Abstract
Compounds that change their absorption and/or emission properties in the presence of a target ion or molecule have been studied for many years as the basis for optical sensing. Within this group of compounds, a variety of organometallic complexes have been proposed for the detection of a wide range of analytes such as cations (including H+), anions, gases (e.g. O2, SO2, organic vapours), small organic molecules, and large biomolecules (e.g. proteins, DNA). This chapter focuses on work reported within the last few years in the area of organometallic sensors. Some of the most extensively studied systems incorporate metal moieties with intense long-lived metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) excited states as the reporter or indicator unit, such as fac-tricarbonyl Re(I) complexes, cyclometallated Ir(III) species, and diimine Ru(II) or Os(II) derivatives. Other commonly used organometallic sensors are based on Pt-alkynyls and ferrocene fragments. To these reporters, an appropriate recognition or analyte-binding unit is usually attached so that a detectable modification on the colour and/or the emission of the complex occurs upon binding of the analyte. Examples of recognition sites include macrocycles for the binding of cations, H-bonding units selective to specific anions, and DNA intercalating fragments. A different approach is used for the detection of some gases or vapours, where the sensor's response is associated with changes in the crystal packing of the complex on absorption of the gas, or to direct coordination of the analyte to the metal centre.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
The colorimetric and fluorescent detection of localized molecular environments has become pivotal in the development of working sensor devices [1]. The diimine complexes of the late transition metals, many of which possess long lived excited states, have been in the vanguard of sensor design. Simple variation in their substituents not only allows the addition of a large variety of recognition sites but permits the photophysical properties to be tuned [2, 3]. As a result, a number of organometallic species of these relatively inert metals have found potential application in the detection of a wide variety of analytes, ranging from cations (including H+), anions, gases and small organic molecules, all the way through to large biomolecules such as DNA.
As a general rule, a molecular sensor is comprised of two sections, usually located in two distinct domains. One part is employed in the recognition of the target analyte. Through the considerable efforts within the fields of supramolecular and host–guest chemistry, suitable recognition units have been designed for the detection of a wide variety of materials. The second key unit is the indicator or reporter that, upon a successful recognition event, undergoes a detectable change such as in the colour, the fluorescence or even the redox potential. One of the most extensively studied systems is the tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) cation as a consequence of its unique combination of chemical stability and emissive behaviour. There are numerous examples where this simple moiety has been incorporated into larger sensing devices, and will not be considered further in this chapter [4]. However, it is noted that many of the ligand systems explored with this stalwart of coordination chemistry have also been incorporated into a range of other organometallic luminescent platforms, such as the fac-tricarbonyl rhenium(I) moiety, which possesses a long lived triplet metal-to-ligand charge transfer (3MLCT) state. Cyclometallated iridium(III) complexes have also drawn considerable recent attention [5], as they offer the possibilities of tuning emissive states by ligand modification opening routes to red, green and even blue fluorescent materials, as well as larger quantum yields in comparison to the analogous Ru(II) complexes. Attention is also drawn to the acetylene complexes of platinum which have undergone considerable developments in recent years [6].
The objective of this chapter is to draw attention to a number of recently reported organometallic complexes which detectably change their optical properties in the presence of a target analyte. While every effort has been made to ensure that the chapter is as inclusive as possible, a degree of selectivity has had to be undertaken.
2 Cation Sensors
2.1 Rhenium(I) Carbonyl Complexes
Tricarbonyl Re(I) complexes [Re(CO)3L]+, where L is usually a bipyridine ligand, are often used as optical sensors based on their low-lying MLCT excited states [dπ(Re) → π*(L)]. A common strategy for cation sensing is the attachment to L of pendant macrocycles, such as crown ethers. In order to ensure a good electronic communication between the cation-binding macrocycle and the reporter Re centre, Lazarides et al. [7] have recently developed ditopic ligands derived from 5,6-dihydroxy-1,10-phenanthroline where pendant crown ether groups are directly linked to the phenanthroline fragment (1a, 1b; Fig. 1). A limitation of the system was found to be the poor donor ability of the O atoms directly connected to the electron-withdrawing phenanthroline–Re moiety, which resulted in unexpected low binding constants for K+. However, 1a and 1b both showed strong binding to Ba2+, which was easily detectable through the quenching of the 3MLCT luminescence band (and a slight red-shift). The incorporation of soft donor atoms such as S or Se in the pendant groups allows for specific binding of soft metal cations. For example, Yam et al. [8] have achieved highly selective sensing of Pb2+ and Hg2 using complexes 1c and 1d, respectively (Fig. 1). In this case, spectral changes were observed both in the UV–Vis and luminescence spectra of the compounds. In particular, a significant enhancement of the 3MLCT luminescence intensity (and a slight red-shift) was observed upon addition of the metal cations in acetonitrile. An alternative approach to facilitate effective electron communication between the pendant group and the reporter unit is the incorporation of conjugated spacers such as the alkene or alkyne moieties used to link azacrown groups to the pyridyl ligands in complexes 1e and 1f (Fig. 1) [9, 10]. The UV–Vis absorption spectra of these compounds are dominated by strong intra-ligand charge transfer (ILCT) transitions localized on the pyridyl ligands (i.e. charge is transferred from the azacrown N atom to the ethenylpyridyl or ethynylpyridyl group) which hide the typical MLCT band. On protonation of the azacrown nitrogen, or complexation of Li+, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+ or Ba2+ into the macrocycle, the ILCT band shifts to lower wavelength with the magnitude of the shift being dependent on the cation. Recent work also include the development of pH-sensitive systems, such as fac-[Re(CO)3(di-2-pyridylketonebenzoylhydrazone)Cl] (1g; Fig. 1), whose UV–Vis absorption spectrum has been shown to be very sensitive to the addition of acid or base, with acid concentrations as low as 10−9 M detected in DMF solution. This behaviour is attributed to the compound's ability to form strong H-bonding interactions with surrounding molecules through the amidic hydrogen atom [11]. The proton acceptor properties of the imine and/or pyridine N atoms in the ligand 4-pyridinecarboxaldehydeazine have also been exploited to prepare the pH-sensitive luminescent Re(I) complex 1h (Fig. 1) as well as dinuclear ReIReI and ReIRuII analogues [12].
2.2 Ruthenium(II) and Osmium(II) Complexes
The complex [Ru(bpy)(CN)4]2− and its analogues are, like the Re-carbonyl species discussed above, typical MLCT [dπ(Ru)→ π*(bpy)] chromophores that can be used as optical molecular sensors, usually exploiting the ability of the cyanide ligands to coordinate metal cations. For example, the interaction of [Ru{4,4′-di(tertbutyl)-2,2′-bpy}(CN)4]2− with a variety of metal cations, such as Li+, Na+, K+, Cs+, Ba2+ and Zn2+, in acetonitrile results in a blue-shift of the 1MLCT absorption and the ‘switching on’ of strong 3MLCT luminescence. The energy and intensity of the emission depends on the nature of the cation present, with λ em varying from 646 nm (Cs+) to 537 nm (Zn2+) and the highest quantum yield (0.07) obtained for Ba2+. Structural studies using the less soluble analogue [Ru(bpy)(CN)4]2− showed that both ‘end-on’ and ‘side-on’ coordination of CN occurs, depending on the size and charge of the cation [13]. The rich luminescence properties of [Ru(bpy)(CN)4]2− have also been used to design interesting logic gates responding to two chemical stimuli (acid and base), based on the self-assembly of the Ru(II) complex with a naphthyl-substituted dendritic host [14]. Addition of a pendant azacrown ligand to [Ru(terpy)(CN)3]− has resulted in a new water-soluble Ru(II) chromophore (1i; Fig. 1) which exhibits selective cation-binding behaviour (through the azacrown pendant) and pH-sensitivity (through protonation of the cyanide ligands). The complex has been shown to be a good candidate for sensing subtle humidity changes and to serve as a mobile-phase additive in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for the separation of alkali and alkaline-earth metal cations, as well as amino acids [15]. The cation-binding properties of a Ru(II)-carbene derivative with a benzo-15-crown-5 pendant have also been reported [16].
Cyano-Os(II) complexes can also be used as cation sensors in a similar manner as their Ru analogues. Thus, [OsL2(CN)2(N–N)] (L is PPh3, PMe3 or DMSO) containing a variety of phen and bpy (N–N) ligands have recently been shown to act as luminescent sensors towards Zn2+ through ion binding of the cyano ligands [17].
2.3 Iridium(III) Cyclometallated Complexes
There are numerous instances where the MLCT phosphorescence of cyclometallated Ir(III) complexes is exploited for sensing applications. In a recent example, the emission intensity of the water soluble Ir complex 1j (Fig. 1) has been shown to increase with an increase in pH, in accord with the degree of ionization of the carboxylic acid in the ligand. Addition of metal cations, however, quenched the luminescence, with a more significant change found for divalent ions Mg2+, Cu2+ and Hg2+, compared to monovalent alkali cations [18]. Derivatives containing imidazo-phenanthroline units, such as 1k (Fig. 1) are also sensitive to the addition of H+, possibly through interactions with the imidazolyl group, although these compounds have been mainly applied in anion sensing [19]. In another recent example (1l; Fig. 1), the cation-binding 3,5-di(pyridyl)pyrazole unit was used to preferentially bind Pb2+ vs Hg2+, Ca2+ or alkali cations. The sensing of Pb2+ is based on the significant quenching of the room-temperature phosphorescence upon forming a 1:1 adduct with the Ir(III) complex, and can be performed in acetonitrile solution or by supporting the Ir(III) compound on a solid which can then be put in contact with an aqueous solution of Pb2+. The latter provides the basis for a convenient detection device [20].
2.4 Ferrocene-Based Sensors
Although more often used as electrochemical sensors, ferrocene (Fc) derivatives can also act as optical sensors because their UV/Vis absorption properties can be readily modified upon binding of guests near the Fc moiety. This is usually achieved through perturbation of the characteristic low energy MLCT transition of ferrocene (at ca. 400–500 nm). Often dual sensors with combined electrochemical and optical responses are prepared, although only changes in the optical properties of the compounds will be discussed herein. Fc sensors are also particularly versatile because it is relatively easy to introduce a large variety of binding groups and functionalities on the cyclopentadienyl (Cp) ligands. For example, the doubly functionalized colourless Fc derivative 2a (Fig. 2) can bind F− through its urea fragment, and K+ via the crown ether. Addition of F− produces a yellow compound in acetonitrile, but the colour is quenched by the subsequent addition of K+. This ‘on–off’ switching effect sets the basis for a logic gate [21]. Basurto et al. [22] have prepared a family of multi-functionalized Fc derivatives (e.g. 2b and 2c, Fig. 2) showing significant spectral changes upon addition of a variety of metal ions (e.g. Cu2+, Hg2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, Fe3+, Al3+ and Ag+) as well as several anions, including the selective naked-eye colorimetric detection of Cu2+. Fc ligands with diamino–diimido functionalities have also been proposed for the combined potentiometric/spectrophotometric detection of Cu2+ [23]. Diferrocenyl derivative 2d (Fig. 2) allows naked-eye detection of Mg2+ and shows selective UV/Vis spectral changes towards this cation, while not responding to Ca2+ or alkaline metal ions. The metal-sensor interaction is believed to occur through the C=N–C group with no participation of the OH group [24]. Analogous Mg2+ detection properties have been also described for the related pyridine derivative 2e [25], and the triferrocene complex 2f [26], whereas Fc-ruthenocene derivatives (e.g. 2g) act as selective naked-eye sensors towards Zn2+ in preference to many other mono- and di-valent cations (Fig. 2) [27]. In the two latter complexes, metal coordination is assumed to occur mainly through the aza-N atoms. The introduction of S-donor groups in this type of ligands (e.g. 2h, Fig. 2) allows the selective detection of soft metals, such as Cd2+, Hg2+ and Pb2+ [28, 29]. A series of other Fc-ruthenocene derivatives with interesting cation-sensing properties have also been reported [30, 31].
Despite the fact that Fc units normally act as fluorescence quenchers, it is possible to prepare fluorescent Fc derivatives that respond to the presence of guests. Thus, it has been shown that the absorption and emission spectra of compounds 2i–2k (Fig. 2) change significantly in the presence of Ca2+ or Ba2+ but remain largely unchanged on addition of Li+, Na+ or K+, with the main metal binding sites located at the carbonyl group (2i, 2j) or azacrown (2k) groups. The detection ability of the compounds is, however, limited by the fact that the fluorescence intensity does not change monotonically with the concentration of the metal ion, which is attributed to the formation of various species with different stoichiometries in solution [32–34]. Analogous Fc derivatives with only one arm are not fluorescent but show UV–Vis spectral changes on addition of Ca2+ [35]. Ferrocene derivatives containing anthracene groups also act as cation sensors through enhancement of the structured fluorescent band of the anthracene moiety on metal complexation [36, 37].
2.5 Platinum(II) Complexes
In recent years, Pt(II) alkynyl terpyridine complexes have been shown to be versatile ion sensors [6]. For example, complexes with amino–alkynyl ligands (3a; Fig. 3) act as pH sensors, derivatives with crown ether pendants (3b; Fig. 3) have been used as sensors for mono- and di-valent cations, such as Li+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cd2+ or Zn2+, and analogous compounds containing flavones as pendant ligands have shown selective binding towards Pb2+ [38–42]. The origins of the changes observed in the absorption and emission spectra vary, with some systems showing switching between different excited states in the Pt(II) complex on ion binding. The related dinuclear calix[4]crown complex (3c; Fig. 3) also shows marked luminescence enhancement on cation binding, with a more selective response towards K+ [43]. The supramolecular Pt rectangle (3d; Fig. 3) has been proposed as an optical sensor for Ni2+, Cd2+ and Cr3+ in solution. The UV–Vis spectrum of the rectangle shows significant changes in the presence of the cations, which coordinate to the phenanthroline units without disturbing the supramolecular structure [44].
2.6 Gold(I) Complexes
The tendency of Au(I) and other d 10 metals to form metal–metal interactions is often at the origin of intense emission, which has been exploited to prepare cation sensors; e.g. the emission can be switched ‘on’ by favouring the formation of metal–metal contacts upon ion coordination. This approach has been successfully applied by Yam et al., who used dinuclear Au(I) complexes containing ligands, such as calix[4]crown, crown ether or alkynyls, capable of trapping an additional metal ion and concomitantly altering the emission of the compounds by shortening significantly the Au–Au distance (e.g. 4a and 4b; Fig. 4) [45–48]. Recent work in related digold(I) complexes with alkynyl binding units has shown that cation binding can lead to complicated dimeric structures [49, 50]. Interestingly, Yam et al. have combined the binding and optical properties of Au(I)-alkynyls with the photoisomerization of azobenzene moieties in a macrocyclic complex, the conformation of which can be controlled by addition or removal of Ag(I), thus setting the basis for a dual-input molecular logic photoswitch (4c, Fig. 4) [51].
3 Anion Sensors
3.1 Rhenium(I) Carbonyl Complexes
The Re(I) tricarbonyl moiety, in combination with pyridyl ligands, has led to a number of both neutral and charged species [52]. Sloan et al. initially isolated a self-assembled Re(I)–Pd(II) square (5a; Fig. 5) which demonstrated an increase in emission with the inclusion of ClO4 − within the cavity and a binding constant of 660 M−1 [53]. The much larger and rigid cavities (5b–5f; Fig. 5) from the Lees group showed an unusual change in their luminescence on the introduction of BF4 − and PF6 − anions, initially with a dramatic decrease in the observed fluorescence, followed by a significant increase. It is noted that there was no observed change with ClO4 −, OAc− and OTf− [54]. More recently the neutral molecular square (5g) reported by Tzeng et al. has shown colorimetric changes on the introduction of a range of inorganic anions with selectivity for F− over CN− and OAc−, and no perturbation observed for Br−, PF6 −, BF4 −, ClO4 −, NO3 − or HSO4 − [55].
The neutral dimetallic complex (5h; Fig. 5) reported by Beer et al., which demonstrated reasonable affinities for H2PO4 − in 1H NMR titration studies [56], inspired a recent study from Pelleteret et al. They have recently reported a series of neutral bimetallic Re(I) complexes (5i; Fig. 5), bridged by a flexible ethylene glycol diamide chain [57, 58]. This complex shows a significant increase in fluorescence upon the introduction of H2PO4 − in non-protic solvents, which appears to arise from the removal of intra-molecular hydrogen bonds between the metal carbonyl and the free amide by the competitive oxo-anion. A series of structurally similar dinuclear luminescent Re(I) tricarbonyl anion receptors, featuring amide-type anion binding sites (5j–5m; Fig. 5) have also been shown to display outstanding sensitivity and selectivity toward a variety of anionic species [59, 60]. The intensity of these highly emissive positively charged species was significantly quenched by as much as 10%, even in the presence of only 10−8 M CN− or F− anions. The bis(sulfonamide) complex 5n (Fig. 5) also exhibits considerable colorimetric change on the introduction of F−, CN− and OAc−, attributed to a de-protonation which is exacerbated by the Lewis acidity of the metal and can be used to modulate the amidic pK a [61].
Building on the ability of pendant cation receptors described above, the emission intensity of Re(I) complexes with pendant crown-ether groups (6a–6c; Fig. 6) was shown to increase on the addition of OAc− with a concomitant 5 nm hypsochromic shift. The observed stability constants were larger when a K+ ion sits within the macrocycle [62]. Similarly, the calix[4]arene appended complex 6d (Fig. 6) demonstrates a selectivity for OAc− with a marked revival of the quenched emissive behaviour on the introduction of the anions [63]. In another example, the inclusion of the positively charged pseudorotaxane thread within a macrocyclic complex (6e–6h; Fig. 6), assembled around a Cl− ion, resulted in a significant enhancement in the fluorescence intensity [64]. This may be as a consequence of the increasing rigidity of the complex upon the interaction with the anion. This was further exemplified with a stoppered rotaxane thread (6i, Fig. 6), where removal of the templating anion, and subsequent replacement with Cl−, NO3 − and, significantly, HSO4 − in acetone gave a similar increase in the quantum yield [65]. A couple of charged Re(I) complexes (6j and 6k; Fig. 6) have been shown by Lo et al. to recognize F−, OAc− and H2PO4 − with pK s values ranging from 3.53 to 4.94 in acetonitrile [66]. While the anion binding properties of 6k can be reflected by changes in the fluorescence, complex 6j shows perturbations in both the absorption and emission spectra.
3.2 Platinum(II), Ruthenium(II) and Iridium(III) Complexes
In recent years, several other organometallic fluorogenic centres have been considered for inclusion in anion sensing materials. Two Pt(II) terpyridyl alkynyl complexes (7a and 7b, Fig. 7) show a dramatic colorimetric response to F−, OAc− and H2PO4 −, arising from interaction of the phenolic proton with the electronegative anion, and perturbation of the ligand-to-ligand charge transfer. Complex 7b shows selectivity for F− due to complete de-protonation [67]. In addition, complex 7a has a considerable quenching in fluorescence on the addition of these anions. Similarly, a series of Ru(II) alkynyl complexes (7c–7g; Fig. 7) show a dramatic colour change, visible to the naked eye, on the addition of a range of anions including OAc−, H2PO4 −, HSO4 −, Cl− and Br−, although selectivity for F− is evident, and there is a dependence on the electron density on the appended functional group [68]. Bucking this trend, a series of luminescent cyclometallated Ir(III) poly-pyridine thiourea complexes (7h–7p; Fig. 7), have shown selectivity for OAc− over both F− and H2PO4 − [69]. The thiourea moieties of the complexes permit a 1:1 stoichiometry with the anion, as demonstrated by a significant quenching of the emissive 3MLCT state. This behaviour appears to be independent of the appended functional groups.
3.3 Ferrocene-Based Sensors
It has already been noted that Fc complex 2a gives a colorimetric change in the presence of F− [21]. In addition to the electrochemical response [70, 71], the attachment of suitable chromophores/fluorophores to Fc has permitted optical responses to anions. This was initially demonstrated by Beer et al., who showed that the inclusion of H2PO4 − in a cleft between a Ru(II) and two Fc groups (8a; Fig. 8) induced a significant increase and a 30 nm red-shift in emissive behaviour [72]. In the structurally similar Fc and cobaltocinium complexes (8b and 8c; Fig. 8), the rate of the quenching energy transfer between the two metal centres could be perturbed by the inclusion of Cl− in the intra-metallic cavity, resulting in a significant switching of the Ru MLCT based fluorescence [73]. The guanidinoferrocene receptor (8d; Fig. 8), in addition to potentiometric detection of F−, OAc−, HSO4 − and H2PO4 −, can act as a fluorescent chemosensor for Zn2+, Ni2+ and Cd2+ metal ions. Furthermore, proton induced complexation provides a versatile means of sensing selectively NO3 − via fluorescence quenching [74]. A urea centred complex (8e; Fig. 8) with a weak naphthalene emission when excited at 310 nm undergoes a 13-fold enhancement on the introduction of F−, and a weaker, but significant response to H2PO4 − [75].
4 Small Molecule Detection
4.1 Detection of Gases and Volatile Organic Compounds
The optical detection of vapours or gases by metal complexes often requires the sensor to show a response in the solid-state (i.e. detection takes place either by crystals of the complex, or by the compound supported on a solid matrix, cast as a film, etc.). Changes of the optical properties of the sensor upon absorption of the analyte are related to (1) quenching of the sensor's luminescence (e.g. by O2), (2) disruption/modification of non-covalent interactions in the crystal packing of the sensor (e.g. H-bonding, π–π stacking, metal–metal contacts), and/or (3) change of the coordination environment of the metal centre (e.g. through coordination of the analyte to the metal). Although a porous sensor structure is not a pre-requisite, a relatively ‘open’ and flexible crystal packing favours the inclusion of the volatile and its interaction with the sensor.
Detection of dioxygen is often based on the quenching of the 3MLCT emission of d 6-metal complexes. In a recent example, cyclometallated compounds [Bu4N][Ir(ppy)2(CN)2] (9a) and [Ir(ppy)3] (9b; Fig. 9) dissolved in poly((n-butylamino)thionylphosphazene) polymer films have been shown to have high sensitivity to oxygen quenching [76]. Detection of SO2 has been achieved using Pt(II) complexes with N,C,N′-pincer ligands which, in their crystalline state, are able to coordinate reversibly the gas giving rise to a colour change. Based on this process, multi-metallic dendritic sensors were also developed [77]. Coordination of ethylene to Pd(II) or Pt(II) square planar complexes has recently been applied to prepare a colorimetric ethylene detector based on a 2,9-di-n-butylphenanthroline Pd(II) complex supported on silica [78].
The optical properties of Pt(II) complexes are often associated with the formation of PtII–PtII stacked structures [79]. Thus, the well-known intense colours and vapochromic properties of complexes [Pt(CNR)4][M(CN)4] (M is Pt, Pd; R is alkyl or aryl) are attributed to the presence of extended metal–metal chains of alternating anions and cations [80, 81]. The inclusion of vapour guests by the solids gives rise to colour changes (and/or changes in emission) which are mainly related to disruption of the metal–metal interactions, but also to changes in other non-covalent contacts throughout the structure. In recent years new analogues have been prepared and applied in novel sensing devices [82, 83], including humidity sensors [84]. Mann et al. [85] have shown that thermal re-arrangement of [Pt(p-CN–C6H4–C2H5)4][Pt(CN)4] also yields the vapochromic isomer cis-[Pt(p-CN–C6H4–C2H5)2(CN)2], whose structure also consists of linear PtII–PtII chains. Exposure of the crystalline solid to aromatic volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as toluene, benzene, chlorobenzene, p-xylene or mesitylene, produces a reversible blue-shift in the emission. It is noted that the trans isomer does not exhibit vapochromic behaviour, which is attributed to its less open structure, with shorter metal–metal distances, and an efficient π–π stacking of isocyanide ligands [86]. Rod-like crystals over 500 μm in length have been obtained for the analogue cis-[Pt(CNtBu)2(CN)2] using an injection–reprecipitation method. These PtII–PtII stacked ‘wires’ exhibit intense green emission which shifts significantly, and/or increases in intensity, on exposure to VOCs [87]. [Pt(CN)2(4,4′-dicarboxy-2,2′-bpy)] forms several intensely coloured polymorphs depending on pH and crystallization solvents. Interconversion between the various polymorphs occurs in solution and also on exposure of the crystals to different solvent vapours. It is suggested that bulky substituents on the bipyridine ligand favour the formation of cavities in the crystal lattices and the subsequent inclusion of guests [88]. The red potassium salt [K(H2O)][Pt(bzq)(CN)2] (bzq is 7,8-benzoquinolinato) has been used to prepare vapochromic films that become yellow in the presence of solvent vapours, such as dichloromethane, methanol, ethanol, acetone, tetrahydrofuran, or acetonitrile, after exposure times ranging from 5 s (methanol) to 45 min (tetrahydrofuran) [89]. In other examples, Pt–Pt interactions are not directly involved in the vapochromic behaviour of the complexes [90, 91]. For example, crystals of the intensely luminescent solvated complex 10a 6CHCl3ċC5H12 (Fig. 10) change colour on desolvation and show a significant decrease in emission intensity [91]. The original colour and intense emission are restored upon exposition to the vapour of halogenated solvents or small polar VOCs (e.g. THF, acetone, or diethyl ether), but not to aromatics, methanol or ethanol. It has been shown that the solvated structure contains voids or solvent channels with an extended network of CH–π and π–π interactions, which rearrange on desolvation, giving a more compact packing, and presumably favouring quenching of the luminescence via inter-molecular dipole–dipole interactions. The incorporation of halogenated and small polar solvents is favoured by the formation of relatively strong CH–π, π–π, CH–X and X–X interactions, whereas the size of the voids may be too small to host aromatic VOCs. In the case of derivatives 10b and 10c (Fig. 10) [90] the alkynyl moieties act as convenient receptors for chlorinated solvents via multiple CH–π(C≡C) interactions.
Since the early example of Balch et al. [92] of solvent-induced luminescence of a trigold(I) complex, attributed to the presence of columnar AuI–AuI interactions, other examples have been proposed as efficient VOC detectors based on extended metal–metal contacts involving Au(I), as well as other d 10 metal ions. For example, Fernandez et al. described the vapochromic and vapoluminescent behaviour of {Tl[Au(C6Cl5)2]} n (10d, Fig. 10), which exhibits a 3D network of AuI–TlI interactions with channels into which the VOCs can diffuse [93, 94]. Reversible changes of colour are observed when the solid is exposed to a variety of VOCs, such as acetone, acetonitrile, triethylamine, acetylacetone, tetrahydrothiophene, 2-fluoropyridine, tetrahydrofuran, and pyridine vapours. The luminescence of 10d has its origin largely in the AuI–TlI contacts, and binding of the Tl atoms to the VOCs are believed to be responsible for the observed behaviour. Interestingly, the colour change observed when [(X5C6)2AuTl(ethylenediamine)] n (X is Cl, F; 10e) reacts with ketone vapours in the solid-state is associated to condensation reactions at the amine moieties, promoted by their coordination to Tl (Fig. 10) [95]. Polymeric AuI/AgI complexes {Ag2L2[Au(C6F5)2]2} n (L is Et2O, Me2CO, THF, CH3CN; 10f, Fig. 10) also show fast vapochromic and vapoluminescent behaviour towards a variety of VOCs. Recent studies have proven that substitution reactions between the ligand at the Ag atoms and the VOCs are responsible for the observed behaviour, and that the emission is localized in the tetranuclear AuI/AgI cores [96]. This type of AuI/AgI polymers can be incorporated into fibre optics for optical measurements [97–102]. The coordination polymers {Cu[Au(CN)2](solvent)2} n , which can be obtained in two polymorphic forms depending on the solvent, exhibit visible colour changes on exposure to various volatiles, including water, MeCN, DMF, dioxane, pyridine and NH3. This is due to their coordination to the Cu(II) centres, each analyte modifying the crystal field splitting differently [103]. A related compound, {Zn[Au(CN)2]} n , responds to NH3 with detection limits as low as 1 ppb [104].
