Skip to main content

Zusammenfassung

Die flexible endoskopische Untersuchung ist heute über 50 Jahre alt und nimmt einen zentralen Stellenwert bei der Diagnostik des oberen und unteren Gastrointestinaltrakts ein. Sie steht oft am Anfang einer Untersuchungsreihe gastrointestinaler Tumoren und ist häufig die entscheidende Untersuchung, da sie zur histologischen Sicherung der Diagnose führt. In den letzten Jahren hat sich durch hochauflösende optische Verfahren die Möglichkeit eröffnet, feingewebliche Veränderungen der Schleimhaut zu erkennen, die bislang nur dem Pathologen vorbehalten war. Die verfeinerte CCD-Chip- Technologie und neue Techniken der Chromo- und Zoomendoskopie erlauben somit eine neue Dimension zuverlässiger und komplikationsarmer Diagnostik. Der stetige Fortschritt von endoskopischen Verfahren erweitert die therapeutische Intervention vor allem im Bereich maligner Erkrankungen. Der therapeutisch interventionellen Endoskopie als Grenzgebiet zwischen Gastroenterologen und Viszeralchirurgen wird ein weiteres Kapitel gewidmet. Hier wird zunächst nur auf die rein diagnostischen Möglichkeiten der Endoskopie als endoluminales lokales Staging eingegangen.

Dr. Dittler†, dem Autor der Vorauflage, gewidmet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Ancona E, Rampado S, Cassaro M, Battaglia G, Ruol A et al. (2008) Prediction of lymph node status in superficial esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 15(11):3278–3288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arima M et al. (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of tumor staging and treatment outcomes in patients with superficial esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc 4(4):145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemaly M, Scalone O, Durivage G, Napoleon B, Pujol B et al. (2008) Miniprobe EUS in the pretherapeutic assessment of early esophageal neoplasia. Endoscopy 40(1):2–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, Barcherini S, Crespi M; Italian Multicentre Study Group (2001) Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. Gut 48(6):812–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert MP, Auernhammer C, Caca K, Eckel F, Fischbach W et al. (2008) Update S3-guideline »colorectal cancer« 2008. Z Gastroenterol 46(8):799–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endo T et al. (2002) Classification of Barrett’s epithelium by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 55(6):631–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flejou JF (2005) Barrett’s esophagus: from metaplasia to dysplasia and cancer. Gut 54Suppl 1:i6–i12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher RH, Lobb R, Bauer MR, Kemp JA, Palmer RC et al. (2007) Screening patients with a family history of colorectal cancer. J Gen Intern Med 22(4):508–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fu KI, Sano Y, Kato S, Fujii T, Nagashima F et al. (2004) Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: a prospective study. Endoscopy 36(12):1089–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R, Honarpisheh H, Bohnacker S, Staedtler C et al. (2004) Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology 230(2):465–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamashima C, Shibuya D, Yamazaki H, Inoue K, Fukao A, Saito H, Sobue Tl (2008) The Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38(4):259–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helm J, Enkemann SA, Coppola D, Barthel JS, Kelley ST, Yeatman TJ (2005) Dedifferentiation precedes invasion in the progression from Barrett’s metaplasia to esphageal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 11(7):2478–2485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hünerbein M, Ulmer C, Handke T, Schlag PM (2003) Endosonography of upper gastro intestinal tract cancer on demand using miniprobes or endoscopic ultrasound. Surg Endosc 17(4):615–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlstone DP et al. (2005) High magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy or high frequency 20MHz mini probe endoscopic ultrasound staging for early colorectal neoplasia: a comparative prospective analysis. Gut 54(11)1585–1589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue T et al. (2008) Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 43(1)45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1995) Japanese Classification of gastric carcinoma. Kanehara, p 4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienle P, Buhl K, Kunty C, Dux M, Hartmann C, Axel B et al. (2002) Prospective comparison of endoscopy, endosonography and computed tomography for staging of tumours of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Digestion 66(4):230–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo S., Rubio C, Teixeira CR, Kashida H, Kogure E et al. (2001) Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: magnifying view. Endoscopy 33:367–373

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mashimo H, Wagh MS Goyal RF (2005) Surveillance and screening for Barrett esophagus and adenocarcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 39(4 Suppl 2):S33–S41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May A et al. (2004) Accuracy of staging early oesophageal cancer using higoh resolution endoscopy and high resolution endosonography: a comparative, prospective, and blinded trial. Gut 53(5)634–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meining A et al. (2004) Inter-and intra-observer variability of magnification chromoendoscopy for detecting specialized intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction. Endoscopy 36(2); 160–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murata Y, Ohta M, Hayashi K, Ide H, Takasaki K (2003) Preoperative evaluation of lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 9(2):88–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl J et al. (2009) Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Gut 58(1):73–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polkowski M, Palucki J, Wronska E, Szawlowski A, Nasieroska-Guttmejer A, Butruk E (2004) Endonsonography versus helical computed tomography for locoregional staging of gastric cancer. Endoscopy 36(7):617–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasanen JV, Sivho EL, Knuuti MJ, Minn HR, Luostarinen ME, Laippala P et al. (2003) Prospective analysis of accuracy of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasonography in staging of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol 10(8):954–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, Dixon MF, Yoshida S, Chalmers DM, Axon AT (2000) Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 355:1211–1214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sato T, Miwa K, Sahara H, Segawa M, Hattori T (2002). The sequential model of Barrett’s oesophagus and adenocarcinoma induced by duodeno-esophageal reflux without exogenous carcinogens. Anticancer Res 22(1A):39–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P et al. (2003) Magnification chromoendoscopy for the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 52(1):25–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P et al. (2006) The utiliy of a novel narrow band imaging endoscopy system in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 64(2):167–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002 Gastrointest Endosc 58(6Suppl)S3–S43

    Google Scholar 

  • Update on the paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract (2005) Endoscopy 37(6):570–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watabe H, Mitsushima T, Yamaji Y, Okamoto M, Wada R et al. (2005) Predicting the development of gastric cancer from combining Helicobacter pylori antibodies and serum pepsinogen status: a prospective endoscopic cohort study. Gut 54(6)764–768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver SR, Blackshaw GR, Lewis WG, Edwards P, Roberts SA, Thomas GV et al. (2004) Comparison of special interest computed tomography, endosonography and histopathological stage of esophageal cancer. Clin Radiol 59(6):499–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, Stillman JS, O’Brien MJ et al. (2006) DK Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 56(3):143–159; quiz 184–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto S et al. (2004) The risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 51(58):998–1000

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda K et al. (2007) Risk factors for occult lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer invading the submucosa and indications for endoscopic mucosal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 50(9):1379–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida S et al. (2005) Diagnostic ability of high-frequence ultrasound probe sonography in staging early gastric cancer, especially for submucosal invasion. Abdom Imaging 30(5):518–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burian, M., Yahagi, N., Sauer, P. (2010). Diagnostische Endoskopie. In: Siewert, J.R., Rothmund, M., Schumpelick, V. (eds) Praxis der Viszeralchirurgie Onkologische Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03808-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03808-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03807-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03808-2

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics