades on the autoimmune nature of myasthenia gravis, the basic role of the thymus gland, the potentially ectopic mediastinal thymic tissue distribution, and the different subgroups of myasthenic patients has not resolved the debate about the appropriate thymectomy approach.
Thoracoscopic thymectomy has been performed in the surgical department of the Charité University Hospital in Berlin and a few other centers worldwide since 1992. The operative technique was developed through stepwise scientific investigation and adapted for clinical use according to the principles of good clinical practice. The availability of thoracoscopy as a new operative technique has allowed a combination of maximum mediastinal exposure and minimum invasiveness. The guidelines of radical thymectomy according to Jaretzki were applied during the entire development of thoracoscopic thymectomy. All patient data were collected prospectively to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach.
Since then, most of the 14 operative techniques described in the literature were influenced by the success of thoracoscopic thymectomy. In 1997, a task force of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) was assembled to propose a unified method for analyzing the results of thymectomy. Again, the true value of thymectomy was questioned because of the lack of prospective randomized trials proving the effectiveness of thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. The evidence-based review by Gronseth and Barohn of all related but nonrandomized comparative studies had the disadvantage of including only publications in which a nonsurgical group was presented. Therefore, all prospective, successful consecutive thymectomy series from most high-volume centers for myasthenia gravis were excluded. The marginal advantage for thymectomy versus nonoperative treatment of myasthenia gravis from that study was the basis for a complex worldwide prospective randomized study comparing the combination of thymectomy via complete median sternotomy and prednisone treatment for 2 years with prednisone treatment alone. In the 4 years since the study began, 97 active centers enrolled fewer than 100 of the 200 patients required. Thus, the experience of the centers performing at least one thymectomy in this study certainly is limited. If this trial proves a benefit from thymectomy, a minimally invasive approach to this procedure likely would become the method of choice.
Thymoma is the most frequently occurring tumor of the anterior mediastinum. In most cases, these tumors do not show cytologic criteria of malignancy; nevertheless, they have the potential for local infiltration, cellular spillage, intrapleural satellite growth, and recurrence. Their clinical and morphologic behavior led to the classification systems of Masaoka and the World Health Organization. The absolute indication for surgery requires a complete thymectomy, not a thymomectomy. Although even transcervical thymectomies have been performed for thymomas depending on their potential aggressiveness, the surgical community traditionally has defended the dogma that a median sternotomy is always required for treating these tumors. However, selected cases of nonadvanced thymoma have been treated successfully with the thoracoscopic approach.
Thoracoscopic thymectomy has a variety of modifications: the unilateral three-trocar approach from the left or right side, the use of additional trocars at the same or contralateral side, additional minithoracotomy, the bilateral approach, and an additional cervical and/or subxiphoid incision.
The latest modification of minimally invasive thymectomy is robot-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy. This highly precise technique uses wristed instrument tips, provides a three-dimensional enlarged view, and allows a greater operative field, which are highly valuable for an extended radical thymectomy.
Conclusion
This chapter describes mainly unilateral, left-sided, three-trocar thoracoscopic thymectomy in detail. This minimally invasive thoracoscopic operative technique for thymectomy has been proven feasible and safe. The perioperative morbidity rate is reported to be less than 2 %. The risks of thoracoscopic thymectomy include incomplete removal of the thymus gland, nerve (phrenic, laryngeal recurrent, and intercostal) injuries, and bleeding (from the innominate vein and tributaries, aortic arch, and mammary vessels). For complete thymic resection, each step of the technique must be controlled. If the procedure cannot be completed satisfactorily, an extension is required; however, this does not necessarily mean a conversion as the first step, perhaps only the effective use of extra incisions or trocars. A rapid conversion to sternotomy, however, should be possible any time during thoracoscopic thymectomy. Exceptional care must be taken during dissection around the mediastinal vessels to prevent bleeding. The cosmetic results are very acceptable and highly appreciated by patients. Moreover, there is no interference with immunosuppression. After robotic thymectomy, a sternotomy may be easier if necessary in the future. Patient impairment due to this operation is minimal. According to our experience, the development of chronic pain at the trocar sites is very rare. Up to 2002, we performed 80 thoracoscopic thymectomies without robotic assistance, and since 2003, we have performed more than 280 robotic thymectomies. In 2009, 360 robotic thymectomies were registered worldwide. The actual number of these operations might be even greater and is increasing rapidly. A special advantage of robotic assistance is its practicability even for limited indications, such as small children, obese patients, and older patients with large amounts of tissue inside the mediastinal area. Robotic thymectomy also can be applied in select cases of thymoma. Meanwhile, in the surgical department of the Charité University Hospital in Berlin, a prospective series of 50 patients is under evaluation. The main outcome parameter after thymectomy for myasthenia gravis is the cumulative complete stable remission rate of myasthenia symptoms. This was prospectively estimated according to MGFA recommendations. After robotic thymectomy, the cumulative complete stable remission rate was 58 %, which is comparable to the results published by the Jaretzki group and others.
Actually, the number of clinics offering robotic thymectomy is increasing. During the past 15–20 years, patients and their neurologists have preferred a less invasive yet radical approach to thymectomy, and robotic thymectomy is suitable for that purpose. Differences in opinion regarding the complexity and application of various modifications of thoracoscopic thymectomy are a result of differences among surgical schools, in the surgeon’s experience with a certain technique, in the availability of equipment, and in consideration of patient-related aspects.
Selected Bibliography
Bodner J, Wykyspiel H, Wetscher G, Schmid T (2004) First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:844–851
Castle SL, Kernstine KH (2008) Robotic-assisted thymectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20:326–331
Jaretzki A, Steinglass KM, Sonett JR (2004) Thymectomy in the management of myasthenia gravis. Semin Neurol 24:49–62
Marulli G, Rea F, Melfi F, Schmid TA, Ismail M, Fanucchi O et al (2012) Robot-aided thoracoscopic thymectomy for early-stage thymoma: a multicenter European study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144(5):1125–30 [Epub ahead of print]
Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F et al (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:790–795
Rea F, Bortolotti L, Girardi R, Sartori F (2003) Thoracoscopic thymectomy with the ‘da Vinci’ surgical system in patient with myasthenia gravis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2:70–72
Rückert JC, Ismail M, Swierzy M, Braumann C, Badakhshi H, Rogalla P, Meisel A, Rückert RI, Müller JM (2008a) Minimally invasive thymus surgery. Chirurg 79:18, 20–25
Rückert JC, Ismail M, Swierzy M, Sobel H, Rogalla P, Meisel A, Wernecke KD, Rückert RI, Müller JM (2008b) Thoracoscopic thymectomy with the da Vinci robotic system for myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1132:329–1135
Rückert JC, Swierzy M, Ismail M (2011) Comparison of robotic and nonrobotic thoracoscopic thymectomy: a cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:673–677
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rückert, J.C., Swierzy, M., Rückert, R.I., Ismail, M. (2015). Thymectomy (VATS, da Vinci). In: Dienemann, H., Hoffmann, H., Detterbeck, F. (eds) Chest Surgery. Springer Surgery Atlas Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12044-2_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12044-2_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12043-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12044-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)