The Ir(III) cyclometallated complex 10g (Fig. 10) shows selective vapochromic and vapoluminescent properties in response to acetonitrile or propiononitrile vapour, while remaining unchanged for other VOCs [105]. Crystals of the compound change from a black to a red polymorph in less than 1 min on exposure to the solvent vapours; at the same time, strong emission is switched ‘on’ (red form). Structural analyses show that the black form exhibits shorter π–π stacking distances between the quinoxaline ligands of neighbouring molecules, which favours dipole–dipole interactions and quenching of the luminescence.
4.2 Detection of Small Organic Molecules in Solution
The detection of small organic species in solution has proven to be a significant challenge, and has received surprisingly little attention. The fac-carbonyl Re molecular squares, bearing organometallic fragments, have featured in a number of studies, building on their observed recognition of both anionic and volatile organic species [52]. The large Re(I) cornered square bridged by zinc porphyrin moieties 11a (Fig. 11), demonstrate considerable red shifts in the porphyrin based fluorescence on the addition of millimolar quantities of pyridine, but not with toluene [106]. In the simple neutral cyclophanes 11b–11d (Fig. 11), which posses a variety of different rigid spacers, the luminescence quenching rate constants, k q, of the 3MLCT excited state have been investigated in the presence of a variety of aromatic amines such aniline and were found to be higher than those for simple monomeric Re(I) complexes [107]. In another example an enantiopure square 11e (Fig. 11) undergoes luminescence quenching with the chiral alcohol, R- or S-2-amino-1-propanol, and in the process demonstrates an enantioselectivity of 1.22, determined by differential quenching rates [108]. The optically active mixed, neutral Pt/Pt/Ag and Pt/Pd/Ag macrocyclic complexes (11f; Fig. 11) have undergone an exploration for the inclusion of several diamines demonstrating a significant interaction with the neutral guests tetramethylpyrazine and phenazine, detected by perturbations in the circular dichroism spectra [109].
The detection of sugar has attracted a number of studies. The neutral diboronic acid complex 12a (Fig. 12) was reported by Yam et al., illustrating a preference for mono-saccharides and a marginal preference for d-fructose (pK s = 2.40 in DMSO), through a perturbation in the 3MLCT transition, and an increase in the observed emission [110]. There is, however, considerable complexity to the system in aqueous solution given the pH dependence of the boronic acid groups [111]. Glucose testing with a structurally similar complex 12b (Fig. 12) showed a significant dependence on the solvent system used; in methanol, a 55% fluorescence intensity increase was observed with a change in glucose concentration from 0 to 400 mg dL−1, although in a methanol-phosphate buffered saline solution, no significant response was found to glucose at physiological pH [112].
A competitive indicator displacement approach has been successfully employed for sulfhydryl amino acids and short chain peptides using heterobimetallic donor–acceptor complexes: cis-[ML2(μ-CN)2{Pt(DMSO)Cl2}2] (M is Fe2+, Ru2+ and Os2+ and L is 2,2′-bpy). The cis-[ML2(CN)2] units are used as signalling indicators, and {Pt(DMSO)Cl2} as both an acceptor group, and the receptor for the analytes. All three ensembles are able to produce specific colorimetric/fluorometric responses to cysteine, homocysteine and methionine, as well as the sulfhydryl-containing small peptide glutathione [113, 114]. In a very recent paper, an alternative strategy, employing an Ir(III) complex [Ir(pba)2(acac)] (Hpba is 4-(2-pyridyl)benzaldehyde and acac is acetylacetone) has been shown to posses selectivity for homocysteine. Upon addition of the amino acid, in a semi-aqueous solution, a colour change from orange to yellow and a luminescent variation from deep red to green were evident to the naked eye, attributed to the formation of a thiazinane group from the free aldehyde group [115].
5 Sensing of Large Biomolecules
5.1 Detection of DNA
The development of probes for large biomolecules has attracted considerable attention using luminescent late transition metals, particularly Ru(II) polypyridyl lumophores. Attention has been given to sensing the presence of DNA, and has been the subject of several review articles [116–118]. As with other areas of molecular detection, the fluorescent Re(I) moiety has been the subject of a number of studies. Schanze and Thornton isolated a series of complexes (13a, Fig. 13), structurally related to the anion recognition unit to 6j (Fig. 6), bearing an anthracene unit [119, 120]. The complexes exhibit dual emission from both the metal 3MLCT and the anthracene unit, although significant quenching is observed. On addition of DNA, hypsochromism of the anthracene absorption is detected, but not in the Re centred transitions, suggesting that the planar anthracene group is intercalating in the DNA. A dramatic increase was observed in the 3MLCT emission in keeping with many transition based metal complexes associated with the hydrophobic DNA environment. Building on these results, a similar ‘light-switch’ interaction was observed with the Re(I) complex 13b (Fig. 13), bearing the intercalating ligand dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine (dppz). In aqueous solution the complex is non-luminescent, whereas 3ILdppz phosphorescence is observed from the aqueous DNA bound complex [121]. Similar behaviour was observed with two structurally related complexes (13c and 13d, Fig. 13), which exhibited potential for photo-cleavage of DNA [122, 123]. Recent developments include the consideration of bimetallic complexes, such as 13e, where a hypsochromic shift in both the MLCT and IL transitions when added to buffered DNA [124]. Studies with the hetero-dinuclear complex 13f reveal energy transfer between the Re(I) and the Ru(II) centres, and a light-switch behaviour in the emission on the introduction of DNA [125].
5.2 Detection of Proteins
The use of fluorescent organometallic complexes to label biological substrates is beginning to provide some exciting alternatives to the more traditional organic dyes [126], with suitable iridium [127–129], rhodium [130], platinum [131], rhenium [132–135] and osmium [136] examples having recently been reported. The Re diimine ‘wires’ (13g and 13h, Fig. 13), have been shown to form complexes with the nitric oxide synthase mutant δ114 [137]. Steady-state luminescence measurements with 13h establish a dissociation constant of 100 nM, while 13h binds with a K d of 5 μM, causing partial displacement of water from the haeme iron. The optical behaviour of (13i, Fig. 13), in the presence of l-methionine, and chemotactic N-formyl-amino acids: N-formyl-l-methionine, N-formyl-l-glycine and N-formyl-l-phenylalanine shows the complex to be insensitive to l-methionine, but highly sensitive to the N-formylamino acids at concentrations of less than 10−5 M in non-aqueous polar solvents, and is dependant on the polarity of the side chain of the amino acids.
Considerable progress has been made by the group of Lo in developing organometallic probes capable of recognizing the presence of specific classes of proteins, and has recently been the subject of a detailed review [138]. To highlight some recent advances, a large number of fac-carbonyl Re(I) (14a–14c, Fig. 14) [139–141] and cyclometallated Ir(III) complexes (15a–15c, Fig. 15) [142–144] bearing biotin moieties have been reported. Each of these complexes exhibit the characteristic 3MLCT emission in solution, which was significantly enhanced in the presence of the glycoprotein avidin. Furthermore, the inclusion of the extended planar ligands dppz and dppn has been shown to permit similar enhancement to be observed in the presence of DNA [141, 145].
In another exciting development, the inclusion of a thiocyanate group into the ligands of complex 14b has allowed the complex not only to bind to avidin, but also to be tagged to bovine serum albumin (BSA) [146]. The inclusion of indole groups into both the Re(I) (14d and 14e, Fig. 14) chromophores [147, 148] show enhanced emission in the presence of indole binding proteins including BSA and tryptophanase, despite having excellent emission in aqueous solution. Similarly, the estrodiol containing Re(I) complexes (14f and 14g, Fig. 14) [149] and the related Ir(III) complexes (15d and 15e, Fig. 15) [150], demonstrate lifetime extension and enhanced fluorescence in the presence of oestrogen receptor α. In a related study, a cyclometallated Pt(II) complex (16, Fig. 16), bearing an extended poly(ethylene glycol) has demonstrated that the photoluminescence is enhanced in the presence of the hydrophobic regions of proteins such as BSA in aqueous solution [151].
6 Conclusions and Outlook
The versatility of organometallic complexes in optical sensing has been demonstrated by the variety of sensor compounds developed in recent years and the wide range of analytes that have been targeted. New research has built upon the properties of well-known chromophores, such as Re(I), Ir(III) or Ru(II) complexes, but also on less common species, such as Au–Tl/Ag networks or metal-containing self-assembled macrocycles, and has produced sophisticated architectures able of dual responses (e.g. optical and electrochemical) or containing various recognition sites appropriate for logic gates. Detailed systematic studies on the optical and structural properties of the complexes before and after inclusion of the analytes has brought a much better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the molecular recognition and reporting events. This fundamental research is essential to improve and predict the selectivity and sensitivity of the sensors, and further work is still needed if a rational design of sensors for specific target analytes is to be achieved. A further challenge will be the development of sensing devices with commercial potential. Whereas some examples of the incorporation of organometallic sensors into working optical devices have been reported, these are still scarce. However, given the increasing interest for reliable and cost-effective sensors for environmental and medical applications, this area is likely to receive much attention in coming years.
References
de Silva AP, Gunaratne HQN, Gunnlaugsson T, Huxley AJM, McCoy CP (1997) Chem Rev 97:1515–1566
Demas JN, DeGraff BA (2001) Coord Chem Rev 211:317–351
Keefe MH, Benkstein KD, Hupp JT (2000) Coord Chem Rev 205:201–228
Vos JG, Kelly JM (2006) Dalton Trans 4869–4883
Lowry MS, Bernhard S (2006) Chem Eur J 12:7970–7977
Wong KMC, Yam VWW (2007) Coord Chem Rev 251:2477–2488
Lazarides T, Miller TA, Jeffery JC, Ronson TK, Adams H, Ward MD (2005) Dalton Trans 528–536
Li MJ, Ko CC, Duan GP, Zhu NY, Yam VWW (2007) Organometallics 26:6091–6098
Lewis JD, Moore JN (2003) Chem Commun 2858–2859
Lewis JD, Moore JN (2004) Dalton Trans 1376–1385
Bakir M, Brown O, Johnson T (2004) J Mol Struct 691:265–272
Cattaneo M, Fagalde F, Katz NE (2006) Inorg Chem 45:6884–6891
Lazarides T, Easun TL, Veyne-Marti C, Alsindi WZ, George MW, Deppermann N, Hunter CA, Adams H, Ward MD (2007) J Am Chem Soc 129:4014–4027
Bergamini G, Saudan C, Ceroni P, Maestri M, Balzani V, Gorka M, Lee SK, van Heyst J, Vogtle F (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:16466–16471
Li MJ, Chu BWK, Yam VWW (2006) Chem Eur J 12:3528–3537
Yam VWW, Ko CC, Chu BWK, Zhu NY (2003) Dalton Trans 3914–3921
Lai SW, Chan QKW, Zhu N, Che CM (2007) Inorg Chem 46:11003–11016
Konishi K, Yamaguchi H, Harada A (2006) Chem Lett 35:720–721
Zhao Q, Liu S, Shi M, Li F, Jing H, Yi T, Huang C (2007) Organometallics 26:5922–5930
Ho ML, Cheng YM, Wu LC, Chou PT, Lee GH, Hsu FC, Chi Y (2007) Polyhedron 26:4886–4892
Miyaji H, Collinson SR, Prokes I, Tucker JHR (2003) Chem Commun 64–65
Basurto S, Riant O, Moreno D, Rojo J, Torroba T (2007) J Org Chem 72:4673–4688
Pallavicini P, Dacarro G, Mangano C, Patroni S, Taglietti A, Zanoni R (2006) Eur J Inorg Chem 4649–4657
Lopez JL, Tarraga A, Espinosa A, Velasco MD, Molina P, Lloveras V, Vidal-Gancedo J, Rovira C, Veciana J, Evans DJ, Wurst K (2004) Chem Eur J 10:1815–1826
Tarraga A, Molina P, Lopez JL, Velasco MD (2004) Dalton Trans 1159–1165
Caballero A, Tarraga A, Velasco MD, Espinosa A, Molina P (2005) Org Lett 7:3171–3174
Oton F, Espinosa A, Tarraga A, Molina P (2007) Organometallics 26:6234–6242
Caballero A, Tarraga A, Velasco MD, Molina P (2006) Dalton Trans 1390–1398
Caballero A, Espinosa A, Tarraga A, Molina P (2008) J Org Chem 73:5489–5497
Caballero A, Espinosa A, Tarraga A, Molina P (2007) J Org Chem 72:6924–6937
Caballero A, Garcia R, Espinosa A, Tarraga A, Molina P (2007) J Org Chem 72:1161–1173
Delavaux-Nicot B, Maynadie J, Lavabre D, Fery-Forgues S (2007) J Organomet Chem 692:3351–3362
Delavaux-Nicot B, Maynadie J, Lavabre D, Fery-Forgues S (2006) Inorg Chem 45:5691–5702
Maynadie J, Delavaux-Nicot BM, Fery-Forgues S, Lavabre D, Mathieu R (2002) Inorg Chem 41:5002–5004
Maynadie J, Delavaux-Nicot B, Lavabre D, Fery-Forgues S (2006) J Organomet Chem 691:1101–1109
Zapata F, Caballero A, Espinosa A, Tarraga A, Molina P (2007) Org Lett 9:2385–2388
Caballero A, Tormos R, Espinosa A, Velasco MD, Tarraga A, Miranda MA, Molina P (2004) Org Lett 6:4599–4602
Yang QZ, Tong QX, Wu LZ, Wu ZX, Zhang LP, Tung CH (2004) Eur J Inorg Chem 1948–1954
Wong KMC, Tang WS, Lu XX, Zhu NY, Yam VWW (2005) Inorg Chem 44:1492–1498
Tang WS, Lu XX, Wong KMC, Yam VWW (2005) J Mater Chem 15:2714–2720
Han X, Wu LZ, Si G, Pan J, Yang QZ, Zhang LP, Tung CH (2007) Chem Eur J 13:1231–1239
Lanoë PH, Fillaut JL, Toupet L, Williams JAG, Le Bozec H, Guerchais V (2008) Chem Commun 4333–4335
Lo HS, Yip SK, Wong KMC, Zhu N, Yam VWW (2006) Organometallics 25:3537–3540
Resendiz MJE, Noveron JC, Disteldorf H, Fischer S, Stang PJ (2004) Org Lett 6:651–653
Yam VWW, Cheng ECC (2001) Gold Bull 34:20–23
Yam VWW, Cheung KL, Cheng ECC, Zhu NY, Cheung KK (2003) Dalton Trans 1830–1835
Yam VWW, Yip SK, Yuan LH, Cheung KL, Zhu NY, Cheung KK (2003) Organometallics 22:2630–2637
Li CK, Lu XX, Wong KMC, Chan CL, Zhu NY, Yam VWW (2004) Inorg Chem 43:7421–7430
de la Riva H, Nieuwhuyzen M, Fierro CM, Raithby PR, Male L, Lagunas MC (2006) Inorg Chem 45:1418–1420
Lagunas MC, Fierro CM, Pintado-Alba A, de la Riva H, Betanzos-Lara S (2007) Gold Bull 40:135–141
Tang HS, Zhu NY, Yam VWW (2007) Organometallics 26:22–25
Sun SS, Lees AJ (2002) Coord Chem Rev 230:171–192
Slone RV, Yoon DI, Calhoun RM, Hupp JT (1995) J Am Chem Soc 117:11813–11814
Sun SS, Anspach JA, Lees AJ, Zavalij PY (2002) Organometallics 21:685–693
Tzeng BC, Chen YF, Wu CC, Hu CC, Chang YT, Chen CK (2007) New J Chem 31:202–209
Beer PD, Dent SW, Hobbs GS, Wear TJ (1997) Chem Commun 99–100
Pelleteret D, Fletcher NC (2008) Eur J Inorg Chem 3597–3065
Pelleteret D, Fletcher NC, Doherty AP (2007) Inorg Chem 46:4386–4388
Sun SS, Lees AJ, Zavalij PY (2003) Inorg Chem 42:3445–3453
Sun SS, Lees AJ (2000) Chem Commun 1687–1688
Lin TP, Chen CY, Wen YS, Sun SS (2007) Inorg Chem 46:9201–9212
Uppadine LH, Redman JE, Dent SW, Drew MGB, Beer PD (2001) Inorg Chem 40:2860–2869
Beer PD, Timoshenko V, Maestri M, Passaniti P, Balzani V, Balzani B (1999) Chem Commun 1755
Curiel D, Beer PD, Paul RL, Cowley A, Sambrook MR, Szemes F (2004) Chem Commun 1162–1163
Curiel D, Beer PD (2005) Chem Commun 1909–1911
Lo KKW, Lau JSY, Fong VWY (2004) Organometallics 23:1098–1106
Fan Y, Zhu YM, Dai FR, Zhang LY, Chen ZN (2007) Dalton Trans 3885–3892
Fillaut JL, Andries J, Perruchon J, Desvergne JP, Toupet L, Fadel L, Zouchoune B, Saillard JY (2007) Inorg Chem 46:5922–5932
Lo KKW, Lau JSY, Lo DKK, Lo LTL (2006) Eur J Inorg Chem 4054–4062
Beer PD, Bayly SR (2005) Top Curr Chem 255:125–162
Beer PD, Hayes EJ (2003) Coord Chem Rev 240:167–189
Beer PD, Graydon AR, Sutton LR (1996) Polyhedron 15:2457–2461
Beer PD, Szemes F, Balzani V, Sala CM, Drew MGB, Dent SW, Maestri M (1997) J Am Chem Soc 119:11864–11875
Oton F, Tarraga A, Molina P (2006) Org Lett 8:2107–2110
Oton F, Tarraga A, Espinosa A, Velasco MD, Molina P (2006) J Org Chem 71:4590–4598
Huynh L, Wang ZU, Yang J, Stoeva V, Lough A, Manners I, Winnik MA (2005) Chem Mat 17:4765–4773
Albrecht M, van Koten G (2001) Angew Chem Int Ed 40:3750–3781
Cabanillas-Galan P, Farmer L, Hagan T, Nieuwenhuyzen M, James SL, Lagunas MC (2008) Inorg Chem 47:9035–9041
Kato M (2007) Bull Chem Soc Jpn 80:287–294
Isci H, Mason WR (1974) Inorg Chem 13:1175–1180
Exstrom CL, Sowa JR, Daws CA, Janzen D, Mann KR, Moore GA, Stewart FF (1995) Chem Mater 7:15–17
Bailey RC, Hupp JT (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:6767–6774
Grate JW, Moore LK, Janzen DE, Veltkamp DJ, Kaganove S, Drew SM, Mann KR (2002) Chem Mat 14:1058–1066
Drew SM, Mann JE, Marquardt BJ, Mann KR (2004) Sens Actuator B Chem 97:307–312
Buss CE, Mann KR (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:1031–1039
Dylla AG, Janzen DE, Pomije MK, Mann KR (2007) Organometallics 26:6243–6247
Sun Y, Ye K, Zhang H, Zhang J, Zhao L, Li B, Yang G, Yang B, Wang Y, Lai SW, Che CM (2006) Angew Chem Int Ed 45:5610–5613
Kato M, Kishi S, Wakamatsu Y, Sugi Y, Osamura Y, Koshiyama T, Hasegawa M (2005) Chem Lett 34:1368–1369
Fornies J, Fuertes S, Lopez JA, Martin A, Sicilia V (2008) Inorg Chem 47:7166–7176
Lu W, Chan MCW, Zhu NY, Che CM, He Z, Wong KY (2003) Chem Eur J 9:6155–6166
Kui SCF, Chui SSY, Che CM, Zhu NY (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128:8297–8309
Vickery JC, Olmstead MM, Fung EY, Balch AL (1997) Angew Chem Int Ed Eng 36:1179–1181
Fernandez EJ, Lopez-De-Luzuriaga JM, Monge M, Montiel M, Olmos ME, Perez J, Laguna A, Mendizabal F, Mohamed AA, Fackler JP (2004) Inorg Chem 43:3573–3581
Fernandez EJ, Lopez-de-Luzuriaga JM, Monge M, Olmos ME, Perez J, Laguna A, Mohamed AA, Fackler JP (2003) J Am Chem Soc 125:2022–2023
Fernandez EJ, Laguna A, Lopez-de-Luzuriaga JM, Montiel M, Olmos ME, Perez J (2006) Organometallics 25:1689–1695
Fernandez EJ, Lopez-De-Luzuriaga JM, Monge M, Olmos ME, Puelles RC, Laguna A, Mohamed AA, Fackler JP (2008) Inorg Chem 47:8069–8076
Luquin A, Bariain C, Vergara E, Cerrada E, Garrido J, Matias IR, Laguna M (2005) Appl Organomet Chem 19:1232–1238
Bariain C, Matias IR, Fdez-Valdivielso C, Elosua C, Luquin A, Garrido J, Laguna M (2005) Sens Actuator B Chem 108:535–541
Elostua C, Bariain U, Matias JR, Arregui FJ, Luquin A, Laguna M (2006) Sens Actuator B Chem 115:444–449
Elosua C, Matias IR, Bariain C, Arregui FJ (2006) Sensors 6:1440–1465
Terrones SC, Aguado CE, Bariain C, Carretero AS, Maestro IRM, Gutierrez AF, Luquin A, Garrido J, Laguna M (2006) Opt Eng 45
Luquin A, Elosua C, Vergara E, Estella J, Cerrada E, Bariain C, Matias IR, Garrido J, Laguna M (2007) Gold Bull 40:225–233
Leznoff DB, Lefebvre J (2005) Gold Bull 38:47–54
Katz MJ, Ramnial T, Yu HZ, Leznoff DB (2008) J Am Chem Soc 130:10662–10673
Liu ZW, Bian ZQ, Bian J, Li ZD, Nie DB, Huang CH (2008) Inorg Chem 47:8025–8030
Slone RV, Hupp JT (1997) Inorg Chem 36:5422–5423
Thanasekaran P, Liao RT, Manimaran B, Liu YH, Chou PT, Rajagopal S, Lu KL (2006) J Phys Chem A 110:10683–10689
Lee SJ, Lin WB (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:4554–4555
Müller C, Whiteford JA, Stang PJ (1998) J Am Chem Soc 120:9827–9837
Yam VWW, Kai ASF (1998) Chem Commun 109–110
Mizuno T, Fukumatsu T, Takeuchi M, Shinkai S (2000) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:407–413
Cary DR, Zaitseva NP, Gray K, O'Day KE, Darrow CB, Lane SM, Peyser TA, Satcher JH, Van Antwerp WP, Nelson AJ, Reynolds JG (2002) Inorg Chem 41:1662–1669
Chow CF, Chiu BKW, Lam MHW, Wong WY (2003) J Am Chem Soc 125:7802–7803
Chow CF, Lam MHW, Sui HY, Wong WY (2005) Dalton Trans 475–484
Chen HL, Zhao Q, Wu YB, Li FY, Yang H, Yi T, Huang CH (2007) Inorg Chem 46:11075–11081
Erkkila KE, Odom DT, Barton JK (1999) Chem Rev 99:2777–2795
Metcalfe C, Thomas JA (2003) Chem Soc Rev 32:215–224
Pierard F, Kirsch-De Mesmaeker A (2006) Inorg Chem Commun 9:111–126
Thornton NB, Schanze KS (1996) New J Chem 20:791–800
Thornton NB, Schanze KS (1993) Inorg Chem 32:4994–4995
Stoeffler HD, Thornton NB, Temkin SL, Schanze KS (1995) J Am Chem Soc 117:7119–7128
Yam VW-W, Lo KK-W, Cheung K-K, Kong RY-C (1997) J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 2067–2072
Ruiz GT, Juliarena MP, Lezna RO, Wolcan E, Feliz MR, Ferraudi G (2007) Dalton Trans 2020–2029
Metcalfe C, Webb M, Thomas JA (2002) Chem Commun 2026–2027
Foxon SP, Phillips T, Gill MR, Towrie M, Parker AW, Webb M, Thomas JA (2007) Angew Chem Int Ed 46:3686–3688
Lo KKW, Hui WK, Chung CK, Tsang KHK, Ng DCM, Zhu NY, Cheung KK (2005) Coord Chem Rev 249:1434–1450
Lo KKW, Ng DCM, Chung CK (2001) Organometallics 20:4999–5001
Lo KKW, Chung CK, Zhu NY (2003) Chem Eur J 9:475–483
Lo KKW, Chung CK, Lee TKM, Lui LH, Tsang KHK, Zhu NY (2003) Inorg Chem 42:6886–6897
Lo KKW, Li CK, Lau KW, Zhu NY (2003) Dalton Trans 4682–4689
Wong KMC, Tang WS, Chu BWK, Zhu NY, Yam VWW (2004) Organometallics 23:3459–3465
Dattelbaum JD, Abugo OO, Lakowicz JR (2000) Bioconjug Chem 11:533–536
Guo XQ, Castellano FN, Li L, Szmacinski H, Lakowicz JR, Sipior J (1997) Anal Biochem 254:179–186
Hamzavi R, Happ T, Weitershaus K, Metzler-Nolte N (2004) J Organomet Chem 689:4745–4750
Lo KKW, Ng DCM, Hui WK, Cheung KK (2001) J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 2634–2640
Garino C, Ghiani S, Gobetto R, Nervi C, Salassa L, Ancarani V, Neyroz P, Franklin L, Ross JBA, Seibert E (2005) Inorg Chem 44:3875–3879
Dunn AR, Belliston-Bittner W, Winkler JR, Getzoff ED, Stuehr DJ, Gray HB (2005) J Am Chem Soc 127:5169–5173
Lo KKW, Tsang KHK, Sze KS, Chung CK, Lee TKM, Zhang KY, Hui WK, Li CK, Lau JSY, Ng DCM, Zhu NY (2007) Coord Chem Rev 251:2292–2310
Lo KKW, Tsang KHK, Sze KS (2006) Inorg Chem 45:1714–1722
Lo KKW, Hui WK (2005) Inorg Chem 44:1992–2002
Lo KKW, Tsang KHK (2004) Organometallics 23:3062–3070
Lo KKW, Li CK, Lau JSY (2005) Organometallics 24:4594–4601
Lo KKW, Lau JSY (2007) Inorg Chem 46:700–709
Lo KKW, Hui WK, Ng DCM (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:9344–9345
Lo KKW, Chung CK, Zhu NY (2006) Chem Eur J 12:1500–1512
Lo KKW, Louie MW, Sze KS, Lau JSY (2008) Inorg Chem 47:602–611
Lo KKW, Tsang KHK, Hui WK, Zhu N (2005) Inorg Chem 44:6100–6110
Lo KKW, Sze KS, Tsang KHK, Zhu NY (2007) Organometallics 26:3440–3447
Lo KKW, Tsang KHK, Zhu NY (2006) Organometallics 25:3220–3227
Lo KKW, Zhang KY, Chung CK, Kwok KY (2007) Chem Eur J 13:7110–7120
Che CM, Zhang JL, Lin LR (2002) Chem Commun 2556–2557
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fletcher, N.C., Lagunas, M.C. (2010). Chromo- and Fluorogenic Organometallic Sensors. In: Bozec, H., Guerchais, V. (eds) Molecular Organometallic Materials for Optics. Topics in Organometallic Chemistry, vol 28. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01866-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01866-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01865-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01866-4
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)